Recommended Posts

Prolly gonna need some... actually don't think any single AP can handle that, you'll prolly need to create a mesh network or have a bunch of them to handle the traffic and just the associations. Each AP no matter how fast still SHARES the bandwidth it has amongst all connected users so even if you had a 1Gbps AC router, with 1000 users speeds would be down to 1Mbps (sometimes, obviously depends on usage).

So you'll need probably 20-30 APs spread out all over... I don't think brand matters much but just network planning. Gotta setup network power since they'll all be within close proximity (relatively) to each other so you don't want 1 overpower the others. Since in 2.4Ghz you only have 3 channels to work with you gotta space those 3 apart then mix and match the rest that are around those.

I'd say some of those Cisco APs only because I don't know many other options, i'm sure others will come along and tell you. For research you can check out how they deploy them in Football Stadiums and such - I think Dallas Cowboys Stadium had like 10,000 APs for the 70,000 Users.

If I may be so bold, have you considered talking to a college campus IT administrator?

Because they need to connect 100, or in the larger campus grounds, 1000's of computers, usually they have a network to their servers and so on.

I'm no IT genius, believe me, but it might help talking to such a person (as an IT admin) to gather information face to face. :)

Ok. Lets start with what is your connection to the Internet then we can discuss what your needs are. Perhaps remote offices would be a good idea to get an idea about as well. Give us something to go with other than something so vague.

  • 2 weeks later...

a 1000 users with a budget of $1500?? Where did you get this number from?

As sc302 asked already to do what? Route their text messages to the internet, where is this router connected? Internet, another location - what bandwidth do you have to support these 1000's users to do what exactly via the router?

You better have 1 fat pipe if your expecting to support 1k users for internet access.

There is no possible way to give you anything useful with the info given - sorry. If you were looking at say a 3945 from cisco which is a branch office type router that can handle a connection in the 400Mbps range your in the +10K, not $1500 ;)

That being said - depending on what your doing and what your bandwidth requirements are you can put together some pretty beefy home grown router solutions, pfsense, m0n0wall, etc. That can route some serious traffic on a shoestring budget.

What I find confusing - is why someone would be involved in trying to find anything involved to do with 1k plus users that would need to ask here on neowin in the first place. Someone doing design work for a 1k user network should have the skill set already to know how to size the equipment required to support such a network.

Now if you have gotten thrown into the deep end without your floaties --- there are quite a few people here that can provide some great information and be happy to help.. But going to need loads more information.

Did you maybe add a couple of zeros in a typo and you meant 10 users? Or small company with 100 users that has outgrown their off the shelf soho router? And the boss says hey you know how to get my wireless working when it stops, so what do you think? ;) Sort of thing?

There is a slight difference between going to the local computer store or looking on newegg for a new "router" that does 802.11n or ac etc.. And has gig ports vs 100mbit ports and designing the network required to support 1k users ;) What is the infrastructure currently supporting these 1000 users?

One of my old locations had in its hay day 900 plus nodes -- with core switch in the 100's of K dollars cisco 6509 with countless closet switches and multiple routers for connections to other locations and the internet.. Just 1 of the closet switches were over your $1500 budget...

So I am really curious on the details of what your looking to accomplish with such a budget.. Did you maybe forget a few zero's on the budget side of it ;)

It can be done on that budget though. Maybe look away from the big vendors, stop saying it can't be done and moaning and answer the original question.

The OP still needs to quantify exactly what they are trying to achieve - layout of the site, multi-site, (assuming) multi-VLAN, what is being routed, how many and what kind of links etc., without that it's shooting in the dark....

A 1000 user site is a very different proposition to a 100 user site - it isn't just a increase in seats, you (should) have the network organised differently.

Even the lower end provider gear (Zyxel, their USGs are great value) is still ?2000 and up for equipment with high throughput and that stuff maxes out ~400Mbps

Yes the big vendors are expensive, they are also tried, and tested, they have support contracts with replacement kit on the floor within an hour (on some smartnet plans) and if you have 1000 users sitting around unable to work you don't need to be messing about with some cobbled together router, you need it to be standard.

It probably is possible in theory to actually knock something up using a PC, Linux and some fast NICs - that would probably do the throughput, however personally I wouldn't go that route - I like tried, tested, solid and supportable.

I'll have to check out the Mikrotik stuff though - never heard of it....

It can be done on that budget though. Maybe look away from the big vendors, stop saying it can't be done and moaning and answer the original question.

yes if you expect them to access the internet in 90's speed.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • But the reality is it will work for people's needs, and they don't care about the technology that makes it. Clearly not everyone's needs, but that low end space where personal laptops were only used to type emails, watch content and browse websites, but they didn't want to do that on a small screen device. Heck, writing that out I can now see the connection and reason it'll do so well. Apple is about experience. If the experience is bad, they don't release it. Low end Windows laptop manufacturers up until this point have not taken that into consideration ever before, so slow laggy usage with brittle slimey plastic shells were common. I hope that the low end space at least creates better physical products that last a bit longer, and if Microsoft get their act together, they could also have a solid OS on such low end hardware that would actually make the experience work for what the hardware was intended for. The fact that the CPU is a "cellphone", sorry mobile phone processor is irrelevant. It's about the experience, and so far, that sounds quite solid.
    • Hello, Bonjour is Apple's implementation of a multicast-DNS service, which allows devices running Apple's software and/or hardware to find each other on your local network.  I believe the Windows version was last updated around 2010. If you do not need it, you can stop and disable the Bonjour service in the Services Control Manager (filename: SERVICES.MSC).  Once you have done that, the operating system will no longer attempt to load the service. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • This AMD RX 9070 16GB GPU that performs close to Nvidia 5070 is under $600 by Sayan Sen With the memory shortage that's prevalent nowadays, discounts are super-hard to get. As such we post good deals whenever they pop up. Recently, we covered a few great discounts on SSDs wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup NVMe PCIe Gen4 drive for just $400 thanks to a special coupon. If you want a faster product but don't need all that capacity, you can also opt for Samsung's 990 PRO 2TB that is on sale for its lowest price in over three months. Let's say though that you are on the hunt for a 1440p gaming card. In that case AMD's RX 9070 non-XT can help, and with its 16GB VRAM, you can also run AI models locally without worrying about bottlenecking (check out our recent 9070 GRE reviews for gaming and productivity to get an idea). The PowerColor Reaper variant of the RX 9070 is currently on sale for just $580 which is a very good price in the current state of affairs (purchase link under the specs table down below). The Reaper cooler on this 9070 uses a triple‑fan design with ring‑blade fans, paired with premium dual ball bearings to extend lifespan and reduce friction. "Intelligent" fan control allows the fans to remain idle at lower temperatures, only spinning up when the GPU is under load. A nickel‑plated copper base makes direct contact with both the GPU and memory modules, helping to spread heat evenly. PowerColor also applies Honeywell PTM7950 phase‑change thermal interface material (TIM), which fills microscopic gaps between the die and heatsink for more efficient thermal transfer. The fan shroud is shorter in height as the firm has made it such that it can be used in certain SFF (small form factor) cases. The technical specifications of the Reaper RX 9070 are given in the table below: Specification Value Stream Processors 3584 Units Video Memory 16GB GDDR6 Memory Speed 20.0 Gbps Memory Interface 256-bit Engine Clock Game Clock: up to 2070 MHz Boost Clock: up to 2520 MHz Bus Standard PCI Express 5.0 x16 Display Connectors 1 x HDMI 2.1b, 3 x DisplayPort 2.1a Maximum Resolution DisplayPort: 7680 × 4320 HDMI: 7680 × 4320 Board Dimensions 289mm × 111mm × 41mm 304mm × 127mm × 42mm (with bracket) Slot 2 Minimum System Power Requirement 600W Power Connectors Two 8-pin PCI Express Get the PowerColor Reaper RX 9070 at the links below (you get only a 90-day warranty on Woot): PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 16GB Graphics Card (RX9070 16G-A): $579.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) (Was: $700) PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 16GB Graphics Card (RX9070 16G-A): $559.99 (Sold and Shipped by Woot US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Are they marketed as an entry into astronomy or astrophotography? I do astrophotography. With big rigs, lots of computers, cables and headaches. I love it. And by learning this ridiculously complex hobby, I’ve learned about the objects I’m shooting. Astronomy followed from photography.
    • Microsoft confirms Recycle Bin bug across all versions of Windows by Usama Jawad A couple of days ago, we reported that the latest Patch Tuesday update has seemingly resulted in a lot of issues for many users, including OneDrive and Dropbox access problems, BitLocker recovery lockouts, and BSODs. Although Microsoft is yet to acknowledge these bugs, it has confirmed another, relatively smaller issue across all supported versions of Windows. In an update on its Windows Release Health Dashboard, Microsoft has confirmed that after installing June's Patch Tuesday update (KB5094126), you'll experience unexpected behavior when leveraging Recycle Bin. Basically, when you attempt to delete an item from the Recycle Bin, the confirm dialog will show you the internal file name of that content rather than the actual name. For example, the file may be named abc.png, but the confirm dialog will ask if you're sure that you want to permanently delete $Rxxxxx.png from the Recycle Bin. This is pretty much it for the scope of the bug itself; it just displays the wrong name in the confirm dialog. The correct name will be shown in the list view of the Recycle Bin and if you restore the file, it will return with the correct name as well. This issue affects pretty much all supported versions of Windows client and server, including: Client: Windows 11, version 26H1; Windows 11, version 25H2; Windows 11, version 24H2; Windows 11, version 23H2; Windows 10, version 22H2; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2021; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2019; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB 2016 Server: Windows Server 2025; Windows Server 2022; Windows Server 2019; Windows Server 2016; Windows Server 2012 R2; Windows Server 2012 As things currently stand, Microsoft is working on a concrete solution that will be released in a "future" Windows update. It remains to be seen if the firm will wait till the next Patch Tuesday or roll out an out-of-band (OOB) fix. The good news is that commercial customers can deploy a workaround right now, but they will have to reach out to Microsoft Support for Business for additional details.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      582
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!