from Note I to Note II, should I go for WP8?


Recommended Posts

Fanboy rage?

If you had bothered to think about what you typed, you would realize it was a fanboy comment you made. The masses don't choose Android so they can futz around with developer options or root and mod their device. It was a very ignorant comment on your part, especially when the vast majority of Android users know nothing of adb or dd.

Yes, fanboy rage. It's the only explanation for the lack of reading comprehension here.

If you like to type obscure commands, choose Android, because you won't be doing that on Windows Phone (unless you want to SSH into another machine and type obscure commands... then yes, there are apps for that on Windows Phone).

No, he's not attacking Android saying that you need to type obscure commands. You don't need to. But if you want to, choose Android.

Yes, fanboy rage. It's the only explanation for the lack of reading comprehension here.

If you like to type obscure commands, choose Android, because you won't be doing that on Windows Phone (unless you want to SSH into another machine and type obscure commands... then yes, there are apps for that on Windows Phone).

No, he's not attacking Android saying that you need to type obscure commands. You don't need to. But if you want to, choose Android.

He was attacking android with his little comments. Read it again, all of it including his little salesman comment. You can type obscure commands in any OS. Either way, the fanboyism is coming from him and nobody else.

Yes, fanboy rage. It's the only explanation for the lack of reading comprehension here.

If you like to type obscure commands, choose Android, because you won't be doing that on Windows Phone (unless you want to SSH into another machine and type obscure commands... then yes, there are apps for that on Windows Phone).

No, he's not attacking Android saying that you need to type obscure commands. You don't need to. But if you want to, choose Android.

Are you out of your mind? It's very rare for anyone to have to use the console in Android, even most rooting processes are done with 1 click software these days. Go educate yourself and then come back to this debate when you actually have the slightest clue how Android really works.

Are you out of your mind? It's very rare for anyone to have to use the console in Android, even most rooting processes are done with 1 click software these days. Go educate yourself and then come back to this debate when you actually have the slightest clue how Android really works.

You're still not listening. I didn't say you have to use the console on Android. "vcfan" didn't say you have to use the console on Android. You obviously don't. We know that. Stop thinking that's what we're saying. We're not. We know you don't have to use the console on Android.

I said if you want to use the console, it's there. And if you want it, Android is what you need. If you want to be able to access it, don't get Windows Phone. If you don't need it, you can still choose either Android or Windows Phone. "vcfan" was simply saying that if you don't need access to the console (which would exclude Windows Phone), then he recommends Windows Phone.

Is that clearer? This is a simple concept. Heck, it's actually a complement.

Let me translate this to a different context:

If you need the ability to flash custom ROMs, choose Android. Otherwise, I suggest product X.

If you need blue kernel panic screens (and blue kernel panic screens are important to you), choose Windows. If you don't care what color your kernel panic screens are, try product X.

He was attacking android with his little comments. Read it again, all of it including his little salesman comment. You can type obscure commands in any OS. Either way, the fanboyism is coming from him and nobody else.

No, he wasn't attacking Android... at least not until the salesmen comment. You're just being way too sensitive. Huge misunderstanding.

You're still not listening. I didn't say you have to use the console on Android. "vcfan" didn't say you have to use the console on Android. You obviously don't. We know that. Stop thinking that's what we're saying. We're not. We know you don't have to use the console on Android.

I said if you want to use the console, it's there. And if you want it, Android is what you need. If you want to be able to access it, don't get Windows Phone. If you don't need it, you can still choose either Android or Windows Phone. "vcfan" was simply saying that if you don't need access to the console (which would exclude Windows Phone), then he recommends Windows Phone.

Is that clearer? This is a simple concept. Heck, it's actually a complement.

Let me translate this to a different context:

If you need the ability to flash custom ROMs, choose Android. Otherwise, I suggest product X.

If you need blue kernel panic screens (and blue kernel panic screens are important to you), choose Windows. If you don't care what color your kernel panic screens are, try product X.

No, he wasn't attacking Android... at least not until the salesmen comment. You're just being way too sensitive. Huge misunderstanding.

I guess everyone who saw his nonsense and commented is oversensitive too.

I guess everyone who saw his nonsense and commented is oversensitive too.

Well, the original sentence in question was ambiguous. It could be interpreted in multiple ways. You took it as an attack against Android. That wasn't his intention.

Why don't you use the new launcher 8? :D

https://play.google....nfo.tikusoft.l8

Because It won't give me live email tiles.

maybe it does, maybe I haven't tried this one. I did try a 8 launcher before. Let me try this one.

Well, the original sentence in question was ambiguous. It could be interpreted in multiple ways. You took it as an attack against Android. That wasn't his intention.

Yes it was.

You are right that it was ambiguous, and could be interpreted multiple ways. He confirmed it later that the way I took it was correct (as an attack) with his salesman comment. You would be correct that I (and others) took it the wrong way, had he not shown his true intentions later.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Looks like no official TBW rating, which should be a required listing in my opinion for sites like Amazon (hell, put it on the box too.)
    • I think I understood the article fine. Online password managers open users up to more possibilities of getting hacked, and due to KeePass being offline and local it reduces the idea of getting hacked. If someone chooses to put their database online they're kinda missing the point. With regards to the idea of the on-prem idea, I would have two issues. I'm not sure about the first issue, but I wouldn't be surprised about them offering a cloud storage for the passwords that most wouldn't bother to switch off, regardless of if they went for on-prem or not. The second issue is that the on-prem solution for Bitwarden costs money, whereas KeePass is free and open-source (as far as I am aware). The article points out how to sync the database between devices, and I recognise that deficiency in security. But it isn't a necessity. So both services can offer a same idea, but one is free and the other isn't...choices, choices.... But to each their own.
    • AB Download Manager 1.9.2 by Razvan Serea AB Download Manager is an open-source, feature-rich download manager designed to accelerate downloads, organize files efficiently, and provide seamless control over downloads. With support for multiple connections, resume capability, and an intuitive interface, it enhances the downloading experience for users seeking speed and reliability. The software integrates with various browsers, enabling quick link grabbing and batch downloading. It supports HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP protocols, ensuring broad compatibility with different file sources. Users can schedule downloads, set speed limits, and categorize files automatically for better organization. AB Download Manager is lightweight yet powerful, making it a great alternative to proprietary download managers. Its open-source nature allows developers to contribute, customize, and improve the software as needed. Whether you're downloading large files, managing multiple downloads at once, or seeking an ad-free experience, this tool offers a practical and efficient solution. Key features of AB Download Manager: Multi-Connection Support – Accelerates downloads by splitting files into multiple segments. Resume Capability – Allows paused or interrupted downloads to be resumed without starting over. Batch Downloading – Supports downloading multiple files at once for improved efficiency. Browser Integration – Captures download links directly from browsers for seamless operation. HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP Support – Ensures compatibility with a wide range of file sources. Download Scheduling – Enables users to automate downloads at specific times. Speed Limiting – Lets users control bandwidth usage for optimized performance. File Categorization – Automatically organizes downloaded files into designated folders. User-Friendly Interface – Simple and intuitive design for easy navigation. Cross-Platform Compatibility – Works on multiple operating systems. Ad-Free Experience – No intrusive ads or tracking for a clean user experience. AB Download Manager 1.9.2 changelog: Added New Twilight theme (#1292) Optional download completion notifications on Android (#1290) Fixed Fixed a crash on some older CPUs on Windows Fixed oversized system tray icon on macOS Improved Updated translations Prevented Android devices from sleeping while downloads are active (#1291) Various UI and UX improvements Download: AB Download Manager 1.9.2 | Portable | ~80.0 MB (Open Source) Download: ARM64 | Portable ARM64 | Android Links: AB Download Manager Website | Github Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • I am not surprised because life is the product of a lot of biochemical and physical processes that releases various energies as a by-product. The only thing new here is the detection of these photon emissions. The researches noted this "glow" is not a metaphysical one. They don't even immediately end when one is dead. Things like fires, light bulbs, and on a bigger scale stars release a lot more "light" and they are hardly alive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      516
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!