Indie Developers Won


Recommended Posts

The solo and small-team game-makers who?ve made games like Fez, Braid and Limbo won?t be able to control their own destinies on Microsoft?s next game console, according to a Shack News report.

The article quotes Matt Booty, who is Microsoft?s general manager of Redmond Game Studios and Platforms, as confirming that indie devs will still need publishers to get their games onto the newly revealed console. Booty does say that Microsoft will explore new business models, though.

This news comes in stark contrast to Sony?s promises that indies will be able to self-publish content on the PS4. The publisher model, of course, means that some other entity has to decide whether to take a risk on helping get a game on a console and that someone else gets a cut of profits.

Looking back on it now, the Xbox Live Indie Games space wound up becoming a neglected ghetto for creators trying to find an audience. The energy that that scene once held migrated to mobile and has blossomed PC, where platforms like Steam let creators chart their own way. One thing that?s enabled indie creations to find success has been the ability to set and change release windows and prices as they see fit. No need to charge more money to ensure multiple partners get a cut and no need to rush out a game that still needs polish because someone else says you have to.

Source: http://kotaku.com/in...-xbox-509271999

After everything Sony announced with the PS4 and indies (Nintendo too even allow it with WiiU now), WHY are MS still following this route?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1153864-indie-developers-won/
Share on other sites

Indie devs chip in

Phil Fish, Polytron

?What a giant load of **** that was! All buzzwords! They talked for an hour and basically said nothing. What does ?always ready? mean??

?There was absolutely nothing relevant to me in that presser. Nothing about digital distribution or indies. Nothing at all.?

Brian Provinciano, Vblank Entertainment

?Their intention from the first Xbox was to own the living room, and the evolution of the 360 showed this trajectory in motion. The Xbox One is them realizing this vision. The problem is, they?re leaving core gamers behind. You would?ve thought that the reaction to their E3 2012 press conference would?ve been a wake up call, but they?re on a different course. They see more money in general entertainment, media and ads than core gamers. They see dollar signs with subscription fees. They want the revenue stream that cable providers and phone carriers have been enjoying. I?m certain that the Xbox One will launch with the base price plus a 2 ? 3 year contract. The unfortunate thing about this is that many consumers will be fooled by the lower price point, even though they?ll end up paying more in the long run.

?They?re preaching TV services to gamers and gamer press, the exact group of people who will be least receptive to it. Microsoft?s direction isn?t in line with E3, it?s in line with CES.

?Despite delaying their announcement a month, they still failed to capitalize on the opportunity to recalibrate after the PS4 announcement. I?m quite surprised by how limited their attempts were to one-up the PS4.

?Prior to this conference, I was expecting that at least during the E3 presentation, Microsoft would pander to indies in some way. They remain the only platform which prevents self-publishing. I wouldn?t expect anything other than just talk from them, but I was expecting them to address indies nonetheless. However, after this, I could see them leaving indies out completely. After all, they have their eye on the average consumer, not the core gamer. Average consumers aren?t as versed in the ?indie? game scene.?

James Silva, Ska Studios

?As a consumer, I?m excited. We use an Xbox 360 as an entertainment hub anyway, so getting a more robust, snappier version of that is a win. And lag-free Kinect is something I really, really wanted the instant Kinect 1.0 debuted, so that?s great.

?As a developer of semi-simple 2D indie games, I?m looking forward to playing with one, though our style isn?t going anywhere ? it?ll just end up with some more gratuitously excessive particle systems.?

Ben Kane, Going Loud Studios

?While it wasn?t the content I hoped to learn about, I do accept that Microsoft?s living room strategy has many facets beyond gaming, and that?s what today was about. I?ll wait to hear more about Xbox Live, digital distribution, the marketplace, and where indies fit in. I don?t think there was a message here for indie developers, but I also don?t read anything nefarious from that. The presentation was simply directed at a different aspect of ?living room entertainment.?

?An Xbox Live Indie Games successor, whether direct (a premium-but-open service where anyone can make and sell games) or spiritual (a more open XBLA-style partnership hopefully with a much lower barrier for entry) would be at the top of my list for things I?d like to see at the E3 presentation.?

Philip Tibitoski, Young Horses

?As an indie and developer the Xbox One reveal didn?t really say anything to me. The stuff with fantasy sports is cool and all, but I was more interested in seeing how the marketplace/store might have changed or how discovery was being handled. This reveal was for a different audience and I?ll be interested to see what they talk about at E3 when they?re ready to talk software.

?Are they opening up avenues for smaller developers? We?ve seen efforts from the other big players like Steam Greenlight, or what Sony has been up to with PS3 and Vita, or even the recent announcements of PS4 indies like Hohokum. Mobile is open and Sony is opening up while making developer-related processes more simplistic to focus on games. What exactly is Microsoft planning for this to be on parity with others? I can?t tell from what they?ve revealed so far, except that there are smaller developers shown in the opening video reel.?

Rami Ismail, Vlambeer

?We think it?s interesting that Microsoft is taking the Xbox away from gaming as its core business, but it was sort of weird watching this event go down. We did see some indie developers in the opening video, so there obviously is an indie strategy somewhere, but I don?t think we know a thing about Xbox One and gaming ? they still have to show their hand with regards to that at E3. The whole presentation felt sort of awkward, but the D-pad looks really nice. Sadly, at this point the thing we?re looking forward to most for the Xbox One is Skype on our TV.?

http://www.joystiq.com/2013/05/21/microsofts-message-to-indies-with-xbox-one-it-was-sort-of-wei/

So I guess Microsoft put this on their website for nothing...

post-62693-0-24066600-1369235648.jpg

Source: http://www.buildwind...om/Announcement

We're talking about self publishing here, not developing or releasing indie games.

Another indie dev, that of Toki Tori 2

ka7H3HX.png

Why are they unhappy? Spoke earlier about self-publishing issues.

We're talking about self publishing here, not developing or releasing indie games.

Another indie dev, that of Toki Tori 2

ka7H3HX.png

Why are they unhappy? Spoke earlier about self-publishing issues.

I fail to understand your differentiation between self publishing and indie games. Isn't self publishing same as what goes in say iOS App Store? When did Microsoft said they won't allow indie games or they have no plans for self publishing?

Why quote a developer who has not done any Xbox games in the past?

I fail to understand your differentiation between self publishing and indie games. Isn't self publishing same as what goes in say iOS App Store? When did Microsoft said they won't allow indie games or they have no plans for self publishing?

Why quote a developer who has not done any Xbox games in the past?

You don't know what self-publishing means? It means they can put their game on XBL without having to find a middle-man publisher. Some of these games are made by 1 person, or a handful. They aren't publishers.... they're developers.

MS don't like that, and if you want MS to publish, you need to give them a 1 year exclusive on your game.

Microsoft has never had an indie friendly business model, so I can't say I'm surprised. If Sony aligns itself with indies and doesn't restrict the gaming experience as heavily as Microsoft then that will give it a huge advantage going into the next-generation.

You don't know what self-publishing means? It means they can put their game on XBL without having to find a middle-man publisher. Some of these games are made by 1 person, or a handful. They aren't publishers.... they're developers.

MS don't like that, and if you want MS to publish, you need to give them a 1 year exclusive on your game.

Microsoft was the first to allow self publishing with XNA.. maybe it proved unviable or maybe they're doing something different. Who knows. We won't find out until Build and E3. Too early to assume anything but based on Facts, Microsoft has already been pretty indy friendly

do people really spend 500 bucks on a console for indy games? i mean, minecraft on the xbox 360 is absolutely amazing and its considered indy is it not? there's simply NO evidence whatsoever that MS is ignorant of the market and its changes.

Microsoft was the first to allow self publishing with XNA.. maybe it proved unviable or maybe they're doing something different. Who knows. We won't find out until Build and E3. Too early to assume anything but based on Facts, Microsoft has already been pretty indy friendly

do people really spend 500 bucks on a console for indy games? i mean, minecraft on the xbox 360 is absolutely amazing and its considered indy is it not? there's simply NO evidence whatsoever that MS is ignorant of the market and its changes.

Says all the indie developers who've been moaning about MS for the past year (and Sony), and have all been excited with Sony embracing the indie scene with the PS4?

You don't know what self-publishing means? It means they can put their game on XBL without having to find a middle-man publisher. Some of these games are made by 1 person, or a handful. They aren't publishers.... they're developers.

MS don't like that, and if you want MS to publish, you need to give them a 1 year exclusive on your game.

Xbox Live Indie Games doesn't require publishers as far as I know (XBLA does). So I guess I was right about self-publishing (iOS, GPlay, WP/W8 etc.) and as far as I know Microsoft has not said anything about it. There is a persistent rumor that they will have app store for Xbox and will discuss more at Build in June 2013. The Skype app, snapping, notification app on Xbox One etc. all point to that.

Xbox Live Indie Games doesn't require publishers as far as I know (XBLA does). So I guess I was right about self-publishing (iOS, GPlay, WP/W8 etc.) and as far as I know Microsoft has not said anything about it. There is a persistent rumor that they will have app store for Xbox and will discuss more at Build in June 2013. The Skype app, snapping, notification app on Xbox One etc. all point to that.

The indie games of value go on XBLA....

What do you mean they haven't said anything about it, it's right there in the first post about self publishing on the Xbox One. Windows/Windows Phone is irrelevant here.

The indie games of value go on XBLA....

What do you mean they haven't said anything about it, it's right there in the first post about self publishing on the Xbox One. Windows/Windows Phone is irrelevant here.

Sigh...Kotaku again doing he-said-she-said thing with this...The same sentence contradicts itself

"The article quotes Matt Booty, who is Microsoft?s general manager of Redmond Game Studios and Platforms, as confirming that indie devs will still need publishers to get their games onto the newly revealed console. Booty does say that Microsoft will explore new business models, though."

iOS/Gplay/W8/WP are relevant because they allow self publishing and I wasn't sure if that's what you meant.

So if I had to guess - you will need a publisher for putting your game on the Xbox OS but you will be able to self publish on the other OS running apps such as Skype.

Says all the indie developers who've been moaning about MS for the past year (and Sony), and have all been excited with Sony embracing the indie scene with the PS4?

If they're willing to ignore the marketshare, they can do so at their own cost. WIth that said, I've had no lack of indy content on my xbox 360, i don't see that changing on the One. If developers want to stroke their egos and polish their hatred of all things Microsoft, that is their own fault.

I hope SOny does open things up, because i like open systems and i hope Microsoft has to compete to be just as open.

But i don't think its anywhere as bad as you suggest mostly because it hasn't been bad. Indy devs have made millions off xbox.

Sigh...Kotaku again doing he-said-she-said thing with this...The same sentence contradicts itself

"The article quotes Matt Booty, who is Microsoft?s general manager of Redmond Game Studios and Platforms, as confirming that indie devs will still need publishers to get their games onto the newly revealed console. Booty does say that Microsoft will explore new business models, though."

iOS/Gplay/W8/WP are relevant because they allow self publishing and I wasn't sure if that's what you meant.

As it stands they need publishers, there is no contradiction there. Chucking out we'll explore new business models holds little weight as it stands, 'exploring' doesn't mean much when you confirm as it stands indies need publishers.

If they're willing to ignore the marketshare, they can do so at their own cost. WIth that said, I've had no lack of indy content on my xbox 360, i don't see that changing on the One. If developers want to stroke their egos and polish their hatred of all things Microsoft, that is their own fault.

I hope SOny does open things up, because i like open systems and i hope Microsoft has to compete to be just as open.

But i don't think its anywhere as bad as you suggest mostly because it hasn't been bad. Indy devs have made millions off xbox.

We are talking about as I said sometimes individuals or teams of a handful of people... Out of their own expense it's not easy to go and find a publisher, and as I also said if you want MS to publish you need to give them a year exclusive. Ironically, that 'ignores' marketshare.

Publishers can also take big chunks of your profits, it's exactly why indie developers do not always like that business model. Mix in the stupid PS3/360 costs to patch your game, thankfully of which Sony are sorting on the PS4, and you have an indie nightmare.

As it stands they need publishers, there is no contradiction there. Chucking out we'll explore new business models holds little weight as it stands, 'exploring' doesn't mean much when you confirm as it stands indies need publishers.

We are talking about as I said sometimes individuals or teams of a handful of people... Out of their own expense it's not easy to go and find a publisher, and as I also said if MS want you to publish with them you need to give them a year exclusive. Ironically, that 'ignores' marketshare.

Uh...dude read up the article. It talks about XBLA games not XBL Indie Games. So I fail to see your point here.

Uh...dude read up the article. It talks about XBLA games not XBL Indie Games. So I fail to see your point here.

Where do the highly reputable indie games get released on, XBLA! Minecraft, Braid, Limbo are NOT getting released through XBL Indie Games. That's the kind of developers MS are annoying and Sony are embracing as it stands.

It would be a crime if MS forced publishing through XBL Indie Games considering 90% of the content is crap.

Where do the highly reputable indie games get released on, XBLA! Minecraft, Braid, Limbo are NOT getting released through XBL Indie Games. That's the kind of developers MS are annoying and Sony are embracing as it stands.

It would be a crime if MS forced publishing through XBL Indie Games considering 90% of the content is crap.

It's the developers choice to put a game on XBLA - no one forced them away from Indie games. Put your game on XBLIG, advertize it and be happy.

It's the developers choice to put a game on XBLA - no one forced them away from Indie games. Put your game on XBLIG, advertize it and be happy.

Not any more ;)

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/124246-Microsoft-Dropping-Xbox-Live-Arcade-and-Indie-Games

Plus, seriously, any self respected highly acclaimed indie developer is not going to release a critically acclaimed title through XBLIG....

Indies on Xbone: Where's the beef?

So who is making Xbox One games, then?

Of course, this could all be a smokescreen. With E3 approaching rapidly and Microsoft promising games, games, games at their big E3 reveal, perhaps indie developers will feature heavily.

From the various chats I've had with prominent indie developers over the last 24 hours, I'd say that's looking rather unlikely.

After the Wii U reveal, I contacted numerous indies to find out who was working on what, and received a large number of responses back. When the PS4 was revealed I did the same again, and received the same level of correspondence.

After the Xbox One reveal, I went ahead and did it all over again -- but the reaction has been rather different this time around. In the same space of time that I waited for responses to my Wii U and PS4 pieces, I've received just a handful of replies, most of which said they weren't working on Xbox One games.

It could be that I've simply contacted the wrong indies. My train of thought was that Microsoft is most likely going to be working with indie devs that it has worked with before, but as of yet I've come up with past Xbox 360 devs telling me they aren't working on Xbox One games (all except Trine's Frozenbyte, who told me "We keep an open channel to Microsoft and there are some thoughts going on, however right now we have nothing to announce for Xbox One.")

Even more worrying is that a number of indie devs have said that they've tried to get in on the Xbox One action, but as of yet haven't received any additional information past a simple introduction.

Rami Ismail at Dutch studio Vlambeer, for example, said that Microsoft actually got in touch with him about Xbox One development, and then never got back to him when he made contact. The Super Crate Box developer hadn't heard of any other European devs who were looking into creating Xbox One games either, and he's a fairly well connected guy.

And Young Horses' Phil Tibitoski (Octodad) had a similar experience, in which someone at Microsoft responded to a request for Xbox One development information, and then was never heard from again. It would appear that getting in contact with Microsoft to actually build games for their new console isn't exactly easy.

That's not to say that there aren't any indie developers working on Xbox One games right now. Nathan Vella of Capybara Games (Superbrothers: Sword & Sworcery EP) featured in a video during the console's reveal, and elsewhere I've heard murmurings that Minecraft's Mojang are currently in talks with Microsoft (although Markus Persson was unable to confirm with me whether this was the case.)

And again, this could all potentially change come E3 -- perhaps Microsoft is keeping its hand to its chest, and will sprout forth many a developer when it's time to reveal the games.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • BrowserOS 0.46.0 by Razvan Serea BrowserOS is a free, open-source Chromium-based browser that runs AI agents natively, offering a smarter, more productive browsing experience. It supports Chrome extensions and integrates AI agents to automate tasks, fill forms, and streamline workflows. Your data stays on your computer: you can use your own API keys or run local models via Ollama, making it a privacy-first alternative to tools like Perplexity, Comet, or Dia. With built-in productivity tools and app integrations, BrowserOS boosts efficiency while keeping control firmly in your hands. Being Chromium-based, BrowserOS lets you effortlessly import your bookmarks, passwords, and Chrome extensions in just a few clicks. BrowserOS works with OpenAI GPT models, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, and local AI models via Ollama or LMStudio. You can use your own API keys and effortlessly switch between providers. BrowserOS Agent Your AI productivity assistant that organizes and manages your browsing effortlessly Quickly list, group, or close tabs Save and resume browsing sessions Search your history and organize bookmarks Switch instantly to the tab you need BrowserOS Navigator – Automate web tasks with ease Navigate websites and search automatically Interact with pages without manual effort Handle repetitive tasks in seconds What makes BrowserOS special Feels like home - same familiar interface as Google Chrome, works with all your extensions AI agents that run on YOUR browser, not in the cloud Privacy first - bring your own keys or use local models with Ollama. Your browsing history stays on your computer Open source and community driven - see exactly what's happening under the hood MCP store to one-click install popular MCPs and use them directly in the browser bar (coming soon) Built-in AI ad blocker that works across more scenarios! BrowserOS 0.46.0 changelog: Run Claude Code & Codex right in your browser — We've extended the agent harness to bring full coding agents into BrowserOS. Claude Code and Codex now come bundled and plug straight into the assistant, so you can drive your browser with the agent — and the subscription — you already use. A brand new experience — A redesigned new tab, a calmer composer, and a rebuilt command center for switching between agents. The whole assistant is cleaner, faster to reach, and easier to live in. New MCP tools — We rebuilt the browser tool surface from the ground up — a tighter, more reliable set of tools for agents to drive the browser. Plus one-click install of BrowserOS as an MCP server into the agents you already run, with automatic URL sync. Chromium 148 — Updated to the latest Chromium base with all recent upstream fixes and security patches. Streamlined — We've pulled back a few features that weren't getting much use — Skills, Soul, and Memory — so we can focus and ship better versions of them soon. Download: BrowserOS 0.46.0 | 181.0 MB (Open Source) Download: BrowserOS for macOS | 485.0 MB Links: BrowserOS Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft finally admits its default Windows 11 25H2, 24H2 action broke key legacy component by Sayan Sen Microsoft last week released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. So far the company has acknowledged two known issues that have popped up after the release which include bugged-out Office apps as well as the Recycle Bin; though there could be more at play too. Speaking of bugs and issues, Microsoft seems to have finally acknowledged a problem that probably has been around for close to a year. That's because back in July of 2025 the company made a default change to the latest Windows 11 versions, wherein it switched to JScript9Legacy on Windows 11 24H2 and later releases. Hence following the release of version 25H2 in October 2025, JScript9Legacy also remained default-enabled. As a result there has been a compatibility issue ever since then. For those wondering, by switching to JScript9Legacy Microsoft intended to improve the security of modern Windows PCs by reducing vulnerabilities tied to legacy scripting like cross-site scripting (XSS), among others. XSS exploits can allow cyber-attackers to attach malicious code onto legitimate websites and use them to execute the code when a potential victim loads such a website. Hence the new JScript9Legacy engine enforced stricter execution policies and improved object handling, which should help mitigate such attacks. Microsoft today has published a new support article detailing the problem. Neowin spotted it while browsing. The company says that JScript global definitions and execution context may fail to persist across scripts, potentially breaking older dependent apps and web-based components that relied on this legacy behavior. In the article Microsoft has confirmed that the issue stems from its move away from the older jscript9.dll engine in favor of jscript9legacy.dll. As mentioned above, while the newer engine was designed to address vulnerabilities and strengthen security it also changes how JScript handles execution context. As a result functions and definitions loaded by one script could no longer remain available to subsequent scripts once execution ended. The company notes that some applications worked correctly on earlier Windows versions because the older JScript engine automatically retained global definitions and execution state between scripts. Under the newer model though that behavior is disabled by default causing certain legacy workloads and polyfill-dependent scripts to fail. Microsoft says it addressed the problem via the KB5077241 update though the fix had not been enabled automatically in the following updates. As such admins must explicitly turn on persistent JScript execution context using a Registry setting that the tech giant shared today. The configuration can be applied to individual processes or system-wide through the FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE registry key. The steps have been outlined below: Run the following command to create the feature control registry key: reg add "HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\FeatureControl\FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE" Under this key, create a new DWORD (32-bit) value. Configure the value as follows: To enable persistence for specific processes only: Set the value to 1 for each target process name. To enable persistence for all processes: Add * as the key name and set its value to 1. You can find the official support article here on Microsoft's website.
    • The possibility that milk gathers back into a glass implies that gravity can be 'reversed'.
    • VidCoder 12.20 by Razvan Serea  VidCoder is a DVD/Blu-ray ripping and video transcoding application for Windows. It uses HandBrake as its encoding engine. Calling directly into the HandBrake library gives it a more rich UI than the official HandBrake Windows GUI. VidCoder can rip DVDs but does not defeat the CSS encryption found in most commercial DVDs. You’ll need the NET 8 Desktop Runtime. If you don’t have it, VidCoder will prompt you to download and install it. The Portable version is self-contained and does not require any .NET Runtime to be installed. You do not need to install HandBrake for VidCoder to work. Feature list: Multi-threaded MP4, MKV containers Completely integrated encoding pipeline: everything is in one process and no huge intermediate temporary files H.264, H.265, MPEG-4, MPEG-2, VP8, Theora video Hardware-accelerated encoding with AMD VCE, Nvidia NVENC and Intel QuickSync AAC, MP3, Vorbis, AC3, FLAC audio encoding and AAC/AC3/MP3/DTS/DTS-HD passthrough Target bitrate, size or quality for video 2-pass encoding Decomb, detelecine, deinterlace, rotate, reflect, chroma smooth, colorspace filters Powerful batch encoding with simultaneous encodes Customizable Pickers to automatically pick audio and subtitle tracks, destination, titles and more Instant source previews Creates small encoded preview clips Pause, resume encoding VidCoder 12.20 changes: Updated HandBrake core to 1.11.2. Download: VidCoder 12.20 | 47.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Portable VidCoder 12.19 | 89.3 MB Link: VidCoder Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      590
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!