Recommended Posts

HI,

I guess this is a hardware question. I have a second PC that has a freshly formatted HD and I need to copy the entire contents of a HD on a another PC to it. What would be the best way? I was thinking of some ways like, crossover cable, Ethernet (100mb through my router) or USB 3.0 to an external and back. How would you do it?

Thanks,

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1152826-hard-drive-mirroring/
Share on other sites

If you are just looking to copy data, you can slave the drive in your new computer, you can copy the data over the network, you can use a ide/sata to usb device to attach the drive to a usb port and copy the data, you can create an image of the drive using a pay for image utility which will allow you to mount/browse the image on what ever computer you are at that has the full version installed (acronis, ghost, easeus all come to mind). How do you want to tackle it?

"Ethernet (100mb through my router)"

So they are on the same network already?? Then why are we having this discussion - just copy your "data" over, robocopy is your friend.. You would of been done by now.

Now 100mbit network kind of blows for moving large amounts of data.. But hit go, come back later.

Your not talking clone of the OS or anything?? Sounds to me like just data files.

Now if your nics on your pcs are gig, and your limited by your routers lan ports. Then either buy a gig switch, or yes directly connect them - 10/100/1000 interfaces, ie gig do autocross so any normal patch cable will work. Yes gig would be much faster for moving large amount of files.

"Ethernet (100mb through my router)"

So they are on the same network already?? Then why are we having this discussion - just copy your "data" over, robocopy is your friend.. You would of been done by now.

Now 100mbit network kind of blows for moving large amounts of data.. But hit go, come back later.

Your not talking clone of the OS or anything?? Sounds to me like just data files.

Now if your nics on your pcs are gig, and your limited by your routers lan ports. Then either buy a gig switch, or yes directly connect them - 10/100/1000 interfaces, ie gig do autocross so any normal patch cable will work. Yes gig would be much faster for moving large amount of files.

Ok, well yes it is just data and I was ultimately going to use the lan if no other "better" method revealed themselves. Yes also to the facts that each PC has gig nics and a I have a gig router, however, I have never been impressed with the speed across the lan using the router. Perhaps a crossover cable would be best. I have one anyway so I will do some testing before I start the transfer.

Oh and we are still having this conversation because I just love talking to you BudMan.... ;) I knew you'd give me some good options.

Thanks,

Not impressed with your gig speed transfers? So these boxes are connected via gig, why did you state 100mbit then?

Your not going to find a faster way, other than directly connecting your 2nd disk to where you want to move it and copy. But how much data are you talking? I move TBs of data very quickly over my gig network.

With somewhat recent disks and even very cheap gig hardware you should see 50MBps, which is only about half of what gig connection can move. I see 70 to 90MBps over my cheap ass hardware and even to and from a VM.

at 50MBps you can move 2TB in less than 12 hours. Hit go when your done using your computers for the night, next morning should be done. If you want to keep them in sync, then just run robocopy to copy changes in files, etc. how ever often you want to do that.

if your not seeing at min 30MBps moving files - then clearly something is not right and we should look into it. Even if less than 50MBps we should take a look unless your moving 1000's of tiny little files?

I would test wire speeds with iperf or netio, etc. You should be seeing 800Mbps over your gig connection even on cheap hardware..

C:\>iperf -c storage.local.lan -w 256k
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to storage.local.lan, TCP port 5001
TCP window size:  256 KByte
------------------------------------------------------------
[336] local 192.168.1.100 port 22701 connected with 192.168.1.8 port 5001
[ ID] Interval	   Transfer	 Bandwidth
[336]  0.0-10.0 sec  1.06 GBytes   909 Mbits/sec

So that was simple test between my workstation and my VM NAS, in theory at 900Mbps could move files at /8 112MBps -- which is faster than my disks could read or write anyway.. So network would not be the bottleneck in moving files between machines. The disks would be.

A tip if I may, if you're not getting the full potential of 1Gbps bandwidth AND you trust the data source I recommend disabling anti-virus real time scanning on both PC's while you transfer the data. I did that with recently when both PC's were using Microsoft Security Essentials and I moved over 500GB at an average of 875Mbps as opposed to 120Mbps while real time scanning was on.

Not impressed with your gig speed transfers? So these boxes are connected via gig, why did you state 100mbit then?

<snip>

Uhhmm, oops. <shrug> I guess I just f**ked up on that one. Anyway I will go ahead with those tests and as I said I have I have a crossover cable. I will exhaust what I know for tests until the new system is ready.

Thanks again for all the help! You always come through. Should I just call the "BudMan" phone next time or use the "BudMan signal"? LOL

Cheers,

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!