Secure Boot complaint filed against Microsoft


Recommended Posts

I know a couple of implementations offer revocation of third party keys, I've heard rumour some allow revocation of the master key and both of these cases allow for the addition of your own keys.

Your objection appears to be that some corporations want to control the entire signing process.. Something that no OEMs ever offered, and none offer despite MS getting them half way (I bet some allow the revocation of the primary signing key, but I've never bothered to look).. The issue of course being that Windows will object to a different signature on their binaries when it loads up.. So even if it was possible, you couldn't do it with Windows 8 >.>

You seem to want something that completely defies the point of the secure boot system :\

Also, I've yet to find a single business customer with a concern about the signing key in secure boot. Most of them don't care full stop. >.>

whats your motherboard type?

i would like to recommend it to some client,

as most Secure Boot capable motherboard i've seen, doesn't allow you to installing your own keys easily,

some said that user can change the key during Firmware Updates,

which mean the key must be specified somewhere in the firmware binaries!

...

Sabertooth Z77

It's not a low end mobo, and that's probably why it's more flexible in that regard.

You can download the latest BIOS from http://us.acer.com/ac/en/US/content/drivers.

I am. Seeing this now...thanks.. this was not an option sept of last year.... seems that is why in oct they released an updated one. Now have to teach him how to flash it... he is on assignment in germany now. He won't be back for another month. He said he still wants 7 win8 he says is sluggish.

I had a friend bring me his All in one with Windows 8

Acer Aspire AZS600-UR15

and wanted me to install Windows 7 on it- there was no option to turn off the check.

Windows 7 would pretend like it would install then at the point of installing boot loader - Fail- even when I placed a fresh drive int the machine.

It would not let it write to the boot sector.

I looked and there was nothing -- the only options were - to control boot order- check for extra hard drives and turn to compatibility mode.

I had to end up restoring the Windows 8.

Actually, I could think of a number of other reasons for that happening except Secure Boot. especially since the computer already allowed changing boot order and changing boot device.

So a user should be content with a system that lags? then? And they want to run a lower OS? - Priceless-

And upgrade of processor is not a valid option since it is a cpu/gpu built into an all in one .

Or you should be stuck with something they don't like then?

If Windows 8 lags, then it's either a so slow computer it'll lag on 7 as well, unlikely if it's a new computer, or there's something wrong with the computer and his techie friend should have known that instead of instantly blaming Windows 8 because he has a personal non rational hate for it, those are the things that make you unable to properly troubleshoot problems. you need objectivity.

I am. Seeing this now...thanks.. this was not an option sept of last year.... seems that is why in oct they released an updated one. Now have to teach him how to flash it... he is on assignment in germany now. He won't be back for another month. He said he still wants 7 win8 he says is sluggish.

Again, if his computer is sluggish, windows 7 isn't going to fix that, since no part of 8 is slower than 7, and many parts are in fact faster. so if it's sluggish something else is wrong.

and again, while your old bios didn't have the option to turn on secure boot, it was never on in the first place as has been explained to you, if it was on, it wouldn't have prevented writing the boot loaded, it would have prevented starting it and it wouldn't have allowed USB/CD boot. So there must be something else preventing writing the boot loader.

Again, if his computer is sluggish, windows 7 isn't going to fix that, since no part of 8 is slower than 7, and many parts are in fact faster. so if it's sluggish something else is wrong.

and again, while your old bios didn't have the option to turn on secure boot, it was never on in the first place as has been explained to you, if it was on, it wouldn't have prevented writing the boot loaded, it would have prevented starting it and it wouldn't have allowed USB/CD boot. So there must be something else preventing writing the boot loader.

It is not mine....the installer booted it only got as far as preparing.... failed on any hard drive writes..in an effort to fix the sluggushness ..I did a factory restore of it...when he bought it the literature he had said "now with secure boot" but we found no way to turn that off. That was september of last year.. when the user said sluggish he is talking about bsimpleb tasks like surfing the web. IE is what he said was slow and he did not like the tiles ... to him it is sluggish... I merely tried to give him what he needed. ...and I also tried which I know someone is going to say.. with and without the option of setup mode enabled and disabled. The booklet said it had secure boot... but no choice to go into advanced mode nor authenticate.....which the other person with the oct bios screen shows. That when he gets back we will flash it and try it again. I even tried one of my spare drives thinking it was something installed on his hard drive. That drive of mine I had wiped it and still no os other than 8 refused to install. So what else than a secure boot that his booklet said it had that was blocking it. Also on that spare drive I tried 7 .linux and then a copy of 8 which was the only one that would write to that spare drive. So please tell me what else it could be? I ended up putting his old one in and did a factory restore to help fix it. Then installed all updates.

Don't blame MS on that. Blame it on Linux not working with OEM to produce more Linux computers. Also, I thought Linux are mostly techy. They can just build the computer for themselves.

The other thing to look at is -- people say "BUY a Linux Computer" well that limits the choices and those choices are not very strong computers.

Other than -

https://www.system76.com

But still there are not a lot of options- They don't even offer any AMD chip-sets.

Again, if his computer is sluggish, windows 7 isn't going to fix that, since no part of 8 is slower than 7, and many parts are in fact faster. so if it's sluggish something else is wrong.

and again, while your old bios didn't have the option to turn on secure boot, it was never on in the first place as has been explained to you, if it was on, it wouldn't have prevented writing the boot loaded, it would have prevented starting it and it wouldn't have allowed USB/CD boot. So there must be something else preventing writing the boot loader.

There are a number of fringe cases where in 8 performs significantly worse than 7 on certain hardware configurations.

In particular there are a number of issues with how the OS communicates with storage devices that causes repeated interrupts and makes the OS run like proverbial ass >.>

I don't know how MS buggered that one up tbh D:

Even the knowledgeable ones (Timothy Lottes for one example) seem to believe MS did it just to block competition. I'm really not sure what to think of these people.

How are they blocking the competition when you can just go into your bios and turn secureboot off?

So a user should be content with a system that lags? then? And they want to run a lower OS? - Priceless-

And upgrade of processor is not a valid option since it is a cpu/gpu built into an all in one .

Or you should be stuck with something they don't like then?

If the system lags that a simple case of a problem between chair and keyboard or HW failure.

Otherwise, yes to all.

Don't like it? Send it back while it is still in warranty.

If some idiot didn't research say the fact that you cannot upgrade a laptop's CPU, no one is to blame except that idiot.

I mean, you buy things by looking for qualities you want and reading reviews.

If the system lags that a simple case of a problem between chair and keyboard or HW failure.

Otherwise, yes to all.

Don't like it? Send it back while it is still in warranty.

Hhhe

If some idiot didn't research say the fact that you cannot upgrade a laptop's CPU, no one is to blame except that idiot.

I mean, you buy things by looking for qualities you want and reading reviews.

He bought it because it was the latest and he later found he did not liike win8. The reviews were good on it 9/10 liked it. He liked everthing but the os.

If the system lags that a simple case of a problem between chair and keyboard or HW failure.

Otherwise, yes to all.

Don't like it? Send it back while it is still in warranty.

Hhhe

If some idiot didn't research say the fact that you cannot upgrade a laptop's CPU, no one is to blame except that idiot.

I mean, you buy things by looking for qualities you want and reading reviews.

He bought it because it was the latest and he later found he did not liike win8. The reviews were good on it 9/10 liked it. He liked everthing but the os.

There are a number of fringe cases where in 8 performs significantly worse than 7 on certain hardware configurations.

In particular there are a number of issues with how the OS communicates with storage devices that causes repeated interrupts and makes the OS run like proverbial ass >.>

I don't know how MS buggered that one up tbh D:

I assume certain storage driver models were deprecated (the ones that call your devices SCSI for example) though I have no direct experience with this. It also may have just been a bug that was fixed already. Network drivers were similarly disappointing at launch and I can't say what's up with that, had to change mine from the defaults as fast as possible.

I still have an awful experience with a lot of current antivirus programs I've tried in 8 too with WinRT apps loading incredibly slow and such, and I wonder if other people are lashing out about that.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!