Recommended Posts

R.U.S.E, day one $60 PC game and I had to register it via Steam. Mass Effect 3, same situation you have to register it via Origin. StarCraft 2, register via Battlenet. These are are all brand new, AAA titles that REQUIRE registration with a service. More off the top of my head: Battlefield 3, Skyrim, Sim City, Dead Space 2/3

I wont try to argue with someone who try to tell me there's as much good deals in store as there's on Steam. Cause it's a waste of time.

I don't know about USA. But here you'll never find a new game in a store for under 40$ unless it's a really crappy game (by new i mean not used even if the game is 1 year old the brand new boxed copy will still be 40$ or more if it's still avalaible).

I'm a really patient man. I don't mind waiting 1 year for a game to do own in price on Steam. And despite what some people may say i'm always able to find game son Steam for 30$ and under. Here when it comes to console gaming if you want a game for 30$ and under in a store you need to buy used.

I wont try to argue with someone who try to tell me there's as much good deals in store as there's on Steam. Cause it's a waste of time.

Oddly, some games have been cheaper on disc lately than online. Far Cry 3, for example, has been under $20 on disc for the PC, but hasn't made it that low digitally (yet) for whatever reason.

Oddly, some games have been cheaper on disc lately than online. Far Cry 3, for example, has been under $20 on disc for the PC, but hasn't made it that low digitally (yet) for whatever reason.

Hum here the disc version of FarCry 3 is 60$ for all platform (PS3, 360 and PC). The used 360 and PS3 version is 40$ (sales end june 13 it usually is 55$). I don't know how much the Steam version is since i'm at work but Steam Watch has yet to send me an email to tell me the game is cheap enough to buy it so it's surely still high.

I don't know where you live but here the stores steal us badly.

Anyway to be honest disk or online i don't care i buy the cheaper version. It's just that i have less trouble finding deals when it comes to the PC market than it is when it comes to the console market.

This is the Internet, not the people's republic of china. If you don't want to read negative press simply ignore the threads or start your own.

Don't bother. Telling people to post their own content is pointless, they'd rather complain about the content everyone else makes the effort to post.

And yet they still will not return to me an account for several years ago. And, regardless, Valve controls access to your games as they see fit. The fact is, they aren't yours to keep. They are Valve's to let you use. Disc based media is no different, the only difference is that the last 10 years of console gaming didn't operate like PC gaming, which since as far back as I can remember was a license based system like any other software. Games are software, and if people don't consider it that, then they need to wake up to the reality.

All the X1 is doing is making that more apparent, especially with discless play after install.

I assume you got your account blacklisted for doing something like doing a chargeback on a game. You should contact Valve about your account, then. Thought their support isn?t the best, they may be able to help.

As for controlling access, you can always back up your games on Steam if you're paranoid about it.

I wont try to argue with someone who try to tell me there's as much good deals in store as there's on Steam. Cause it's a waste of time.

I don't know about USA. But here you'll never find a new game in a store for under 40$ unless it's a really crappy game (by new i mean not used even if the game is 1 year old the brand new boxed copy will still be 40$ or more if it's still avalaible).

I'm a really patient man. I don't mind waiting 1 year for a game to do own in price on Steam. And despite what some people may say i'm always able to find game son Steam for 30$ and under. Here when it comes to console gaming if you want a game for 30$ and under in a store you need to buy used.

The console industry monetizes gaming in a fundamentally different way than PC digital distribution sources like Steam. Console monetization is predicated on the development of games. The platform holders make their money during development. Publishers have to pay millions of dollars in licensing fees and distribution costs before the game ever reaches store shelves. This is huge overhead, and they get a tinier percentage of each sale. Console games have to sell at high quantity and high cost to recoup that overhead.

PC gaming doesn't work like this. Steam monetizes the distribution of games. They?re not concerned with having games developed, they?re concerned only with selling ones that are already made. There are no licensing fees. There is no flat distribution costs. With Steam, developers keep 70 cents on every dollar sold. Retail can't match that. PC games can be profitable at sale pricing or at low volume because developers make a lot more money on PC gaming per sale and they have less overhead to begin with.

I very well know how the industry works Dogma. That's no my point. My point is simply i don't mind not being able to resell if i pay 30$ and less. I do mind if i pay between 40 and 60$. I have a harder time finding console games at 30$ and under than i have finding PC games at this price. I rely on the eBay/Kijiji used games market in the console side of things to find games at an affordable price. If i buy a One it appears i'll have to deal with EB Games even for used games which i do not want to since they usually charge more.

I assume you got your account blacklisted for doing something like doing a chargeback on a game. You should contact Valve about your account, then. Thought their support isn?t the best, they may be able to help.

As for controlling access, you can always back up your games on Steam if you're paranoid about it.

My account was apparently "compromised" in a 4 year absense of me logging in. I lost $200 worth of games back in 2003-2007. I was never emailed or informed in any manner my account had been compromised and locked out and upon emailing them they flat out told me "We do not reactivate blacklisted accounts, I'm sorry for the inconvenience." I have never once done anything fishy with games. Since then, I've been resigned to the fact that anything I own on Steam is not mine, and as such am completely prepared to have the same situation on the consoles when it happens (which is inevitable). Now or later means nothing to me.

And I doubt backing up your steamapps folder will do anything, since you need steam to use it. But thanks for the accusations.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!