Xbox event cheering / applausing was from Microsoft employees


Recommended Posts

I'm sure a lot of presenters do this, I've read about it before.

I'm not trying to defend MS, it's a pretty bad practice when you do it to the extent they did.

EDIT: Well, depends what employees they are, after reading other responses :p

How low...

About the same level as WWE (apologies to non-wrestling fans) whenever SmackDown is on; most of the time, fan reactions (cheers, boos, chants, etc.) get edited in.

The press are/should be too busy taking photos and notes/blogging.

I think I'd be cheering my arse off too, if I'd just shown off my new box of awesome I'd been working on for years. Cheering myself, cheering my collogues. I'd be pumped.

Maybe they were happy because Microsoft is giving free Xbox ones to its employees. I believe many companies self applaud I'm their own announcements or unveilings.

How is this a low move...of course they have MS staff there and of course they're going to be cheering for their own product. Bogus headline is bogus.

+1 Of course Microsoft employees would be cheering for it. That's their own blood, sweat, and tears being presented on stage. Wouldn't you bee cheering for your own hard work?

If that's the case then they are tools as well as lame.

Says the guy posting on a tech website who most likely would sit and cry in a corner if you had to do some of the complex things that the people who were cheering had worked on....Get a grip, don't like people cheering? Then im sorry but you need to step away from the computer and assess your own life...Long and hard...If hearing/seeing other people happy makes you that angry you feel the need to post about it, then i feel truly sorry for you.

  • Like 2

I love Microsoft love it. But, I actually thought at the time how apple like. Saying that it's a press conference basically maybe in future the music and "rock concert" look can be toned down. As for the own employees doing the cheering, it's a little rich but I really just found it perplexing as in what's the point of it. Are people to unintelligent to understand the conference? I found it akin to another thing I don't understand and dislike laugh tracks or canned laugher on comedy shows.

Says the guy posting on a tech website who most likely would sit and cry in a corner if you had to do some of the complex things that the people who were cheering had worked on....Get a grip, don't like people cheering? Then im sorry but you need to step away from the computer and assess your own life...Long and hard...If hearing/seeing other people happy makes you that angry you feel the need to post about it, then i feel truly sorry for you.

You're right and I should re-evaluate my life the next time someone doesn't agree with my opinion. Thanks for breaking me down and putting me back together with your paint by numbers psychoanalysis.

  • Like 2

It's cool if they're cheering their own product, they've put effort into it, but if it was done to make Microsoft look better, then it's lame. Fanboys shouldn't be taking other people's words out of context here, but then again haters shouldn't be putting too much into it.

You're right and I should re-evaluate my life the next time someone doesn't agree with my opinion. Thanks for breaking me down and putting me back together with your paint by numbers psychoanalysis.

Not really, you're the one who jumped to insults when you didn't agree with something...Again...Take a breath and relax yourself. It's also a simple call you on your bull**** nothing more, nothing less...You put down these people who have probably worked 5 years + on tech so you can get to that game a little faster, or smoother, or easier or anything..You should be cheering with them or at least excited for the end result, If not then i really don't know why you even watched the event...My guess was just to have an excuse to talk **** on a forum.

You're right and I should re-evaluate my life the next time someone doesn't agree with my opinion. Thanks for breaking me down and putting me back together with your paint by numbers psychoanalysis.

Hopefully not sarcasm because you probably should lighten up and not call people who are passionate about what they do "tools."

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
    • it dosnt support onprem exchange. it dosnt support mapi-calls. the views are all worse/limited. its slower. it cant see public folder calendars. we already have webmail. the list of other missing features is pretty huge but i only see it when customers call to say their email isnt working, and 9/10 times its cause they accidentality changed to outlooknew(new). Hold the line everyone!
    • yeah, this looks beautiful. Damn this winter's going to be great.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!