PlayStation 4 DRM policies get a bit more complex


Recommended Posts

Seems to be the Xbox fans which are invading PS4 threads trying to drag them down and giving them 1 stars. Shame it doesn't log who votes things down, I would be interested to see who keeps doing it.

well you and Audioboxer have been doing it for years on the Xbox side so why complain.

It's also funny how you both removed your forum pic at the same time and now you both are sporting them again at the same time. Some coordination there.

You can keep playing them as long as you're a PS+ sub. Same as this gen. You do not need to have an internet connection to play PS+ games. When downloaded a time bomb is attached to them, that is the length of time you have left on your sub. Obviously if you resub that is extended.

In other words, you do need intermittent connection to keep playing those free games. Got it.

It's exactly like the xbox minus 24 hour check. Everything is left to the publisher.

http://www.polygon.c...r-own-drm-terms

not "exactly" like. the PS4 is NOT backed by an API that will block games that are played on other consoles without the original owner logging in. this isnt happening.

well you and Audioboxer have been doing it for years on the Xbox side so why complain.

It's also funny how you both removed your forum pic at the same time and now you both are sporting them again at the same time. Some coordination there.

Ignoring the fact that I've had a 360 longer than PS3, I had it from launch till 2011. I hardly go into Xbox forums, other than recently because of E3, so don't know how you come to the conclusion I have been doing it for years.

I like that you think it is some kind of conspiracy or collusion. I removed it because I got whined at by Xbox fans. Now you guys are tasting bitter tears I thought it would be funny to sport one again.

In other words, you do need intermittent connection to keep playing those free games. Got it.

How else would you insert a PlayStation plus code or subscribe from the PS Store?

You don't need an online connection to play the games, but obviously if your sub runs out how else can you resub?

Ignoring the fact that I've had a 360 longer than PS3, I had it from launch till 2011. I hardly go into Xbox forums, other than recently because of E3, so don't know how you come to the conclusion I have been doing it for years.

I like that you think it is some kind of conspiracy or collusion. I removed it because I got whined at by Xbox fans. Now you guys are tasting bitter tears I thought it would be funny to sport one again.

well audio for years and you as long as I can remember in recent years. Your avatar changes are funny coincidence no need to get defensive on that.

How else would you insert a PlayStation plus code or subscribe from the PS Store?

You don't need an online connection to play the games, but obviously if your sub runs out how else can you resub?

If the games are free, why do you need to validate PS+ if you stop subscribing?

well audio for years and you as long as I can remember in recent years. Your avatar changes are funny coincidence no need to get defensive on that.

You are the one getting defensive trying to imply that we put them on at the same time for a reason.

If the games are free, why do you need to validate PS+ if you stop subscribing?

Because you don't get to keep them once you stop subscribing, it's not rocket science to figure out so stop trying to bait him into saying something you can scoff at, it's pathetic.

Because you don't get to keep them once you stop subscribing, it's not rocket science to figure out so stop trying to bait him into saying something you can scoff at, it's pathetic.

why are you meddling in a pretty normal back and forth between me and Audio?

As I've been saying....

People think it's publishers who pushed Microsoft into DRM, Microsoft thought up the cloud processing as the sugar that helps you swallow the bitter pill of DRM which is the only reason they thought it up.

Are you going to stop spreading FUD like mixing up two entirely different systems like the cloud processing and the DRM. they're not the same thing, they don't run on the same servers, they don't even run on the same server platform, one runs on the XBL servers the other runs on the Azure platform.

one is there to make sure the fully digital distribution of games isn't abused while giving you all the benefits you can from a digital system.

and your claim that MS pushed it on the publisher is as ridiculous as it's picked out of the sky. MS wanted a digital distribution system with disks as an alternate distribution to keep the retail happy and alive and so people can get the games right away without downloads if they have slow lines. they also wanted people to have certain freedoms in this digital system, like being able to share the games with the family, lend it to friends and so on. in order to provide this, publishers demand DRM. MS designed a system with the freedom to keep the players happy and the restrictions necessary to keep publishers happy.

and no the DRM has nothing to do with the cloud. so stop making stuff up already. This is almost as bad as when you made up the rumor that Forza 5 wasn't full HD and 60 despite it already being confirmed. your lying isn't helping your credibility any.

I think it's hilarious how certain people are trying to sabotage the PS4, even at the worst case it's FAR better than XB1 situation.

You mean like. making up rumors, spreading FUD that has already been debunked... yeah... why would people do that... I'm asking you.

Are you going to stop spreading FUD like mixing up two entirely different systems like the cloud processing and the DRM. they're not the same thing, they don't run on the same servers, they don't even run on the same server platform, one runs on the XBL servers the other runs on the Azure platform.

one is there to make sure the fully digital distribution of games isn't abused while giving you all the benefits you can from a digital system.

and your claim that MS pushed it on the publisher is as ridiculous as it's picked out of the sky. MS wanted a digital distribution system with disks as an alternate distribution to keep the retail happy and alive and so people can get the games right away without downloads if they have slow lines. they also wanted people to have certain freedoms in this digital system, like being able to share the games with the family, lend it to friends and so on. in order to provide this, publishers demand DRM. MS designed a system with the freedom to keep the players happy and the restrictions necessary to keep publishers happy.

and no the DRM has nothing to do with the cloud. so stop making stuff up already. This is almost as bad as when you made up the rumor that Forza 5 wasn't full HD and 60 despite it already being confirmed. your lying isn't helping your credibility any.

I know they are freaking different, my point was they are using the cloud as added value to disguise the fact that it is DR FREAKING M. No one would accept DRM if it didn't have added value hence why they are letting you share games and such.

Believe what you want, the sun shines out of Microsofts ass I get it. The very fact PS4 has no DRM is fact that publishers weren't pushing Microsoft.

well audio for years and you as long as I can remember in recent years. Your avatar changes are funny coincidence no need to get defensive on that.

Well he said my avatar and sig made me a fanboy for the little period where he removed his PS sigatar, so I guess his change back to PS sigatar means according to his own statements....

I know they are freaking different, my point was they are using the cloud as added value to disguise the fact that it is DR FREAKING M.

NO, they are not. they are very clearly separating the DRM and digital copies of the game issue from the cloud computing, YOU are the only people who are making this ridiculous claim.

They are using the benefits of a fully digital distribution as a defense for the DRM. not the cloud. the cloud computing is being marketed on it's own. it's only been stated that for a few games, you need to be online anyway to take advantage of the cloud computing, not in defense of the DRM. like Forza 5, to drive against other people's drivatars you need to be online. being offline you lose a lot of the advantages that the cloud offers. this has nothing to do with the DRM, just about being online and the cloud.

Just because they don't run on the same servers doesn't mean it wasn't implemented as a form of DRM.

Do you really think people would just accept it if there wasn't any cloud computing or benefits such as not having a disc in the drive?

Hard not to be a fanboy in the face of such disgusting anti-consumerism coming from Microsoft, just because they added a couple of features doesn't mean you should bend over and take it.

I don't feel like I'm bending over and taking anything. I get a lot of benefits. I can play my games on my console in the living room, the upstairs living room, at my mothers on the xbox there. I can switch games instantly and flip between games without juggling disk until I decide what game I want to play when I'm in that kind of undecided mood. my GF can play games from my library on the upstairs xbox when I'm downstairs. My cousins can share in my library. I can digitally lend games to and from my friends. I can digitally rent games from OnePlay. I don't need to worry about scratched disks.

For that I'll gladly trade a 24 hour online check that can still be abused to make me and my GF play the same game at the same time for as long as we want on our two xboxes, all I need to do is be offline on the main one.

your defintiion of bending over and taking it is missing a key ingredient. it would imply there are no benefits. when there's a basket full of them.

Just because they don't run on the same servers doesn't mean it wasn't implemented as a form of DRM.

Do you really think people would just accept it if there wasn't any cloud computing or benefits such as not having a disc in the drive?

OMG. of course it does. you can play Forza 5 without online, but you won't get the Drivatars(if you've seen the less capable previous generations of them, you know they are pretty damn awesome, far better than driving against the on the rails with random "driving errors" opponents you get in every other racer). That is nothing to do with DRM. that is an online function. Are you calling the floating blobs in Fable 3 and the other online players in Test Drive unlimited DRM as well ?

DRM is DRM, online functionality is online functionality.

Also not having a disc in the drive IS a benefit, among the other such as the sharing and such. that's kind of the point isn't it. it isn't online drm for the sake of it. the DRM is there BECAUSE you don't need the disc in the drive, BECAUSE you can share games. NOT the other way around.

Hard not to be a fanboy in the face of such disgusting anti-consumerism coming from Microsoft, just because they added a couple of features doesn't mean you should bend over and take it.

well you are ok with paying for previously-free online play - so why blame him? Aren't you "bending over and taking it"?

I already said I am very disappointed that they have chosen to go pay to play online.

OMG. of course it does. you can play Forza 5 without online, but you won't get the Drivatars(if you've seen the less capable previous generations of them, you know they are pretty damn awesome, far better than driving against the on the rails with random "driving errors" opponents you get in every other racer). That is nothing to do with DRM. that is an online function. Are you calling the floating blobs in Fable 3 and the other online players in Test Drive unlimited DRM as well ?

Good lord, I know they are different functionality wise, but cloud computing is just a trojan horse to force the DRM onto players, reading comprehension is great.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Onkyo Dolby Atmos AV receivers are really solid deals by Sayan Sen Recently we covered great deals on several soundbar models from the likes of Sony, JBL, Samsung and others for really good prices (the lowest in several months). Aside from that we also reported on the Edifier S3000MKII, a hi-fi two-way bookshelf monitor that's available for only $800. Today we bring a list of AV receivers from Onkyo that are available at great prices including the Onkyo NR7100, RZ30, and 8470 (purchase links under the specs table down below). The Onkyo TX-NR7100 and Onkyo TX-RZ30 are both 9.2-channel AV receivers designed for immersive home theater setups but they occupy slightly different tiers within Onkyo’s lineup with the RZ30 positioned as the more advanced model. The TX-NR7100 is a THX Certified 9.2-channel receiver offering up to 100 W per channel (8 ohms, 2 channels driven). It supports Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, and IMAX Enhanced formats, with flexible configurations such as 5.1.4 or 7.1.2 speaker layouts. A key highlight is its built-in Dirac Live Room Correction which should help optimize sound based on your room and its acoustics. In comparison, both models share several core capabilities though the RZ30 is geared toward enthusiasts seeking more precise calibration and system flexibility, while the NR7100 is positioned as a slightly more accessible, value-focused option with strong all-round performance. The technical specs of the RZ30 and NR7100 9.2 AVRs are given in the table below: Specification Onkyo TX-RZ30 Onkyo TX-NR7100 Power Output (FTC, 2ch driven) ~100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) 100 W/ch (8Ω, 20Hz–20kHz, 0.08% THD) Dynamic / Peak Power 9 × 170 W (6Ω, 1kHz, 1% THD, 1ch driven) 220 W/ch (6Ω, 1kHz, 10% THD, 1ch driven) Frequency Response 5 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) 10 Hz – 100 kHz (+1/-3 dB) THD 0.08% 0.08% Room Correction Dirac Live (full bandwidth) Dirac Live (with AccuReflex support) Immersive Audio Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, IMAX Enhanced Speaker Layout Support Up to 7.2.2 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing Up to 7.2.4 / 5.2.4 / 9.2 processing HDMI Inputs / Outputs 6 inputs / 2 outputs (eARC) 6 inputs / 2 outputs (Main + Sub/Zone 2) HDMI 2.1 Support 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC 8K/60, 4K/120, VRR, ALLM, QFT, DSC, eARC Video Formats HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDCP 2.3 Streaming / Network Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Wi-Fi, AirPlay 2, Chromecast, Bluetooth, DTS Play-Fi Get them at the links below: Onkyo TX-RZ30 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $797.00 (Sold and shipped by Electronic Expo) Onkyo TX-NR7100 9.2-Channel AV Receiver: $699.00 (Sold and shipped by Adorma) Onkyo TX-8470 2 Ch Stereo Receiver: $449.00 (Sold and Shipped by Adorma) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links or authorized dealer links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from such links only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • A different thing with Russia. When you say is it better, depends on things. It is better that we don't have the E.U making rules and laws that have nothing to do with them. Is the trading part better? No, that is really mucked up, but then we knew that was going to happen and we would have make agreements, like we do with other parts of the world. Freedom of movement is certainly better, but could be improved, we still need more control over our borders. do you live in the U.K?
    • So what am I quoting from them? I never listened to what Farage or his cronies said. I wanted the U.K to leave the E.u years before the referendum and it had nothing to do with Farage and his cronies. So what country do you live in? Did we work much better together? We were always at logger heads with the E.U because we disagreed with them so much. Maggie was always on at them. I would have thought the E.U was glad to get rid of us as we stopped the integration or made it a two tier. Now without us they can integrate more. I would not have voted out if it was just a trading block and we can still work together on somethings.
    • MPC-BE 1.9.0 by Razvan Serea Media Player Classic - BE is a free and open source audio and video player for Windows. Media Player Classic - BE is based on the original "Media Player Classic" project (Gabest) and "Media Player Classic Home Cinema" project (Casimir666), contains additional features and bug fixes. The BE mod (Black Edition Mod) is a skinned version of Media Player Classic Home Cinema, much better looking than the plain old MPC. MPC-BE 1.9.0 changelog: Splitters Fixed crashes in some situations. AudioSplitter Added support for the RF64 format. Fixed reading of channel layout for some WavPack files. Added support for ID3 tags for Wave64 files. Unknown Wave64 chunks are now ignored. AviSplitter Added support for 'y408' video. Improved support for 'HEVC' video. FLVSplitter Added support for VVC video. MP4Splitter Improved handling of corrupted files. MatroskaSplitter Expanded support for V_UNCOMPRESSED video codecs. Fixed support for frame rotation (ProjectionPoseRoll). Improved support for "V_MS/VFW/FOURCC / HEVC". MpcDvdVideoDecoder Fixed conversion to YUY2. Fixed display of menus for some DVD-Videos. RoQVideoDecoder Output in NV12 and YV12 formats is allowed. Full range is used. MPC Video Decoder RGB32 format will be output as a top-down bitmap by default. Added support for the "IID_MediaSideDataDOVIMetadataV2" interface. Removed support for the deprecated "IID_MediaSideDataDOVIMetadata" interface. Fixed retrieving the name of the video adapter when using NVDEC. Fixed crashes in some situations. MPC Video Converter Added support for AYUV video format. MpcAudioRenderer Improved input format validation. Optimized retrieval of supported formats for exclusive mode. Added the "Keep audio device active when paused" setting. Fixed crashes and freezes in various situations. Subtitles Added the ability to open the properties of an external subtitle renderer in the "Subtitles" settings panel. Fixed external subtitle connections for VSFilter. Fixed a crash when rendering PGS/SUP subtitles when using AVX2. YouTube Improved support for yt-dlp. The built-in YouTube parser is no longer used. Player The HTTP read strategy has been changed. If the playlist contains one entry, more key combinations can be used to control the player (jump through chapters, adjust volume). Improved support for reading ASX playlists. The translation of the MediaInfo report for Chinese, Korean and Japanese has been removed. Added blocking of 32-bit filter "PICVideo Lossless JPEG Decompressor" (pvljpg20.dll), because it crashes. Added blocking of the system filter "AVI Decompressor", which will eliminate the crash of VFW codecs. Fixed a rare crash when using the "/slave" key. Fixed a crash when getting a list of fonts for OSD. Added the ability to load an external audio file using hotkeys. Fixed opening a network path starting with \?\UNC. The "Determine duration when adding" playlist setting now works for YouTube video URLs. The "Online media services" settings panel has been redesigned. Added a "Merge files using FFmpeg" option to the file saving dialog. This option is activated when playing multiple streams obtained using yt-dlp. Added loading of local .dpl playlists ("DAUMPLAYLIST"). Fixed a hang when the user closes the player during the URL opening process. Various interface fixes. Installer Updated MPC Video Renderer 0.10.5. Updated MPC Script Source 0.2.17. Added MPC Image Source 0.3.6. Translations Updated Japanese translation (by tsubasanouta). Updated Chinese (Traditional) and Dutch translation (by beter). Updated Romanian translation (by Andrei Miloiu). Updated Hungarian translation (by mickey). Updated Turkish translation (by cmhrky). Updated German translation (by Klaus1189). Updated Chinese (Simplified) translation (by wushantao). Updated Italian translation (by mapi68). Updated Korean translation (by Hackjjang). Updated Chinese (Traditional) (by udfbe). Updated libraries dav1d 1.5.3-6-g04b69f9; ffmpeg n8.2-dev-1857-g4653e68aab; libpng git-v1.6.55-9-g7d52a8087; Little-CMS git-lcms2.18-26-gf739cda; MediaInfo git-v26.05-38-g702c9b7fd; ZenLib git-v0.4.41-91-g073f297; zlib 1.3.2. Download: MPC-BE 64-bit | Portable MPC-BE 64-bit | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: MPC-BE 32-bit | Portable MPC-BE 32-bit Link: Media Player Classic - BE Home Page Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Apple reportedly looks to blacklisted Chinese memory chips as RAM prices climb by Karthik Mudaliar Image via Apple Apple is reportedly trying to get a clearance from the Trump administration to buy memory from ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) to get some relief from soaring DRAM prices. As per a report by the Financial Times, Apple approached the Commerce Department more than a month ago and also spoke to other officials and allies in Washington. For starters, CXMT is a company that's already been placed on the Pentagon's list of Chinese military companies. The Chinese company is the country's top DRAM maker. For Apple, the timing is certainly awkward but not surprising. Tim Cook had recently warned that Apple would have to raise prices because AI companies are buying up large amounts of memory for data centers, and just like that, Apple raised MacBook and iPad prices. Micron also recently revealed that customers have committed billions of dollars to secure memory supply years in advance, which shows us how aggressive securing infrastructure has become. This gives suppliers such as Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron more leverage, while pushing hardware makers to look for alternatives. CXMT is one of those alternatives, but not the simplest one. Apple has spent many years trying to diversify parts of its supply chain away from China, especially for final assembly, while still depending heavily on Chinese manufacturing and suppliers. Even domestic brands from China are moving towards CXMT and YMTC instead of relying on Samsung, Micron, and SK Hynix. For Apple, though, it would invite more scrutiny than local Chinese companies. For now, this is more like a lobbying effort rather than a confirmed supply deal. There's no official statement from either of the parties. What is clearer, though, is the pressure behind such a request. AI demand has certainly made hardware a bottleneck, and companies are trying everything they can to bring things back to normal, even if that means making politically sensitive choices. Source: Financial Times
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      227
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!