Recommended Posts

Ok, this might seem like a strange thing to worry about, but on my 64-bit Windows 8 Pro (clean) installation, the File Explorer takes about twice as long (1.38 seconds) to start when I click a shortcut on the taskbar than when I click a shortcut from the start screen or the desktop (0.76 seconds). Is there any reason for this? How could I speed of the opening of File Explorer (and probably other programs) when launching from the taskbar? I probably wouldn't care as much if it wasn't such a noticeable difference when waiting for it to open. Both cases (desktop and taskbar) opened instantly on Windows 7 Ultimate.

Anything over 0.3 seconds is easily noticeable to the average human brain. This difference is well over that threshold. For a task that I perform many times a day, it is an annoying regression and I'm simply looking for insight. If you have nothing constructive to say, please move along.

I think it takes longer for the application to start from the superbar, because of the little anination it does when you click the icon.

Try turning off all Windows animations. That should help your speeds a bit.

(Or just turn off "animations in the taskbar".)

Anything over 0.3 seconds is easily noticeable to the average human brain. This difference is well over that threshold. For a task that I perform many times a day, it is an annoying regression and I'm simply looking for insight. If you have nothing constructive to say, please move along.

Moving along

  • Like 3

I think it takes longer for the application to start from the superbar, because of the little anination it does when you click the icon.

Try turning off all Windows animations. That should help your speeds a bit.

(Or just turn off "animations in the taskbar".)

Disabling all animations and/or the taskbar animations made no difference. Thanks for the suggestion, though!

Do you have any other programs installed or just Windows itself?

If you have security software try disabling it. Same with startup/background processes.

I do have other software installed now. Just a few common programs (like Google Chrome). I was having this problem before I installed them, though. I disabled all of my security software and startup programs, rebooted, and still have the problem. Interestingly enough, if I right click the File Explorer icon on the taskbar and click on one of the jump list entries, it opens just as quickly as if I used the Start Screen. There's just something wrong with simply left clicking the taskbar icon. At this point, it's a puzzle to solve, not so much a necessity.

I do have other software installed now. Just a few common programs (like Google Chrome). I was having this problem before I installed them, though. I disabled all of my security software and startup programs, rebooted, and still have the problem. Interestingly enough, if I right click the File Explorer icon on the taskbar and click on one of the jump list entries, it opens just as quickly as if I used the Start Screen. There's just something wrong with simply left clicking the taskbar icon. At this point, it's a puzzle to solve, not so much a necessity.

That's weird. Have you tried to unpin it and pin it again? That's all I can think of right now.

@OP

Have you installed all the Microsoft Updates after clean install?

There are bunch of updates (above 500 MB) available from Microsoft which improve performance and stability.

I have all the updates applied and don't see any difference in launching File Explorer in my machine.

It's super quick. I see it as soon as I click.

I refuse to believe this. If you have disabled all window animations and you are indeed trying to run the same File Explorer from both locations then there should be no difference at all. Try one thing for me though. Hit up CMD and type


explorer
[/CODE]

and tell us how long that takes to start up.

That's weird. Have you tried to unpin it and pin it again? That's all I can think of right now.

That didn't help. Thanks, though.

@OP

Have you installed all the Microsoft Updates after clean install?

There are bunch of updates (above 500 MB) available from Microsoft which improve performance and stability.

I have all the updates applied and don't see any difference in launching File Explorer in my machine.

It's super quick. I see it as soon as I click.

Yeah, I updated the system as soon as the install finished. I obsessively update :p

I refuse to believe this. If you have disabled all window animations and you are indeed trying to run the same File Explorer from both locations then there should be no difference at all. Try one thing for me though. Hit up CMD and type


explorer
[/CODE]

and tell us how long that takes to start up.

Entering 'explorer' in the command prompt opens instantly, just like the Jump List entries, hitting windows + E, and shortcut on the start screen. I don't blame you for not believing it. I can assure you, however, that it is happening. It's not a huge deal, so whether or not I find a solution doesn't matter. I made this thread because I, too, see no reason for it and wanted to see if anyone else had heard of a similar issue. I guess not and that's fine.

  • 3 weeks later...

1.38 seconds.... disgraceful

How would you even have noticed the difference between 0.76 seconds and 1.38 seconds?

When you have a high performing system, that's a lifetime to do something like open File Manager, one, one thousand, tw.......

There's clearly something wrong.

Perhaps the indexing service?

I recently had this problem after opening File Manager and waiting for it to enumerate all drives. Disabling defender eliminated the problem. So I disabled indexing, deleted the indexes, disabled Defender. Rebooted, re-enabled all, and all is well. Took a whole day to figure it out though, with several Google searches which lead to disabling Defender.

typing this from windows 8, and it works beautifully. (Dell Inspiron 1545)....opens as fast as I can click on it. (internal Intel drivers, generic MS drivers to be exact...dell won't release updated graphics drivers for this chipset for 8, frown)

  • 2 weeks later...

I have the same problem! It actually takes almost 2secs for the file explorer to open on my laptop when clicked from the taskbar.

and yes, 1.38 secs compared to milliseconds is a lot longer when you're always using your computer, so to the first person who replied to this thread, it is very noticeable.

and yeah, opening file explorer from the jump list is instant.

has anyone solved this problem? it is very annoying. can't work fast when you need to browse quick through your files.

right clicking file explorer on the taskbar and clicking any folder (jump list) is not very intuitive.

i just need for file explorer to appear immediately after clicking it on the taskbar.

anyone already has the solution for this? thanks!

  • 2 months later...

I had this problem too, but the solution is obvious! All other methods of opening explorer.exe are quick, but not the taskbar, so it must be using a different path. So it was! It goes to a directory (libraries by default), rather than opening explorer.exe.

THE FIX

Go to C:\Users\USERNAME\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Quick Launch\User Pinned\TaskBar , where the taskbar shortcuts are stored. (The IE team developed the idea, hence the path)

Right click on File Explorer, and click properties.

Change the path to C:\Windows\explorer.exe .

Problem solved!

  • 3 weeks later...

I had this problem too, but the solution is obvious! All other methods of opening explorer.exe are quick, but not the taskbar, so it must be using a different path. So it was! It goes to a directory (libraries by default), rather than opening explorer.exe.

THE FIX

Go to C:\Users\USERNAME\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Quick Launch\User Pinned\TaskBar , where the taskbar shortcuts are stored. (The IE team developed the idea, hence the path)

Right click on File Explorer, and click properties.

Change the path to C:\Windows\explorer.exe .

Problem solved!

 

Thank you! Good thing I came back to this thread I was hoping someone would have figured out the fix already.

 

Thanks again! :laugh: 

 

Now my Windows 8 experience is once again whole. :rofl:

  • 3 weeks later...

I had the same problem, but it is also slow when I click Windows-E. Anybody knows if there is an obscure shortcut for this as well? Opening Windows Explorer from the task bar is now immediate, but pressing Windows-E takes almost 3 seconds. That's 3 seconds to think about how much I love the improvements in Windows 8...

  • 3 months later...

I had this problem too, but the solution is obvious! All other methods of opening explorer.exe are quick, but not the taskbar, so it must be using a different path. So it was! It goes to a directory (libraries by default), rather than opening explorer.exe.

THE FIX

Go to C:\Users\USERNAME\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Quick Launch\User Pinned\TaskBar , where the taskbar shortcuts are stored. (The IE team developed the idea, hence the path)

Right click on File Explorer, and click properties.

Change the path to C:\Windows\explorer.exe .

Problem solved!

 

Hi,

 

first off all, hi to everyone, and thank you PokeOracle for this solution...

 

it solved in windows 8, but now it happened again in windows 8.1 and the target is greyed out...

 

i'm trying to solve this by using same logic, but nothing solves...

 

does anyone solved this in windows 8.1?

 

regards...

Same here. It worked fine until I upgraded to Windows 8.1. Now it takes 4+ seconds to start Windows Explorer, even if I open explorer.exe under c:\Windows. It used to be a snap.Anyone with ideas on how to speed this up? I have a rather new i7 computer with 16GB ram, so the hardware shouldn't be the issue.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • But the reality is it will work for people's needs, and they don't care about the technology that makes it. Clearly not everyone's needs, but that low end space where personal laptops were only used to type emails, watch content and browse websites, but they didn't want to do that on a small screen device. Heck, writing that out I can now see the connection and reason it'll do so well. Apple is about experience. If the experience is bad, they don't release it. Low end Windows laptop manufacturers up until this point have not taken that into consideration ever before, so slow laggy usage with brittle slimey plastic shells were common. I hope that the low end space at least creates better physical products that last a bit longer, and if Microsoft get their act together, they could also have a solid OS on such low end hardware that would actually make the experience work for what the hardware was intended for. The fact that the CPU is a "cellphone", sorry mobile phone processor is irrelevant. It's about the experience, and so far, that sounds quite solid.
    • Hello, Bonjour is Apple's implementation of a multicast-DNS service, which allows devices running Apple's software and/or hardware to find each other on your local network.  I believe the Windows version was last updated around 2010. If you do not need it, you can stop and disable the Bonjour service in the Services Control Manager (filename: SERVICES.MSC).  Once you have done that, the operating system will no longer attempt to load the service. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • This AMD RX 9070 16GB GPU that performs close to Nvidia 5070 is under $600 by Sayan Sen With the memory shortage that's prevalent nowadays, discounts are super-hard to get. As such we post good deals whenever they pop up. Recently, we covered a few great discounts on SSDs wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup NVMe PCIe Gen4 drive for just $400 thanks to a special coupon. If you want a faster product but don't need all that capacity, you can also opt for Samsung's 990 PRO 2TB that is on sale for its lowest price in over three months. Let's say though that you are on the hunt for a 1440p gaming card. In that case AMD's RX 9070 non-XT can help, and with its 16GB VRAM, you can also run AI models locally without worrying about bottlenecking (check out our recent 9070 GRE reviews for gaming and productivity to get an idea). The PowerColor Reaper variant of the RX 9070 is currently on sale for just $580 which is a very good price in the current state of affairs (purchase link under the specs table down below). The Reaper cooler on this 9070 uses a triple‑fan design with ring‑blade fans, paired with premium dual ball bearings to extend lifespan and reduce friction. "Intelligent" fan control allows the fans to remain idle at lower temperatures, only spinning up when the GPU is under load. A nickel‑plated copper base makes direct contact with both the GPU and memory modules, helping to spread heat evenly. PowerColor also applies Honeywell PTM7950 phase‑change thermal interface material (TIM), which fills microscopic gaps between the die and heatsink for more efficient thermal transfer. The fan shroud is shorter in height as the firm has made it such that it can be used in certain SFF (small form factor) cases. The technical specifications of the Reaper RX 9070 are given in the table below: Specification Value Stream Processors 3584 Units Video Memory 16GB GDDR6 Memory Speed 20.0 Gbps Memory Interface 256-bit Engine Clock Game Clock: up to 2070 MHz Boost Clock: up to 2520 MHz Bus Standard PCI Express 5.0 x16 Display Connectors 1 x HDMI 2.1b, 3 x DisplayPort 2.1a Maximum Resolution DisplayPort: 7680 × 4320 HDMI: 7680 × 4320 Board Dimensions 289mm × 111mm × 41mm 304mm × 127mm × 42mm (with bracket) Slot 2 Minimum System Power Requirement 600W Power Connectors Two 8-pin PCI Express Get the PowerColor Reaper RX 9070 at the links below (you get only a 90-day warranty on Woot): PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 16GB Graphics Card (RX9070 16G-A): $579.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) (Was: $700) PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 16GB Graphics Card (RX9070 16G-A): $559.99 (Sold and Shipped by Woot US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Are they marketed as an entry into astronomy or astrophotography? I do astrophotography. With big rigs, lots of computers, cables and headaches. I love it. And by learning this ridiculously complex hobby, I’ve learned about the objects I’m shooting. Astronomy followed from photography.
    • Microsoft confirms Recycle Bin bug across all versions of Windows by Usama Jawad A couple of days ago, we reported that the latest Patch Tuesday update has seemingly resulted in a lot of issues for many users, including OneDrive and Dropbox access problems, BitLocker recovery lockouts, and BSODs. Although Microsoft is yet to acknowledge these bugs, it has confirmed another, relatively smaller issue across all supported versions of Windows. In an update on its Windows Release Health Dashboard, Microsoft has confirmed that after installing June's Patch Tuesday update (KB5094126), you'll experience unexpected behavior when leveraging Recycle Bin. Basically, when you attempt to delete an item from the Recycle Bin, the confirm dialog will show you the internal file name of that content rather than the actual name. For example, the file may be named abc.png, but the confirm dialog will ask if you're sure that you want to permanently delete $Rxxxxx.png from the Recycle Bin. This is pretty much it for the scope of the bug itself; it just displays the wrong name in the confirm dialog. The correct name will be shown in the list view of the Recycle Bin and if you restore the file, it will return with the correct name as well. This issue affects pretty much all supported versions of Windows client and server, including: Client: Windows 11, version 26H1; Windows 11, version 25H2; Windows 11, version 24H2; Windows 11, version 23H2; Windows 10, version 22H2; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2021; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2019; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB 2016 Server: Windows Server 2025; Windows Server 2022; Windows Server 2019; Windows Server 2016; Windows Server 2012 R2; Windows Server 2012 As things currently stand, Microsoft is working on a concrete solution that will be released in a "future" Windows update. It remains to be seen if the firm will wait till the next Patch Tuesday or roll out an out-of-band (OOB) fix. The good news is that commercial customers can deploy a workaround right now, but they will have to reach out to Microsoft Support for Business for additional details.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      578
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      72
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!