Microsoft "No fee to play XBOX one games on other consoles"


Recommended Posts

so basically you can't just, by a game, finish it, have the disc collecting dust for months, have a friend over who didnt buy the game back when it was release and you want to lend it to him. You can't? You have to pay a fee? what's the deal here.

The game install being tied to your account, and that account being able to enable playing the game on any console (one at a time obviously), was a given.

Are you somehow implying that you are a better than others here because you are a gamer and you have a GF? :laugh: If yes, that's new low for you.

Yeah I sure said that, I'm a regular pimp, why would I not be better than others on here.... :wub:

It's a light hearted poke at a gaming culture that can be very solitary outside of playing games online with your mates. There are many people even simply in friendships who swap games with each other as a more cost effective way of trying games out.

My GF and I are serious (simply meaning we see/spend much time with each other), and we do not see the point of us both buying copies of every game we enjoy. As we have similar genre interests, outside of us both wanting to play something at the same time, or wanting a genuinely amazing game in our collection, we aren't both buying copies of Heavy Rain when I can just give her my copy when I'm done.

She doesn't want to play it on my account on her PS3, she wants to play it on hers to get the trophies and satisfaction of using her own account name (especially if it's a multiplayer game - Yes not all MP games have online passes). Even if she didn't have to pay a fee, simply use my account, she doesn't want to do that for the exact same reasons. People get attached to their online alias/ID and account in general, especially with the trophy/achievement culture. Not to mention if I'm using my account at home, and she has to sign into my account at hers, well, that would boot me out wouldn't it? .....

Just wondering, what is the process if you get games from something like Gamefly? Genuine question, i've not seen anything regarding that.

Most likely the same as the used game market, whatever this "solution in progress" is for when you cannot log into the original disc owners account (whoever rented from Gamefly first?). Phil Harrison said a fee, MS backtracked, but it's going to be something or the "you need to be logged into the owners account" requirement simply would not exist - Like how it is this generation, a disc is a disc, it works wherever with no cavecats.

Most likely the same as the used game market, whatever this "solution in progress" is for when you cannot log into the original disc owners account (whoever rented from Gamefly first?). Phil Harrison said a fee, MS backtracked, but it's going to be something or the "you need to be logged into the owners account" requirement simply would not exist - Like how it is this generation, a disc is a disc, it works wherever with no cavecats.

Or they have a way for rentals to work and haven't revealed it. It wouldn't exactly be hard to do.

Or they have a way for rentals to work and haven't revealed it. It wouldn't exactly be hard to do.

How do you differentiate a rental disc without considerable headache? Most of them are simply using "retail" units, hence how Blockbuster sells ex-rentals. They aren't branded or anything.

How do you differentiate a rental disc without considerable headache? Most of them are simply using "retail" units, hence how Blockbuster sells ex-rentals. They aren't branded or anything.

Just because you don't see the solution doesn't mean there isn't one. Microsoft has solved far more complex problems than this.

They really want to know if you can lend a game out, I bet you can, and I bet that as long as that game is lent out you can't play it either. I'm going to make a guess and say each disc has some encryption key on it, as with every console so far actually. That key is matched to your account, so if that same key is flagged on another account the first one could be turned off until the second one is uninstalled.

So, until your friend is done and uninstalled the game and gave you the disc back then your installed copy won't play. Just a guess though.

No, discs are mass produced, if one game has an encryption key on the disc then every copy of that disc produced will have the same encryption key, you cannot do what you're talking about without making a brand new master for each disc, and the cost, time, machining and everything to do that makes it impossible.

Just because you don't see the solution doesn't mean there isn't one. Microsoft has solved far more complex problems than this.

You said it wouldn't exactly be hard to do so, so I simply asked you wondering why you thought that! Or I proposed a challenge to you, as rightly or wrongly my brain can't see an easy way to do it with how rental discs work.

This is nothing to do with being a PS3 fan, etc. This is about Microsoft essentially killing off the second hand game market (or at least, reducing it's value somewhat).

Say I have a copy of 1 game on the shelf, and my friend has another. We can no longer just play each others games without having to be signed into the others account, or paying a fee. How is that a good thing?

Unfortunately retailers have exploited second-hand games to the point where they are deliberately undermining first-hand sales, which hurts developers. Companies like GameStop have taken billions of dollars away from the gaming industry and consumers haven't been made aware of what impact that has. Steam doesn't allow the reselling of games and it's been nothing but a positive influence on the industry, significantly reducing the cost of games for those willing to wait and providing a better income to developers.

How do you differentiate a rental disc without considerable headache? Most of them are simply using "retail" units, hence how Blockbuster sells ex-rentals. They aren't branded or anything.

Everything could be done online in a similar way to Steam, in that the disc is literally only for storing the data and doesn't entitle you to play the game. Rented games could include one-use serial codes that either let you play for a specific amount of time or track your play time and bill you accordingly. The difference is that developers would actually get money from such a system.

Unfortunately retailers have exploited second-hand games to the point where they are deliberately undermining first-hand sales, which hurts developers. Companies like GameStop have taken billions of dollars away from the gaming industry and consumers haven't been made aware of what impact that has. Steam doesn't allow the reselling of games and it's been nothing but a positive influence on the industry, significantly reducing the cost of games for those willing to wait and providing a better income to developers.

Everything could be done online in a similar way to Steam, in that the disc is literally only for storing the data and doesn't entitle you to play the game. Rented games could include one-use serial codes that either let you play for a specific amount of time or track your play time and bill you accordingly. The difference is that developers would actually get money from such a system.

This is a good example of someone using their brain and not jumping in with hate and anger, well done sir! :)

Everything could be done online in a similar way to Steam, in that the disc is literally only for storing the data and doesn't entitle you to play the game. Rented games could include one-use serial codes that either let you play for a specific amount of time or track your play time and bill you accordingly. The difference is that developers would actually get money from such a system.

Take Lovefilm for example, that's thousands of individual codes having to be printed for games, as they're an online based rental company it's a lot of work. These companies also allow you to rent and play for as long as you want, so if MS are going to start rubbing out the rental companies ethos of own for as long as you want, that's yet again another headache.

Doesn't gamefly allow you to buy your rental and keep it at a cost? What happens there? I see DirtyLarry occasionally keeping his rentals permanently by paying $40+ to keep the rental and actually own it.

Steam doesn't allow the reselling of games and it's been nothing but a positive influence on the industry, significantly reducing the cost of games for those willing to wait and providing a better income to developers.

Good luck if you think what MS is about to do is going to offer you steam like prices, steam like DRM (complete offline play with NO restrictions) and steam like sales. Comparing consoles to steam/origin always falls off a cliff somewhere.

You said it wouldn't exactly be hard to do so, so I simply asked you wondering why you thought that! Or I proposed a challenge to you, as rightly or wrongly my brain can't see an easy way to do it with how rental discs work.

So because you can't figure it out you answer people's questions saying it can't happen? That's awfully kind of you.

So because you can't figure it out you answer people's questions saying it can't happen? That's awfully kind of you.

But you said you thought it was easy, or at least not hard, you've yet to bring anything to our discussion other than "MS can figure it out". WHY do you think it's easy?

Or they have a way for rentals to work and haven't revealed it. It wouldn't exactly be hard to do.

You're asking me to figure it out, yet you're not posting any suggestions of your own when I am at least pointing out what MS would have to navigate through.

Take Lovefilm for example, that's thousands of individual codes having to be printed for games, as they're an online based rental company it's a lot of work. These companies also allow you to rent and play for as long as you want, so if MS are going to start rubbing out the rental companies ethos of own for as long as you want, that's yet again another headache.

Or they could just email them to you. And there's no reason that companies like Lovefilm couldn't simply track how long you use games and bill you accordingly.

Good luck if you think what MS is about to do is going to offer you steam like prices, steam like DRM (complete offline play with NO restrictions) and steam like sales. Comparing consoles to steam/origin always falls off a cliff somewhere.

Publishers set the price of games, not Microsoft. If they can make more money by lowering prices then they will. But you're right, I don't expect that Microsoft's foray into digital distribution will be as good for gamers as Steam -- its record with XBLA suggests otherwise. However, that doesn't mean it will be all doom-and-gloom.

Or they could just email them to you. And there's no reason that companies like Lovefilm couldn't simply track how long you use games and bill you accordingly.

Or more likely they just wont stock Xbox One games because its too much hassle.

Or they could just email them to you. And there's no reason that companies like Lovefilm couldn't simply track how long you use games and bill you accordingly. Publishers set the price of games, not Microsoft. If they can make more money by lowering prices then they will. But you're right, I don't expect that Microsoft's foray into digital distribution will be as good for gamers as Steam -- its record with XBLA suggests otherwise. However, that doesn't mean it will be all doom-and-gloom.

But they do not do that, that's not part of the rental ethos. You can rent a game from them and as long as you're paying your lovefilm subscription keep it for as long as you want. That would essentially "kill" the rental market, here you go guys pay the ?12 a month to us for your games rental package AND if you keep a game longer than 3 days you need to start paying ?1 a day :/ Can you imagine something like that coinciding with PS4 games continuing to work how PS3 games currently work when rented from Lovefilm? Even bigger disaster there than the one you'd have alone trying to charge people for keeping a game for a certain amount of time.

MS set development costs on Live though, as in patching/publishing fees which we already know from this gen developers aren't exactly chuffed about. Steam is nowhere near as entry cost expensive, hence lower RRPs, better sales and a lot more variety.

This is how it currently is.... A person can buy a game and lend that game to a friend once you are done with it. Heck you can even trade it. With the Xbox One, you can not lend your games to a friend; unless you give those friends access to your Live account. And something to remember is that your pressumably can not be logged into live at the same from the same account.

This essentially kills off sharing game with your friends. This was such a bad move from Xbox.

But you said you thought it was easy, or at least not hard, you've yet to bring anything to our discussion other than "MS can figure it out". WHY do you think it's easy?

You're asking me to figure it out, yet you're not posting any suggestions of your own when I am at least pointing out what MS would have to navigate through.

Why do you think you can post nonsense without backing it up?

I said it was easy, as in easier than other things the company has tackled and definitely something they've considered during the dev process given the prominence of that industry. I don't have to come up with anything, you just need to stop answering questions you're assuming the answer to without any backing source. This isn't about me. You said it won't happen, and you just plain don't know that.

Why do you think you can post nonsense without backing it up?

I said it was easy, as in easier than other things the company has tackled and definitely something they've considered during the dev process given the prominence of that industry. I don't have to come up with anything, you just need to stop answering questions you're assuming the answer to without any backing source. This isn't about me. You said it won't happen, and you just plain don't know that.

I actually never said it won't happen (go find that quote), just unleashed a load of issues that have to be trawled through. I think most readers on here wouldn't exactly call the completely rational points I've made "nonsense", but okay.

This is how it currently is.... A person can buy a game and lend that game to a friend once you are done with it. Heck you can even trade it. With the Xbox One, you can not lend your games to a friend; unless you give those friends access to your Live account. And something to remember is that your pressumably can not be logged into live at the same from the same account.

This essentially kills off sharing game with your friends. This was such a bad move from Xbox.

We don't have enough info on the details yet though. What if you can lend out a game but until you get it back you can't play it yourself? We honestly don't know what they'll do, they haven't said specifics yet so everyone is just guessing.

Game rentals could be as simple as movie rentals from PSN. Download then activate, dies after a few days. You can then either purchase or delete

Simples

Yeah that works if you're renting FROM Sony and MS, but the normal routes of current rental systems, either in retail or online do not have expiration dates for your rentals as long as you're paying your monthly package subscription. That is because they're disc based and the discs are 100% the same as a retail disc, rental companies do not have special discs given to them.

MS would then be cutting out traditional rental methods, or as discussed earlier in here having to find a solution amongst all the issues of somehow differentiating a rental disc from a retail disc WITHOUT loading the finacial burden/hassle onto the rental companies (or they would just say no, we're not offering your games).

Game rentals could be as simple as movie rentals from PSN. Download then activate, dies after a few days. You can then either purchase or delete

Simples

Except you can get "all you can eat" game rental and rent as many games as you want a month and keep them for as long as you want for around ?10-15 a month.

If you do it via PSN/XBL then you are going to be paying ?4-5 per game.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
    • Did you see their FAQ, its quite good. Have a look in the Advanced section. https://delta.chat/en/help
    • Just install Linux Mint that is a real blessing and many times cheaper because you can continue using your old Windows computer/laptop with the latest Linux updates.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!