Installer for Y'z Toolbar


Recommended Posts

Your re-distributing his software, aswell as editing it. I think you need to ask permission.

I'm not editing it. I added one theme to the themes folder. I did not edit any file (the DLL, the EXE, the two .LANG files, or anything).

Edit:

Copyright/Reproduction

? ? The author (M.Yamaguchi) owns the full copyright to Y'z ToolBar.

? ? I choose to allow the use, reproduction, and distribution of this software

? ? in a free manner, but only under the assumption that the contents of this

? ? archive are not changed or altered in any way, and it's contents are intact.

? ? (for any sort of reproduction please notify me fHowever, any user can freely change and distribute any created toolbar theme in

? ? an archive.n archive.

? ? The author assumes no responsibility, or gives any sort of guarantees for

? ? damages that may occur from using this software.

It says the contents cannot be changed, however it has an exception saying you can bundle toolbar themes without permission.

It's no different than say AutoPatcher or something like that, right?

AutoPatcher is a (great) program that installs zillions of Windows patches as well as a bunch of registry tweaks, PowerToys, and more. This is a setup program for Y'z Toolbar and only Y'z Toolbar.

Ask permission my ass!!!!

Do what you want with it. Are the police gonna come running around to your house. NO! Rubbish.

There is no copyrights on these things

Don't be stupid. The Y'z Toolbar program itself is considered intellectual property of the creator. :rolleyes:

@memodude: I'm using your installer. :)

Ask permission my ass!!!!

Do what you want with it. Are the police gonna come running around to your house. NO! Rubbish.

There is no copyrights on these things

Don't be stupid. The Y'z Toolbar program itself is considered intellectual property of the creator. :rolleyes:

Yep. Actually, everything you create inherently is "copyright"ed (unless you make it public domain). Registering a copyright just lets you sue people about it. Also, if someone infringes on your registered copyright, you still have to pay for your lawyer and all.

@memodude: I'm using your installer. :)

Nice. :)

Comments in bold. :D

Just wondering, how many people are using my installer? :)

I can't really see a use for it to be honest. I just unzip, bang it in a directory and shortcut to startup. It's not exactly a big program is it.

Using an installer would feel a bit like using an Uzi to swat a fly. (Not that it wouldn't be fun to try for a day!)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think the car analogy is more this: Left hand drive, basic commands on the left side of the infotainment screen. Right hand drive, basic commands on the right side of the infotainment screen. Granted, you're not swapping between the two often so it's doesn't really work. But it's to do with the proximity of you (your mouse, or the driver) to the controls.
    • I mean, the old one was broken and so stupidly complex for many users, so I don't see that as a feasible option. A context menu needs to be simple to use, and for me the Windows 11 style actually worked really well for me, and many others. I used to have to scroll the damn context menu just to get to "file properties" in Windows 10. That was not a good experience, and I'm sure you'd agree. What they're trying to do is make it the best of both worlds, as clearly you'd prefer the Win10 style. I'm curious how they're going to do this.
    • The "Show more options" has its place, as does the simpler context menu, but it should perhaps be a separate fly-out rather than relaunching the entire, old context menu. The old context menu was getting absurd in Windows 10. Often I'd have to make the context menu scroll just to get to "File properties" on my old laptop. Even without much installed, the amount of items was just too much. It's a context menu, not a "do all" menu. Making it configurable is fraught with challenges too, so I'm interested to see how Microsoft tackles this one.
    • I don't hate the new menus, I am not a fan of the lack of features and how they went live when they clearly are not complete. The menu itself presents much better than the previous - but what's lacking (IMO) is: 1) Any kind of automated manipulation such as: "this goes on the new menu because you use this feature more often on this filetype" "this is rarely used and will fall back to the old menu" 2) Any kind of user manipulation such as: "a UI to add/remove/order items to the new menu"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      262
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      86
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!