IE8 - four years old ...at what point should we developers kill it off?&#33


Recommended Posts

This next week will mark the 4th birthday of Internet Explorer 8... which in today's fast changing web browser landscape is pretty old indeed!

Some companies have already discontinued support for IE8, such as Google which dropped IE8 support across their range of services (YouTube, Gmail, Picasa, Docs, Drive, Blogger, etc) back in November 2012

Source: http://googleappsupd...s-internet.html

- which I think was a great move! ...but sadly, despite that being four months ago now, very few other big sites appear to have yet followed suit!

So I'm curious to know what other web developer's current stance is on IE8?

We're contemplating at what point to officially stop supporting IE8 for our own web-based app/service. We'd love to drop it now as it holds back what we can do, but given that Windows XP is still very popular - particularly in corporate environments (and remains supported by Microsoft until next 2014!), and the highest version of IE that Windows XP users is only IE8... we're in two minds as to just when to no longer support IE8 (yes, or course XP users could just use another, more modern, browser instead of IE8 - but not if they're in a corporate environment that forces them to use XP + IE8, etc)

So fellow web developers - Are you still maintaining IE8 compatibility with your web sites/apps/services? ...or given the now global availability of IE10 for Windows 7 (and later), have you already dropped, or are planning to drop IE8 support in the near future?

Some companies have already discontinued support for IE8, such as Google which dropped IE8 support across their range of services (YouTube, Gmail, Picasa, Docs, Drive, Blogger, etc) back in November 2012

Source: http://googleappsupd...s-internet.html

- which I think was a great move! ...but sadly, despite that being four months ago now, very few other big sites appear to have yet followed suit!

Although I'm no web developer, I'm not sure 'one' equates to 'some'

I've seen noone else drop IE8 support.

And since developers seem to be afraid of ever alienating anyone I don't expect to see more people drop IE8 support until MS drops XP support.

Although I'm no web developer, I'm not sure 'one' equates to 'some'

There are others besides Google (example: http://docs.moodle.org/dev/Moodle_2.4_release_notes#Requirements), but I agree they are currently limited in number, and Google is perhaps the most notable example to date!

I agree with you that developers are nervous about dropping IE8 support in case it alienates certain users, which is why I'm keen to "gauge" what other developer's plans are for their continued IE8 support?

It's the whole IE6 debate again - which Microsoft have stated that they will support until Windows XP SP3 support ends, meaning IE6 will still be officially supported until 2014, 13 years after its release!

Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8196242.stm

Now, I think there are now very few sites/web apps/services that still maintain any sort of IE6 compatibility, despite Microsoft still officially supporting IE6 until next year!! ...so I would hope that the argument that developers should continue to support a browser until its vendor's own support ends, wouldn't necessarily need to apply to IE8 (because it certainly didn't with IE6!)

unfort we are screwed because microsoft never made ie9 for xp they should of atleast ported the engine doesnt have to be with the new graphics accelerator

Why should they have ported IE9 to XP? Windows XP was already in extended support when IE9 was released, that basically meant that no features would be backported to that dated OS. Had XP mainstream support ended one month earlier it wouldn't even have obtained IE8 and would be still stuck with IE7.

IE9 requires a platform upgrade, that would have required Microsoft to port the entire graphics library including Direct3D, DirectWrite along with a bunch of DX10+ stuff to XP, that was not feasible since XP was already too dated.

IE8 won't die this fast. I am working on a client project and one of our target configs is Vista + IE8! I felt sad when I read that the first time. :( I wish companies upgraded faster but...

On the other hand Google has really stopped caring about browsers besides Chrome so they are not really a gold standard in this matter.

for client sites we always support IE8. Potentially losing the client 10-12% of business isn't really acceptable.

I share your concerns! - but it is a vicious circle! - I mean, as long as client's don't update their browsers, developers feel they have to continue to support them... but then when developers continue to support old browsers, client's then don't see any real need/urgency to update their browsers! ...and so it goes on!

That's why I admire Google for taking a stand at the end of last year and no longer supporting IE8 - which will have undoubtedly prompted users to update their browser/switch to a more modern browser!

I wonder if developers who have dropped support for IE8 have actually seen any real noticeable loss/decrease of clients/customers though? ...or after some initial grumbling that they have to update their browser, do clients/customers generally accept that fact?!

IE8 won't die this fast. I am working on a client project and one of our target configs is Vista + IE8! I felt sad when I read that the first time. :( I wish companies upgraded faster but...

At least with Vista you CAN run IE9... so maintaining IE8 support I would have thought would have been less of an issue (not to mention more work!) for you?

You're right - IE8 won't die this fast, just as long as us developers continue supporting it! ...but I agree with you that it's also the companies that are to blame! ...in fact, I'd go one step further and say it's Microsoft that are to primarily to blame, for continuing to support very old/obsolete browsers - because they are only really pandering to large companies/corporations with nervous IT departments who aren't keen on rolling out newer versions of IE.

If Microsoft made a stand and ended support for such browsers sooner, corporations would then be more inclined to roll out updated IE browsers, meaning developers can then concentrate on developing better apps/sites that take advantage of newer standards/technologies rather than having to spend time maintaining backwards compatibility with out-dated browsers!

At least with Vista you CAN run IE9... so maintaining IE8 support I would have thought would have been less of an issue (not to mention more work!) for you?

You're right - IE8 won't die this fast, just as long as us developers continue supporting it! ...but I agree with you that it's also the companies that are to blame! ...in fact, I'd go one step further and say it's Microsoft that are to primarily to blame, for continuing to support very old/obsolete browsers - because they are only really pandering to large companies/corporations with nervous IT departments who aren't keen on rolling out newer versions of IE.

If Microsoft made a stand and ended support for such browsers sooner, corporations would then be more inclined to roll out updated IE browsers, meaning developers can then concentrate on developing better apps/sites that take advantage of newer standards/technologies rather than having to spend time maintaining backwards compatibility with out-dated browsers!

The biggest problem with IE8 is performance. We don't care much about fancy CSS effects and others can be worked around. The rendering speed and JavaScript engine on the ther hand are a real problem.

"IE8 - four years old ...at what point should we developers kill it off?!"

4 years ago.

---

Actually just installed XP on an old P4 and IE8 was the only version of IE that didn't crash after 20 seconds

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • You sound like some eastern Ukrainians before the war: "I didn't vote for USSR disbanding - I want Ukraine to be part of Russia again" 🤣
    • Uninstalr 3.1 by Razvan Serea Introducing Uninstalr: Easy to use and very accurate software uninstaller for Windows. It can uninstall multiple apps at the same time and we think it’s pretty cool. Developed with expertise by Macecraft Software - the minds behind jv16 PowerTools. Key Features Batch uninstall many apps at the same time. Supports unattended uninstallation of apps. Supports monitoring of new software installations. Also detects portable apps and previously uninstalled software leftovers. Shows all the data added to your system by installed software on a file by file basis. Shows all the data it will remove before starting the uninstallation. Filter and search the list of installed software. According to our benchmark, Uninstalr is the most accurate software uninstaller by leaving the least amount of leftovers when uninstalling apps. Supports detection and uninstallation of Microsoft Store, Steam, Big Fish Game System, Chocolatey, NuGet and Ninite installed software. Supports Windows Dark Mode. Supports Windows 11, 10, 8 and 7. Comes with these translations builtin: Chinese Simplified, Chinese Traditional, Czech, Danish, English, Filipino, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hindi, Hungarian, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Malay, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Spanish, Swedish, Thai, Turkish, Ukrainian and Vietnamese. Has a single executable file portable version and a normal setup version. Uninstalr is freeware, lightweight and easy to use. No bells and whistles, no nonsense. Uninstalr’s custom uninstallation engine has a dedicated support for the detection and uninstallation of 15 types of apps: Normal Windows apps Microsoft Store apps Portable apps Chocolatey apps Ninite apps PortableApps.com apps Steam games EA App games Epic Games Store games Riot platform games GOG Galaxy games WarGaming.net games Battle.net games itch.io games Big Fish platform games Uninstalr 3.1 changelog: Key Changes Uninstalr now starts and shows the list of installed apps faster after the initial scan has been completed, and with much smaller memory usage. Uninstalr now detects and highlights apps that automatically start with Windows. Greatly improved the detection of portable apps. Improvements New feature: Uninstalr now detects and highlights apps that automatically start with Windows. New feature: Uninstalr now highlights possible leftovers and apps from Russia and China. This can be disabled from the Settings. New feature: A new filter that allows you to show only software that is installed to other than the system drive. New feature: Users can now select to always do the deepest and the most accurate scan for installed apps, at the cost of the analysis taking a longer time. Greatly improved the detection of portable apps, such as added dedicated support for MiTeC, EZ Tools and SysInternals tools. Improved support for portable apps installed via Windows System Control Center (WSCC). NirSoft portable apps are now listed with "NirSoft" prefix for easier identification. Improved the speed of uninstalling apps. The main installed software listing search will now find "Xbox GameBar" if you search for "Game bar" and vice versa. The tooltip now displays more detailed information of the installed apps, such as its registry key and uninstaller path. The links in the About section now look more like clickable links. The main menu is now more clearly indicated in the main user interface. Microsoft Teams Meeting Add-in for Microsoft Office ships with some Windows 11 installations and is now considered a builtin Windows app and only listed if builtin Windows apps filter is enabled. Added a Help button to the main user interface that opens the help section of the website. Added an option not to close Uninstalr after uninstallation. If you open the Uninstalr website from the app, the website now receives the version number of your current Uninstalr version and warns you if you are using anything but the latest version. Improved the accuracy of the New Software Monitor. Improved confirmation messages for Steam and other platform related uninstalls. Improved the uninstallation performance of Steam games. Fixes: Known bug fixed: Some installed app names are capitalized incorrectly, such as "CCleaner Portable" is listed as "ccleaner portable". Known bug fixed: Some apps can be listed twice, for example, Smart Defrag can be listed once as Smart Defrag and then Smart Defrag Home. Known bug fixed: On the pre-uninstallation screen, the Scripts checkbox can be checked by default on Dark Mode but not on the normal mode. Known bug fixed: Perform Deep Analysis can be started only by clicking the button, not via the Right Click menu, main menu or F4 keyboard shortcut. Muse Hub could be incorrectly listed as Adobe Muse. SyncTrayzor was incorrectly detected as two unrelated software, SyncTrayzor and Syncthing. Smart Defrag was incorrectly listed twice as Smart Defrag 11 and Smart Defrag Home. It was possible to enter non-printable characters to the search input boxes of the main screen, and the path listing screen, which caused the UI to look funny. Changing the translation from Settings, especially many times in a row, caused the UI to distort. If you had multiple instances of portable apps on your system, such as the 64b and 32b versions of the same portable app, typically only one of them was detected, not both. In some very rare cases, Uninstalr UI could start with random characters in its search input boxes, which could make the UI look rather confusing. This was a rare issue, only reported by two users. The pre-uninstallation screen could display non-existing paths for example as the software's installation directory or main exe file. This was a cosmetic issue. New Software Monitor cannot detect the installation of Claude. Selecting all the found software made the UI look funny with the top panel covering everything else (because the names of all the selected software were listed there). Sometimes a Steam game could be listed a normal app instead of a Steam game. If the system restart after an uninstallation is delayed, e.g. because of Windows Updates being installed, this additional delay is incorrectly added to the time how long the uninstallation process took. This cosmetic bug could cause the program incorrectly report an uninstallation time longer than the actual uninstallation time. Uninstalling Minecraft could simply fail. The Only scan the system drive for installed apps setting does not fully work. If some apps are installed to a non system drive and this setting is enabled, the app could still be detected and listed on the main user interface. Changing any settings could also incorrectly alter the Only Scan The System Drive For Installed Apps setting. Microsoft OneDrive and Copilot are not always detected. If you enter something to the search filter field, then select the text and press the Delete key, this triggers the Uninstall button click even if your intent was to delete the text input. If you press the F5 key to refresh the screen during the uninstallation loading screen, the program will crash. If you enabled some setting, such as "Do not analyze installed app installation sizes", it could automatically be unchecked later. Uninstalr doesn't warn you if you try to remove Fortec antivirus. There should be a warning if user attempts to remove any antivirus or antimalware type program. Such programs should not be uninstalled using a third party uninstaller, as they are typically protected against automated uninstallation, for security reasons. With "Do not analyze installed app installation sizes" option checked from the Settings, Uninstalr could still display some installation size related elements in the UI which was confusing. The "Only scan the system drive" option moved under Improve Scan Speed from the General settings. If two software have the exact same name and version number, selecting both of them for uninstallation fails because only one is actually selected. Sorting the installed apps by size sometimes fails and the order is incorrect. The "Don't show which paths are currently analyzed" did not work correctly - some parts of the UI still show the currently analyzed path with this setting checked. The "Don't list software less than 10 MB" filter did not work correctly - some apps smaller than 10 MB could still be listed. Uninstalr could start very quickly and display an empty list of detected apps. Restarting the app usually fixed the issue and the list of installed apps was properly displayed. If you placed portable Uninstalr to a same folder with other portable apps, those were not detected because Uninstalr automatically added its installation folder to the ignore list. When trying to uninstall some specific software, Uninstalr could get stuck on the Searching for more data relating to the app phase. Uninstalr could sometimes do a silent uninstallation even if user had unchecked the Perform a silent uninstallation option. Known issues: Uninstalr can fail to run with an Out Of Memory error in systems that have a lot of installed apps. Using the New Software Monitor tool multiple times during one session can cause the program to get stuck on the Scanning stage. The "uninstallation completed" message box sometimes closes when the user moves the mouse cursor over the button before user clicks it. There is no feedback for the user after Fix Information feature has been used. The Right Click menu's Select by publisher option can display the number of apps per each publisher without correct vertical alignment. The default user interface might not display all of the found installed apps if you have over 600 installed apps. If you do, using the Screen Reader Compatible Interface solves the issue. Leftover apptype filter checkbox is shown in red font only in Dark Mode. Clicking the app's icon from the Windows Taskbar doesn't minimize/restore the app like other apps. The warning about an app that user wishes to uninstall being related to some other app user did not select can sometimes be inaccurate. If app's language is changed without restarting Uninstalr, the list of installed software might not automatically refresh. When software is being uninstalled, the UI can say it is processing paths unrelating to the uninstalled app. This is purely cosmetic and does not mean these paths are removed. Uninstalr might not properly detect and/or uninstall Steam games if they are installed to a drive different than Steam's default location in C:\. You might see "This action is only valid for products that are currently installed" error message from Windows Installer during uninstallation. This is a cosmetic issue. Download: Uninstalr 3.1 | 7.1 MB (Free, paid version available) Download: Uninstalr Setup 3.1 View: Uninstalr Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • I and many others did not vote to get out of the E.u because of Putin or Farage, we did so for our own reasons. You don't have to tel me what my own did or did not do when it comes to the E.U. The EEC is or was the European Economic Community, a different beast to what the E.U is now.The EEC was a mainly about trading, the E.U have gone far beyond that and as I have said before, is now more of a United States of Europe. The U.K did not vote to join a United States of Europe. Anyway, they did not want us in there in the first place, Charles de Gaulle stopped us joining as he claimed we didn’t agree with the core ideas of integration. He was not wrong and that is why we voted out of the E.U when the time came. I was not old enough to vote the first time. My only regret is that we did not have the referendum years ago and got out years ago. If we rejoined, we would have to agree to join the Euro and no doubt Schengen, agree with freedom of movement, we have enough problem with people coming over here as it is. i have no problem with people coming over here if they work and don't try to push their way of life onto us. The E.U has a currency, freedom of movement, an anthem a flag, a parliament, well they are there, not sure if they do anything. Don't sound like something that is just for trading. Oh yeah, also wanted a euro Army. How many stupid rules have the E.U made that we had to follow? I doubt I will see the Uk rejoin the E.U, which suits me. Oh yeah, my partner is Polish, she came over here before Poland joined the E.U and she got fed up of people just coming over here with ease, while she had to struggle. She is now a British citizen and have been for a fair few years
    • Hello, Paul. Thanks for the editorial. It was interesting. I'm going research more into the app and its concept. Of course, if you know me at all, you know that I'd say your articles needs some editing! I always do, don't I? For instance, the article occasionally mentions relays before defining it.
    • Screamer is 50% off on Steam, making it £24.99 here in the UK: https://store.steampowered.com/app/2814990/Screamer/ You might remember the series from the mid 90s / early 2000s, this new game is also by Milestone who created the older games.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!