VGLeaks: First look as Durango XDK (always connected, kinect required)


Recommended Posts

If mandatory installs are like Office 2013 streaming installs, it won't be much of a problem really.

Always on, always connected sounds more like a marketing term than a requirement. I guess it will be same as ps4 and will be using the connected standby mode for updates.

It is a marketing term really, I remember them using it before for other things.

Errr. size on disk has no relevance to what resolution the game runs at, in fact chances are a game with smaller disk size would in fact run at higher resolution on the console, and last I checked more games ran at high er res on the 360 than the PS3, especially multi platform games.

that argument makes no sense at all.

What? If it is a higher resolution, they can in theory use higher quality textures and assetts, which would not doubt take up more disk space.

And again, taking words out of context to make your point. My words clearly stated...

Actually it might. A decent amount of those games he listed from the PS3 run at a slightly higher resolution then 360 games. Somebody took the time to figure out the native resolution of most games on each system here. The games that do run at a similar resolution on the 360 also sometimes come with two disks (Halo 4).

I was in fact looking at the games TheLegendOfMart posted, and it is pretty easy to see those first party Sony titles usually run at a higher resolution then the 1st party developed MS titles. Not sure how or why, but considering how extensive the page I posted was, I take this persons word for it.

With Halo 4, the second disk is purely multiplayer content, and the most likely reason it's separate is so that you can install the disk to your console (I don't think the Xbox supports installing specific content from a disk to the HDD, it's an all or nothing type affair)

Is it not the MP content because both SP and MP could not fit on one disk? How is that not running out of room?

What? If it is a higher resolution, they can in theory use higher quality textures and assetts, which would not doubt take up more disk space.

And again, taking words out of context to make your point. My words clearly stated...

Which was my point, the games with higher res assets would then give lower frame rates, not higher as you claimed. But that wasn't what you said anyway. You said bigger disks meant the game could run at higher resolution, a connection that doesn't exist, anywhere. No as I said, in that case it would be the other way, the games with bigger disks and thus higher red assets would then have to run a lower res to compensate.

There was toying out of context about my quote there.

Also some first party MS titles technically run at higher res, since they render each scene twice, ref. Halo games, which use double pass rendering.

Point being, disk size has nothing to do with render size. And as ha been pointed out numerous times, the PS3 didn't have enough memory to really make use of the BD storage space.

Is it not the MP content because both SP and MP could not fit on one disk? How is that not running out of room?

Same assets on mp and sp. jus different map files, the map files themselves aren't that big, it's the assets that eat up room.

I can't see what any of the issues are.

When I used to be a PC gamer (pre-steam's preloader) I would have to INSTALL the game before I could play it. If i ran out of space on my HDD I would either uninstall a game or buy a new HDD. So everyone moaning about that is clearly nuts or under 20.

Installing onto the Xbox 360 & PS3 is optional and i presume a minority used it, but having it mandatory for the next Xbox isn't a deal breaker, it bares no impact on my gaming experience and entertainment. thats why i buy a console to get entertainment. If it loads quicker then its great. I can't see how this is a negative point at all.

Always on/connected - Not an issue, my pc/laptop is always connected to the internet when its turned on, and my 360 automatically connects to Xbox Live. Can't really see how thats an issue? As long as the DRM thats implemented isn't invasive in any way and detrements my gaming experience then I couldn't care less.

Kinect bundled with the Xbox and being required to plug in? - Great! I've always toyed with the idea of getting a Kinect but never got round to it. Having it with the new xbox means devs can integrate it more and actually make it worthwhile to have. Yes having it plugged in as a requirement is a pain but get over it. As yet we don't know why thats required or what they intend to use it for other than the obvious so any comments really are uneccesary until we at least know more.

It's very likely that Kinect is integrated into nextBox and only thing you need to "connect" are the actual sensors(cameras, mics etc.) which for practical reasons can't be integrated.

When I used to be a PC gamer (pre-steam's preloader) I would have to INSTALL the game before I could play it. If i ran out of space on my HDD I would either uninstall a game or buy a new HDD. So everyone moaning about that is clearly nuts or under 20.

You've never been able to play the game from a CD/DVD in the PC, you've always had to install it, so the comparison is silly.

Kinect bundled with the Xbox and being required to plug in? - Great! I've always toyed with the idea of getting a Kinect but never got round to it. Having it with the new xbox means devs can integrate it more and actually make it worthwhile to have. Yes having it plugged in as a requirement is a pain but get over it. As yet we don't know why thats required or what they intend to use it for other than the obvious so any comments really are uneccesary until we at least know more.

Having it included with the system doesn't really changed the fact that flailing your arms around like a fool has no practical use outside of things like just dance and kinect sports.

You've never been able to play the game from a CD/DVD in the PC, you've always had to install it, so the comparison is silly.

Actually i'm pretty sure i remember playing The Ultimate Doom straight from the CD many many years ago.

When I used to be a PC gamer (pre-steam's preloader) I would have to INSTALL the game before I could play it. If i ran out of space on my HDD I would either uninstall a game or buy a new HDD. So everyone moaning about that is clearly nuts or under 20.

Installing onto the Xbox 360 & PS3 is optional and i presume a minority used it, but having it mandatory for the next Xbox isn't a deal breaker, it bares no impact on my gaming experience and entertainment. thats why i buy a console to get entertainment. If it loads quicker then its great. I can't see how this is a negative point at all.

At the moment (most) console games don't require any install. By making installs mandatory it means that users will have to manage storage space, particularly if the included storage is limited (I'd be surprised if Microsoft included more than 1TB of storage, which would only be enough for 20 installs at maximum size). I can easily see how that would be annoying for console gamers who haven't had to put up with that before.

I can't see what any of the issues are.

When I used to be a PC gamer (pre-steam's preloader) I would have to INSTALL the game before I could play it. If i ran out of space on my HDD I would either uninstall a game or buy a new HDD. So everyone moaning about that is clearly nuts or under 20.

Installing onto the Xbox 360 & PS3 is optional and i presume a minority used it, but having it mandatory for the next Xbox isn't a deal breaker, it bares no impact on my gaming experience and entertainment. thats why i buy a console to get entertainment. If it loads quicker then its great. I can't see how this is a negative point at all.

Consoles should have the ability to pop in a disc and play without any PC-like system set up. It seems the Nextbox will have something along these lines, but it still requires an install behind the scenes. Installing the game does have advantages, but with proprietary HDDs and limited space, install swapping is more than a fringe concern. And it something that should NOT even be in the picture. It's not a problem on PCs because people can get large, inexpensive HDDs from where ever they want. That is not the case with consoles.

Always on/connected - Not an issue, my pc/laptop is always connected to the internet when its turned on, and my 360 automatically connects to Xbox Live. Can't really see how thats an issue? As long as the DRM thats implemented isn't invasive in any way and detrements my gaming experience then I couldn't care less.

Your last sentence in that paragraph is the crux of the issue. Anyone who thinks the "always on, always online" is not DRM is fooling themselves. It is going to prevent used games and will most likely prevent offline play in order to stop piracy. (which of course won't work, and it will only affect legitimate customers as usual) As long as we can play our games offline when our internet decides not to work, then I'm fine with the always online "feature" too. However, this feature is still too vague so we will have to wait for specifics.

Kinect bundled with the Xbox and being required to plug in? - Great! I've always toyed with the idea of getting a Kinect but never got round to it. Having it with the new xbox means devs can integrate it more and actually make it worthwhile to have. Yes having it plugged in as a requirement is a pain but get over it. As yet we don't know why thats required or what they intend to use it for other than the obvious so any comments really are uneccesary until we at least know more.

Kinect is, and always will be, a gimmicky piece of hardware that no "true" gamer will want or need. Visual gestures and voice commands won't add any tangible value to typical games; and it will only ever be truly useful in dancing/exercise games. And it has already impacted those who don't want it because of the changes to the 360 dashboard. The nextbox requiring that it be plugged in is evidence that it's going to be a big part of the console's user experience which is not exciting for those of us who don't want it. Again, a feature like this should be optional.

As the info leak gets confirmed, the always on issue is beginning to pick up Internet steam, with prevention of playing used games being the focal point.

After install to HD, the Blu-Ray is unusable on another system???? Or rather uninstallable????

In terms of a legal stand point can they really end the used games market? Surely by their means of DRM to prevent used games being played will close down lots of businesses which im sure is against some fair trade acts or whatever.

Personally - I used to buy used games when I owned the orignal xbox, because i had limited income and you could actually get decent deals in the UK. Nowadays the games I would want to play are still near retail price even pre-owned, the value you get for a trade in is ridiculous and you might as well save for another week and buy the game brand new. That and with the bargains you can get on the internet I always go new over pre-owned as theres only usually a ?10-?15 difference.

I do however, understand, that many people still purchase used games etc and see it of more popularity in the US rather than in the UK (hardly anyone I know with a 360 has any preowned games, and nearly everyone I know has a 360).

But as others have said, until they specify how it works and how it affects us everything said here is pure speculation that is just going to cause difference of opinions and conflict.

After install to HD, the Blu-Ray is unusable on another system???? Or rather uninstallable????

You will likely have an activation code, like with Windows. Once you have activated your game you can probably play it offline on that console to your hearts content. Of course if you put the disc in another console the disc will work, however the activation code will have already been used. Again exactly like Windows, I could use my disc to install it on someone else's computer however my serial number would not activate it.

In terms of a legal stand point can they really end the used games market? Surely by their means of DRM to prevent used games being played will close down lots of businesses which im sure is against some fair trade acts or whatever.

No different than 99% of PC games that require cdkeys.

No different than 99% of PC games that require cdkeys.

www.gog.com,

Drm free, Activation free pc games.

If and this is still a big IF, they do some form of activation code it'd be much the same as devs having you pay for a new online pass for your used game. If a new code for a used disc is cheap it might not be a issue in the end. Again though, this is a big IF and until something official comes out we're all guessing here. The leaked documents don't say anything about used games or activation.

I don't see why anyone would have to manually manage installs. The game installs in the background, so you can start playing as soon as you pop in the disc, it's no different than it is today. There could be a setting to automatically uninstall the oldest played game when running low on disc space, so you don't have to worry about running out of space.

Why would they, the leaked documents are from the SDK that's meant for developers.

And those two things wouldn't be important to developers why? At the least needing activation would be pretty important to the people making the game.

You will likely have an activation code, like with Windows. Once you have activated your game you can probably play it offline on that console to your hearts content. Of course if you put the disc in another console the disc will work, however the activation code will have already been used. Again exactly like Windows, I could use my disc to install it on someone else's computer however my serial number would not activate it.

Then there's no need for always on Internet as it relates to game play/install. So we'll have to see just what's up when more details are release as the scenario you describe is basically how it is now. Rather than attached the DRM to the Always on, they should just say activation codes now required. Of course, you should be able to deactivate on a given console if you choose.

Having it included with the system doesn't really changed the fact that flailing your arms around like a fool has no practical use outside of things like just dance and kinect sports.

controlling videos, navigating menus for IE, netflix and any number of other non gaming stuff without having to pick up a controller which isn't natural to control GUI's with anyway. and choice control to play and pause movies when you get up to do stuff during a movie without picking up a controller. the new Ghost recon game. The reason there's no games that use the Kinect well except for fitness games nowadays is because it's not a natural part of every xbox, and the new Kinect 2.0 is also a LOW more accurate and sees a lot more detail. You don't need to flail. just like unlike the movies, you don't spin the wheel on your car 3 full turns when you do a 90 degree turn.

No different than 99% of PC games that require cdkeys.

True, however there isn't a large market (especially in the UK) for second hand video games for this reason. Most stores if not all refuse Computer games as you used to be able to easily copy and crack, and no proof of uninstallation etc.

Whereas video games once you handed the disc in, you can't play it (unless you managed to copy it and in any case, you'd have a cracked console so would probably pirate the games rather than purchase originally anyway)

Kinect is, and always will be, a gimmicky piece of hardware that no "true" gamer will want or need. Visual gestures and voice commands won't add any tangible value to typical games; and it will only ever be truly useful in dancing/exercise games. And it has already impacted those who don't want it because of the changes to the 360 dashboard. The nextbox requiring that it be plugged in is evidence that it's going to be a big part of the console's user experience which is not exciting for those of us who don't want it. Again, a feature like this should be optional.

Not true at all. When you can start recognizing fingers and maybe even eye movements as well as head and face you can do a lot of things with that.

Combine that with a cloud service and then illuminroom or the glasses then you can really go places. The only problem is your limited mind.

You can create new game experiences with it and that is what I want. I still love Skyrim, but I am so so tired of the same old games that everyone plays over and over and over again. The video game industry is in a huge rut. If you take something like Heavy Rain and add in the above with the cloud service updating the game on the fly with information and other things, the game can be dynamic and use your voice and fingers to do things in the game. Take out the quick time events in the game and interact in real-time that would be cool. Then maybe either add illuminroom / glasses and you can really start to change things.

The last thing you need is some form of physical feedback that you can feel and you would be good to go.

You can continue to play the same games we have been playing for 20 years with better graphics and some online play, or you can look for something beyond that. I am headed beyond that. I think that video games can become as mainstream as movies, but you will need to make some changes that are huge and that is fine with me.

You know what I find funny is now that I am working on my business I find so many things I would invest in. From 3D Printing to new Kinect Experiences that take all of the next generation technologies and combines them to make things more interactive and a lot more interesting.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • On the topic of being locked out of a service. Recently two different friends of mine got locked out of their Google accounts. Both were hack attempts and one of them is waiting 30 days before he can get back in. He had backup codes and MFA but not a passkey. It was a browser token hack. Anyhow he has to wait 30 days for the dispute or whatever to end. The other person only had a password and is screwed losing all of the email, docs and years of photos. Google won’t help her at all. Her fault because she had no backup/recovery setup. Enable passkeys if possible. Also do NOT use browser based password managers. If using a cloud service make sure it is one you can fully sync to one of your devices so you can back it up. Like a PC or Mac with some backup drive plugged into it. Google is the worst to use IMHO. You can’t sync your photos at all. You have to use the “Take Out” service which is manual and takes days. That service strips the meta data from your photos. Also Google Docs synced to a device are useless without a Google accounts. MS Office/Libre Office is not going to open a link to a Google doc to a dead account.
    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!