Recommended Posts

Yeah I would hope so :rofl:

Actually that's the same ad:

post-23147-0-72171000-1379520091.png

 

post-23147-0-81293800-1379520119.png

 

Whoever uploaded for USA did a bad job of titling it. Technically this winter is Winter 2013 (in my opinion, since Winter starts Dec 21, 2013). That's like saying tonight is really Thursday because most of the night happens past midnight.

Season 1 was awesome but I didn't find season 2 really that exciting.

 

Yea well maybe because this show is about a law firm for christ sake.. how much more boring and unrealistic can it be. Go to a law firm and find out.  Places of work are not this exciting ... ever. 

And mind you it is a television show.. so.. yeah.

Yea well maybe because this show is about a law firm for christ sake.. how much more boring and unrealistic can it be. Go to a law firm and find out.  Places of work are not this exciting ... ever. 

And mind you it is a television show.. so.. yeah.

TV/Film are rarely ever realistic. We all know this. So what's your point? He was merely commenting on the show's season season not being exciting, which has nothing to do with reality.  :huh:

TV/Film are rarely ever realistic. We all know this. So what's your point? He was merely commenting on the show's season season not being exciting, which has nothing to do with reality.  :huh:

I guess no point :shifty:  sorry. Just certain exaggerations are too much. Cases in real life take years, these guys wrap up huge cases in one to two episodes. 

I guess no point :shifty:  sorry. Just certain exaggerations are too much. Cases in real life take years, these guys wrap up huge cases in one to two episodes. 

I understand that. But that's true for all shows, there has to be a level of suspension of belief to watch them.

 

I've always enjoyed legal dramas like Suits and Law & Order, but try watching Court TV and BAORING! :laugh: 

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

So, Louis knows! What do you think he will do?

 

First of all, I would recommend putting that in spoiler tags for the benefit of those who have not seen the latest episode. Second of all,

technically he does not know for sure, he just suspects, because of that A+ grade from a professor who does not believe in giving them out. Personally, I think he will be looking to expose Mike and using that as leverage to get further up the food chain in the company. He is already a Senior Partner, so maybe his name on the door of the firm?

The episode aired six days ago. I really disagree with spoiler tags for TV shows when the episode has aired. Fair enough if it had leaked or you are talking about a movie or a game only days after release.

 

Well, what's the board rule in this kind of situation? I appreciate that the episode aired in the US a week ago, but this is an international community, so it may not have propagated to their broadcasters yet.

Not everyone watches stuff as it's aired, which is evident with the amount of +1 channels, and catch up services, on demand, and NOW TV etc.. We're at a stage where people can watch programmes at their own discretion.. I'd say an absolute minimum of 7 days before you start throwing spoilers around.

Not everyone watches stuff as it's aired, which is evident with the amount of +1 channels, and catch up services, on demand, and NOW TV etc.. We're at a stage where people can watch programmes at their own discretion.. I'd say an absolute minimum of 7 days before you start throwing spoilers around.

Easy way to stay spoiler free: after an episode airs, if you haven't watched it, DON'T GO IN THE THREAD. Problem solved. (Y)
  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • >defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool It is not. It is the inhuman artist replacement. The human writing the prompt is the employer/manager requesting the work product of the artist -- a supervisory/descriptive job that doesn't carry with it any rights to the copyright of that work product at all. And since AI is not human itself, it can't gain copyright for anything it is asked to regurgitate or hallucinate, so it can't transfer that copyright to the employer/manager/human who asked for the output. This was all legally reaffirmed last year. So, no, while there are AI tools, AI slopware generation is NOT a "tool" in the legal definition of that word.
    • As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      178
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!