Need assistance on choosing a 27' Monitor


Recommended Posts

The problem I have with both monitors is that they are only 1920 x 1080. If I was going to go with that resolution then a 32" HDTV would seem to be more logical. The price would be about the same (maybe a little more). I use a Mitsubishi 40" LED HDTV as my main monitor, and truly am glad to have gone in that direction. The sound alone is a huge difference because of the ability the HDTV gives to having surround sound.

The problem I have with both monitors is that they are only 1920 x 1080. If I was going to go with that resolution then a 32" HDTV would seem to be more logical. The price would be about the same (maybe a little more). I use a Mitsubishi 40" LED HDTV as my main monitor, and truly am glad to have gone in that direction. The sound alone is a huge difference because of the ability the HDTV gives to having surround sound.

No one in there right mind will use a LED TV as a monitor or either a Large Monitor... especially with the 1080p resolution... but no one needs a bigger monitor then 27 - 30" for there computer unless you demonstrating something like a Company like Microsoft for Xbox or PlayStation showing off the latest games for there new consoles. or demonstrating anything else., and plus you want a higher resolution for there's large displays or it will look way too big and won't look right. and no one needs a large display at this time I will recommended either a 27 - 30" LED monitor and please don't use a television. for a monitor it just isn't right.

No one in there right mind will use a LED TV as a monitor or either a Large Monitor... especially with the 1080p resolution... but no one needs a bigger monitor then 27 - 30" for there computer unless you demonstrating something like a Company like Microsoft for Xbox or PlayStation showing off the latest games for there new consoles. or demonstrating anything else., and plus you want a higher resolution for there's large displays or it will look way too big and won't look right. and no one needs a large display at this time I will recommended either a 27 - 30" LED monitor and please don't use a television. for a monitor it just isn't right.

Maybe she's of he older generation and needs things to appear bigger?

Show some consideration man...

You might want to consider going for the Dell S2740L instead. Dell just has a very good name and in general pretty good monitors. The panel is most likely exactly the same as the Asus but in my opinion Dell's design is much, much nicer.

But I do agree about the resolution. 1080p at 27" leaves you with a really low display density. Higher resolution panels are pretty expensive but they're worth it. Another solution is downsizing to 23". It'll still be 1080p but it'll cost less and you can get a higher-quality matte panel (like the Dell U2312HM). Those monitors also have much better ergonomics.

Size isn't everything you know. We're at a point where 5" phones are full HD and 10" tablets have 2560x1600. Heck, even my 13.1" laptop from 2010 has a 1080p panel. No point in going for pixels that big when we're talking PC.

No one in there right mind will use a LED TV as a monitor or either a Large Monitor... especially with the 1080p resolution... but no one needs a bigger monitor then 27 - 30" for there computer unless you demonstrating something like a Company like Microsoft for Xbox or PlayStation showing off the latest games for there new consoles. or demonstrating anything else., and plus you want a higher resolution for there's large displays or it will look way too big and won't look right. and no one needs a large display at this time I will recommended either a 27 - 30" LED monitor and please don't use a television. for a monitor it just isn't right.

Oh Boy. . .here is one those individuals who is smarter then anyone else. Get a life. It just shows how small of person you are my come on a website and jacking someone up. It this sounds as if I am angry it is because I am. Belittling someone just to show off your intelligences has the tendency to bring out someones defenses. . . BTW have a nice day. :angry:

Hello,

As someone who does not do any graphics or video work, I really couldn't justify spending $700 or so on a monitor. For me, the big draw is that the higer resolution allows me to display more text on the screen. This is the first display I've owned since the SONY SDM-HX93 I got in 2004 that displays more than 1200 pixels vertically (it was a 1600?1200 display).

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

Yeah saw that ASUS as well, too expensive right now ??

Thnx

  • 2 years later...

Hello,

 

Just to follow up, almost exactly two years later, the backlight on the monitor starting flickering on and off very rapidly.  I thought this might possibly be an issue with a driver update (but there haven't been any recently) and the problem continued even if I disconnected the monitor from the computer (i.e., just when the monitor was displaying its logo screen).

I turned the unit off, and went to unplug the external power supply from the monitor.  The latter was very hot--too hot to hold comfortably--and had a burnt smell coming from it.

 

I contacted Micro Center chat via tech support, and they'd like for me to bring the monitor to the nearest store (~2 hour drive one way) for a technician to look at.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

Hello,

I just purchased a 1440p display, an EQD Corp. Auria EQ276W. This is a 27" WQHD (2560

Hello,

 

EQD Corporation is a company which makes monitors and audio accessories.  Auria is the brand name for their line of monitors.  Links to both are in the preceding article.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

 

You get what you pay for...  Who is EQD Corp Auria??  You would have been better with a good ASUS 1080p.

Hello,

 

Update:  I received a replacement power supply for the EQD Corp. Auria EQ276W that I ordered on eBay last week, plugged it in and... I'm back up and running.

 

I was actually using an ASUS PB278Q in the meantime.  As far as I could tell, it has the exact same panel as the EQ276W.  I will admit the ASUS has a better stand and OSD than the Auria, but once you've got the monitor set up, I don't think that is as much of an issue.

 

While 1080 is nice for watching movies, I really do like the 2560

  • 1 year later...

Hello,

 

Update:  Almost 13 months from my last post, it looks like the replacement power supply for the EQD Corp. Auria EQ276W died.

 

I have replaced the monitor with a Dell P2416D monitor.  This is another WQHD (2560×1440 pixel, 16:9 aspect ratio) display, but is only 24" across, versus the EQ276W's 27" screen.

 

Pro's:  The Dell P2416D has a VESA mount and a much better base, which I really, really like compared to the proprietary stand used by the EQD Auria EQ276W, and its on-screen controls are much, much better as well.  It also has a monitor profile information file, so it is not detected as a "generic display" like the EQD was in Device Manager.

 

Con's:  While its only 3" smaller at 24", it is definitely noticeable.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

Hello,

 

Update:  I tested the external power supply for the EQD Corp. Auria EQ276W and found out it wasn't outputting any voltage, so ordered a replacement.  I figured if that wasn't the problem, I could still probably repair the monitor or get it repaired fairly easily.  Turns out it was the external power supply after all.

 

I am back to using the EQD Corp. Auria EQ276W as my primary monitor, and plan on eventually setting up the Dell P2416D as a second display in portrait mode for writing and the like.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

 

 

On 5/5/2016 at 0:19 AM, goretsky said:

Hello,

 

Update:  Almost 13 months from my last post, it looks like the replacement power supply for the EQD Corp. Auria EQ276W died.

 

I have replaced the monitor with a Dell P2416D monitor.  This is another WQHD (2560×1440 pixel, 16:9 aspect ratio) display, but is only 24" across, versus the EQ276W's 27" screen.

 

Pro's:  The Dell P2416D has a VESA mount and a much better base, which I really, really like compared to the proprietary stand used by the EQD Auria EQ276W, and its on-screen controls are much, much better as well.  It also has a monitor profile information file, so it is not detected as a "generic display" like the EQD was in Device Manager.

 

Con's:  While its only 3" smaller at 24", it is definitely noticeable.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

Hello,

 

Update:  I tested the external power supply for the EQD Corp. Auria EQ276W and found out it wasn't outputting any voltage, so ordered a replacement.  I figured if that wasn't the problem, I could still probably repair the monitor or get it repaired fairly easily.  Turns out it was the external power supply after all.

 

I am back to using the EQD Corp. Auria EQ276W as my primary monitor, and plan on eventually setting up the Dell P2416D as a second display in portrait mode for writing and the like.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

 

 

On 5/5/2016 at 0:19 AM, goretsky said:

Hello,

 

Update:  Almost 13 months from my last post, it looks like the replacement power supply for the EQD Corp. Auria EQ276W died.

 

I have replaced the monitor with a Dell P2416D monitor.  This is another WQHD (2560×1440 pixel, 16:9 aspect ratio) display, but is only 24" across, versus the EQ276W's 27" screen.

 

Pro's:  The Dell P2416D has a VESA mount and a much better base, which I really, really like compared to the proprietary stand used by the EQD Auria EQ276W, and its on-screen controls are much, much better as well.  It also has a monitor profile information file, so it is not detected as a "generic display" like the EQD was in Device Manager.

 

Con's:  While its only 3" smaller at 24", it is definitely noticeable.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

Have you considered an ACER B286HK if you have issues again?  It's an inch larger, but supports 4K directly (3840x2160).  It has a $500USD SRP, but can be found under that - especially e-tail (such as amazon.co.uk).  What do I have against ASUS?  Primarily the price (for the displays) - they are pricey; on top of that, you all too often wind up having to buy display cables separately (so you get whacked yet again).  With ACER, they aren't fancy, but are instead quite standard - and they include cables for ALL the inputs (even DisplayPort); I'm considering this monitor as an upgrade from my own current display (ACER H233H.bmid - which is working fine).

Hello,


That sounds very interesting.  I'll take a look the next time I'm buying.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

 

On 5/14/2016 at 7:27 PM, PGHammer said:

Have you considered an ACER B286HK if you have issues again?  It's an inch larger, but supports 4K directly (3840x2160).  It has a $500USD SRP, but can be found under that - especially e-tail (such as amazon.co.uk).  What do I have against ASUS?  Primarily the price (for the displays) - they are pricey; on top of that, you all too often wind up having to buy display cables separately (so you get whacked yet again).  With ACER, they aren't fancy, but are instead quite standard - and they include cables for ALL the inputs (even DisplayPort); I'm considering this monitor as an upgrade from my own current display (ACER H233H.bmid - which is working fine).

  • 5 years later...

Hello,

 

As a final conclusion, I had given the EQD Auria EQ276W monitor to a family member, and its external power supply died once more (2021).  The monitor was replaced with a different one in the meantime.  I came over to install a new power supply, connected it to a spare PC and verified it was still working... and accidentally knocked it over, shattering the internal glass pane. 

It was a very nice monitor despite it being power supply-hungry.  Since it wasn't actively being used (it was going to become the spare monitor) I will replace it with something inexpensive (probably a 1080p panel).

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

  • Sad 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google pitches Spanner as one database for all AI agents with these new featues by Karthik Mudaliar Google Cloud is introducing new features within Spanner, its distributed database, as a place where enterprises should keep their data, using which AI agents could make smarter and better decisions. In a detailed blog post, Google highlighted quite a few features coming to Spanner, including relational data, graph relationships, vector search, key-value access, full-text search, and operational analytics together in one database architecture. Google says that today's systems aren't well-made for AI agents. There could be data that is present in one system, search indexes in another, embeddings in a vector database, and relationship data in a graph database. This fragmentation isn't great for AI agents to do their jobs because they don't have access to all of this data in one place. This is where Google is positioning Spanner as a solution. Spanner is already a globally distributed relational database with strong consistency, and Google wants its customers to see it as a broader data layer for AI applications. The company introduced something called Spanner Graph, along with integrated vector search, full-text search, a Cassandra-compatible key-value endpoint, and a columnar engine for analytical queries on operational data. Google also added that its ScaNN-powered vector search can support indexes with more than 10 billion vectors, while the columnar engine can make some analytical scans up to 200 times faster. All of this isn't just exclusive to the Google Cloud Platform, and there's support for multi-cloud as well. This comes via Spanner Omni, which Google says is a downloadable, containerized version of Spanner that can run on Kubernetes and in environments outside Google Cloud, including Microsoft Azure and AWS, and even on-premises infrastructure as well as edge deployments. Google says that customers who are interested in the full-featured edition should contact the company, and there's no word on commercial availability or separate pricing. Those interested can read the full blog by Google Cloud, which details these features individually.
    • Kalmuri 4.2.5 by Razvan Serea Kalmuri is your all-in-one, portable screen capture and recording solution designed for speed, simplicity, and flexibility. Whether you need a full-screen snapshot, a custom area, a scrolling webpage, or smooth video recording, Kalmuri delivers with ease. Capture text instantly from images with built-in OCR, keep floating images on top for quick reference, and use the precise color picker for perfect design matching. Customize hotkeys to work your way and share results instantly with built-in upload options. Kalmuri runs without installation, making it ideal for USB use, and offers an intuitive interface that’s easy to learn. Kalmuri key features: Video recording support (designation of whole screen and area) Whole screen, active program, window control, area application Extract text from images using optical character recognition (OCR). Support for PNG, JPG, WEBP, BMP, GIF file formats MP4 video recording powered by FFmpeg for high-quality results Full web page capture Share the captured image on the web Color extraction function Printer output Hotkey settings Adjustable via keyboard for area capture (Arrow key, Ctrl+Arrow key, Shift+Arrow key) File name format (sequential, datetime) Free to use it at work, at home, in government offices, at school, etc. Using Kalmuri portable for video recording Kalmuri’s portable version doesn’t include FFmpeg, which is required for video recording. Without it, you’ll get an “error FFmpeg.exe not found” message. To fix this, download FFmpeg from the provided link, extract it, and place FFmpeg.exe in Kalmuri’s folder. Kalmuri will then recognize it automatically, allowing you to start recording in high quality instantly. Kalmuri 4.2.5 changelog: Fixed an intermittent crash when using Area Capture Improved stability for Area Capture and screen recording Resolved a capture issue that could occur right after startup Download: Kalmuri 4.2.5 | 24.2 MB (Freeware) Download: Kalmuri Portable 4.2.5 | 2.1 MB View: Kalmuri Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • They have lots of info on me, I have a facebook account and have done so for years, it was the thing to have then. My phone number is not on it. I don't have the Facebook app on my phone these days, just the messenger part, and only for a couple of people to contact me, most will text me via SMS or phone. I agree, Meta, like others, even without an account will know something about me. Just have to try and keep some things private Also, never saw the need for Whatsapp, people used to ask for me to join it, but as I said to them, I have SMS and a phone, use that, or email
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Juan Dela earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Collagen Project earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      273
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      143
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!