So when did we settle on AMD as the CPU?


Recommended Posts

Well look at it this way, if it's true then it makes sense. Think about it, both consoles according to previous 'rumours' suggest that they both have very similar hardware/CPU/GPU configurations. The only major difference I've noticed from both of the specs 'rumoured' is that the PS3 will have 8GB GDDR5 memory and the next Xbox will have 8GB DDR3 + 16MB ESRAM. We'll know for sure in a few days.

Was this debunked? http://www.computerandvideogames.com/343191/next-xbox-to-boast-ridiculously-powerful-16-core-cpu/?site=cvg

It seems VGLeaks put out that it was AMD and everyone just went with it unless i missed something.

It seems possible with Xbox because 360 already has a GPU designed by ATI/AMD.

AMD is cheaper, has equivalent and/or better performance and is known for being good for gaming! It probably kept the price of the new Xbox down by $100 or more

AMD is cheaper, has equivalent and/or better performance and is known for being good for gaming! It probably kept the price of the new Xbox down by $100 or more

Good for gaming? No. Intel's Core series have always been better than AMDs for gaming.

It's something that Microsoft and Sony settled on, not us. AMD's relationship with both companies was good. Before the acquisition of ATI in 2006 by AMD, they designed the Xbox 360's GPU (Xenos) as well as the Wii's GPU (Hollywood). After the acquisition, an AMD GPU was used in the WiiU and NVIDIA's relationship with Sony went sour. Microsoft had a choice to either stick with NVIDIA after the Xbox in 2001 (NVIDIA GPU) or switch to ATI. Sony, on the other hand, had no choice but to work with AMD.

Both the CPU and GPU of the PS4 and Xbox One was designed by AMD. It's interesting to note that both solutions will use a single system-on-a-chip that combines the CPU, GPU, and other elements (e.g. memory controller).

was this debunked or not?

Yes. The Xbox One uses an 8-core x86 AMD CPU.

Nope, just good at reading real-world gaming benchmarks :)

Misread your initial post (too busy shoveling food in my mouth). The i3 are better or worse than the AMD's price equivalent, depending on how a game handles all the available cores. The i5s are better. Regardless, when you're working with a small budget, AMD has way better bang for your buck.

Anyway, we're offtopic.

It's something that Microsoft and Sony settled on, not us. AMD's relationship with both companies was good. Before the acquisition of ATI in 2006 by AMD, they designed the Xbox 360's GPU (Xenos) as well as the Wii's GPU (Hollywood). After the acquisition, an AMD GPU was used in the WiiU and NVIDIA's relationship with Sony went sour. Microsoft had a choice to either stick with NVIDIA after the Xbox in 2001 (NVIDIA GPU) or switch to ATI. Sony, on the other hand, had no choice but to work with AMD.

Both the CPU and GPU of the PS4 and Xbox One was designed by AMD. It's interesting to note that both solutions will use a single system-on-a-chip that combines the CPU, GPU, and other elements (e.g. memory controller).

Yes. The Xbox One uses an 8-core x86 AMD CPU.

I actually dont think it has. I think the most precise thing we have got from MS is that its a 64bit, 8 Core system,

Xbox One's CPU is a custom SoC based on AMD's Jaguar. It is designed in-house with AMD's help (pretty much what they did with the 360).

I actually dont think it has. I think the most precise thing we have got from MS is that its a 64bit, 8 Core system,

See here: https://www.neowin.net/news/amd-confirmed-as-co-designer-of-xbox-one-apu-chip

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Also known for https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/jan/29/adware-internet.   Regards, Aryeh Goretsky    
    • Hello, I have used a few TEAM Group SSDs, USB flash drives, and Micro SDXC cards in the past. They all seemed to work fine. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!