Recommended Posts

^ yeah its hard to beat pfsense for "cost" FREE, you just need to provide some hardware to run it on and some setup time.

It will run on pretty much anything, you have a old pc around? There you go - your hardware.

  • Like 2

Any Cisco ISR will do this. But honestly you should be looking for a combined device with a NIPS, Malware filtering go incoming downloads aswell as the bog standard stateful firewall.

As always its the rules that matter and unless its set to implicit deny its worthless.

A issue also with pFsense is that other people in the office mostly know how to control it....With most common routers, this is possible With pFsense you have to take 10 minutes.

If you don't give them the admin password they will not be able to control it.

  • Like 2

dude I have been trying to help him in the other thread he has started.. If your not talking a 150 router its going to be over budget. Reread what he posted - he wants the other others to be able to control it.

He has no concern with content filtering, talk of SNORT - you might as well be talking talking nuclear physics to a 3 year old.

His clients ask his 10 year old zyxel for dns, and they are members of domain - I would bet this is 99% of his issues. The router his looking for is something you would pick up at your computer store for $20, not a SMB/Enterprise class firewall.

"A issue also with pFsense is that other people in the office mostly know how to control it....With most common routers, this is possible With pFsense you have to take 10 minutes."

I don't get it. It's a problem when people know how to control it? It takes a whopping 10 min to look at the GUI to figure it out? To me, it sounds like he doesn't want them to be able to figure it out and it is a problem if they can.

I don't think english is his native language.. screen shots of machines are in spanish I believe.

Notice the "With pFsense you have to take 10 minutes." - and in his other thread he clearly states that he looked at pfsense but it was too complicated ;)

"A way better firewall; pFsense seems complicated so Im thinking Cisco or DD-WRT."

So I take it he wants the office to be able to understand the router, not the other way around.

pFSense.. it is free.. I am sure you have some old hardware you can put it on.. I am not sure why you would want the whole office to use it..? They'll just have that crap shredded to pieces.. Sonicwalls are ok for the money.. you get what you pay for in that aspect.. If you are dead set against doing what most of everyone here is recommending.. look into getting a nice Cisco Router and loading DD-WRT

Let's be real for a second. Unless you're doing Site to Site VPNs, or need a remote access VPN for mobile users, then you might want to consider keeping a simple router setup. You really aren't going to find a "real" firewall that Joe Enduser can understand and operate. NAT, PAT, and VPN cryptography isn't something even the normal "admin" understands. This is just a pill that has to be swallowed. They might be able to set up users or something for remote access, but everything else should probably be left alone. If they don't then who do you think they will end up calling for help?

That being said. If a true firewall solution is what's needed, then if you have the knowledge (and believe me it takes a good bit) then a Cisco ASA 5505 is going to be about the best you can get for a very small office or a spoke site. If the learning curve is to great, then go with SonicWall gear, as others have mentioned. Either way you go, make sure that (as with all technology implemented in a production/business environment) you get a support contract, to get updates/assistance etc.

Don't waste time on unsupported freeware products. Not only is this very unwise, but you'll find yourself tearing all of them out if a merger ever happens because they aren't "standard" gear that most companies use.

Let's be real for a second. Unless you're doing Site to Site VPNs, or need a remote access VPN for mobile users, then you might want to consider keeping a simple router setup. You really aren't going to find a "real" firewall that Joe Enduser can understand and operate. NAT, PAT, and VPN cryptography isn't something even the normal "admin" understands. This is just a pill that has to be swallowed. They might be able to set up users or something for remote access, but everything else should probably be left alone. If they don't then who do you think they will end up calling for help?

That being said. If a true firewall solution is what's needed, then if you have the knowledge (and believe me it takes a good bit) then a Cisco ASA 5505 is going to be about the best you can get for a very small office or a spoke site. If the learning curve is to great, then go with SonicWall gear, as others have mentioned. Either way you go, make sure that (as with all technology implemented in a production/business environment) you get a support contract, to get updates/assistance etc.

Don't waste time on unsupported freeware products. Not only is this very unwise, but you'll find yourself tearing all of them out if a merger ever happens because they aren't "standard" gear that most companies use.

I don't see how you think PFSense, Smoothwall, Monowall, Untangle, etc, aren't REAL firewalls? I agree they aren't at the same level of an ASA, but there is nothing wrong with them. I know a LOT of businesses that use PFSense. For one thing, to get any support with the ASA (including downloads for upgraded firmware), then that will be more money.

For that matter, most of those firewalls have support options available, either through them or someone else. You also don't need a support contract. Just pay when you need it from one of those companies or vendors.

If you can't figure out PFSense, or any other firewall, an ASA isn't going to be any easier.

I don't see how you think PFSense, Smoothwall, Monowall, Untangle, etc, aren't REAL firewalls? I agree they aren't at the same level of an ASA, but there is nothing wrong with them. I know a LOT of businesses that use PFSense. For one thing, to get any support with the ASA (including downloads for upgraded firmware), then that will be more money.

For that matter, most of those firewalls have support options available, either through them or someone else. You also don't need a support contract. Just pay when you need it from one of those companies or vendors.

If you can't figure out PFSense, or any other firewall, an ASA isn't going to be any easier.

I didn't say that the ASA was the most "simple" solution, nor the most cost effective. I agree that it's quite the opposite. Just saying that amongst most large enterprises it's what I see the most of. If you have the knowledge, you can get a 5505 going for < $1000.

If I couldn't go the ASA route, then I wouldn't hesitate going SonicWall simply because of the quality support and also due to the fact that most enterprise level engineers are familiar with them.

If someone calls me in the middle of the night for a support call, and I have to tunnel into some homebrew PFSense box, then the first thing that pops in my head before I VPN to the customer's site is "Oh man, I wonder what kind of run down gear they are running this on"....

In no way am I bashing PFSense, it's a wonderfull product made by very competent people, but at the end of the day, I'd rather be backed by either Cisco TAC, or Dell Support should something go wrong with the device and I need to have it RMAed out. This and many other reasons, stability, etc.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
    • 38% off a super insane price is still an INSANE price.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!