>4GB ram in win x86 possible?


Recommended Posts

is unlikely considering that 64-bit processors have wider registers (64-bits) to push more data through the pipes. It should be the same or better.

The amount of data doesn't affect the speed at which a smaller amount of data goes through it. It's pretty close to the same. It does depend on the processor arch and there is a tiny translation penalty for 32 bit apps.

Of course, there's also the portion of memory the GPU takes, 32 bit apps with LAA and all that to consider so it's not a simple comparison.

you know its possible for Pentium Pro processor can have up to 64 GB memory,

but only 4 GB can be accessed at a time.

PAE is an ancient old technolgy (1995), its already there before x86-64 CPU exisited,

but Microsoft only actively used it in their 64-bit OS.

Its not a Software limitation

yes it is, unless you're talking about CPU before 1998 that is.

XP pre-dates multicore CPUs, it isn't optimised for them in the slightest (let alone low power/scaling stuff which CPUs do now). Newer versions of Windows make much better use of the underlying hardware (DWM offloads all desktop drawing to the GPU, Direct2D/DirectWrite offloads all application drawing to the GPU, etc.)

What a load of crap. Multiple CPU systems were in use for many many years, the difference to the OS between a different CPU and a different core is very small.

What a load of crap. Multiple CPU systems were in use for many many years, the difference to the OS between a different CPU and a different core is very small.

For server class systems, yes. But the desktop certainly didn't have multiple core/CPU systems as the norm.

When XP was released, a system with 4 CPU cores and 4GB+ of RAM was a high end server and well outside the design specifications.

  • Like 1

Slumdog - Normally people are willing to give some consideration to alternative views, but you have pretty much the entire of the posters against you on this.

32bit will run more slowly on x64 enabled chips. The x64 chips either have less registers for x86 instructions, or virtualise the calls and instructions. Since the Core range, this has been the case, but it's becoming more pronounced over time as Intel and AMD start to push for more x64 usage. I am aware there was a register issue with certain batches of Core processors, but the Core2 range had fixed that and begun this trend.

On top of this, XP doesn't have access to DirectDraw/Direct2D, thus it IS slower for more complex graphical browser based workloads. Chrome and Firefox both leverage varying levels of Direct2D or proprietary hardware acceleration. Thus, both will be faster on 7/8.

A lot of the people in this thread are extremely knowledgeable in a vast array of disciplines. Pretty much everyone is saying you're wrong on this. If you choose not to regard this point of view, fine, but you shouldn't expect us to blow smoke up your ass to validate your views.

PAE cannot (to the best of my knowledge) be enabled on XP. Consider 64 bit systems, and consider Windows 7. Even if you don't like the interface, there are significant improvements to thread handling, core allocation, memory management, graphical interfaces, Direct X draw and layers. Hell, consider 8 and user Start8 or whatever you want. I don't care about the interface disagreements, but the kernel is much improved.

Even if you insist on using FIrefox in CPU rendering modes, you will find noteworthy performance improvements from the better process scheduling on 7.

Lastly: Even if you enable PAE on XP, there are issues with process limitations (something people mistook for threads.. seriously) and most apps are compiled to only address 2GB of space at a max. Unless you enable particular compiler flags, most compilers will automatically compile for a maximum of 2gb of addressable space per process.

So.. Time to move on.

EDIT:: It's worth noting my CPU knowledge is a little out of date. The_decryptor pointed out some changes to the Core iX processors that invalidated much of what I said about performance overheads. Either way, x64 is still faster >.<

  • Like 2

For server class systems, yes. But the desktop certainly didn't have multiple core/CPU systems as the norm.

When XP was released, a system with 4 CPU cores and 4GB+ of RAM was a high end server and well outside the design specifications.

I remember when XP came out, I installed it on a 2 year old laptop. It had a 300mhz processor, and 64mb of RAM. At school, the best computer was a 900mhz PC with something insane like 128mb of RAM. A year later, I was talking to a friend who built a computer with 256mb of RAM in his computer. This was enough for him to disable his page file.

I mean, I guess it's like using puppy Linux as your main OS. I don't know why but to each their own.

I remember when XP came out, I installed it on a 2 year old laptop. It had a 300mhz processor, and 64mb of RAM. At school, the best computer was a 900mhz PC with something insane like 128mb of RAM. A year later, I was talking to a friend who built a computer with 256mb of RAM in his computer. This was enough for him to disable his page file.

I mean, I guess it's like using puppy Linux as your main OS. I don't know why but to each their own.

My first build had 1GB of RAM on a Prescott based Pentium 4. I was blown away by the speed, XP screamed along.

I disabled PageFile and was blown away with the speed :D Now days, You don't need to disable paging because your system will have so much memory it only pages when MS's algorithm is being ****..

I liked XP (hated it when I first started using it) but 7 was a mile forwards in all regards. Vista was an improvement, but Microsoft has their priorities wrong. Even if you don't like Vista, there's nothing not to like about 7 >.<

EDIT::

Might I just add Greenwizard, your app isn't really a productivity app, some might contend it does the exact opposite :p

The amount of data doesn't affect the speed at which a smaller amount of data goes through it. It's pretty close to the same. It does depend on the processor arch and there is a tiny translation penalty for 32 bit apps.

But, any 64-bit data can now fit in a register. Unmentioned, but 64-bit processors also tend to have more registers as well.

What?

Can't use more than 4GB RAM with a 32-bit OS. If you want to use more, you'll have to dump that dinosaur of an OS you seem hell bent on using.

You missed the part where he said x64.. You know.. Being capable of more than 4GB of addressable memory O.o

You missed the part where he said x64.. You know.. Being capable of more than 4GB of addressable memory O.o

No I didn't. I was surprised that anyone would say that XP x64 was a good OS. The comment below "What?" was to the OP. Will edit.

No I didn't. I was surprised that anyone would say that XP x64 was a good OS. The comment below "What?" was to the OP. Will edit.

Windows XP Professional x64 Edition (XP x64) isn't bad at all. Windows XP 64-bit Edition (XP 64-bit) on the other hand had isn't all that good because it wasn't supported well.

there are kernel hacks floating around, which enable PAE support in xp/vista/7 x86, but as others said, PAE has been disabled for a reason in the consumer editions of windows.

although the hacks do work, it's not advisable to use them, if you want to use the pc for multimedia/gaming stuff, because it's very likely you will run into incompatible drivers.

-andy-

It's almost like all his knowledge of computer and OS stopped at 2005. Welcome to 2013. Why are you hell bend on keeping Windows XP? What's SO good about XP that keeps you from upgrading to Win7 x64?

high standards and unwillingness to compromise... if i have to drop the standards might as well move to win8 x64. and yes im already triple booting these 3OSes so there is no question of being stuck in 2005.

btw where did you pull out the year 2005 from?

dated is still faster if you use a web browser other than ie.... which i suppose everyone does ALL the time.

im looking for hacks mainly.

Then read that article. It tells you how to enable it by editing your boot.ini file.

EDIT: Whoops, this one does: http://msdn.microsof...8(v=vs.85).aspx

2005 about is when the XP kernel and GDI was deprecated and Longhorn development was underway, I think.

Windows XP Professional x64 Edition (XP x64) isn't bad at all. Windows XP 64-bit Edition (XP 64-bit) on the other hand had isn't all that good because it wasn't supported well.

Well one of those is for Itanium processors, there's probably nobody who uses those aside in certain very, very specific server environments.

It's almost like all his knowledge of computer and OS stopped at 2005. Welcome to 2013. Why are you hell bend on keeping Windows XP? What's SO good about XP that keeps you from upgrading to Win7 x64?

He's one of the reasons why after 12 years, XP still has ~40% market share. The scary thing is that there are many, many systems admins that think like this, and mistake their own stubbornness, and unwillingness to adapt, as maintaining high standards.

He's one of the reasons why after 12 years, XP still has ~40% market share. The scary thing is that there are many, many systems admins that think like this, and mistake their own stubbornness, and unwillingness to adapt, as maintaining high standards.

scared for whom? srsly :shiftyninja:

More to the point, there are lots of people with not very much money >.<

Enabling PAE on XP will only enable access to 4GB of RAM >.>

pae is automatically enabled on xp sp3 + x86_64 processors... this thread is about going beyond 4gb... where is the vast array of expertise when after 5 pages the subject of the thread is not even grasped.? :/

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!