Recommended Posts

Hello guys,

I want to buy the GeForce GTX 660 (GTX660-DC2-2GD5, 2GB 192-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 x16 HDCP) , but would like to be sure if its compatible with my motherboard and other parts of my pc. Here are all the info that i think you need ( and probably a lot more :p ) : http://pastebin.com/Aqjgc2Nz .

Thanks/

Going by the specs of the pc... im gunna say no. The hardware is that of a 5+ year old machine, I would say you are better off saving for a whole new computer.

Also this: Power Supply 280W

The 660 has a draw power of about 195W alone, you would be lucky to power a USB keyboard if you did get one

Well then ure good in that area, the other thing id be concerned about would be the length in ure case - 660's would require about 10 inches of breathing room to house it.

if you are good there, then id wait for more knowledgeable people to come on and reply so you get a definite answer :)

It is. It's also fairly small (unless it's Asus) and cool.

Except GTX 660 can't possibly draw 195W even under Furmark. Most review sites state total system consumption, that's what it is. Sometimes they even are so lazy to show only total pull from the wall, where PSU efficiency needs to be counted. TDP of 660 is 140W, peak in-game about 120W. I hope you got a fair quality PSU, still. Hope it's not Modecom. I remember they had 620W unit, and no Modecom thing is any good whatsoever.

Hi Pellumb,

You currently have an Intel CPU in a 775 socket. Do you know the model of the CPU? I'd imagine with a Nvidia 660, your biggest bottleneck may well be the CPU.

Honestly, it might be worth while saving up for a new PC all together. Prices are coming down rapidly on 3rd gen (IvyBridge) Intel i series (which will still be great performers for years to come). What country as you in? That might help us get some prices if you're interested :)

Also to note, your motherboard is not PCIe 3 compatible. Now, that doesn't mean it won't work; it just means it won't be using it's full potential!

The Antec Power Supply is also fine. I can't find the actual page in question, it gives me a 404, however assuming it has the necessary power pins (2x8pin - I think) for your graphics card, it should be fine.

I know it's not exactly what you asked for, but just my 2 pennies.

Dan

I'm having trouble with the Antec link as well, but it leads to HCG-620M. If that's the correct one, High Current Gaming series stands good on its own. This one is built by SeaSonic - those guys rarely do it bad, too.

All GTX 660 kinds that I know of require only one 6-pin PEG, so no worries there. Might be a little unwiedly for small, cramped cases. Their design is really weird - heatsink goes a fair bit longer than PCB (Asus, Gigabyte WindForce).

Only Veyron GTX 690 can currently saturate PCI-E 2.0 16x link as such, so link speed wise it's all ok.

PCI-E 3.0 has a very small chance to throw off some buggy BIOS, but generally it has happened so far only with new boards with their first unpolished UEFI releases.

Q6600 might be a bottleneck, but it depends on the game, really. I figure, it's a good idea to get a powerful graphics card now (we won't get anything new in this field at least until next year) and enjoy the eye candy, then upgrade the rest when the choice becomes easier and dust prices of new Haswells and Richlands settle down.

My 2 candies >.<

I checked the Power Supply and it seems to have the need pin for GPU. So there i think its ok.

Read bit more about if 660 GTX on PCI-E 2.0 can be a problem, and in many forums they say that is should be ok on PCI-E 16x.

About the CPU, if possible i am thinking about Overclocking it. Currently its 2.4Ghz, and according to some should be alright going up to 3.4Ghz. But because i have never done any OCing before, i wont do it myslelf, will try to find someone who knows more about it.

Hopefully today i will get the GPU. Will keep you updated.

I tried the GTX 660, but it was too big for my case. Actually most of higher end GPUs seem to be big.

So today went to a computer shop and asked what is the best GPU i can get that fits my in my case. And he recommended the Gigabyte GTX 650 OC ( 128-bit, 2Gb ), which seems to be pretty good. I think this is the last upgrade that can be done to this PC. The next step will be building a new PC, but it can be a few years latter.

What do you think about the GTX 650 ? Does anyone have experience with that ?

I tried the GTX 660, but it was too big for my case. Actually most of higher end GPUs seem to be big.

So today went to a computer shop and asked what is the best GPU i can get that fits my in my case. And he recommended the Gigabyte GTX 650 OC ( 128-bit, 2Gb ), which seems to be pretty good. I think this is the last upgrade that can be done to this PC. The next step will be building a new PC, but it can be a few years latter.

What do you think about the GTX 650 ? Does anyone have experience with that ?

GTX 650 is pretty crap because it has less than half the performance of the 660Ti. This Asus 670 would be the most powerful card that would fit in a tiny case, but like previously mentioned, it will be bottlenecked by the CPU.

I think it (GTX 660) will be a decent upgrade from your current GT 630.

Your CPU will slow you down a bit, and I don't think overstocking it will help much. Your next step could be to plan on upgrading to a newer motherboard / cpu / ram combo in the future.

I tried the GTX 660, but it was too big for my case. Actually most of higher end GPUs seem to be big.

So today went to a computer shop and asked what is the best GPU i can get that fits my in my case. And he recommended the Gigabyte GTX 650 OC ( 128-bit, 2Gb ), which seems to be pretty good. I think this is the last upgrade that can be done to this PC. The next step will be building a new PC, but it can be a few years latter.

What do you think about the GTX 650 ? Does anyone have experience with that ?

Oh never-mind, just seen this.

Consider also upgrading your case to something like an Corsair 200r or Cooler Master n200. Both are inexpensive and under $50.

As much as I might be Nvidia fan, you'd better go with Radeon 7770 (most are small, except Asus again) or 7790 (there are some small models) then.

GTX 650 doesn't deliver for the price - underperforming low-end has been a problem of Nvidia since the beginning of time.

Besides, what models of 660 did your computer shop had in stock?

Check Gainward Golden Sample model - doesn't have that over-the-top cooling solution for the hefty factory OC it runs, but might just fit. It's the smallest of them all, I think.

Otherwise, might want to look for another case. Cable management aside and general good looks, cheap ones aren't that bad. Say, mentioned Corsair 200R or my own mentions - Zalman ZM-T1 or CM Elite 342 are fairly good bets that go ridiculously cheap, but offer quite a lot of space and won't fall apart when touched.

I checked the Power Supply and it seems to have the need pin for GPU. So there i think its ok.

Read bit more about if 660 GTX on PCI-E 2.0 can be a problem, and in many forums they say that is should be ok on PCI-E 16x.

About the CPU, if possible i am thinking about Overclocking it. Currently its 2.4Ghz, and according to some should be alright going up to 3.4Ghz. But because i have never done any OCing before, i wont do it myslelf, will try to find someone who knows more about it.

Hopefully today i will get the GPU. Will keep you updated.

PCI-E 16x gonna be ok. I run a 670 on PCI-E 2 16x and this is not a problem.

The CPU gonna be a bottleneck though. My Core iE 750 is a bottleneck for my 670. Still better than nothing. There wont be a real gpu upgrade until 2014. So the 660 is not wasted. If you find the cpu is too much of a bottleneck in some games you can look at replace the mb and the cpu later this year.

[edit]

Just saw the gpu doesn't fit in your case. Yeah the nVidia cards are rather long. My 670 barely fit in my Antec ninehundred and this is a mother f****** big case. I had to unscrew a disk bay and leave it laying a little bit out of the case to fit the gpu inside it.

Check at ATI cards. My old 6950 was lot smaller than my 670. Maybe a 7850. Maybe you should buy used. A 6950 would be a perfect fit for your computer. It's still a good card and it's small. The cpu should not be too much of a bottleneck for it. I was still able to run all games last year when i sold it but it was too much border line at 1080p. But for lower resolution it was still perfectly fine.

It's ones like Gigabyte who put their huge double-fan Windforce (not that they're bad - just very, very unnecessary) and Asus, whose DirectCU is just batsh*t stupidly oversized. Take their 650 Ti OC, for example - what the hell, people? You could cool 4870 X2 or Fermi with that!

Some like Palit and Gainward, on the other hand, don't go crazy for budget models.

geIszup.jpg

  • 1 month later...

Hi Pellumb,

You currently have an Intel CPU in a 775 socket. Do you know the model of the CPU? I'd imagine with a Nvidia 660, your biggest bottleneck may well be the CPU.

Honestly, it might be worth while saving up for a new PC all together. Prices are coming down rapidly on 3rd gen (IvyBridge) Intel i series (which will still be great performers for years to come). What country as you in? That might help us get some prices if you're interested :)

Also to note, your motherboard is not PCIe 3 compatible. Now, that doesn't mean it won't work; it just means it won't be using it's full potential!

The Antec Power Supply is also fine. I can't find the actual page in question, it gives me a 404, however assuming it has the necessary power pins (2x8pin - I think) for your graphics card, it should be fine.

I know it's not exactly what you asked for, but just my 2 pennies.

Dan

Depends on the CPU.  A dual-core will almost certainly be a bottleneck; however, a quad-core, especially an overclocked quad, is unlikely to bottleneck much of anything except *maybe* BF3/CoDMW3 or later - and even that is only at high levels of detail with AA.  Because I typically game at the same resolution as my desktop (1920x1080 - which is also my monitor's ceiling) I generally turn AA off, and that is with a GTX550 Ti (which has half the RAM of the 660) paired with a bone-stock Q6600.

 

And a GTX660 mostly requires ONE 6-pin power plug - even a factory-overclocked one.  Case in point - http://www.evga.com/Products/Product.aspx?pn=02G-P4-2662-KR

 

And while that's the lower-end factory-OC card, the top-end card differs ONLY in RAM loadout - power requirements are absolutely unchanged.  The evidence - http://www.evga.com/Products/Product.aspx?pn=03G-P4-2667-KR

 

The shocker was the lack of power requirements - neither GPU requires greater than a 450W PSU (basically identical to the GTX550 Ti).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I'm no Apple fan, and have never bought an Apple product for myself. But I'd argue that where you think Apple is behind regarding an OLED display, that the vast majority of people out there wouldn't even know or care for an OLED. Apple have struck the balance well to create a price point that works, and I hope that PC manufactures, and Microsoft take notice. I'd argue that Asus will struggle to compete with the Neo BECAUSE they put in a more expensive OLED that many people won't actually notice with its deeper blacks. Most people wouldn't care either that their screen is stuck at 60Hz! When I bought a 4k monitor (future proof and for the space), my laptop could only push that out at 30Hz, and it worked fine for my needs for 1.5 years! Heck, the average human eye can't see more than 90Hz in many situations!! So while they are trying to differentiate themselves, and it may well gain them a few customers, for the most part, I think they're missing the point of what the Neo is for.
    • I disagree. Boomer execs only want one thing; money money money. The original fans of the series want a specific reboot that focuses on the vibe and feel of the original series. Boomers don't want that because then they can't have a 8 to 9 figure return. This was canceled because of greed. 
    • Meta rolls out Meta Business Agent globally on WhatsApp, Instagram, and Messenger by David Uzondu Image via Meta Meta is expanding Meta Business Agent, a feature that the social media giant promises will help businesses deliver "personalized experiences for customers using AI," launching the tech globally. Before this global release, Meta Business Agent used to be a free test called "Business AI" during a testing phase that started in October 2024. Meta picked India, Mexico, and Brazil to test the software, gathering data from over one million active shops that used the chat tools. The agent works on WhatsApp, Instagram, and Messenger, helping shops answer customer questions, check incoming leads, book appointments, and recommend products from a catalog. Meta said that the business agent can match your brand's unique tone when speaking to customers, and that it plans to improve the feature to handle "daily operations" like market research, product insights, calendars, and rival research. Soon, users will find these AI-supported shops easily by typing names in the WhatsApp search bar. Image via Meta Apart from the Business Agent, Meta is also introducing the Meta Business Agent Platform, a new agentic platform that provides the infrastructure needed to build, customize, and run virtual helpers at scale. With the Platform, companies link their bots to services like Shopify, Zendesk, and Shopee using firm-level controls, guardrails, and metrics to define strict rules. This setup lets coders build custom behaviors, keeping customers happy with direct answers. Speaking of agents, you might have heard that hackers recently broke into Instagram accounts by simply asking the Meta AI support assistant on the mobile app to hand over control. You can check out our coverage on that here.
    • Transmission 4.1.2 by Razvan Serea Transmission is a fast, easy-to-use bittorrent client with support for encryption, a web interface, peer exchange, magnet links, DHT, µTP, UPnP and NAT-PMP port forwarding, webseed support, watch directories, tracker editing, global and per-torrent speed limits, and more. Transmission has one of the lowest memory & resource footprints of any major BitTorrent client. Transmission's light overhead is one reason why it is so well suited for home NAS and media servers. Having been used by Western Digital, Zyxel and Belkin, Transmission gives truly impressive performance on almost any compatible hardware. Transmission is an open source, volunteer-based project. Unlike some BitTorrent clients, Transmission doesn't play games with its users to make money. Transmission doesn't bundle toolbars, pop-up ads, flash ads, twitter tools, or anything else. It doesn't hold some features back for a payware version. Its source code is available for anyone to review. Transmission doesn't track users, the website and forums have no third-party ads or analytics. Transmission 4.1.2 changelog: This is Transmission 4.1.2, a bugfix release. It fixes 20+ bugs and has a few performance improvements too. All users are encouraged to upgrade to this version. Highlights Fixed 4.1.0 bug that could cause duplicate HTTP announces to be sent to trackers. (#8639) All Platforms Reject benc data that has invalid characters. (#8577) Fixed a bug during the startup sequence where if one torrent failed to parse, subsequent torrents would also fail. (#8605) Fixed a bug that stalled some downloads at 99%. (#8654) Fixed a 4.1.0 upgrade bug that could overwrite utp_enabled and tcp_enabled settings. (#8658) Fixed a 4.1.0 crash that could happen when a peer supplied reqq value smaller than 32 in LTEP handshake. (#8713) Fixed a 4.1.0 regression that periodically wrote upload & download stats to disk even when Transmission had been idle since the last write, preventing the stats file's disk from hibernating while idle. (#8722) Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that prevented TCP peer connections on some systems. (#8748) Added safeguards to HTTP responses to prevent clickjacking. (#8749) Fixed edge case that didn't preserve the order of a batch of torrents when moving their queue position up or down. (#8782) Added sanitization for UTF-8 client names provided by peers during handshake. (#8809) Stopped appending redundant zeros to blocklist files when downloaded from a remote URL. (#8819) Fixed a build failure that occurred when building with link-time optimization. (#8540) macOS Client Fixed a 4.1.0 memory leak. (#8613) Fixed navigation focus issues in the Inspector. (#8792, #8810) Improved UI code to use less CPU. (#8832, #8833, #8835, #8836, #8842, #8846, #8851) Qt Client Fixed a 4.1.0 crash when parsing some RPC responses from older Transmission servers. (#8618) Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that saved both deprecated and current settings names to settings.json. (#8623) GTK Client Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that did not show translated logging level strings. (#8611) Fixed a 4.1.0 crash when toggling alternative speed limits. (#8709) Web Client Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that displayed timestamps in some dropdowns as 6.75:45 instead of 6:45. (#8624) Fixed a bug that could show incorrect torrent status when reconnecting to the server after a lost connection. (#8780, #8783) transmission-remote Improved transmission-remote console output for JSON-RPC 2. (#8799, #8805) Download: Transmission 64-bit | Qt 5 Setup ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Transmission 32-bit | Qt 5 Setup Links: Transmission Homepage | Other OSes | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!