Recommended Posts

This is pretty damn good. Seth Rogen playing the intro of The Last Of Us...

 

You can tell he wants to be funny as that is what he is known for, but the more he plays, the more he just pushes being funny to the side and enjoys it for what it is.

 

Have to say props to him as well for being an actual gamer. He instantly says how he has to switch to inverted controls, which he finally does about 8 minutes in, and notice how he does not have to look down to press triangle or square. All other so called gamer celebrities always have to look down at the controller. Jimmy Fallon I am looking at you.  :laugh:

Finally beat the game an hour or so ago. Easily within the Top 3 games of this almost over console generation and in fact it probably is the best overall console exclusive I have played this generation. I also really loved the subject matter of the game and how they chose to handle it, which no doubt has a lot to do with why it was perhaps my favorite overall game this generation.

 

It pretty much is a classic from every angle. Graphics. Audio. Gameplay. Storyline. All as good as it gets.

It also has some incredibly good AI. Damn good. So pretty much the only criticism I have seen about people experiencing glitches is because of how damn good the AI is. With that said, I personally never experienced a single game ending glitch. I only had about 5 smaller glitches where I would hit an invisible wall for a second or glide a few in game feet into a specific position. Nothing that broke the immersion, but still did exist. It actually seems petty even mentioning the glitches though, as everything else is just that good.

Fantastic, fantastic game. It truly is.
It will win multiple GOTY awards, and rightfully so.
I have no doubt whatsoever that history will universally view The Last Of Us as the best PS3 exclusive, and there have been a few damn good games for the PS3 mind you. 

  • Like 1

Well said Larry, though the graphics were not as good as expected. But then this is the end of a generation so it's fine. Game looks good, but not better than Uncharted 3. Anyway, visuals were not the main point of it. Voice acting and writing are excellent, and gameplay is good. Too hard for me on normal, but set it to easy and it becomes fun  :)

Well said Larry, though the graphics were not as good as expected. But then this is the end of a generation so it's fine. Game looks good, but not better than Uncharted 3. Anyway, visuals were not the main point of it. Voice acting and writing are excellent, and gameplay is good. Too hard for me on normal, but set it to easy and it becomes fun  :)

 

Set it to survivor.

 

Need wraps for medpacks or molotovs?

 

KgL2jzI.gif

I was going to buy a PS3 just to play this, but the super slim prices have actually gone up. Guess I'll have to wait until the PS4 is actually released to get a deal.

Just bout a refurb PS3 Slim from Sony Store to play this. $199 for the 320GB with standard warranty plus $60 for a Cronus adapter for Xbox Controller. I'm gonna put an SSD in it and call it next gen. PC will be my next gen for a couple years but I want to play this and I miss Wipeout HD/Fury.

Just finished this a few nights ago. Really awesome game. Naughty Dog are the best at story-focused games IMHO, not just in the story and characters but the gameplay itself. Some story-based games let the story dominate and the game becomes too linear and/or too repetitive, but Naughty Dog manage to keep things fresh and give enough freedom for it to not feel as linear as it really is.

 

Already looking forward to their next game and I don't even know what it is yet.  :laugh:

Going to get this completed this weekend. I've just met up with survivors and we're doing some night time sneaking. How far in am I?

 

IIRC, about 30%. Although it's been a few sleeps since I finished the game!

  • 2 weeks later...

Well, I finally got around to finishing The Last of Us yesterday. Overall I thought it was great. If I can sum up my thoughts of the game into one phrase (two?) it would be, "fantastic story, ok game."

 

The characters were believable, relatable, and the voice actor performances were incredible. ND has set the bar for storytelling quality that I don't think any other game comes close to today, and probably won't until ND's next game; it really is THAT good. The story itself was intense and brutal, but also had it's moments of levity, which gave it those highs and lows that all great stories share. The ending chapter(s), especially, were pretty gripping. I actually felt the desperation and some of the other emotions that Joel displayed at the end, which I can say very rarely happens to me while playing a game. I just can't say enough good things about the story.

 

The graphics, sound design, and animations were absolutely outstanding. I can't think of any game that does any of them better. However, the gameplay was hit or miss. I loved the crafting, and gathering items. More specifically, I loved that the crafting items were found in realistic places. (in cabinets, drawers, on top of counters, etc) That kind of little detail does wonders for the believability of the game world. I also liked the weapon upgrade mechanics too, for similar reasons. But, I didn't like the Joel-upgrades. They just didn't seem to do much, or noticeably change the gameplay. Except for the shiv-upgrade.

 

The melee and ranged combat was good, but the damage needs a lot of tuning. More than once, I shot human enemies in the head or chest, and they didn't die. Whether with a gun or bow, those should be one-hit kills, no matter what. I hate the fact that normal humans enemies took way more shots than would be realistically possible in order to kill. Especially, headshots. It's just something that irks me, and quite frankly ruined some of the fire fights for me. The same can be said of the infected enemies, but I'm sort of ok with them being able to stand more punishment, because they're not really human anymore. But, again, headshots should have been instantly fatal, but weren't. I understand they did this so that ammo is more precious, and weapon upgrades had meaning, but it was more frustrating than fun.

 

I really want to play the game on Survivor too, but I'm afraid the way they made it harder was to just reduce weapon damage or increase enemy health (or both). Neither of which is the proper way to make this type of game harder. I wish they would have made Survivor mode be realistic damage, but just made ammo more scarce. Get it as close to real as possible, and emphasize the stealth aspects of the game more than the shooting. But that leads me into my other gripe with the game.

 

Not always, but often enough to be frustrating, enemies in this game showed that age-old behavior that lets them know exactly where you are the instant you peak your head out and instantly fire/charge/toss a molotov with 100% accuracy regardless of lighting conditions or what else may obscure their vision. The infected sections were especially annoying in this regard because they were usually dark, indoor areas but the infected that used sight could some how see clear across rooms and down hallways in almost pitch black darkness and recognize you as an enemy. It's just another videogame trope that I wish Naughty Dog would have left behind. They kind of do for the most part because this doesn't happen every time, and the stealth and AI is much better than other games with similar mechanics. But, there are still those times when something doesn't work the way it should and it ruins the fun.

 

I haven't tried multiplayer yet. I don't know if I will, since I'm much more of a single-player compaign gamer myself. At least in games like this. I think I may try Survivor, but I'm not looking forward to the lame difficulty tuning.

  • 5 months later...

PlayStation Store Says The Last of Us Prequel DLC Arrives Feb. 14

ku-xlarge.jpg

 

The first DLC extension for The Last of Us, "Left Behind," is listed for a Feb. 14 launch in a pre-order listing on the PlayStation Store.

 

The chapter, a prequel to the main story, hadn't been officially dated before. We've reached out to a Sony representative to shed more light on this. "Left Behind" will explore the friendship between Ellie and another young survivor named Riley, before Ellie meets Joel, the protagonist of the main game.

 

Source: Kotaku

  • Like 2
  • 4 weeks later...

Played it, and its damn good for a 2 hour run through :)

Comes with some little surprises even in a origin story of Ellie, and you will be pleased to know she swears more then ever :P

Still hunting for trophies, and there is no trophy list up anywhere so here is what I have already

Don't Go - Easy (Finish Left Behind on Easy)
Don't Go - Normal (Finish Left Behind on Normal)
Don't Go - Hard (Finish Left Behind on Hard)
Don't Go - Survivor (Finish Left Behind on Survivor) **silver trophy**
BFFs - All optional conversions found in Left Behind
Picked Clean - All Left Behind collectables found
Nobody's Perfect - Played Jak X Combat Racing
???
???
??? 

Im guessing one of those is to win at water pistols but im not sure.

Anyway back to the game, its really good! Once again you get invested in Ellie right from the start, and you have flashbacks to when she had to help out Joel from the original game (where he got shot in the Firefly lab). You kind of switch between then and now and they explain how Ellie stitched him up, and how she got the bite on her arm. 
Awesome DLC, although short, definitely money well spent. 
 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!