Recommended Posts

Is it far to compare Bill Gates to Da Vinci just to show the differences in how great they where and how long they will be remember? In 100 years I don't believe Bill Gates or Steve Jobs will be well known like Thomas Edison. Really, they help make computers what they are today, but they didn't create something new, they only made it better. I just think they will be known as another great ceo that did some great things for the time. Nothing revolutionary; just making good consumer products.

I think the average person in 60 years will have to look up the name Bill gates or Steve jobs to know who they are.

Does anyone know who Peter Carl Goldmark is? inventor of the color Tv! He made a better TV. I would be surprised if anyone knew who invented the cell phone, riding mower, Smoke detector, etc... These are all common consumer products that we take for granted and none of use really know who invented them.

No disrespect to the great inventors over the years but who really cares who invented what. Not many do, those who do have some short of reason they do (fans of product, etc.)

Bill and Steve are great now, but they are only so popular now because they where CEOs of great company's. People remember Steve going on stage with his black shirt and blue jeans talking about some of the biggest and most popular consumer products of our time. Not because he helped make those consumer products. He was a rock star, he is an idol. People loved seeing him, his complexion and everything about him. He was a cool hippie that made it big. That's why they are making a movie about him. That's why people know him so well.

Am I right? Am I wrong?

Like most things, it'll be buried in time. Someone will refer to them but those growing up (unless specifically interested in computer history) will probably be unaware.

There will more 'big figures' in history before then, each era will have their own idols and famous pioneers to stand on the shoulders of those that have stood before them.

We don't have an inventor of the hover board yet, I forecast that dude will be a legend ;)

if gates is not a main part of an extremely special invention or cure in his life time he will not be remembered generally at all. of course he will be part of some history compendium in the part about computer science, philantropist extremely wealthy man.

but apart from that, nope. noone with general basic knowledge will have heard of him.

I read an article that Bill Gates would be remembered in the third world countries for the next 100 years, and statues would be build to honour him.

Not because of Microsoft, but because of his charitable work.

yeah well that is how media might tell it. i can assure you, of the regular people in those countries noone has even heard of a man Gates.

in that area of information we are extremely manipulated and misinformed.

The same way John D. Rockfeller is...

I had written up a well thought out and researched response to your comment, but was lost accidently when I closed the wrong tab.

It could not be recovered.

But basically I don't think they compare because Rockfeller made history. He did things on the larger scale which nobody could compare to at the time. Bill gates hasn't even donated enough to stand out from donations made in recent years like Rockfeller did. Rockfeller had a lot more money to spend than Bill does. I don't have much to back this up because I'm not re writing my perfect response, but I had to give something. Also who is this Paul Allen? =-p

he will be mentioned. I remember that the 1980's and 1990's MS was an innovative warhorse. Everything revolved around MS. when Win95 came out,I remember the massive media blitz and seeing video of many people waiting in line to purchase the new Desktop OS. Bill Gates has contributed ALOT to computing and alot of it may be good or bad, depending on what side of the fence you are standing on in this debate but

Bill Gates WILL be remembered as a pioneer and leader of Microsoft. Microsoft has done alot for computing..yes, he will mostly be remembered by reference to MS mostly for the 80's and 90's.

I think Bill Gates will be mostly known more for creating Microsoft and Windows and partly for his charity work! People in 100 years will say " I remember Bill Gates, he created Microsoft and WIndows"! Steve Jobs on the other hand will be known as the person who brought Apple back up.

I think Bill Gates will be mostly known more for creating Microsoft and Windows and partly for his charity work! People in 100 years will say " I remember Bill Gates, he created Microsoft and WIndows"! Steve Jobs on the other hand will be known as the person who brought Apple back up.

People in 100 years will be straight out of the movie "idiocracy" so they won't remember much of anything.

If it hadn't been Gates, Jobs and Wozniak that brought about the computer age it would of been three other weird kids in a garage. Einstein was a wacked out genius. Look at the guy

220px-Albert_Einstein_Head.jpg

Ben Franklin was a a politician and one of the greatest inventors of all time. Gates and Jobs are inventors but it was Wozniak that should of gotten more credit then both of them.

Who's to say Microsoft or Apple will even be around in 20 years? Big giant corporations have fallen before. The technology market is a fast changing environment and under bad leadership a ship will reach the bottom of an ocean before help ever arrives.

Just because someone is well know today, does not mean they will be forgotten tomorrow. It happens every decade. Seriously what has Bill Gates done to make History? and why would an average person know who Bill Gates is in 100 years from now? how would Paul Allen's legacy compare?

Bill Gates was just another rich ceo

Computers and software have evolved far beyond what they where in the 70s & 80s. Microsoft only further advanced what was already in place.

There are many tech company's that made great leaps that are more important stepping stone than what Microsoft has done.

This is not a popularity contest.

In 100 years, Bill Gates and Steve Jobs will seem like relics of the past. People will be "taught" that they were important much in the same way we today are taught that Edison and Henry Ford were important. Remembered by repetition and drills.

Bill will not be their contemporary, there will be a striking irrelevance to his name, or anyone who is alive today, for that matter. The discussion will change, it will be about what is NOW. And the "now" will be five generations turned over since the present time in which this post is written.

You see how fast the discussion of what is "important" changes now. A twitter post can make headline news. Multiply this accelerating trend times a billion, and you will see that in the not-so-distant future, nothing is timeless. Truly. Everything becomes disposable and transient. That includes the legacies of giants.

Will Bill Gates be known in 100 years?

Yes, he surely will be.

1. He created a company that captured up to 90% of the most dynamic market of the time and managed to hold on to it for decades;

2. He played a crucial role in bringing PC's to the masses for both business and personal uses, de facto creating the industry.

3. He was the wealthiest man on the planet for many years at the turn of the centuries.

4. He made donations on a scale not seen before.

You see how fast the discussion of what is "important" changes now. A twitter post can make headline news. Multiply this accelerating trend times a billion, and you will see that in the not-so-distant future, nothing is timeless. Truly. Everything becomes disposable and transient. That includes the legacies of giants.

That's exactly what I'm getting at. Its almost as if you have to kill off a country to be known for generation. Perhaps Bill might be in a computer science history books, but the average person probably won't even know half the people in any history book. Bill accomplished some great things, but so did Martin Cooper. Please go ask someone who Martin cooper is. There is a good chance they don't know who he really is. I would say he is as important as Bill Gates and what they did for the consumer market.

Bill Gates is living in the now and before we know it there we be someone else we look up to and next the generations won't know who Bill was because now its all about this John Doe guy. 50 years of Bill gates maybe, 100 years I doubt it.

A personal computer could be obsolete or irreverent in a decade. If you look how far technology has moved in the last 20 years that statement could easily be possible. I do plan on taking my jet car to work in 20 years, lol

People in 100 years will be straight out of the movie "idiocracy" so they won't remember much of anything.

lol

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!