Microsoft "No fee to play XBOX one games on other consoles"


Recommended Posts

The rental companies could just get codes to issue to renters, easy.

Now do these codes allow you to play indefinitely, or do they still expire? If they expire as spoken about earlier that completely destroys the currental rental ethos. Are these codes going to be supplied for every Xbox One game to EVERY rental company? There exists some smaller scale online based rental companies, see Boomerang Games for the UK. Are they printed or emailed, if printed who is footing the cost for them? Can rental discs be shared amongst friends? While not officially sanctioned by rental companies, I'm pretty sure people take current rentals to their friends house - Does that go back to the whole you need to be signed into your account to play the disc? Currently people can buy rentals to keep to own from Gamefly, will that still work? If so, what happens next do Gamefly need to supply you with another code for ownership of the disc?

The rental companies could just get codes to issue to renters, easy.

How would that work though? Mail rental companies let you keep the game for as long as you want, providing your paying your monthly subscription. Do they issue a code that they then have to revoke when they get the disc back? They won't go for that, far too much costly admin involved. Will the code be time limited? They won't do that either, their subscribers can keep the games as long as they want.

The only practical solution is the one they currently use, so don't be surprised if they just don't carry games for the new console.

XBox One? Better start calling it XBoned. :p

We don't have enough info on the details yet though. What if you can lend out a game but until you get it back you can't play it yourself? We honestly don't know what they'll do, they haven't said specifics yet so everyone is just guessing.

Actually we do. A friend can borrow your game disc, because you will not need it. But when he installs it on his Xbox One he will need to activate it before he can play it. He can not activate it because you have the "activation" code that came with the game attached to your Live account, so he will need to buy a license. Essentially repurchasing the game.

Here:

Phil Harrison tries (again) to clarify game ownership, second-hand sales and always-online in Xbox One

And here:

CVG Andy Robinson: "Just interviewed Phil Harrison. Reaffirmed that second hand games need to be repurchased"

And here:

But they do not do that, that's not part of the rental ethos. You can rent a game from them and as long as you're paying your lovefilm subscription keep it for as long as you want. That would essentially "kill" the rental market, here you go guys pay the ?12 a month to us for your games rental package AND if you keep a game longer than 3 days you need to start paying ?1 a day :/

It depends on the terms that Microsoft or publishers set and we could see some innovative new approaches - there's no reason that rentals would have to be charged at a daily rate. The problem is that currently developers don't make money from rented games beyond the initial sale - the result is that companies like Lovefilm and GameStop are leeching money away from the gaming industry, away from the people creating the content. Most consumers don't even know it's happening.

I have no problem with people who are currently leeching off the gaming industry by renting games being asked to pay more to compensate developers. They are contributing no more to the gaming industry than people who simply pirate games.

It depends on the terms that Microsoft or publishers set and we could see some innovative new approaches - there's no reason that rentals would have to be charged at a daily rate. The problem is that currently developers don't make money from rented games beyond the initial sale - the result is that companies like Lovefilm and GameStop are leeching money away from the gaming industry, away from the people creating the content. Most consumers don't even know it's happening.

I have no problem with people who are currently leeching off the gaming industry by renting games being asked to pay more to compensate developers. They are contributing no more to the gaming industry than people who simply pirate games.

Really? Pirating equal to renting? Rental companies do not get game discs for free, it has to be purchased all they do is give that stock to different people continually. Essentially you are saying if I lend my friends games I'm not "contributing to the gaming industry" :s

Gamefly have that awesome policy in place that DirtyLarry has been vocal about using that you can decide to buy the game you're renting directly from them if you want to keep it.

Renting/borrowing/temporarily owning is part of the human world, the games industry does not sit on a pedestal to sit and judge people who cannot afford to, but do still contribute money where they can to their hobby. If MS want to try and kill rentals fine, that's their roadmap, but to ever try and put pirates and people who rent even in the same room, not really fair.

It depends on the terms that Microsoft or publishers set and we could see some innovative new approaches - there's no reason that rentals would have to be charged at a daily rate. The problem is that currently developers don't make money from rented games beyond the initial sale - the result is that companies like Lovefilm and GameStop are leeching money away from the gaming industry, away from the people creating the content. Most consumers don't even know it's happening.

I have no problem with people who are currently leeching off the gaming industry by renting games being asked to pay more to compensate developers. They are contributing no more to the gaming industry than people who simply pirate games.

Maybe with the current state of games people don't want to waste ?40 for a short, lowest common denominator, game. I buy what I want to buy, rent and use PS+ to get games I wouldn't even think of buying, I don't see how that is "leeching", publishers don't get my money whether I rent it or not.

I really like this comment

"That makes no sense. An NFL game is a one-time game. A video game/movie/music CD is a PRODUCT you BUY and OWN.

Look up the First Sale Doctrine. You have every legal right to do whatever you want with your product. Sell it. Give it away for free. Use it as a frisbee or shiny drink coaster. Nobody can stop you from doing it, and certainly not any butthurt big companies whining that you just gave the game you PAID for already away to someone else and they didn't get a dime from it. Too bad.

These are products, not sporting events. These are like movies, books, comics, CDs, and every one of those mediums, with the SOLE exception of games, acknowledges that the second-hand market exists and is ALLOWED to exist.

You are not right about this. Just because a company acts big and tough does not mean you, the consumer, don't have a butt-load of protected legal rights to any product you pay in full for. You want to buy a used car? Go right ahead. You want to buy a used CD? Go right ahead. You want to buy a used comic book? Go for it. You want to buy a used video game? YOU CAN. You have every right to go right to ebay and sell or buy a game for whatever you wish to spend or ask for, and no company PR guy whining about it changes that reality"

  • Like 4

I can't see how Microsoft Fanboys are going to defend the practice of crippling a disk after it's installed onto your ACCOUNT, that's the important word here folks, it's not installed to your hardware, it's installed to your account. Let's say you rack up 15 games or so, and you're a hardcore gamer, and experience what a lot of other Xbox 360 users have experienced, the loss of your account to some hacker. Microsoft does it's classic blame dodging, and their abysmal support basically tells you your account is gone, your 15 games are gone with it, and they say, "Well just buy them again!". This doesn't look like an appealing situation.

Draconian DRM is generally frowned upon in the gaming community, and it looks like Xbox One is THE DRM system.

No, discs are mass produced, if one game has an encryption key on the disc then every copy of that disc produced will have the same encryption key, you cannot do what you're talking about without making a brand new master for each disc, and the cost, time, machining and everything to do that makes it impossible.

Think Windows XYZ and product keys. I am not saying it's a good thing but it can be done. It can be as easy as scanning a QR code using Kinect. Rental companies can issue QR codes in similar fashion and you just hold up your smartphone/PC screen for Kinect to read.

How do you differentiate a rental disc without considerable headache? Most of them are simply using "retail" units, hence how Blockbuster sells ex-rentals. They aren't branded or anything.

I think a company that can put a hypervisor at the heart of a game console can easily think of something :laugh:. QR codes are not rocket science.

I can't see how Microsoft Fanboys are going to defend the practice of crippling a disk after it's installed onto your ACCOUNT, that's the important word here folks, it's not installed to your hardware, it's installed to your account. Let's say you rack up 15 games or so, and you're a hardcore gamer, and experience what a lot of other Xbox 360 users have experienced, the loss of your account to some hacker. Microsoft does it's classic blame dodging, and their abysmal support basically tells you your account is gone, your 15 games are gone with it, and they say, "Well just buy them again!". This doesn't look like an appealing situation.

Draconian DRM is generally frowned upon in the gaming community, and it looks like Xbox One is THE DRM system.

You'd think.... I didn't really see anyone convincingly defending EA with SimCity, or Blizzard with Diablo 3. Heck, Blizzard are moving away from DRM with Diablo 3 on the PS3/PS4, tells you a lot.

The PS3 has it spot on with licensing/DRM, it's tied to hardware, up to 2 PS3s now (yes it was better when it was up to 5), and all the content can happily be played offline without any stupid check-ins.

Maybe with the current state of games people don't want to waste ?40 for a short, lowest common denominator, game.

The "current state of games"? If you don't like them then don't play them. You make it sound like people have to suffer through them. Gaming is better than it's ever been and the production values have gone up exponentially, yet prices have remained virtually static (without even factoring in inflation).

As for price, games drop in price very quickly nowadays - the new Tomb Raider was released just a couple of months ago yet already it's only ?24 on X360; Halo 4 costs only ?19 and that's not much older. And expensive games are the price you pay for the convenience of a console. PC games are considerably cheaper and offer much better visuals and gameplay experience.

Obviously people should be wary of Microsoft restricting second hand sales, as it has the potential for abuse. Microsoft doesn't exactly have the best track record when it comes to XBLA, with its focus on advertising above that of supporting developers. However, Steam stands as a shining example of how restricting ownership can benefit gamers through cheaper prices, better community interaction and supporting the developers of games. And as long as Sony doesn't opt for the same restrictions it will keep Microsoft in check. It is up to individuals to decide whether the restrictions are a deal-breaker, though I suspect for most they won't be.

"GameStop's president has offered his two cents on the next-generation used games market, explaining he is confident both Sony and Microsoft are happy to see it continue.

Speaking to Forbes, Tony Bartel reassured consumers that next-generation games will still be bought and sold on the pre-owned market, as console manufacturers appreciate it's a necessary facet of the marketplace.

?

It's a recognised way to make these games more affordable. All three new platforms understand that.

"Both Sony and Microsoft have said games can be resold and that's exactly what we anticipated," he said. "It's a recognised way to make these games more affordable. All three new platforms understand that.

"As people upgraded to PS3 they traded in their old systems and libraries, which is why Sony made the move to not support backwards compatibility with later iterations of PS3. That's why the 'buy, sell, trade' model works well. It enables people to purchase new games by trading in their old ones. We expect to see the same thing with this transition for PS4 and Xbox One. Trade-ins allow for a seamless transition."

Interestingly, Bartel revealed that 70 per cent of GameStop's $1 billion market sales comes from the sale of new games rather than pre-owned ones.Confusion reigned yesterday when sources first reported that the Xbox One wouldrequire mandatory installs, with anyone wanting to play a game on more than one machine forced to pay for it again. Thankfully, this was later clarified as a misunderstanding - you can play a game using your own account from any machine, though you can't share that game with others unless they're signed into your account or playing on the same machine.

So that's nice and clear, then. To try and cut through the confusion surrounding Xbox One, we've put together a list of things we know for certain which we'll be updating as more comes out.

The exact constraints placed upon the resale of games have yet to be revealed."

http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/05/22/gamestop-president-weighs-in-on-next-gen-pre-owned-games

How stupid do they think people are??

The "current state of games"? If you don't like them then don't play them. You make it sound like people have to suffer through them. Gaming is better than it's ever been and the production values have gone up exponentially, yet prices have remained virtually static (without even factoring in inflation).

Gee what a surprise, the old "don't like it don't buy/play them" retort.

You completely missed my point which was I'm not going to spend ?40 on a game I'm not sure of, not all games get demos so the only way I can try it is by renting, but by doing this I'm some kind of leech.

LOL, has anybody seen the disaster going on in N4G with their PS4 crap. Everybody is preassuring Microsoft to respond, i dont know why people are desperate wait till E3 its like 18 days from now. -_- lol i like the console its pretty neat, but im not desperate i swear some people LOL Patience in Virtue :p

That does not really put anything to bed as far as the issue, it still prohibits the readily available access to used games. Unless you are going to create a new ID for every game and sell the ID With it.

Install the game and the Licence will be put on ur gamertag.

Give the game to a friend to borrow, and that deauthorizes your license and puts it on his gamertag

When hes done, he gives the game back, and you reauthorize it. When its deauthorized it wont play.

That hopefully should be the way to do it.

Gee what a surprise, the old "don't like it don't buy/play them" retort.

You completely missed my point which was I'm not going to spend ?40 on a game I'm not sure of

Then don't - just wait a month or two for it to drop in price or go on sale. The problem with traditional renting is that it doesn't reward the people making the game but instead takes money away from them. If publishers want to make money they need to make sure games are priced appropriately, as many people aren't willing to pay full price for them. Like I said, Steam has a good balance - you have a relatively high initial price with pre-order incentives for the eager fans, with substantial flash sales within a month or two of release.

It remains to be see how game rentals will be implemented and how much they'll cost, so we don't know how they'll compare to the current system. They might end up a similar price while supporting developers, in which case it's a win-win. I've never been a fan of cancerous businesses like GameStop, so I couldn't care less if they go under.

Install the game and the Licence will be put on ur gamertag.

Give the game to a friend to borrow, and that deauthorizes your license and puts it on his gamertag

When hes done, he gives the game back, and you reauthorize it. When its deauthorized it wont play.

That hopefully should be the way to do it.

If the rumors are true, I hope this is how it works.

You sir are a die hard ps fan. What are you doing here? All you have to say is negatives about the Xbox. Can we xboxers enjoy the news without any FUD or negatives being spilt?

You don't like the console fine (no one was forcing you to get it anyway)

You don't like the way it looks? (Fine too, nofu)

You don't like that Microsoft didn't only focus on games (ur a ps fan, you weren't going to buy the Xbox anyway)

Oh yeah, I love being able to do jack **** with a game that I beat. I cant sell it, or trade it to anyone, I can't rent it in a store to see if I like it before I buy it, I get to waste my money and be stuck with something I may hate forever! Works perfectly for the publishers, and Microsoft, sucks for the consumer. Thats the way they like it though, so what else is new.

I also think PS4 will also do something for used games, I mean if xbox has this stuff going on, wouldnt developers like it? and Make more games for the new Xbox

I think it's pretty much given that Microsoft won't do it without Sony (unless they get massive deals from publishers).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • A different thing with Russia. When you say is it better, depends on things. It is better that we don't have the E.U making rules and laws that have nothing to do with them. Is the trading part better? No, that is really mucked up, but then we knew that was going to happen and we would have make agreements, like we do with other parts of the world. Freedom of movement is certainly better, but could be improved, we still need more control over our borders. do you live in the U.K?
    • So what am I quoting from them? I never listened to what Farage or his cronies said. I wanted the U.K to leave the E.u years before the referendum and it had nothing to do with Farage and his cronies. So what country do you live in? Did we work much better together? We were always at logger heads with the E.U because we disagreed with them so much. Maggie was always on at them. I would have thought the E.U was glad to get rid of us as we stopped the integration or made it a two tier. Now without us they can integrate more. I would not have voted out if it was just a trading block and we can still work together on somethings.
    • MPC-BE 1.9.0 by Razvan Serea Media Player Classic - BE is a free and open source audio and video player for Windows. Media Player Classic - BE is based on the original "Media Player Classic" project (Gabest) and "Media Player Classic Home Cinema" project (Casimir666), contains additional features and bug fixes. The BE mod (Black Edition Mod) is a skinned version of Media Player Classic Home Cinema, much better looking than the plain old MPC. MPC-BE 1.9.0 changelog: Splitters Fixed crashes in some situations. AudioSplitter Added support for the RF64 format. Fixed reading of channel layout for some WavPack files. Added support for ID3 tags for Wave64 files. Unknown Wave64 chunks are now ignored. AviSplitter Added support for 'y408' video. Improved support for 'HEVC' video. FLVSplitter Added support for VVC video. MP4Splitter Improved handling of corrupted files. MatroskaSplitter Expanded support for V_UNCOMPRESSED video codecs. Fixed support for frame rotation (ProjectionPoseRoll). Improved support for "V_MS/VFW/FOURCC / HEVC". MpcDvdVideoDecoder Fixed conversion to YUY2. Fixed display of menus for some DVD-Videos. RoQVideoDecoder Output in NV12 and YV12 formats is allowed. Full range is used. MPC Video Decoder RGB32 format will be output as a top-down bitmap by default. Added support for the "IID_MediaSideDataDOVIMetadataV2" interface. Removed support for the deprecated "IID_MediaSideDataDOVIMetadata" interface. Fixed retrieving the name of the video adapter when using NVDEC. Fixed crashes in some situations. MPC Video Converter Added support for AYUV video format. MpcAudioRenderer Improved input format validation. Optimized retrieval of supported formats for exclusive mode. Added the "Keep audio device active when paused" setting. Fixed crashes and freezes in various situations. Subtitles Added the ability to open the properties of an external subtitle renderer in the "Subtitles" settings panel. Fixed external subtitle connections for VSFilter. Fixed a crash when rendering PGS/SUP subtitles when using AVX2. YouTube Improved support for yt-dlp. The built-in YouTube parser is no longer used. Player The HTTP read strategy has been changed. If the playlist contains one entry, more key combinations can be used to control the player (jump through chapters, adjust volume). Improved support for reading ASX playlists. The translation of the MediaInfo report for Chinese, Korean and Japanese has been removed. Added blocking of 32-bit filter "PICVideo Lossless JPEG Decompressor" (pvljpg20.dll), because it crashes. Added blocking of the system filter "AVI Decompressor", which will eliminate the crash of VFW codecs. Fixed a rare crash when using the "/slave" key. Fixed a crash when getting a list of fonts for OSD. Added the ability to load an external audio file using hotkeys. Fixed opening a network path starting with \?\UNC. The "Determine duration when adding" playlist setting now works for YouTube video URLs. The "Online media services" settings panel has been redesigned. Added a "Merge files using FFmpeg" option to the file saving dialog. This option is activated when playing multiple streams obtained using yt-dlp. Added loading of local .dpl playlists ("DAUMPLAYLIST"). Fixed a hang when the user closes the player during the URL opening process. Various interface fixes. Installer Updated MPC Video Renderer 0.10.5. Updated MPC Script Source 0.2.17. Added MPC Image Source 0.3.6. Translations Updated Japanese translation (by tsubasanouta). Updated Chinese (Traditional) and Dutch translation (by beter). Updated Romanian translation (by Andrei Miloiu). Updated Hungarian translation (by mickey). Updated Turkish translation (by cmhrky). Updated German translation (by Klaus1189). Updated Chinese (Simplified) translation (by wushantao). Updated Italian translation (by mapi68). Updated Korean translation (by Hackjjang). Updated Chinese (Traditional) (by udfbe). Updated libraries dav1d 1.5.3-6-g04b69f9; ffmpeg n8.2-dev-1857-g4653e68aab; libpng git-v1.6.55-9-g7d52a8087; Little-CMS git-lcms2.18-26-gf739cda; MediaInfo git-v26.05-38-g702c9b7fd; ZenLib git-v0.4.41-91-g073f297; zlib 1.3.2. Download: MPC-BE 64-bit | Portable MPC-BE 64-bit | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: MPC-BE 32-bit | Portable MPC-BE 32-bit Link: Media Player Classic - BE Home Page Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Apple reportedly looks to blacklisted Chinese memory chips as RAM prices climb by Karthik Mudaliar Image via Apple Apple is reportedly trying to get a clearance from the Trump administration to buy memory from ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) to get some relief from soaring DRAM prices. As per a report by the Financial Times, Apple approached the Commerce Department more than a month ago and also spoke to other officials and allies in Washington. For starters, CXMT is a company that's already been placed on the Pentagon's list of Chinese military companies. The Chinese company is the country's top DRAM maker. For Apple, the timing is certainly awkward but not surprising. Tim Cook had recently warned that Apple would have to raise prices because AI companies are buying up large amounts of memory for data centers, and just like that, Apple raised MacBook and iPad prices. Micron also recently revealed that customers have committed billions of dollars to secure memory supply years in advance, which shows us how aggressive securing infrastructure has become. This gives suppliers such as Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron more leverage, while pushing hardware makers to look for alternatives. CXMT is one of those alternatives, but not the simplest one. Apple has spent many years trying to diversify parts of its supply chain away from China, especially for final assembly, while still depending heavily on Chinese manufacturing and suppliers. Even domestic brands from China are moving towards CXMT and YMTC instead of relying on Samsung, Micron, and SK Hynix. For Apple, though, it would invite more scrutiny than local Chinese companies. For now, this is more like a lobbying effort rather than a confirmed supply deal. There's no official statement from either of the parties. What is clearer, though, is the pressure behind such a request. AI demand has certainly made hardware a bottleneck, and companies are trying everything they can to bring things back to normal, even if that means making politically sensitive choices. Source: Financial Times
    • I did test it a month or so back, but ... the results I expect to be on the first page are not there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      486
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!