Xbox One Requires Daily Internet Connection


Recommended Posts

geez,some of you guys need to get a grip. we know you don't like xbox or Microsoft, stop posting stuff that's been debunked and not true,and for god sakes stop posting stuff from kotaku. these guys were pushing the 'always online' bs rumor so hard, they are trying to save face. look at every article. they write some crap,then have an update at the bottom with clarification from Microsoft saying the info is bogus.

On the big day of your massive prepared hardware launch, as the public relations figure delegated to do journalist interviews, that, quite frankly at a company of MS size would be a disciplinary offense. MS fired Adam Orth....

It's more like they didn't prepare to answer journalists questions in a way that didn't cause public upset prior to E3. In other words, the no comment or least damaging wording. No company enjoys presenting DRM in this day and age, always trying to candy wrap it - See Diablo 3 and Sim City.

Even your beloved Sony's head didn't know their policy about used games and had to ask PR before he answered it and even then he was ambiguous. It happens. Kotaku is hell bent on this **** for some reason and people like you who hate Xbox for some reason are enjoying every moment of it.

It may be true and it may not be. So far Microsoft has been dodging answering the question and all we can do is wait.

Everything in kotaku article is debunked right here: http://majornelson.com/2013/05/21/xbox-one-and-used-games/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+MajorNelson+%28Major+Nelson+%28Xbox%29%29&utm_content=Google+Reader

Even your beloved Sony's head didn't know their policy about used games and had to ask PR before he answered it and even then he was ambiguous. It happens. Kotaku is hell bent on this **** for some reason and people like you who hate Xbox for some reason are enjoying every moment of it.

It may be true and it may not be. So far Microsoft has been dodging answering the question and all we can do is wait.

Everything in kotaku article is debunked right here: http://majornelson.com/2013/05/21/xbox-one-and-used-games/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+MajorNelson+%28Major+Nelson+%28Xbox%29%29&utm_content=Google+Reader

It quite clearly states only if you are on your profile. If there wasn't a restriction it would not have to say such a specific requirement.

You do not need to be signed into your profile this generation to play a game at your friends.

It quite clearly states only if you are on your profile. If there wasn't a restriction it would not have to say such a specific requirement.

You do not need to be signed into your profile this generation to play a game at your friends.

You actually do need to sign in for XBLA and GoD (probably similar on the PS3 side). If they have said something doesn't necessarily mean it is true.

You actually do need to sign in for XBLA and GoD (probably similar on the PS3 side). If they have said something doesn't necessarily mean it is true.

Nope, no games on the PS3 or PSN (includes fully retail digitally distributed games) or retail require you to be signed in. Even patched download if you aren't signed into PSN but have your ethernet cable plugged in - Why? Game patches are stored on a different server.

Nope, no games on the PS3 or PSN (includes fully retail digitally distributed games) or retail require you to be signed in. Even patched download if you aren't signed into PSN but have your ethernet cable plugged in - Why? Game patches are stored on a different server.

Clarification: I was referring to the "friends place scenario" not my own console. I don't need to log in for XBLA/GoD on my own system.

Clarification: I was referring to the "friends place scenario" not my own console. I don't need to log in for XBLA/GoD on my own system.

You don't need to on a friends PS3 either. One of the great things about hardware licensing is all you need to do on a friends PS3 is have your account ON the console (stored locally), NOT signed in, and they can actually play ALL your games from THEIR account, online or offline.

Hence why 'gamesharing' was/still is incredibly popular on the PS3.

You don't need to on a friends PS3 either. One of the great things about hardware licensing is all you need to do on a friends PS3 is have your account ON the console (stored locally), NOT signed in, and they can actually play ALL your games from THEIR account, online or offline.

Hence why 'gamesharing' was/still is incredibly popular on the PS3.

There is a term for that - it's called soft piracy. I know about that feature and still surprised how sony allowed it. (I am not complaining and would love to have something like that on Xbox side).

There is a term for that - it's called soft piracy. I know about that feature and still surprised how sony allowed it. (I am not complaining and would love to have something like that on Xbox side).

We (we being gamers) share game discs with everyone all the time though (as well as books/magazines/comics/clothes/etc). The digital market overlords have just sheeped us all into believing draconian DRM is okay if it's to do with digital content.

I'm sure there's some CEOs out there who would say playing your legally bought MP3 collection when a friend is round is "soft piracy"....

There is a term for that - it's called soft piracy. I know about that feature and still surprised how sony allowed it. (I am not complaining and would love to have something like that on Xbox side).

How the hell is it piracy to share games with your friends?!?!?!?!

We (we being gamers) share game discs with everyone all the time though (as well as books/magazines/comics/clothes/etc). The digital market overlords have just sheeped us all into believing draconian DRM is okay if it's to do with digital content.

I'm sure there's some CEOs out there who would say playing your legally bought MP3 collection when a friend is round is "soft piracy"....

There is a difference though. When you share a book with your friend, you don't suddenly have two books. I am not pro DRM but as someone who gets paid for software development, I can see the other side too.

How the hell is it piracy to share games with your friends?!?!?!?!

We are talking about sharing PSN games not game discs. Try to follow the conversation...

There is a difference though. When you share a book with your friend, you don't suddenly have two books. I am not pro DRM but as someone who gets paid for software development, I can see the other side too.

I can see a fair point there BUT, that person doesn't own the game, it is still tied to your account. You are the owner of it. Your account can only be licensed on 2 PS3s at a time, so if you delete your account off your friends PS3 he/she cannot play your games.

It's a very fairly balanced DRM system, that yes when it was at 5 activations it was getting abused, but at 2, you're either spreading your account over two PS3s you may own, or one at your friends/GF's/BF's.

It really is in no way unfair to the software developer, you've paid him/her for their work and only YOU own it.

Which is something Sony allows by letting you "activate" the game on a different PS3 entirely as well as your own???

Last time, if you are not going to bother reading what I post - I am not going to bother replying saying the same thing again.

Last time, if you are not going to bother reading what I post - I am not going to bother replying saying the same thing again.

Maybe if you comprehended the fact that Sony lets you use content on two different consoles at the same time you'd understand. No one is gaming or bypassing DRM, Sony ALLOWS it.

Maybe if you comprehended the fact that Sony lets you use content on two different consoles at the same time you'd understand. No one is gaming or bypassing DRM, Sony ALLOWS it.

Just because one company allows it does not mean that another company should. For instance, Microsoft may have implemented the restrictions at the behest of publishers and we may see them favour the X1 over the PS4 as a result. Personally I don't have a problem with it, as I buy my games nearly exclusively on Steam and there are similar restrictions in place.

How the hell is it piracy to share games with your friends?!?!?!?!

Because it goes against the licensing agreement and deprives the developer of income they would have otherwise received.

Because it goes against the licensing agreement and deprives the developer of income they would have otherwise received.

Do you think it's okay for your friend to sit in the same room as you and watch you complete a game from start to finish?

Do you think it's okay for your friend to sit in the same room as you and watch you complete a game from start to finish?

I didn't say it was wrong, just that it could be legitimately classed as piracy / copyright infringement. From the perspective of the consumer there is nothing wrong with it, as if they truly wanted to buy it they would have. My point is that it's understandable for Microsoft and Valve to restrict ownership of games in order to benefit themselves and developers. It is also understandable that people are critical of it, especially when it will prevent them from being able to do things they can do currently. But I believe that the developers of games should be rewarded - if renting or borrowing games doesn't reward the producer of the content then it's little different to simply pirating those games.

'One' is strange naming choice especialy its not the first gen iteration.

So, if Phil Harrison is correct, Xbox One name could be extended into Xbox-One-Day.

Xbox-you-can-only-play-games-on-One-console. :p

I didn't say it was wrong, just that it could be legitimately classed as piracy / copyright infringement. From the perspective of the consumer there is nothing wrong with it, as if they truly wanted to buy it they would have. My point is that it's understandable for Microsoft and Valve to restrict ownership of games in order to benefit themselves and developers. It is also understandable that people are critical of it, especially when it will prevent them from being able to do things they can do currently. But I believe that the developers of games should be rewarded - if renting or borrowing games doesn't reward the producer of the content then it's little different to simply pirating those games.

You avoided his question with a long winded explanation of (summarized) "I understand both sides of the fence".

I understand why you avoided his question because, like it or not, Audioboxer brought up a perfectly valid point: Why does your friend not have to buy the game that he watched from start to finish? When you purchase a game, you purchase the entertainment factor so don't try the argument "He didn't play it so he doesn't have to" (nice try though :) ).

See the funny thing about Software Developers (and I speak from experience, I can show my portfolio) is people argue that you are stealing money right out of their pockets. That is a big fat no for studios (indie developers can be a different story) where the game would have to be pirated well above 50% before the little guys would be affected.

It all comes down to money hungry publishers and DRM enforcers. It won't stop until they squeeze every -single- dollar out of the consumer and blockade any opportunity for another party to get out scott free.

To be honest my Xbox 360 is online 99% of the time it's on and I don't use Xbox Live, I don't talk to people through it and I don't buy anything except DLC. So again, like many other things.. this is not a major issue for me, personally.

You avoided his question with a long winded explanation of (summarized) "I understand both sides of the fence".

I thought my response precluded the need to answer it explicitly but, for the sake of clarity, I don't see any problem with somebody else watching you play a game - afterall, the person playing the game has the licence to do so and if anything it is entirely like to make that person want to buy the game. Gaming is an interactive medium, so the experience of simply watching a game is very different to actually playing it.

I understand why you avoided his question because, like it or not, Audioboxer brought up a perfectly valid point: Why does your friend not have to buy the game that he watched from start to finish? When you purchase a game, you purchase the entertainment factor so don't try the argument "He didn't play it so he doesn't have to" (nice try though :) ).

You're not purchasing the "entertainment factor", you're purchasing a licence from the copyright holder to play the game and that doesn't preclude other people from watching you. That they amount to the same thing is irrelevant.

See the funny thing about Software Developers (and I speak from experience, I can show my portfolio) is people argue that you are stealing money right out of their pockets. That is a big fat no for studios (indie developers can be a different story) where the game would have to be pirated well above 50% before the little guys would be affected.

It's not that I disagree with you but I don't really want to get into a discussion about piracy as that's a very different issue.

It all comes down to money hungry publishers and DRM enforcers. It won't stop until they squeeze every -single- dollar out of the consumer and blockade any opportunity for another party to get out scott free.

I don't think that's a fair characterisation. It's perfectly reasonable for publishers to want to restrict second-hand sales as they undermine primary sales and prevent money from going to the developers. But in order to restrict second-hand sales you have to add value to the experience, which is why the X1 won't require you to use the game disc and will allow you to download games on other consoles when you login to your account. Microsoft has also said it will allow customers to trade-in and resell games, so that will make it a much more flexible system than Steam.

Potentially the X1's trading system will make reselling games even more common than it is now if it can all be achieved over the internet, while at the same time compensating the developers. That to me is an ideal outcome.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • As I've been usually saying lately - we all can thank "AI" for this.
    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • We aren't even at the all-star game and Microsoft is talking about an update that will most likely be released during the World Series if not after. A lot can happen in the world between now and the 2026 World Series, including the 2026 FIFA Cup. Tell me about it again after the FIFA Cup is concluded. That should allow plenty of time to prepare for it.
    • Great, tell me when I have a "Bad Pool Caller" elsewhere not in Windoze.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      542
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!