Microsoft "No fee to play XBOX one games on other consoles"


Recommended Posts

so basically you can't just, by a game, finish it, have the disc collecting dust for months, have a friend over who didnt buy the game back when it was release and you want to lend it to him. You can't? You have to pay a fee? what's the deal here.

The game install being tied to your account, and that account being able to enable playing the game on any console (one at a time obviously), was a given.

Are you somehow implying that you are a better than others here because you are a gamer and you have a GF? :laugh: If yes, that's new low for you.

Yeah I sure said that, I'm a regular pimp, why would I not be better than others on here.... :wub:

It's a light hearted poke at a gaming culture that can be very solitary outside of playing games online with your mates. There are many people even simply in friendships who swap games with each other as a more cost effective way of trying games out.

My GF and I are serious (simply meaning we see/spend much time with each other), and we do not see the point of us both buying copies of every game we enjoy. As we have similar genre interests, outside of us both wanting to play something at the same time, or wanting a genuinely amazing game in our collection, we aren't both buying copies of Heavy Rain when I can just give her my copy when I'm done.

She doesn't want to play it on my account on her PS3, she wants to play it on hers to get the trophies and satisfaction of using her own account name (especially if it's a multiplayer game - Yes not all MP games have online passes). Even if she didn't have to pay a fee, simply use my account, she doesn't want to do that for the exact same reasons. People get attached to their online alias/ID and account in general, especially with the trophy/achievement culture. Not to mention if I'm using my account at home, and she has to sign into my account at hers, well, that would boot me out wouldn't it? .....

Just wondering, what is the process if you get games from something like Gamefly? Genuine question, i've not seen anything regarding that.

Most likely the same as the used game market, whatever this "solution in progress" is for when you cannot log into the original disc owners account (whoever rented from Gamefly first?). Phil Harrison said a fee, MS backtracked, but it's going to be something or the "you need to be logged into the owners account" requirement simply would not exist - Like how it is this generation, a disc is a disc, it works wherever with no cavecats.

Most likely the same as the used game market, whatever this "solution in progress" is for when you cannot log into the original disc owners account (whoever rented from Gamefly first?). Phil Harrison said a fee, MS backtracked, but it's going to be something or the "you need to be logged into the owners account" requirement simply would not exist - Like how it is this generation, a disc is a disc, it works wherever with no cavecats.

Or they have a way for rentals to work and haven't revealed it. It wouldn't exactly be hard to do.

Or they have a way for rentals to work and haven't revealed it. It wouldn't exactly be hard to do.

How do you differentiate a rental disc without considerable headache? Most of them are simply using "retail" units, hence how Blockbuster sells ex-rentals. They aren't branded or anything.

How do you differentiate a rental disc without considerable headache? Most of them are simply using "retail" units, hence how Blockbuster sells ex-rentals. They aren't branded or anything.

Just because you don't see the solution doesn't mean there isn't one. Microsoft has solved far more complex problems than this.

They really want to know if you can lend a game out, I bet you can, and I bet that as long as that game is lent out you can't play it either. I'm going to make a guess and say each disc has some encryption key on it, as with every console so far actually. That key is matched to your account, so if that same key is flagged on another account the first one could be turned off until the second one is uninstalled.

So, until your friend is done and uninstalled the game and gave you the disc back then your installed copy won't play. Just a guess though.

No, discs are mass produced, if one game has an encryption key on the disc then every copy of that disc produced will have the same encryption key, you cannot do what you're talking about without making a brand new master for each disc, and the cost, time, machining and everything to do that makes it impossible.

Just because you don't see the solution doesn't mean there isn't one. Microsoft has solved far more complex problems than this.

You said it wouldn't exactly be hard to do so, so I simply asked you wondering why you thought that! Or I proposed a challenge to you, as rightly or wrongly my brain can't see an easy way to do it with how rental discs work.

This is nothing to do with being a PS3 fan, etc. This is about Microsoft essentially killing off the second hand game market (or at least, reducing it's value somewhat).

Say I have a copy of 1 game on the shelf, and my friend has another. We can no longer just play each others games without having to be signed into the others account, or paying a fee. How is that a good thing?

Unfortunately retailers have exploited second-hand games to the point where they are deliberately undermining first-hand sales, which hurts developers. Companies like GameStop have taken billions of dollars away from the gaming industry and consumers haven't been made aware of what impact that has. Steam doesn't allow the reselling of games and it's been nothing but a positive influence on the industry, significantly reducing the cost of games for those willing to wait and providing a better income to developers.

How do you differentiate a rental disc without considerable headache? Most of them are simply using "retail" units, hence how Blockbuster sells ex-rentals. They aren't branded or anything.

Everything could be done online in a similar way to Steam, in that the disc is literally only for storing the data and doesn't entitle you to play the game. Rented games could include one-use serial codes that either let you play for a specific amount of time or track your play time and bill you accordingly. The difference is that developers would actually get money from such a system.

Unfortunately retailers have exploited second-hand games to the point where they are deliberately undermining first-hand sales, which hurts developers. Companies like GameStop have taken billions of dollars away from the gaming industry and consumers haven't been made aware of what impact that has. Steam doesn't allow the reselling of games and it's been nothing but a positive influence on the industry, significantly reducing the cost of games for those willing to wait and providing a better income to developers.

Everything could be done online in a similar way to Steam, in that the disc is literally only for storing the data and doesn't entitle you to play the game. Rented games could include one-use serial codes that either let you play for a specific amount of time or track your play time and bill you accordingly. The difference is that developers would actually get money from such a system.

This is a good example of someone using their brain and not jumping in with hate and anger, well done sir! :)

Everything could be done online in a similar way to Steam, in that the disc is literally only for storing the data and doesn't entitle you to play the game. Rented games could include one-use serial codes that either let you play for a specific amount of time or track your play time and bill you accordingly. The difference is that developers would actually get money from such a system.

Take Lovefilm for example, that's thousands of individual codes having to be printed for games, as they're an online based rental company it's a lot of work. These companies also allow you to rent and play for as long as you want, so if MS are going to start rubbing out the rental companies ethos of own for as long as you want, that's yet again another headache.

Doesn't gamefly allow you to buy your rental and keep it at a cost? What happens there? I see DirtyLarry occasionally keeping his rentals permanently by paying $40+ to keep the rental and actually own it.

Steam doesn't allow the reselling of games and it's been nothing but a positive influence on the industry, significantly reducing the cost of games for those willing to wait and providing a better income to developers.

Good luck if you think what MS is about to do is going to offer you steam like prices, steam like DRM (complete offline play with NO restrictions) and steam like sales. Comparing consoles to steam/origin always falls off a cliff somewhere.

You said it wouldn't exactly be hard to do so, so I simply asked you wondering why you thought that! Or I proposed a challenge to you, as rightly or wrongly my brain can't see an easy way to do it with how rental discs work.

So because you can't figure it out you answer people's questions saying it can't happen? That's awfully kind of you.

So because you can't figure it out you answer people's questions saying it can't happen? That's awfully kind of you.

But you said you thought it was easy, or at least not hard, you've yet to bring anything to our discussion other than "MS can figure it out". WHY do you think it's easy?

Or they have a way for rentals to work and haven't revealed it. It wouldn't exactly be hard to do.

You're asking me to figure it out, yet you're not posting any suggestions of your own when I am at least pointing out what MS would have to navigate through.

Take Lovefilm for example, that's thousands of individual codes having to be printed for games, as they're an online based rental company it's a lot of work. These companies also allow you to rent and play for as long as you want, so if MS are going to start rubbing out the rental companies ethos of own for as long as you want, that's yet again another headache.

Or they could just email them to you. And there's no reason that companies like Lovefilm couldn't simply track how long you use games and bill you accordingly.

Good luck if you think what MS is about to do is going to offer you steam like prices, steam like DRM (complete offline play with NO restrictions) and steam like sales. Comparing consoles to steam/origin always falls off a cliff somewhere.

Publishers set the price of games, not Microsoft. If they can make more money by lowering prices then they will. But you're right, I don't expect that Microsoft's foray into digital distribution will be as good for gamers as Steam -- its record with XBLA suggests otherwise. However, that doesn't mean it will be all doom-and-gloom.

Or they could just email them to you. And there's no reason that companies like Lovefilm couldn't simply track how long you use games and bill you accordingly.

Or more likely they just wont stock Xbox One games because its too much hassle.

Or they could just email them to you. And there's no reason that companies like Lovefilm couldn't simply track how long you use games and bill you accordingly. Publishers set the price of games, not Microsoft. If they can make more money by lowering prices then they will. But you're right, I don't expect that Microsoft's foray into digital distribution will be as good for gamers as Steam -- its record with XBLA suggests otherwise. However, that doesn't mean it will be all doom-and-gloom.

But they do not do that, that's not part of the rental ethos. You can rent a game from them and as long as you're paying your lovefilm subscription keep it for as long as you want. That would essentially "kill" the rental market, here you go guys pay the ?12 a month to us for your games rental package AND if you keep a game longer than 3 days you need to start paying ?1 a day :/ Can you imagine something like that coinciding with PS4 games continuing to work how PS3 games currently work when rented from Lovefilm? Even bigger disaster there than the one you'd have alone trying to charge people for keeping a game for a certain amount of time.

MS set development costs on Live though, as in patching/publishing fees which we already know from this gen developers aren't exactly chuffed about. Steam is nowhere near as entry cost expensive, hence lower RRPs, better sales and a lot more variety.

This is how it currently is.... A person can buy a game and lend that game to a friend once you are done with it. Heck you can even trade it. With the Xbox One, you can not lend your games to a friend; unless you give those friends access to your Live account. And something to remember is that your pressumably can not be logged into live at the same from the same account.

This essentially kills off sharing game with your friends. This was such a bad move from Xbox.

But you said you thought it was easy, or at least not hard, you've yet to bring anything to our discussion other than "MS can figure it out". WHY do you think it's easy?

You're asking me to figure it out, yet you're not posting any suggestions of your own when I am at least pointing out what MS would have to navigate through.

Why do you think you can post nonsense without backing it up?

I said it was easy, as in easier than other things the company has tackled and definitely something they've considered during the dev process given the prominence of that industry. I don't have to come up with anything, you just need to stop answering questions you're assuming the answer to without any backing source. This isn't about me. You said it won't happen, and you just plain don't know that.

Why do you think you can post nonsense without backing it up?

I said it was easy, as in easier than other things the company has tackled and definitely something they've considered during the dev process given the prominence of that industry. I don't have to come up with anything, you just need to stop answering questions you're assuming the answer to without any backing source. This isn't about me. You said it won't happen, and you just plain don't know that.

I actually never said it won't happen (go find that quote), just unleashed a load of issues that have to be trawled through. I think most readers on here wouldn't exactly call the completely rational points I've made "nonsense", but okay.

This is how it currently is.... A person can buy a game and lend that game to a friend once you are done with it. Heck you can even trade it. With the Xbox One, you can not lend your games to a friend; unless you give those friends access to your Live account. And something to remember is that your pressumably can not be logged into live at the same from the same account.

This essentially kills off sharing game with your friends. This was such a bad move from Xbox.

We don't have enough info on the details yet though. What if you can lend out a game but until you get it back you can't play it yourself? We honestly don't know what they'll do, they haven't said specifics yet so everyone is just guessing.

Game rentals could be as simple as movie rentals from PSN. Download then activate, dies after a few days. You can then either purchase or delete

Simples

Yeah that works if you're renting FROM Sony and MS, but the normal routes of current rental systems, either in retail or online do not have expiration dates for your rentals as long as you're paying your monthly package subscription. That is because they're disc based and the discs are 100% the same as a retail disc, rental companies do not have special discs given to them.

MS would then be cutting out traditional rental methods, or as discussed earlier in here having to find a solution amongst all the issues of somehow differentiating a rental disc from a retail disc WITHOUT loading the finacial burden/hassle onto the rental companies (or they would just say no, we're not offering your games).

Game rentals could be as simple as movie rentals from PSN. Download then activate, dies after a few days. You can then either purchase or delete

Simples

Except you can get "all you can eat" game rental and rent as many games as you want a month and keep them for as long as you want for around ?10-15 a month.

If you do it via PSN/XBL then you are going to be paying ?4-5 per game.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!