Is my "Enter" key really spoilt now? Razor Blackwidow


Recommended Posts

e395e8c8aa8c11e28bc322000a9d0dcb_7.jpg

So sad. I press it downed and it jammed. I used a screw driver to try pop it out, and it became like this. :(

In theory you only blow up the "stabilizer" part, if you put the key back on it should work as normally, problem is that it may pop out with force on one of the sides of the key, since the stabilizers are gone. (My keyboard has red switches and switches but no metallic thingy...)

Thanks, we have received your inquiry at the Razer Support Center.

Generally all inquiries are answered well within one working day. Occasionally, due to some inquires taking more research than others and also due to excessive demand, a reply may take longer than 24 hours. Please accept our apologies in advance for any reply that exceeds this time frame, but be assured we are working hard to get back to you as quickly as possible.

For your records, your case number is: 00097668

Best Regards,

The Razer Support Team

razer support is pretty good. i got a jacked up battery with my razer naga, and they sent me another battery within a week.

they made sure to let me know that it was a rare one time replacement though lol

I've heard pretty poor things about Razer support. It has what has kept me from buying a ultimate blackwidow 2013 KB

razer support is pretty good. i got a jacked up battery with my razer naga, and they sent me another battery within a week.

they made sure to let me know that it was a rare one time replacement though lol

My experience with razer support is exactly the opposite. My $130 razer mouse had an issue and not only did they make me pay for shipping for the replacement, I had to send my original to them first, and I had to pay for that as well. So may $130 mouse ended up costing me close to $170.

Imo everyone should stay as far away from razer products as they can. They're very cheaply made and they're basically designer products so they cost an arm and a leg.

To the OP...good luck getting it replaced. If you bought it within a year it should still be under warranty but like with my situation they'll probably make you pay for shipping.

I've heard pretty poor things about Razer support. It has what has kept me from buying a ultimate blackwidow 2013 KB

i dunno man ive only heard good things and this topped it for me https://www.neowin.net/news/razer-to-honor-orders-made-with-fake-90-percent-off-coupon

but in the OP's case i dont know what support will do for him as he broke the key using a screwdriver to pry it up maybe he can buy a new key + pieces from their support team i dunno

My experience with razer support is exactly the opposite. My $130 razer mouse had an issue and not only did they make me pay for shipping for the replacement, I had to send my original to them first, and I had to pay for that as well. So may $130 mouse ended up costing me close to $170.

Imo everyone should stay as far away from razer products as they can. They're very cheaply made and they're basically designer products so they cost an arm and a leg.

To the OP...good luck getting it replaced. If you bought it within a year it should still be under warranty but like with my situation they'll probably make you pay for shipping.

that sounds about right, MOST companies have you pay for shipping to them when dealing with RMA, ive yet to have a company pay for me to ship it to them

i dunno man ive only heard good things and this topped it for me http://www.neowin.ne...cent-off-coupon

but in the OP's case i dont know what support will do for him as he broke the key using a screwdriver to pry it up maybe he can buy a new key + pieces from their support team i dunno

that sounds about right, MOST companies have you pay for shipping to them when dealing with RMA, ive yet to have a company pay for me to ship it to them

Well, in comparison, Logitech doesn't. 3 times I've used their customer support. All 3 times they sent out replacements with no questions asked, I could keep my original products, and I didn't have to pay for shipping.

For reference though, the 3 times were for minor cosmetic issues, as well. Like the rubber coating starting to peel off on the grip for my G9 mouse. The razer mouse I sent back had an issue with the mouse wheel and the charging cord started fraying that made it unuseable.

Here's something else to consider. The third time I had to get help from logitech customer support my product was past it's 3 year warranty/purchase date. They still helped me with no questions asked. The issues I had with my $130 razer mouse all happened within 3 months of purchase.

Of course, maybe I just got lucky and some nice support people helped me with my logitech issues and the guy at razer was just a dick.

Well, in comparison, Logitech doesn't. 3 times I've used their customer support. All 3 times they sent out replacements with no questions asked, I could keep my original products, and I didn't have to pay for shipping.

For reference though, the 3 times were for minor cosmetic issues, as well. Like the rubber coating starting to peel off on the grip for my G9 mouse. The razer mouse I sent back had an issue with the mouse wheel and the charging cord started fraying that made it unuseable.

Here's something else to consider. The third time I had to get help from logitech customer support my product was past it's 3 year warranty/purchase date. They still helped me with no questions asked. The issues I had with my $130 razer mouse all happened within 3 months of purchase.

thats because you didnt have to send the old in, many companies make you do this and of course you shipping it to them will cost. Many companies have the practice you just spoke about too, they send you a replacement without wanting the old they wont charge you shipping

thats because you didnt have to send the old in, many companies make you do this and of course you shipping it to them will cost. Many companies have the practice you just spoke about too, they send you a replacement without wanting the old they wont charge you shipping

None of that changes the fact that pretty much every single razer product I've owned died within 6 months of purchase. And I've owned many razer products, not just one or two. But 5 or 6 different razer mice, and I take care of my stuff.

And I don't care about "many companies". I used Logitech vs razer as a comparison because they both make peripherals and I have owned and own many of their products. My experience with logitech vs. razer is a night and day difference.

I'm not saying logitech products are without their flaws, because they aren't. But their customer support makes those flaws hurt less when you invest a lot of cash into a product and something goes wrong.

Having to pay nearly $40 dollars extra on a brand new product that already cost $130 that had issues that should have been worked out in a simple QA testing session is not acceptable and that was the last time I have ever spent any money on razer.

In any case, none of this has to do with the OP. Sorry. :rofl:

My experience with razer support is exactly the opposite. My $130 razer mouse had an issue and not only did they make me pay for shipping for the replacement, I had to send my original to them first, and I had to pay for that as well. So may $130 mouse ended up costing me close to $170.

Imo everyone should stay as far away from razer products as they can. They're very cheaply made and they're basically designer products so they cost an arm and a leg.

To the OP...good luck getting it replaced. If you bought it within a year it should still be under warranty but like with my situation they'll probably make you pay for shipping.

Won't there be a local office (Singapore) that they will ask me to send to? I hope so. Have not heard from Support yet.

I will still try to get a mechanical keyboard but not with Razer anymore. :(

Any comments about Steel Series instead? :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      455
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!