Recommended Posts

WIRED EQUIVALENT PRIVACY (WEP) a wireless security measure

hi, I need to try and find more information on WEP I am doing a project (1 of many ) and i need to learn everything I can about WEP ... in extreme detail .. I need to see how and why it is so easily exploited with detailed explanations (I dont need to know how to hack it...just making that clear)

any help will be great..

once again to be clear (just so admins know) I am not asking how to hack a WEP I am asking about the wifi encryption standard and details on the know exploits .. for example, when a key is being obtained handshakes and arps are exchanged ... why? how? what is then done with the information? etc

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1139420-i-need-information-on-wep/
Share on other sites

Join a college/university that subscribes and you'll get it free.

I will get it from my uni then they should have it

You don't learn (and actually understand) that stuff in "extreme" detail in a short amount of time. It's like saying you want to know physical chemistry but don't want to get bogged down with all those orbital shapes and baryons and stuff. To get a solid understanding is going to take some real work so maybe you want to scale back a bit.

I Know I say in my post I need to know everything ... its more... I need access to everything but I know specifically what I am looking for :p its just to long to google search it and I was just coming here for sources or someone with an expert knowledge... I have read your post and will take your points on .... I am going to start ... there is a couple of issues with wep that I will be directly addressing for a program I am writing ... simple OPN WEP to start with then eventually moving on untill my program has all aspects of WEP security down..

Have a listen. This is from Security Now #89

Even More Badly Broken WEP

Leo and I review the operation of wireless network security and discuss in detail the operation of the latest attack on the increasingly insecure WEP encryption system. This new technique allows any WEP-protected WiFi network's secret cryptographic key to be discovered in less than 60 seconds.

http://www.grc.com/sn/past/2007.htm

http://media.grc.com/sn/sn-089.mp3

Kinda the opposite of RTFM: the FM tells you how it's supposed to work and how to build an implementation. It doesn't tell you why an implementation is weak (if it did, we'd never have used it). I went for more of a "read the bug reports and patch notes" recommendation.

[/color]

It sounds more like you don't really care about how or why WEP is weak - that's going to be a discussion for math or comp-sci nerds who like to use lots of letters and symbols when they talk about things. You sound like you're more interested in the steps necessary to exploit a vulnerability.

Consider two imaginary descriptions of a weakness in some piece of cryptographic software:

  • Algorithm X has a bias in byte 3 that makes it 1/2^384 % more likely to return 0 than any other a-bit sequence. You can use that to discover 1 bit of key information in time 2^56 with 95% probability. (1.5 assloads of math and stats follow here. Lots of brackets and letters)
  • Capture 300,000 packets, then compute byte 5 + byte 9 xor byte 3 for each packet. Count how many times you get 1, 2,3,4,5,? as a result of that calculation and store the the number of times for each value. If a value occurs twice as often as any other number then there is a 95% chance that bit 4 of that value is bit #7 in the key. if you get { 1= 953, 2=888, 3=1,965, 3=1,001, 4=920? } then there's a good chance that the 7th bit in the key is 0 (because 3 occurs most often, 3dec = 0b0000011, so bit #4 is 0, so bit #7 of the key is probably 0). You can use this new information about the key + new packets + different calculations to determine the value of more bits in the key.

The first answer is what you'll get out of comp-sci text books and papers. It's the "real understanding" of why WEP is weak. You will see bits of the second in research papers but its typically a mathematical description rather than an algorithm. If you're not a huge math nerd it's going to be somewhat difficult to convert that into a useful algorithm. On the plus side, you know why those algorithms work.

If you prefer the second kind of answer then you're probably best off just reading the source code for a tool like aircrack-ng or metasploit. It won't give you an understanding about why the code works, but you will understand how to use it. The second is saying "you can perform a statistical attack" but it hand-waves passed the details about why particular data is used or exactly how it reveals particular bits of key information (why byte 5+9 and not 7+6? why do we get the bit in the key at postion 7 instead of 3? why do we need 300k packets and not 3m or 300?). If you don't really care why it works then reading the source code is the quickest way to enlightenment.

you are half right :p while I am looking as to how its exploited (i am not looking to exploit it with a program like aircrack and aireplay I want to know what these programs do to exploit it) but I feel I should have an understanding of the math as well but not to a massive indepth level to the point that I can write a book my self :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Looks like the 7.1 is fake effects, can it at least do real 5.1? It says 'virtual 7.1' in all descriptions.
    • You can't, if you didn't notice, it doesn't support surround at all, it's right in the spec list.
    • Hi — I’m always interested in soundcards. Like displays, I just want to know I’m getting as much clean “sonic juice” into my brain as possible as the years take their toll. I’m not entirely sure what to take away from this review, though. It doesn’t really tell me whether the AE‑X is a good product or who it’s actually for. Most of what I’m getting is: there’s a driver to install, here’s what it looks like, and here’s what’s in the box. There’s a lot of emphasis on the SPDIF input. When you mention not needing to switch headphones between console and PC — does that mean the PC has to be powered on just to pass audio through? That seems like a fairly big waste of energy. Is this more something a streamer would use alongside a capture card? How are you testing the sound? (Also, you might want to clarify that you’re using the headphones in wired mode when you mention they’re wireless.) You mention the lack of EMI shielding — how much real‑world difference does that make compared with typical motherboard audio? On multi‑channel: what exactly isn’t supported? Does this mean Windows spatial audio (Dolby Atmos for Headphones, DTS Headphone:X, etc.) won’t work, or just that the card itself doesn’t decode surround formats? And are there any true multi‑driver “surround” headphones left that would even use that? You also highlight support for high‑impedance headphones — but what does that translate to in practice? How does it compare to driving the same headphones from a normal device, and does it make any difference for everyday, lower‑impedance models? In short, who is this card actually targeted at?
    • Yes, THIS is wordart, not the styling that can now be done. Wordart was all about those curvy words, that you could change the path of, like making words go around a circle. I don't think it can be done now, right?
    • Just saw a news report of a Waymo driving into a flooded road.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!