Microsoft explains Xbox One cloud gaming in an effort to justify online req

By +Frank B.
in Xbox

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Yusuf M. Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

You can't cloud compute improved cloth simulation. it needs to be done fairly syncronous with the rendering. however by offloading AI And other calculations from the CPU the CPU can be used more for improved cloth simulation.

How would improved lighting be an issue though ? as I said before, only 3D graphics geeks like me would probably notice major difference between the existing Ambient occlusion fakery and proper photon maps.

I thought that's what they said, my mistake. What I meant was if the lighting was vastly superior then people would find an issue and complain about an inferior experience. I guess that would depend largely on how much better the lighting is with the cloud processing. I'm not a 3D graphics geek but I'm a fan of eye candy so I have the interest but lack the technical knowledge of the advanced stuff.

Anyway, as long as the vanilla (non-cloud assisted) experience is good, then people won't complain. However, if developers purposely make a game where the vanilla experience is worse than it should be... then that's not good. I don't want developers to make the vanilla experience inferior because of the cloud processing. Any improvements should be a bonus, not a necessity.

Experienced

libertas83

Posted
Posted

You have to remember consoles need to think about future not just today. So cloud processing may play a larger role in 3-5 years vs. the next 2. This was all sparked by OnLive who had tech that could make consoles obsolete by doing only cloud processing. Obviously, that didn't work out well for them because they had nothing else to offer. This is where PS4 and X1 can be successful because they have something worthwhile to sell you now and when ISPs and Internet improve, people can start to take advantage of this tech. In other words, this preempts any other console from coming out with the promise of cloud, streaming games when it's actually viable.

Also, Nvidia and AMD are heavily investing in GPU server farms as well which I'm sure will play into this long-term.

And two years later servers get shut down because that game's old, you shouldn't play those old games, stupid, you should buy new ones. *That* is a greater idea.

One has to dedicate and configure servers for specific games just like any other, I presume? As new games get released, older ones will have to move out and make way, because resources aren't infinite and free even for Microsoft, twist or turn - it's been 100% definite thus far that once not enough people are playing or a fair amount of time passes, services get shut down.

I doubt that is how it will work. Azure itself is designed to be agnostic to servers. It scales the number of servers based on workload so that when peak users hit, it automatically scales up, but when demand is low, it scales back down. So games won't be on dedicated servers. You are paying for computing time, not servers. So with stuff like Xbox Live Gold and I'm sure publisher's paying for it as well, you can keep old games running on it without much issue. Old games will actually use less computing overtime because demand will be less.

That's reducing the difference between console and PC upgrades severely, if we're going that way. On the other hand, if the processing power is about to be unlimited over time - why do I need the damn box in the first place? Why not go full cloud?

You need a box to interface with your TV first. Secondly, see my first paragraph, full cloud has already failed by OnLive because not everyone could use it and it had nothing else of value to offer. X1 and PS4 will at least have something to offer in local gaming + multimedia functions.

Grand Master

George P Global Moderator

Posted
  • Global Moderator
Posted

It should be a safe bet that developers will use the cloud on MP and MMOs first. Don't expect to see it used for SP for a ~2 years or so I'd say. It would be cool though to have a SP game like, I think someone used GTA for an example, where the world keeps on changing even when you're not playing so that when you come back to it it's not like time froze in the game. I think it'd be neat to see how they can use this for SP even more than the immediate MP benefits.

Grand Master

Phouchg

Posted
Posted

So with stuff like Xbox Live Gold and I'm sure publisher's paying for it as well

Wouldn't that get passed to end users and raise prices of games everywhere? I, for example, live in a backwater third world country where Live is not available (and probably won't be anytime soon). I won't be getting these awesome photon maps (I'm not entirely convinced that these are impossible on top-end hardware, but that's just a quick lookup) and other candy, anyway.

Anyway, I've been thinking about this offline and I'm starting to see myself how my other arguments are not holding up. The one above stays, though.

Grand Master

HawkMan

Posted
Posted

Wouldn't that get passed to end users and raise prices of games everywhere? I, for example, live in a backwater third world country where Live is not available (and probably won't be anytime soon). I won't be getting these awesome photon maps (I'm not entirely convinced that these are impossible on top-end hardware, but that's just a quick lookup) and other candy, anyway.

Anyway, I've been thinking about this offline and I'm starting to see myself how my other arguments are not holding up. The one above stays, though.

When I create a photon map for a simple scene in finalRender, it will take several minutes to do the simple preview map that's blobby and not nice and smooth. photon maps are effectively inverse raytracing with bouncing. do it in a complex scene like a full game level, with all kinds of different materials with different values of light an color absorption and bounce, and you're talking 10-20+ minutes on a high end i7 rig.

Grand Master

MikeChipshop Member

Posted
  • Member
Posted

I fail to see how some people are seeing this as a bad thing?

Let's face it, if this isn't in the upcoming Playstation (or any other console for that matter) it soon enough will be.

It won't be at the detriment of those not playing online, after all they'll still get a top notch game, but it will be at a benefit to those playing while online.

MS have pulled an awesome move here and if it is what i think it is, they've basically semi-future-proofed the Xbox One!

Grand Master

Phouchg

Posted
Posted

When I create a photon map for a simple scene in finalRender, it will take several minutes to do the simple preview map that's blobby and not nice and smooth. photon maps are effectively inverse raytracing with bouncing. do it in a complex scene like a full game level, with all kinds of different materials with different values of light an color absorption and bounce, and you're talking 10-20+ minutes on a high end i7 rig.

That's 20+ minutes with GPU executing things? My head's already exploded while finding some whitepapers about this, though...

Grand Master

HawkMan

Posted
Posted

That's 20+ minutes with GPU executing things? My head's already exploded while finding some whitepapers about this, though...

traditionally this type of rendering is done with the cpu, the ambient occlusion you use in games today is based on a simplified version of this though it cheats a lot. hence why some shadows in corners get weird and blobby.

Effectively every light source on the room sends out light particles that bounce around untill a predetermined amount of bounces or they're out of energy or below an energy threshold. unless it's a high powered light(ie sun) 2-3 bounces is usually enough, depends on the colors it bounces of rom and how reflective the surface is as well of course. This goes up a degree on complexity when you add in area lights. and area lights is primarily why you use this technology. from HDR skyboxes where the whole skybox send out lights to computers screens and fluorescent tubes. at this point you'e not lnger sending particles form a single point, but from the whole surface of the object in question.

GPU's should be able to help with this due to their parallel nature. it's still extremely heavy calculations though. and the map needs to be updated every time something changed in the enviroment, meaning you would take over the entire processing power of the GPU for several minutes in a best case scenario, increasing loading time a lot, and you'd either break the light map with destructible environments, or have to freeze the game every time something changes.

Grand Master

Phouchg

Posted
Posted

I don't believe even the clouds are powerful enough for this exact technology then. The sheer power of the cloud would be offset by thousands of gamers playing AAA games where this might be used, at any given time. In time, definitely, but not at the moment.

Anyway, another argument of mine reduced to ashes, I can roam elsewhere. Thanks.

Grand Master

HawkMan

Posted
Posted

I don't believe even the clouds are powerful enough for this exact technology then. The sheer power of the cloud would be offset by thousands of gamers playing AAA games where this might be used, at any given time. In time, definitely, but not at the moment.

Anyway, another argument of mine reduced to ashes, I can roam elsewhere. Thanks.

Nah, the cloud will be able to handle this very well. the cloud has far more computing power available in the server clusters than some GPU's. Hence why the cloud would render the photon map in seconds, instead of minutes or tens of minutes. and since the photon map only needs to be updated on new leverl loads or certain intervals on the level. those thousands of gamers aren't going to all be calculating new photon maps at the same time.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2

      By Copernic · Posted

      Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026

      By Aditya Tiwari · Posted

      Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • What should AI detector tools show before users copy or export a report?

      By Barney T. · Posted

      Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2 to finally get one of the most requested features

      By Michal H. · Posted

      not in taskbar search
    • What should AI detector tools show before users copy or export a report?

      By sumytbe · Posted

      I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!