PlayStation 4 DRM policies get a bit more complex


Recommended Posts

Seems to be the Xbox fans which are invading PS4 threads trying to drag them down and giving them 1 stars. Shame it doesn't log who votes things down, I would be interested to see who keeps doing it.

well you and Audioboxer have been doing it for years on the Xbox side so why complain.

It's also funny how you both removed your forum pic at the same time and now you both are sporting them again at the same time. Some coordination there.

You can keep playing them as long as you're a PS+ sub. Same as this gen. You do not need to have an internet connection to play PS+ games. When downloaded a time bomb is attached to them, that is the length of time you have left on your sub. Obviously if you resub that is extended.

In other words, you do need intermittent connection to keep playing those free games. Got it.

It's exactly like the xbox minus 24 hour check. Everything is left to the publisher.

http://www.polygon.c...r-own-drm-terms

not "exactly" like. the PS4 is NOT backed by an API that will block games that are played on other consoles without the original owner logging in. this isnt happening.

well you and Audioboxer have been doing it for years on the Xbox side so why complain.

It's also funny how you both removed your forum pic at the same time and now you both are sporting them again at the same time. Some coordination there.

Ignoring the fact that I've had a 360 longer than PS3, I had it from launch till 2011. I hardly go into Xbox forums, other than recently because of E3, so don't know how you come to the conclusion I have been doing it for years.

I like that you think it is some kind of conspiracy or collusion. I removed it because I got whined at by Xbox fans. Now you guys are tasting bitter tears I thought it would be funny to sport one again.

In other words, you do need intermittent connection to keep playing those free games. Got it.

How else would you insert a PlayStation plus code or subscribe from the PS Store?

You don't need an online connection to play the games, but obviously if your sub runs out how else can you resub?

Ignoring the fact that I've had a 360 longer than PS3, I had it from launch till 2011. I hardly go into Xbox forums, other than recently because of E3, so don't know how you come to the conclusion I have been doing it for years.

I like that you think it is some kind of conspiracy or collusion. I removed it because I got whined at by Xbox fans. Now you guys are tasting bitter tears I thought it would be funny to sport one again.

well audio for years and you as long as I can remember in recent years. Your avatar changes are funny coincidence no need to get defensive on that.

How else would you insert a PlayStation plus code or subscribe from the PS Store?

You don't need an online connection to play the games, but obviously if your sub runs out how else can you resub?

If the games are free, why do you need to validate PS+ if you stop subscribing?

well audio for years and you as long as I can remember in recent years. Your avatar changes are funny coincidence no need to get defensive on that.

You are the one getting defensive trying to imply that we put them on at the same time for a reason.

If the games are free, why do you need to validate PS+ if you stop subscribing?

Because you don't get to keep them once you stop subscribing, it's not rocket science to figure out so stop trying to bait him into saying something you can scoff at, it's pathetic.

Because you don't get to keep them once you stop subscribing, it's not rocket science to figure out so stop trying to bait him into saying something you can scoff at, it's pathetic.

why are you meddling in a pretty normal back and forth between me and Audio?

As I've been saying....

People think it's publishers who pushed Microsoft into DRM, Microsoft thought up the cloud processing as the sugar that helps you swallow the bitter pill of DRM which is the only reason they thought it up.

Are you going to stop spreading FUD like mixing up two entirely different systems like the cloud processing and the DRM. they're not the same thing, they don't run on the same servers, they don't even run on the same server platform, one runs on the XBL servers the other runs on the Azure platform.

one is there to make sure the fully digital distribution of games isn't abused while giving you all the benefits you can from a digital system.

and your claim that MS pushed it on the publisher is as ridiculous as it's picked out of the sky. MS wanted a digital distribution system with disks as an alternate distribution to keep the retail happy and alive and so people can get the games right away without downloads if they have slow lines. they also wanted people to have certain freedoms in this digital system, like being able to share the games with the family, lend it to friends and so on. in order to provide this, publishers demand DRM. MS designed a system with the freedom to keep the players happy and the restrictions necessary to keep publishers happy.

and no the DRM has nothing to do with the cloud. so stop making stuff up already. This is almost as bad as when you made up the rumor that Forza 5 wasn't full HD and 60 despite it already being confirmed. your lying isn't helping your credibility any.

I think it's hilarious how certain people are trying to sabotage the PS4, even at the worst case it's FAR better than XB1 situation.

You mean like. making up rumors, spreading FUD that has already been debunked... yeah... why would people do that... I'm asking you.

Are you going to stop spreading FUD like mixing up two entirely different systems like the cloud processing and the DRM. they're not the same thing, they don't run on the same servers, they don't even run on the same server platform, one runs on the XBL servers the other runs on the Azure platform.

one is there to make sure the fully digital distribution of games isn't abused while giving you all the benefits you can from a digital system.

and your claim that MS pushed it on the publisher is as ridiculous as it's picked out of the sky. MS wanted a digital distribution system with disks as an alternate distribution to keep the retail happy and alive and so people can get the games right away without downloads if they have slow lines. they also wanted people to have certain freedoms in this digital system, like being able to share the games with the family, lend it to friends and so on. in order to provide this, publishers demand DRM. MS designed a system with the freedom to keep the players happy and the restrictions necessary to keep publishers happy.

and no the DRM has nothing to do with the cloud. so stop making stuff up already. This is almost as bad as when you made up the rumor that Forza 5 wasn't full HD and 60 despite it already being confirmed. your lying isn't helping your credibility any.

I know they are freaking different, my point was they are using the cloud as added value to disguise the fact that it is DR FREAKING M. No one would accept DRM if it didn't have added value hence why they are letting you share games and such.

Believe what you want, the sun shines out of Microsofts ass I get it. The very fact PS4 has no DRM is fact that publishers weren't pushing Microsoft.

well audio for years and you as long as I can remember in recent years. Your avatar changes are funny coincidence no need to get defensive on that.

Well he said my avatar and sig made me a fanboy for the little period where he removed his PS sigatar, so I guess his change back to PS sigatar means according to his own statements....

I know they are freaking different, my point was they are using the cloud as added value to disguise the fact that it is DR FREAKING M.

NO, they are not. they are very clearly separating the DRM and digital copies of the game issue from the cloud computing, YOU are the only people who are making this ridiculous claim.

They are using the benefits of a fully digital distribution as a defense for the DRM. not the cloud. the cloud computing is being marketed on it's own. it's only been stated that for a few games, you need to be online anyway to take advantage of the cloud computing, not in defense of the DRM. like Forza 5, to drive against other people's drivatars you need to be online. being offline you lose a lot of the advantages that the cloud offers. this has nothing to do with the DRM, just about being online and the cloud.

Just because they don't run on the same servers doesn't mean it wasn't implemented as a form of DRM.

Do you really think people would just accept it if there wasn't any cloud computing or benefits such as not having a disc in the drive?

Hard not to be a fanboy in the face of such disgusting anti-consumerism coming from Microsoft, just because they added a couple of features doesn't mean you should bend over and take it.

I don't feel like I'm bending over and taking anything. I get a lot of benefits. I can play my games on my console in the living room, the upstairs living room, at my mothers on the xbox there. I can switch games instantly and flip between games without juggling disk until I decide what game I want to play when I'm in that kind of undecided mood. my GF can play games from my library on the upstairs xbox when I'm downstairs. My cousins can share in my library. I can digitally lend games to and from my friends. I can digitally rent games from OnePlay. I don't need to worry about scratched disks.

For that I'll gladly trade a 24 hour online check that can still be abused to make me and my GF play the same game at the same time for as long as we want on our two xboxes, all I need to do is be offline on the main one.

your defintiion of bending over and taking it is missing a key ingredient. it would imply there are no benefits. when there's a basket full of them.

Just because they don't run on the same servers doesn't mean it wasn't implemented as a form of DRM.

Do you really think people would just accept it if there wasn't any cloud computing or benefits such as not having a disc in the drive?

OMG. of course it does. you can play Forza 5 without online, but you won't get the Drivatars(if you've seen the less capable previous generations of them, you know they are pretty damn awesome, far better than driving against the on the rails with random "driving errors" opponents you get in every other racer). That is nothing to do with DRM. that is an online function. Are you calling the floating blobs in Fable 3 and the other online players in Test Drive unlimited DRM as well ?

DRM is DRM, online functionality is online functionality.

Also not having a disc in the drive IS a benefit, among the other such as the sharing and such. that's kind of the point isn't it. it isn't online drm for the sake of it. the DRM is there BECAUSE you don't need the disc in the drive, BECAUSE you can share games. NOT the other way around.

Hard not to be a fanboy in the face of such disgusting anti-consumerism coming from Microsoft, just because they added a couple of features doesn't mean you should bend over and take it.

well you are ok with paying for previously-free online play - so why blame him? Aren't you "bending over and taking it"?

I already said I am very disappointed that they have chosen to go pay to play online.

OMG. of course it does. you can play Forza 5 without online, but you won't get the Drivatars(if you've seen the less capable previous generations of them, you know they are pretty damn awesome, far better than driving against the on the rails with random "driving errors" opponents you get in every other racer). That is nothing to do with DRM. that is an online function. Are you calling the floating blobs in Fable 3 and the other online players in Test Drive unlimited DRM as well ?

Good lord, I know they are different functionality wise, but cloud computing is just a trojan horse to force the DRM onto players, reading comprehension is great.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
    • Did you see their FAQ, its quite good. Have a look in the Advanced section. https://delta.chat/en/help
    • Just install Linux Mint that is a real blessing and many times cheaper because you can continue using your old Windows computer/laptop with the latest Linux updates.
    • Interesting share -- however it does not make sense: Email messages get stored somewhere, so how is Delta Chat "based on email" and decentralized without actually storing anything? By Web3 standard practices, the various Relays would require dedicated storage to make messages available to the recipients (like a large series of message queue channels, akin to racks of traditional post office boxes)... and Contacts must be two-way confirmed in order for encryption keys to be exchanged (ostensibly every key-pair is uniquely bound between sender and recipient) and the Relays would preserve the public keys in order to facilitate message carriage... or every device stores all sorts of keys and contact info. All of this to say, decentralized messaging is like running Bluesky nodes except instead of discovering/browsing public feeds by various posters (at the given node) these Delta Chats would be relaying encrypted messages (via Relays) that only trusted recipients would have the appropriate decryption key (their own private key) to read it. But this doesn't solve the "it's like email" sales pitch. The only way it's like email is that there's encrypted binary stuff being transported from your app into the federated ether of Delta Chat Relays for others to decrypt (hopefully only the intended recipient)... but outside of this federated relays framework, it is absolutely nothing like email.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      228
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      161
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!