• 0

Tabs in Microsoft Word?


Question

Hi, is it just me, or does not having tabs in most Microsoft Office products, including Word and PowerPoint etc a bit primitive?

I know you can have tabs in Excel, kind of, but it would be nice if MS stole the idea of tabs, like they did with IE from Firefox and built this into all of their office software.

I'm a college student and I frequently have several documents open at the same time, it's frustrating to not just quickly flip between them like I can with my browser. I know there's Flip 3D and probably a keyboard shortcut. But the same argument could be made for not introducing tabs in Web Browsers. Why do it? Because it makes life a little bit simpler is why!

Please MS steal this idea! If anyone has any influence with them and wants to steal it instead, please feel free!

There is a 3rd party add on that enables this feature I believe, but it seems to be quite buggy and unstable. So other people have clearly at least thought about it!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1152948-tabs-in-microsoft-word/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Hi, is it just me, or does not having tabs in most Microsoft Office products, including Word and PowerPoint etc a bit primitive?

Just my own preference of course, but personally haven't missed them. Can already quickly flip between them now with either a keystroke or a single click on the taskbar, complete with previews, there's also window list on the ribbon too. For me it doesn't matter if I'm clicking above the document or underneath it, it's still one click or one keypress, personally don't see adding another place to click really boosting my productivity. You mentioned addons, there's a couple that do that, don't use them myself, my neighbor does though, don't recall the one he uses giving him problems. "Office Tabs?" Not positive, didn't pay much attention to it, seems happy with it with Office 2010 anyway.

I'm not 100% positive, but reasonably sure Firefox wasn't the first one with a tabbed browser... could of swore it was IE via a third party shell for IE called NetCaptor, late '90s, then Opera a couple years later. Could be wrong, old age, bad memory, too lazy to search and all that.

  • 0

arachnoid, are you using Office/Word 97? O_o

Kingsoft Office (which in its basic version looks like MS Office 2003) provide a tabbed document interface

Cant see you image but I was using it as an example.of how Word has changed over the years i.e. In word 2K3 it makes separate pages in the taskbar the same as in 2K13

78358eb5babd8ae2d859750a9c84ad7a.png

  • 0

Hi, is it just me, or does not having tabs in most Microsoft Office products, including Word and PowerPoint etc a bit primitive?

I know you can have tabs in Excel, kind of, but it would be nice if MS stole the idea of tabs, like they did with IE from Firefox and built this into all of their office software.

I'm a college student and I frequently have several documents open at the same time, it's frustrating to not just quickly flip between them like I can with my browser. I know there's Flip 3D and probably a keyboard shortcut. But the same argument could be made for not introducing tabs in Web Browsers. Why do it? Because it makes life a little bit simpler is why!

Please MS steal this idea! If anyone has any influence with them and wants to steal it instead, please feel free!

There is a 3rd party add on that enables this feature I believe, but it seems to be quite buggy and unstable. So other people have clearly at least thought about it!

Personally I'd like to have seen a UI that i could tab word, outlook 2010 into tabs as I often copy and paste for my research.

  • 0

Yeah, like I said, all the arguments presented by the naysayers (of which there are always a majority on Neowin) could have been made for any browser too, pre-Firefox. Ask them to give up their properly integrated and elegantly executed tabbed browsing interface now however and go back to the old taskbar only way of doing things and I'm sure you would hear them all sing a different tune.

My experience when I have 20 or 30 word, or powerpoint documents open is that the travel time to the taskbar is often longer than if I could use tabs. bizarrely I can use Tabs with MS's online version of Office, but not with the desktop version. You may think WTF is a few inches of extra movement to get to the taskbar to open a document? But the difference is a that few inches adds up to miles worth of difference through the years and those miles worth of unneeded repetitive movements can lead to serious cases of RSI. (Which I have had the misfortune to experience several times in my life.)

It always just seemed like a natural desire to me, when I had a lot of documents open, to just flip between easily identifiable tabs. Of course you could use keyboard shortcuts and flip 3D etc to achieve a similar goal, but I always find that people who say 'just use the keyboard short cuts' are really a little primitive. Why have a GUI at all in that case? This is the same kind of argument Linux die-hards of old used to make. It is a very old fashioned and out of date paradigm in my view. Keyboard advocates will of course almost certainly object to this perspective.

  • 0

I agree with the OP. Tabs have proven to be indispensable for web browsing, yet remain conspicuously absent from Explorer and Office. Switching between multiple instances of Explorer or Word has been incredibly tedious since Microsoft introduced the superbar in Windows 7. If you have several windows open then when you click on the taskbar icon it brings up Aero Peek rather than displaying the active window and the window preview is utterly useless given that most Explorer windows look the same and can't be easily discerned at a quick glance.

Microsoft was late to the game with a tabbed web browser and doesn't seem to care about multi-tasking on the desktop. In fact Windows 8's Metro interface demonstrates that Microsoft is actually moving away from multi-tasking, which is quite concerning. The success of tabs in web browsers clearly demonstrates that users understand and benefit from tabbed interfaces, so why is the company so reluctant to bring tabs to Explorer or Office?

  • 0

Yeah, like I said, all the arguments presented by the naysayers (of which there are always a majority on Neowin) could have been made for any browser too, pre-Firefox. Ask them to give up their properly integrated and elegantly executed tabbed browsing interface now however and go back to the old taskbar only way of doing things and I'm sure you would hear them all sing a different tune.

I don't think you can really compare a content creation application like Word with a content consumption application like a browser because people use them differently. Tabs might be useful in Word sometimes but there are other times where they would be a real pain. For instance, I often have multiple documents open side by side so I can easily cut and paste from one document to another using ALT+TAB to switch back and forth between documents. This would be difficult to do without using your mouse if all documents opened as tabs in a single instance of Word. Excel behaves in this way (without tabs - it acts as a sort of MDI interface) and it always annoys me.

  • 0

Per the Seventies "That's a Big 10-4 on the tags."

Will try that Tag app that "MayHem" posted about on Office 2013 and get back later.

Back: Tried to use the app mentioned by Mayhem, albeit it will not load, however, it will direct you to a home page where you can download a "Free version" that will work (and does) for Office 2013.

Tested it out and at present show no problems.

There is also an Enterprise Version for a price.

Good Luck. . . :D

  • 0

Mayhem's link has worked well for me with Office 2003 and 2007. I haven't used it with 2010 or 2013 but if it works, it's one of the better options. I can recommend it for that purpose. If you go through the settings you can get the tabs along the bottom like in Excel. (Y)

  • 0

I agree with the OP. Tabs have proven to be indispensable for web browsing, yet remain conspicuously absent from Explorer and Office. Switching between multiple instances of Explorer or Word has been incredibly tedious since Microsoft introduced the superbar in Windows 7. If you have several windows open then when you click on the taskbar icon it brings up Aero Peek rather than displaying the active window and the window preview is utterly useless given that most Explorer windows look the same and can't be easily discerned at a quick glance.

Microsoft was late to the game with a tabbed web browser and doesn't seem to care about multi-tasking on the desktop. In fact Windows 8's Metro interface demonstrates that Microsoft is actually moving away from multi-tasking, which is quite concerning. The success of tabs in web browsers clearly demonstrates that users understand and benefit from tabbed interfaces, so why is the company so reluctant to bring tabs to Explorer or Office?

If you hate the task bar so much you can change it to not group the items....

  • 0

I don't think you can really compare a content creation application like Word with a content consumption application like a browser because people use them differently. Tabs might be useful in Word sometimes but there are other times where they would be a real pain. For instance, I often have multiple documents open side by side so I can easily cut and paste from one document to another using ALT+TAB to switch back and forth between documents. This would be difficult to do without using your mouse if all documents opened as tabs in a single instance of Word. Excel behaves in this way (without tabs - it acts as a sort of MDI interface) and it always annoys me.

Yes, like I said, I heard all of the same arguments for browsers back in the day. Heck it even took me a while to get used to tab web browsing. But now I can't imagine life without it. The take home message I think is if it's done properly, tabbed interfaces can work in a number of scenarios. I wouldn't want MS to take the approach that they did recently with Windows 8 and make it so that a somewhat different way of working was forced on those who didn't care for it. (I.e. the "do it my way, or the highway" approach to interface design.) Users should still have a choice, just as they do with tabbed web browsers, where in theory if you don't like tabs no one forces you to use them. However most people would agree that it would barely make any sense not to use tabs for this purpose now.

You are correct to some extent however. It depends on the usage scenario and on user preference. My frustration is born of the need to frequently have several tens of Word documents open, or PowerPoint slide shows, or indeed as someone else mentioned Explorer windows. My usage pattern under these conditions is often very browser like, with the need to frequently switch between different windows and documents.

The take home message is I think that if done right (and the 'done right' part should not be underplayed I think) that a tabbed user interlace could have many uses. Not so long ago people would have thought it was crazy to have a tabbed email client. However Thunderbird (although I rarely use it as my main client), appears to have implemented this rather well.

As another poster commented however, MS has seemed to 'lose the plot' a little with Windows 8, and have almost abandoned the paradigm of multitasking entirely, particularly with their new touch screen interface and lack of focus on providing a great desktop experience. It is not a helpful direction, particularly with those who may often be presented with the need to perform several complex tasks at the same time.

PS

Just a closing note too. It might be worth thinking that added travel time to the taskbar may only equate to a couple of seconds at a time. But add those seconds up over a lifetime and they will probably equate to hours. Hours that you probably could spend doing something else far more enjoyable!

  • 0

I've not found myself wanting tabs in Office but I agree with some of the sentiment here that it's something that should be Windows-wide rather than specific to Office.

I use Switcher (http://insentient.net/) to search for windows by window title text but it can become quite a hog when you've got 50+ windows open.

Ideally I guess I'd like open windows to appear as results in Windows search.

  • 0

You don't need tabs. The OS manages switching between instances of documents just fine with the aero popups.

Also the tabs in Excel are not to separate documents, but sheets within one document. The mapping is not valid.

Fair enough. Oh BTW welcome ... I hope you're enjoying life in the 1990's. ;)

Someone should at least give this tabbed interface thing a crack. Those who feel they would not like to use such an interface should certainly retain the means not to do so, or wear bags on their heads. Which ever they prefer, lol.

To be fair someone else would probably have to give it a go first prove to the doubting masses if it could work or not and then wait for MS to steal the idea. After 25 years working in the IT sector, this does rather seem to be the way things tend to get done.

  • 0

What the hell are you on about 1990s? This is an OS addition since Win 7 as I recall!

The implementation of multiple documents within one MDI container has been available for a long long time.

Win7 allows a group of instances of one application (such as Word) to be available from one taskbar entry, which when hovered, allows access to any, with live previews.

A tabbed interface is much more old-hat than this!

  • 0

What the hell are you on about 1990s? This is an OS addition since Win 7 as I recall!

The implementation of multiple documents within one MDI container has been available for a long long time.

Win7 allows a group of instances of one application (such as Word) to be available from one taskbar entry, which when hovered, allows access to any, with live previews.

A tabbed interface is much more old-hat than this!

Yes indeed. So much old hat that it doesn't even exist, yet. However I would wager if it ever did happen - and particularly if it was implemented well, that within a few years, after some possible initial resistance, you would probably find yourself quite happily using it and wondering indeed how you ever managed without it, just as many did (including myself) when tabbed web browsing was introduced. I think the game changer for people like you might be how well it was implemented and how well it really worked however.

In any case I can give you one immediate advantage (in addition to reduced travel time for your mouse), which is that right now I have aproximately 19 separate web pages open in tabs in my immediate view. This is a rather low number for me and is because I am working at present with a small screen. However as I sit here I can glance at each of the tabs without moving my mouse at all. This enables me to move straight to a document of interest with exactly zero investment in time or effort whatsoever. A single glance is sufficient, with no eye scanning or mouse travel at all. I would argue that this is quicker and more efficient than the peek functionality of the task bar. Live previews in any case have only ever seemed like a gimmick and a probable memory hog to me. If I can monitor a dozen or more documents at no net investment in time and additional effort, I would take this option first every time.

It is of course as I said, a matter of preference and it would depend how well it was implemented, but done right and under the circumstances I often find myself in, I'm certain a lot of people would find it extremely useful, even if you did not. Tabbed browser interfaces tend to be more memory efficient than their separate window counterparts also.

PS

It is all rather academic anyway. As I said MS don't have a great track record for innovation, so unless someone tries to implement it and does a really good job of it, I doubt MS would be interested in stealing it.

  • 0

The usage of a web browser and a word processor are vastly different from the physical interaction through to the use case. Comparing apples and oranges doesn't help anyone.

I'm not against the use of tabs for those who would rather interact that way, but any argument that "One office app has it why don't they all" (which is what the OP wrongfully asserted is what I'm picking up on here.

Moreover, the Windows interface is obviously aware of multiple instances of one application, so whether tabs or any other mechanism, this should be a Windows feature and not an app-specific feature.

  • 0
You don't need tabs. The OS manages switching between instances of documents just fine with the aero popups.

Nonsense. Browsing websites would be horrible if you had to rely on the superbar to change between webpages and that's the experience people have to put up with for Explorer and Office. There really is no decent reason not to have tabs in Explorer or Office - people wouldn't have to use them but it would greatly benefit those who do. The superbar is very poor when it comes to multitasking.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • As I've been usually saying lately - we all can thank "AI" for this.
    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • We aren't even at the all-star game and Microsoft is talking about an update that will most likely be released during the World Series if not after. A lot can happen in the world between now and the 2026 World Series, including the 2026 FIFA Cup. Tell me about it again after the FIFA Cup is concluded. That should allow plenty of time to prepare for it.
    • Great, tell me when I have a "Bad Pool Caller" elsewhere not in Windoze.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      542
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!