Recommended Posts

Hi,

My current broadband provider (Be) has just been purchased by Sky and will almost certainly move across to their infastructure, so I'm looking to move asap

A fibre connection would be a huge bonus, but mostly I'm after an unlimited connection (or at the very least generous limits) with multiple static IP addresses

The closest I've found so far are some of the Entanet resellers, but they have quite strict download limits during the day (starting from 30GB per month) which would be easy to break through

Thanks :)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1139282-isp-that-offers-multiple-static-ips/
Share on other sites

You aren't going to find many ISPs that offer multiple static IPs to end customers, you'd probably need something more like a business oriented provider for that.

Or go for a provider that offers IPv6, they'll give you more static IPs than there's people on the planet by default (if they're any good)

  • Like 2

Thanks both, I've looked at a lot of services and the best seems to be BT! ?40 per month for 40mb fibre with unlimited downloads and 5 IP addresses... an extra ?5 for a total of 13 IP addresses.

For 5 IPs it's a bit more than Be, but a *lot* quicker (I get 5mb atm) and should I ever need more IPs (5 is my absolute minimum, but will do the job) I can then switch to a higher amount for less than Be :)

Yea you need to go down the business route. BT Business for example do this.

However i have just set a client up with TISCALI (Shock Horror?) well they wouldnt pay over the odds for a good provider. Having said that.... they were given a block of 10 Static IPs and the service is ok.

I would go down BT's route personally.

For what it's worth, I've found Sky to be an excellent ISP. Last month I downloaded over 3TB without any throttling or warnings (there's no fair usage limit) and pings are excellent for gaming. I'm getting a better service now than when I paid for business broadband.

Just moved to Sky and had a fair few problems, but their customer service have actually been really good. They haven't messed me around and they are trying to sort my problems out. It's not directly their fault either, I think the house needs a new phone line as it's old and has been causing problems for a while now. Not at all like TalkTalk who would just say that it's my fault.

And I would be vary cautious of BT as I know 2 people in 2 opposite sides of the country and both have had terrible service from BT. One of them is with BT Business but regularly gets overcharged, they refuse, they get poor connection but BT don't do anything about it for a considerable amount of time (this is true for both of my friends).

Not at all like TalkTalk who would just say that it's my fault.

TalkTalk is the worst company I've ever had to deal with. Terrible connection quality, appalling customer service, deceitful business practices, fraudulent billing... just terrible. We eventually moved to another ISP designed for businesses and within a year TalkTalk bought them up and the service immediately went downhill - slow speeds, constant dropped connections, etc. Nearly everybody I know that has used TalkTalk has had a terrible experience with them.

  • Like 2

So are you running services out of your home? Or is this a business connection? Curious to why the need for multiple ipv4? Business yeah many reasons for it, but in a home - not so much.

If business, I would think you should be on a business class connection that shouldn't have issue with giving you a /29 or /28, etc.

Not going to be much help with ISP in your region but just curious on why 5 is the bare min of statics you need. Maybe if you gave some details of how your using these statics we could fine alternate solutions that would allow for use of just 1?

Thank you all very much for the responses guys - I've just spoke with Be, and just like the first few responses to the thread, they've managed to assure me things could be okay and continue as they are right now with the multiple IP addresses so I'm going to stick with them, and yes Bud unfortunately it is for business reasons and 5 is the very minimum I need (servers on virtual machines just for personal use that I remote into/test things on)

It's a shame as I was very much looking forward to BT fibre and the download speeds! Right now I get 5mb which isn't really enough with say 2 of us on iPlayer, but we'll cope. Maybe something positive will come out of it, and Be will retain the multiple IP functionality as well as introducting fibre :D

BT was ?48p/m after tax... quite steep. My only concern is by the time I realise Be/Sky won't be suitable for me, BT may have pulled their IP offer on their business accounts or similar! Then I'd have very, very limited options...

"and 5 is the very minimum I need (servers on virtual machines just for personal use that I remote into/test things on)"

Why would you not just vpn in to 1 IP, and then you could access anything on your network with just the one connection and 1 IP in use.

Even if I had a whole /16, oh wait we do ;) I would still vpn into 1 IP to be able to access my servers ;) Now there are multiple IPs because of multiple locations.

As option to vpn, say you want to be able to RDP directly just forward different ports to the different inside IPs. I personally would never allow rdp to the public net naked. but for example

public:3389 - private1:3389

public:3390 - private2:3389

public:3391 - private3:3389

etc..

Just throwing this out there -- if you can get more bandwidth for same cost or cheaper, and issue is can not have multiple IPs.. Many methods to skin the cat, depending on what your doing 1 IP might be all you need, just change ways you do things.

  • Like 2
  • 4 weeks later...

Hi guys, me again!

Would be very grateful for some feedback on the three options I have right now:

  • BT Broadband @ ?48pm - FTTC so around 50mb/s downloads, should be future proof
  • Be Broadband @ ?32pm - and hope that Sky doesn't switch off the multiple IP service
  • Demon Broadband @ ?17pm - like my current broadband, only 5mb downloads, but at half the price

Thank you :)

  • 3 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!