Recommended Posts

Truth is, they did. Crysis 3 is far more engaging than 2 ever was...and I'm not even that far in.

But it's supposed to continue where C2 left off, I completed it already but apart from a few key points of the game, I couldn't tell you what it was about, just nice graphics and kill things

And thus we are actually HELPING make Crytek's point for them. What has been getting the video-game industry in hot water (and especially shooters - the most violent video games) is single-player-by design - basically isolated gameplay by design. Why is social play (in or out of computer or console gaming) something to be reviled and rejected? Whether we realize it or not, the increased DEMAND for isolated gameplay as a design, and the increased rise in antisocial behavior in general (and especially antisocial criminal behavior - such as mass shootings) is having everyone+dog looking for ways to avoid contributing to it. (Yes - that includes the same developers currently in the societal crosshairs, such as Crytek.) Oh no - we want what we want and everyone else can go YKW up a rope.

Crytek is making such comments because they want to remain relevant as a company - and especially a company that wants to EXPAND. (In case we haven't noticed, they are not alone in calling for more connected gaming - practically EVERY developer is doing so.) Crysis 3 may well be the last PERMITTED single-player shooter - and as much as I wish I were kidding, look at the societal outrage over shooters. Crytek is making these comments basically to save itself from being lynched.

Are we THAT disconnecvted from today's headlines that we aren't aware of that?

I don't know if you're supporting the argument people are making or just mentioning it, but ...

But non-social isn't anti-social. You cite a concern with loners playing violent shooters, but playing single-player Civilization or SimCity is like doing gardening in your backyard or enjoying model building. And playing a single-player story-driven role-playing game like Skyrim is like reading a novel in your spare time. Some people look at gaming as a hobby, pastime, or personal enjoyment, not as a sport. Even with these single-player games, the gamers are often social, going on forums and entering discussions, just like model hobbyists and book readers discuss their hobbies and books with others.

But this really has nothing to do with people actually being anti-social or being violently anti-social. There is a long standing bias in our culture against people being non-social, the suggestion is that killers are always loners. This isn't true. Charles Manson wasn't a loner. The Columbine killers were two friends, so a social relationship. Lanza's personal life seemed to involve his mother smothering him, not him intentionally being asocial.

If violent shooters are the problem in these killings, which is another argument entirely (which I'm not going to argue for or against here), I don't think it matters if they're social games or not. Stormfront is a very popular social site for a limited group of people, White Nationalists. DailyKos is full of hateful comments every day. Socializing doesn't stop people from being anti-social. They just act anti-social in groups. Anonymous is a group that's anti-social.

There is no difference between killing AI and killing characters played by real people, the player is still sitting in-front of a screen shooting charaters, MP is not social, just as forums are not, facebook is not, they call it social but in reality, you are still sitting on your own in-front of a screen regardless of it being other people or AI talking back to you

Sociable = Gathering with real people in a real place

I don't buy into that horrible theory at all, yes games might have a bigger influence than real guns, but antisocial behavior and antisocial actions are the result of bad parenting, games might facilitate that disconnect, but are not the cause of it, it still falls to horrible parenting coupled with helicopter parenting that are breeding a generation of recluses that have no clue how to act in public

I don't buy into the theory, either; however, Crytek (in fact, ANY developer that works on shooters) had better pay attention to it, because that theory - rightly or wrongly - IS driving the argument.

Crytek is a particularly juicy target for several reasons - they write MOSTLY violent shooters, they have a particularly successful one on their plate right now (Crysis 3), and they just opened a new studio (albeit by acquisition) in the United States (Crytek Austin) - any, let alone all, puts a great big bulls-eye on their back. Belief in the argument is one thing - however, you dare not dismiss it.

I don't buy the crux of the argument the gun-control advocates are using one whit - and I've said so several times - however, I don't dismiss the argument, either.

But it's supposed to continue where C2 left off, I completed it already but apart from a few key points of the game, I couldn't tell you what it was about, just nice graphics and kill things

Thats because Crysis has never been a "great" game, it's always been Graphics and shiny things first, playability second. In the end it's just a generic shooter. I for one personally love playing Story Modes with other people on Co-Op. I always have more fun.

Thats because Crysis has never been a "great" game, it's always been Graphics and shiny things first, playability second. In the end it's just a generic shooter. I for one personally love playing Story Modes with other people on Co-Op. I always have more fun.

Occasionally I enjoy co-op, more so if its LAN in the same room, not that I've done that for a while, mainly I enjoy games for SP, be it storyline or graphics to wow at, I like to be able to stop somewhere and have a look around, mess about a bit, not so easy with MP

Sorry but without single player you really wouldn't have online gaming. It's all about Single player and a story that goes with a game. Getting tired of seeing games go all out online and leave us with unfinished single player campaign.

And thus we are actually HELPING make Crytek's point for them. What has been getting the video-game industry in hot water (and especially shooters - the most violent video games) is single-player-by design - basically isolated gameplay by design. Why is social play (in or out of computer or console gaming) something to be reviled and rejected? Whether we realize it or not, the increased DEMAND for isolated gameplay as a design, and the increased rise in antisocial behavior in general (and especially antisocial criminal behavior - such as mass shootings) is having everyone+dog looking for ways to avoid contributing to it. (Yes - that includes the same developers currently in the societal crosshairs, such as Crytek.) Oh no - we want what we want and everyone else can go YKW up a rope.

The games industry doesn't give two defecations about what the pea-brained American political right is currently "up in arms" (More like up in armchairs) about, they're nothing more than ephemeral fads in the news industry business model. There is no increasing demand for single player, merely the business-first side of the industry targeting what sells more and costs less - yearly instalments of multiplayer titles like Call of Duty.

Any push to "eliminate" single player is actually just always-online DRM attempt 2.0 plus a sprinkling of prevention of resale, this time with a excuse in the form of "You need to be online so this core feature works!!!".

You might like to dream up various politically themed theories, but truth of the situation is the same as it's always been, business is business. MP sells more. And heck, even if you're too stubborn to accept the non-political answer, what effects the game industry will also effect the movie industry - and Hollywood's $$$ speaks far louder than the right wing.

The games industry doesn't give two defecations about what the pea-brained American political right is currently "up in arms" (More like up in armchairs) about, they're nothing more than ephemeral fads in the news industry business model. There is no increasing demand for single player, merely the business-first side of the industry targeting what sells more and costs less - yearly instalments of multiplayer titles like Call of Duty.

Any push to "eliminate" single player is actually just always-online DRM attempt 2.0 plus a sprinkling of prevention of resale, this time with a excuse in the form of "You need to be online so this core feature works!!!".

You might like to dream up various politically themed theories, but truth of the situation is the same as it's always been, business is business. MP sells more. And heck, even if you're too stubborn to accept the non-political answer, what effects the game industry will also effect the movie industry - and Hollywood's $$$ speaks far louder than the right wing.

It's not just the US political system, as much as you might want to think - have you NOT been following the recent issues with gaming in Germany and even Australia?

And you seem to have MISSED the fact that I stated - categorically - that I don't believe the excuses the pols (of ANY country) are giving for the codswallop they are trying to make us swallow.

Crytek (and everyone else) is talking like this to avoid being made examples of - it's called survival.

And though I don't believe it, and certainly don't buy it, I had certainly better pay attention to it.

And there are the same sort of stupids on the OTHER end of the political spectrum - or have you not been listening the the left-listing screeds, in OR out of the United States?

I can't compare sitting in front of my screen playing a well written single player campaign to just running around a map vs real people seeing who can kill who the most for points. How people can still find that fun for hours on in is beyond me. I got into games for a good story and not just mindless fragging on a batch of maps over and over.

It's not just the US political system, as much as you might want to think - have you NOT been following the recent issues with gaming in Germany and even Australia?

And you seem to have MISSED the fact that I stated - categorically - that I don't believe the excuses the pols (of ANY country) are giving for the codswallop they are trying to make us swallow.

Crytek (and everyone else) is talking like this to avoid being made examples of - it's called survival.

And though I don't believe it, and certainly don't buy it, I had certainly better pay attention to it.

And there are the same sort of stupids on the OTHER end of the political spectrum - or have you not been listening the the left-listing screeds, in OR out of the United States?

I didn't miss anything, your political references are a load of utter tripe. As I said, the reasons behind all of this are purely business just as it always has been.

What do you think makes more sense, big Triple-A publishers trying to maximise profit and minimise cost by pandering to the bigger markets. (Yearly MP re-release titles, zombie games) Or an entire industry being in fear of some ignorant, loud-mouthed right-wing blowhards on TV that actually only have an infinitesimal fraction of the power that they think they do?

Yeah, pretty damn sure it's the former. Just like it was when Cevat ran off crying to the consoles because some people pirated his interactive benchmark.

It's not just the US political system, as much as you might want to think - have you NOT been following the recent issues with gaming in Germany and even Australia?

The fact that Germany is loosening up on its tight regulations, ever so slowly. No Australia no longer bans all "adult" games, and instead added an adult only rating to allow violent and sexual games...

Yup. Have you been?

It's not just the US political system, as much as you might want to think - have you NOT been following the recent issues with gaming in Germany and even Australia?

I live in Aus and pay pretty close attention to the media and its views/attitudes towards gaming and, frankly, besides the occasional 2 minutes slots on morning variety type shows, gaming isn't a huge issue here and it certainly isn't being blamed for any societal ills. You know, like gun violence.

The only "recent issues" with gaming in Australia are people commenting on the views in America that violent video games should be hold more accountable for gun violence than guns themselves. Something we, and I imagine a large chunk of the rest of the developed world, find highly amusing.

I was very dissapinted with the Crysis 2, but because i lived crysis 1 + expantion.. I was so eagerly waiting for Crysis 3 !!!!

Now i know why they are saying single player must die! The Crysis 3 single player is horrible. So far from the amazing Fry Cry 1... the only great single player game ever developed by crytek

Perhaps Crytek should stop making SP games. I don't love/hate Crysis or Crytek but how about they decide what they want to do with their games, not tell the consumer what they want.

single player...a very 1980's/90's console concept.

never even bother with the crappy scripted single players. half life 1 and 2...played the single player for about 10 minutes. have all the modern warfare games and didn't play single player. same with battlefield.

i DID play the medal of honour allied assault and it was decent fun.

single player...a very 1980's/90's console concept.

never even bother with the crappy scripted single players. half life 1 and 2...played the single player for about 10 minutes. have all the modern warfare games and didn't play single player. same with battlefield.

i DID play the medal of honour allied assault and it was decent fun.

Those are all FPSs. FPSs deserve decent MP. But some games gain nothing from MP. Or it is incompetently implemented.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Amazon may use OpenAI and Nova models after Anthropic reportedly raises costs by Karthik Mudaliar Amazon is reportedly considering to use OpenAI models and even its own Nova family of AI models after Anthropic raised the cost of using Claude inside Amazon services. According to a report from The Information, Amazon is weighing its options to reduce costs under a new arrangement with Anthropic. But back in April, Amazon said it would invest $5 billion more in Anthropic, with the possibility of adding up to another $20 billion if certain commercial milestones are met. That investment actually came on top of another $8 billion Amazon had already put into the Claude maker. Anthropic, meanwhile, committed to spend more than $100 billion over 10 years on AWS technologies, including Amazon’s Trainium chips. Amazon isn't just a customer of Anthropic but also one of the most important backers and cloud partners. This is why it makes it interesting that Amazon is considering other alternatives to handle its internal workloads. Although Amazon has been building its own options for a while now. Its Nova family of AI models was announced in late 2024 for Amazon Bedrock, with models aimed at text, image, and video tasks. Amazon pitched the model around cost and latency at that time. With that said, OpenAI has also become a more realistic option recently for AWS customers as well as for Amazon itself. Earlier this year, OpenAI brought its latest models and Codex coding agent to Amazon Bedrock, after changes to its previously more restrictive Microsoft cloud arrangement. This allowed AWS to serve even those customers who wanted other alternatives from Claude, without having to move workloads out of Amazon's cloud. Evaluating alternatives could also be due to commercial pressure and not necessarily a sign of a damaged partnership between Amazon and Anthropic. Whether or not Amazon is actually considering switching entirely to OpenAI's models or its own Nova models remains unknown at this moment.
    • Samsung introduces new AI classroom tools and interactive displays at ISTELive 2026 by Fiza Ali Samsung has announced several new education-focused software features and interactive displays for schools during ISTELive 2026, taking place in Orlando, Florida, from 28 June to 1 July. The focus of these updates is on making shared classroom displays easier to use for teachers while giving IT administrators more control over managing devices. One of the key additions is the Samsung Account Management Solution (AMS). In many schools, multiple teachers share the same interactive display throughout the day, which means signing in and setting everything up can become repetitive. With AMS, teachers can log in by scanning a QR code or tapping an NFC-enabled ID card. Once signed in, their personalised workspace, including wallpapers, bookmarks, app shortcuts, and files, can be instantly accessed through Home Personalisation. Samsung has also included a screen lock feature, allowing teachers to lock the display if they need to step away briefly. Furthermore, the company is also updating its Education Portal with new tools designed for school IT administrators. The portal will allow IT administrators to register teachers, enrol devices, and manage user access from a central dashboard. Administrators can also link NFC cards to teacher accounts, making sign-ins quicker across shared displays. Another addition is a Tags feature that lets schools organise displays by building or classroom. Those tags can also be used to send emergency notifications to selected Samsung Interactive Displays through compatible platforms such as InformaCast and Raptor. Moreover, the tech giant's AI Assistant is gaining several new features aimed at supporting everyday classroom tasks such as lesson planning and classroom engagement. One of the features is Circle to Search, which lets teachers circle text or images on the display to quickly find related information, videos, or web results without interrupting the lesson. The content can then be brought into Samsung Whiteboard. Another feature, Live Transcript, converts spoken lessons into real-time captions, which could be useful for students with hearing impairments or those in multilingual classrooms. The AI Assistant also introduces AI Summary and AI Quiz. The summary tool creates summaries of recorded lessons, while AI Quiz generates questions based on lesson content so teachers can quickly check how well students are following along. Teachers signed in through Samsung AMS can also return to their previous AI-generated lesson materials without logging in again. Alongside the software updates, Samsung has expanded its Android-based Interactive Display range with three new models: the WAF-S, WAFX-PS, and WAHX-M. The WAF-S and WAFX-PS ship with Android 16, bringing updates to security, accessibility, and overall usability while maintaining compatibility with Google's education services including Google Classroom and Google Drive through EDLA certification. Meanwhile, the new WAHX-M is the biggest addition to the lineup, introducing a 98-inch display for larger spaces such as lecture halls and conference rooms. It will also be available in 65-inch, 75-inch and 86-inch sizes. Samsung says the WAHX-M further includes on-device AI features such as voice commands, text-to-speech, and an AI calculator, alongside support for Samsung AMS and AI Assistant. Samsung AI Assistant has been available since April, while Samsung AMS and the updated Education Portal will begin rolling out in July.
    • It's been $24 (single) or $89 (4-pack) for many days on both Amazon and Walmart as far as I know. That isn't a big discount. If these end up like the 1st gen, the 4-pack will routinely get down around $80, give or take a dollar. I think they have even hit $69 at times.
    • Microsoft brings Claude to its own Azure infrastructure, powered by Nvidia GB300 Blackwell by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic's Claude models are now generally available in Microsoft Foundry on Azure and are running on Nvidia's GB300 Blackwell Ultra systems. Nvidia wrote in its announcement that the models are hosted on Microsoft Azure and accelerated by GB300 Blackwell Ultra GPUs, with Quantum-X800 InfiniBand networking used to support larger agentic systems and specialized sub-agents that can operate across business domains. This is great for customers and enterprises that want to build autonomous and domain-specific AI agents using Claude without moving outside Microsoft’s cloud platform. Microsoft currently offers Claude models in Foundry in two forms: “Hosted on Azure,” which runs end-to-end on Azure infrastructure and is generally available, and “Hosted on Anthropic infrastructure,” which remains in preview. This separation is quite important for organizations that have procurement, compliance, data processing, or internal governance requirements tied to Azure. Anthropic currently has 11 Claude models listed in Microsoft Foundry, including Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6, and even the unavailable Mythos and Fable models. Billing is handled through Claude Consumption Units (CCUs). Microsoft says CCU is an invoicing unit for Claude models in Foundry, with token usage converted using Anthropic’s published per-model token rates. The usage is billed through Azure Marketplace just like models from other distributors and appears on the customer's Azure invoice, while eligible spend can count against a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment. For starters, GB300 NVL72 is a rack-scale, fully liquid-cooled system that combines 72 Blackwell Ultra GPUs and 36 Grace CPUs. Nvidia has listed 37TB of fast memory, 130TB/s of NVLink bandwidth, and FP4 Tensor Core performance of up to 1,440 petaflops with sparsity. The deal is also part of a three-way partnership between Microsoft, Nvidia, and Anthropic. Under the deal, Anthropic has committed to buying $30 billion in Azure compute capacity and contracting additional capacity up to one gigawatt. Nvidia and Microsoft also said they would invest up to $10 billion and $5 billion in Anthropic, respectively.
    • WhatsApp is getting usernames, and you can reserve your preferred one now by Fiza Ali Sharing your phone number isn't always something you want to do, especially with people you've just met. Whether it's someone from a class, a local community group, or a sports team chat, handing over your number can feel like giving away more personal information than necessary. That's exactly the problem WhatsApp is trying to solve with its upcoming usernames feature. The company has announced that users can now reserve a unique WhatsApp username ahead of the feature's wider rollout later this year. Once usernames become available, they'll let people connect without revealing their phone numbers. It's a change that makes a lot of sense for group chats. Right now, everyone in the group can see your phone number. With usernames enabled, that won't necessarily be the case when someone contacts you for the first time. WhatsApp says it's opening username reservations early because more than three billion people use the app, meaning plenty of people are likely to want the same usernames. Reserving one now gives users a better chance of securing the name they actually want before the feature launches more broadly. If your preferred username is already taken, WhatsApp will also offer a built-in username generator to suggest available alternatives. The feature isn't only aimed at individual users. Creators, businesses, and organisations will be able to claim the same username they already use on Instagram or Facebook, making it easier to keep a consistent identity across Meta's apps. Furthermore, privacy is a big part of how WhatsApp is introducing usernames. There won't be a public directory where people can browse or search for usernames. Instead, people will need to know your exact username before they can start a conversation with you. Additionally, users can also choose to enable a username key, which adds another layer of control by requiring people to enter that key before sending a message. Once the feature rolls out, people who choose to use a username will no longer have their phone number shown when messaging a person or business for the first time. If you want to reserve a username, make sure you're running the latest version of WhatsApp, then head to Settings > Account > Username. The tech giant says usernames will roll out gradually over the coming months, and users will receive an in-app notification when the feature becomes available in their country.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!