Those are not rights. Those were special treatments that were taken away that non-trans whatever didn't get. They should be treated like every other person, not special. They can still go get their "trans-affirming" care, they just have to pay for it like everyone else.
Realistically how many difficult thinking request does the average person needs per week? The simplest 'nonthinking' model is way more powerful than anything we had 18 months ago. While the average person using these things for?
I wonder how many games coding apps I've just thrown together for the sake of having fun or testing. I know I've done it.
I think we've got to a stage where we just randomly asking ChatGPT anything even if we don't use 95% of what we ask it. These thinking instances do have a cost, environmentally as well as other resources. As we all know the limits will go up, but I don't think it's a bad start.
no way that was one of the best microsoft app, sigh its bizarre how microsoft making the worse decision on everything.... so i guess time to ask a good replacement of that
"Let's take one of our most popular and highly rated apps and kill it to force people into the Copilot app no one wants and with fewer features! That's the ticket!"
Idiots. I used Lens all the time and it works great. Don't care if the other apps are subscription based, I'm not installing Copilot.
Weekly reasoning requests limit went down from 2900 ( 100 o3, 2100 o4-mini, 700 o4-mini-high) to just 200 GPT5 thinking requests per week.
Absolute scam altman move
Recommended Posts