Recommended Posts

Hey all. I just built my new computer and have just played Dirt Showdown and Spec Ops: The Line.

Dirt ran ok for 5 mins and then I decide to test another game. When playing Spec Ops The line. Everything on the highest possible settings, everything was going well...until about a couple minutes....click....the system rebooted and the bios came up telling me that it detected power surged and rebooted the system as a result to protect it.

I am reusing my old computer's PSU, ThermalTake 600w PSU. Everything except the 2 Molex cables coming from the PSU are being used by my new system.

I went into the bios to check and every seems fine. Here's a screenie:

And rebooted into Windows where everything is fine. Is the PSU not good or too weak for the new system?

post-30282-0-48032300-1369316930.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1154092-power-surges-detected/
Share on other sites

Here's the full specs:

CPU: i7 3770K with Corsair Hydro H00i on it.

MOBO: ASUS P8Z77V

GPU: asus gtx 680 directcu ii 4gb

RAM: 16 GB

SSD: Samsung 256GB

2 HDDs: Seagte 2TB and 500GB

Pioneer Blu-ray drive

Running Win7

Powered by a ThermalTake 600w PSU taken from old PC.

Yep, you want at least a 650 - 750w and if you can afford it get something from Corsair or even Seasonic.

Whomever told you that 600w is enouhg and more is overkill has obviously never owned either a gaming system or a PC with a lot of kit in, I for example have a 750w in mine with the following setup:

Core i5 3570k

16GB DDR3 RAM

GeForce 560Ti

3 Optical Drives (Including 1 BluRay Writer)

1 SSD

5 HDD's

PCI-E Sound Card

Multiple fans in case etc etc

I would go corsair 850

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B003PJ6QWE

Yeah, 800W is overkill. I'd get a Corsair TX650. I have one, been running with it for at least 2 years now.

The calc says his computer as it sits is right around the 600 mark, 650 won't give much more wiggle room than what he has now. If he overclocks he is done, he adds another gpu he is done. 800 is the minimum I would go with, it is better to have more than just enough. The 600 was probably overkill for his old PC...this isn't his old pc.

The calc says his computer as it sits is right around the 600 mark, 650 won't give much more wiggle room than what he has now. If he overclocks he is done, he adds another gpu he is done. 800 is the minimum I would go with, it is better to have more than just enough. The 600 was probably overkill for his old PC...this isn't his old pc.

Yet, 800/850W is still overkill for him. 650W is probably his low end. But he should still be able to usee it for days to come. Those calculators are rubbish.

Yet, 800/850W is still overkill for him. 650W is probably his low end. But he should still be able to usee it for days to come. Those calculators are rubbish.

Tell that to his computer that is shutting down when the calc say 583W is needed, rubbish maybe as it can't account for everything...it is only a guage to recommend what you should get...IMO go over board a bit, jump a few hundered watts to be on the safe side. Stay too close and you will get burned again.

Power supplies rated for 600W won't necessarily produce the full wattage consistently and your system's i7 processor, with it's turbo going, will surely be straining your borderline acceptable wattage. Upgrade to a 700W+ for your current configuration. Even higher if you ever want to upgrade, as sc302 said.

In fact, I would like to add to the specifics of "overkill" and "fine" relating to power you will need. A power supply that is always pumping out it's full rating will die quickly. That much stress is not how they are meant to be used. You need head room of about 20%. Any more than that, and yes, it's less energy efficient but that's it. At least you won't have any issues and you will be able to upgrade in the future.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to help them sort at least some of Adobe's ancestral spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better when compared to Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      521
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!