Honest opinion on what a MBP might be worth


Recommended Posts

I am thinking of trading my late 2009 unibody MBP for a yet to be determined win 8 laptop.

The specs on the MBP are:

15" Glossy screen

C2D 2.53GHz (Santa Rosa chip ??)

8GB Ram

256GB Crucial M4 SSD

It doesn't have a scratch or ding in it as I have had it in a Speck hard case since I got it. I'm thinking I could reliably ask $800-900 on craigslist.

It doesn't have a scratch or ding in it as I have had it in a Speck hard case since I got it. I'm thinking I could reliably ask $800-900 on craigslist.

You can ask, no one is going to pay that. :rofl:

I think you could sell it for $600ish, depending on where you live. People who want the 15'' model usually want higher end stuff, so anyone looking for a C2D one is just looking to pick it up as a bargain.

Mind you, if all you want is a Windows 8 PC, you can just install Windows 8 on it.

You can ask, no one is going to pay that. :rofl:

I think you could sell it for $600ish, depending on where you live. People who want the 15'' model usually want higher end stuff, so anyone looking for a C2D one is just looking to pick it up as a bargain.

Mind you, if all you want is a Windows 8 PC, you can just install Windows 8 on it.

I have had win 8 on it in bootcamp but I can never get the touchpad to work correctly. In a VM it works great but the experience isn't the same. Still, $600 isn't bad.

You might also want to detail how much life is left on the battery.

Your asking price is a little steep since the C2D is pretty outdated. Somewhere in the $700 range is a little more reasonable.

The best indicator would be to find something similar on Ebay and see how much it sells for. The RAM upgrade and SSD add about $150-$200 onto the value compared to a stock one.

I have had win 8 on it in bootcamp but I can never get the touchpad to work correctly. In a VM it works great but the experience isn't the same. Still, $600 isn't bad.

Yeah, I'm pretty sure Apple is tossing Bootcamp on the "things we've given up on" pile, their driver support is atrocious.

Also, I would pull the SSD and replace the original hard drive if you still have it. People buy older Macs for the form factor, not necessarily the components. it's just another place that I think people would try to grab a bargain on, while it's still a perfectly good drive to use in a new laptop, so cost wise you'd probably be better off keeping it than buying a new SSD with a new laptop.

You might also want to detail how much life is left on the battery.

Your asking price is a little steep since the C2D is pretty outdated. Somewhere in the $700 range is a little more reasonable.

The best indicator would be to find something similar on Ebay and see how much it sells for. The RAM upgrade and SSD add about $150-$200 onto the value compared to a stock one.

I think the cycle count is somewhere around 350-400, maybe 450 at the most. The battery still holds a charge for about 5 hours on normal usage.

Yeah, I'm pretty sure Apple is tossing Bootcamp on the "things we've given up on" pile, their driver support is atrocious.

Also, I would pull the SSD and replace the original hard drive if you still have it. People buy older Macs for the form factor, not necessarily the components. it's just another place that I think people would try to grab a bargain on, while it's still a perfectly good drive to use in a new laptop, so cost wise you'd probably be better off keeping it than buying a new SSD with a new laptop.

I do still have the original hd. I could put the ssd in my mac mini and have a screaming kick ass system there. I have a late 2011 mac mini with a core i5 2.8 ghz, 16gb ram and a 256gb 5200rpm drive. The drive is the bottleneck on it.

EDIT: It's actually a core i7 2.7ghz that is in the mac mini.

  • Like 2

I do still have the original hd. I could put the ssd in my mac mini and have a screaming kick ass system there. I have a late 2011 mac mini with a core i5 2.8 ghz, 16gb ram and a 256gb 5200rpm drive. The drive is the bottleneck on it.

Yeah, definitely. The Mac Minis are great computers if you slap a fast drive in them.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      443
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      200
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!