Recommended Posts

Hi, i have been looking at different GPUs and i would love some help on choosing one. I want to be playing on ultra for nearly every game at 60fps :-) Also i have between ?250-350, but would love to have pay less to get the same performance

These are my choices:

EVGA GTX 670 +FTW 4GB (Highest)

http://www.amazon.co.uk/EVGA-NVIDIA-DDR5-PCI-E-Graphics/dp/B009NN2OTK/ref=sr_1_2?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1371119852&sr=1-2&keywords=EVGA+NVIDIA+GTX+670+FTW

EVGA GTX 670 FTW 2GB

http://www.amazon.co.uk/EVGA-NVIDIA-Signature-Edition-Graphics/dp/B009GB17SI/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top

EVGA GTX 660TI SC+3GB (Lowest)

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B008ZX2OWQ/ref=s9_simh_gw_p147_d0_i1?pf_rd_m=A3P5ROKL5A1OLE&pf_rd_s=center-2&pf_rd_r=0TMSE609XYQZY2XYNTEJ&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=358549767&pf_rd_i=468294

This is what i like the look of but i would love to pay a lower price but still get brilliant power out of it. All help would be much appreciated:-)

Specs:

CPU: AMD FX6300 @3.5ghz (Going to over clock once i get a water cooler)

MOBO: Asrock 970 Extreme4

Ram: Corsair Vengeance 8GB 16000mhz (2x4)

Hard Drives: Not to sure, just savaged them out a old system, but its 500 (2x250)

PSU: Corsair Gaming series GS700 (700W)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1158624-what-gpu-should-i-get/
Share on other sites

Unless you're looking to game at beyond 1080p a 2 gig card should suffice, the 2GB 670 will probably be the best choice if you want a fair compromise between power and cost

  • Like 1

May I suggest spending a few extra for the new card?

http://www.amazon.co.uk/MSI-N770-TF-2GD5-OC/dp/B00D3XW8MO/ref=sr_1_6?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1371142050&sr=1-6&keywords=770+gtx

Its an overclocked version and it generally outperforms the former, expensive flagship 680. If you can, this one will be a better investment

  • Like 1

I can run all games on ultra on my gtx 670 ftw edition (same as above, 2gb version)

I'm running a resolution of 2560 x 1440 and the card is overclocked

What frame do you get on average? Do you have the stock cooler on or a water-cooled block :-)

It's on my list so when it comes down to buying one i will defintly take a look, thanks for all the feedback. Been getting such a headache trying to find a card that would do everything i wanted without paying out too much.

I can run all games on ultra on my gtx 670 ftw edition (same as above, 2gb version)

I'm running a resolution of 2560 x 1440 and the card is overclocked

I can't agree - 'all games on ultra' at that res at 60fps with one card isn't doable - but then that's my requirement - 60fps with all the eye candy on and that does (quite often) require SLI to achieve. I have a LCD in front of the monitor showing GPU usage per card and there's plenty of games pushing both hard thesedays. If you can live with lower FPS then it's not so much a problem but then you're driving a lot more pixels than me and so the cost is much (much) higher as a result. I'm specifically avoiding going to 1440p resolution because I can't stand the low FPS it introduces and quite a few games are borderline at 1920x1200. Of course it varies, and there's also the option of dropping a few settings to get the framerates up again. Choices as always. I have a very low tolerance for <60fps :(

Example of game that pushes my system at 1920? Metro Last Light. Just benchmark it (it has a built in benchmark) with everything on 'ultra'.

The big reason for me going SLI was that the 670 wasn't enough of a jump up from the 580 I had beforehand. The same logic is keeping me off the 770/80 for this generation as replacements.

Long as I get a card that should do very well either High at 60fps or Ultra at 60fps, I will be very happy. The 770 should do that and if it's unlocked to over-clock easy i will do that too. Thanks for all the help guys

I can't agree - 'all games on ultra' at that res at 60fps with one card isn't doable - but then that's my requirement - 60fps with all the eye candy on and that does (quite often) require SLI to achieve. I have a LCD in front of the monitor showing GPU usage per card and there's plenty of games pushing both hard thesedays. If you can live with lower FPS then it's not so much a problem but then you're driving a lot more pixels than me and so the cost is much (much) higher as a result. I'm specifically avoiding going to 1440p resolution because I can't stand the low FPS it introduces and quite a few games are borderline at 1920x1200. Of course it varies, and there's also the option of dropping a few settings to get the framerates up again. Choices as always. I have a very low tolerance for <60fps :(

Example of game that pushes my system at 1920? Metro Last Light. Just benchmark it (it has a built in benchmark) with everything on 'ultra'.

The big reason for me going SLI was that the 670 wasn't enough of a jump up from the 580 I had beforehand. The same logic is keeping me off the 770/80 for this generation as replacements.

Oh definitely not all at 60fps constant, but none ever dip to a fps that is noticeable in terms of laginess or anything like that. Im using the latest beta drivers and overclocked a fair bit

Edit:

Just did a quick test, and although not the most graphic intensive games, theyre 3 popular ones:

Battlefield 3 @ 2560 x 1440 = Average 90fps

Crysis 2 @ 2560 x 1440 = Average 70fps

Skyrim @ 2560 x 1440 = Average 70fps

These were during moment with gunfire/fire/etc

So a 770 will definitely run games at your resolution quite comfortably IMO

Oh definitely not all at 60fps constant, but none ever dip to a fps that is noticeable in terms of laginess or anything like that. Im using the latest beta drivers and overclocked a fair bit

Edit:

Just did a quick test, and although not the most graphic intensive games, theyre 3 popular ones:

Battlefield 3 @ 2560 x 1440 = Average 90fps

Crysis 2 @ 2560 x 1440 = Average 70fps

Skyrim @ 2560 x 1440 = Average 70fps

These were during moment with gunfire/fire/etc

So a 770 will definitely run games at your resolution quite comfortably IMO

I'm amazed with your Crysis 2 results - patched up with the HD textures/DX11 etc that game officially benches like this:

http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/graphics/40613-evga-geforce-gtx-670-ftw/?page=6

Your average is actually above a 690 (i.e. SLI) ?

That correlates with my experience - for that game I *need* SLI with everything turned up! A 680 is managing a mere 36FPS by comparison? :s

So this (http://www.amazon.co.uk/MSI-N770-TF-2GD5-OC/dp/B00D3XW8MO/ref=sr_1_6?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1371142050&sr=1-6&keywords=770+gtx) Should be a very good card and preform well? Haha Thanks guys. Will it be hard to over-clock btw as i'm new to over-clocking never mind a GPU:P

So this (http://www.amazon.co...eywords=770+gtx) Should be a very good card and preform well? Haha Thanks guys. Will it be hard to over-clock btw as i'm new to over-clocking never mind a GPU:P

I'd get this one, has 3 fans lol - http://www.amazon.co...sbs_computers_1

In all seriousness, do a quick search on Google to compare the different models and see which one comes out top for the price

I'm amazed with your Crysis 2 results - patched up with the HD textures/DX11 etc that game officially benches like this:

http://hexus.net/tec...670-ftw/?page=6

Your average is actually above a 690 (i.e. SLI) ?

That correlates with my experience - for that game I *need* SLI with everything turned up! A 680 is managing a mere 36FPS by comparison? :s

Just checked everything, I have dx11 and high res texture pack, only thing I have disabled is motion blur as I don't like it. I've ran benchmarks and it performs better than the 680.. Probably because it's overclocked I'm not sure.

The best 770 is the ASUS Direct CU II, if you can afford the price premium. It runs cooler and more silently than the other models, and it also has a decent factory overclock. This is pretty much my dream video card at the moment, if you can afford it I envy you :p

The best 770 is the ASUS Direct CU II, if you can afford the price premium. It runs cooler and more silently than the other models, and it also has a decent factory overclock. This is pretty much my dream video card at the moment, if you can afford it I envy you :p

I have looked at that one as i'm not the biggest fan of MSI. I was thinking of the Asus, but if it can be over-clocked easy enough without blowing up on the stock cooler i think i will go for that rather than the MSI. They should perform just the same, right ;D

Unless you're looking to game at beyond 1080p a 2 gig card should suffice, the 2GB 670 will probably be the best choice if you want a fair compromise between power and cost

Completly agree, unless your on multi monitor gaming or above 1080p gaming you don't need to shell out for the 4GB card, and for the $20 price diff the 670 is worth it.

Would an AMD 7970 cope with gaming at 2560x1440? My current 2GB 7770 can struggle at the higher graphics settings at full-res.

Would an AMD 7970 cope with gaming at 2560x1440? My current 2GB 7770 can struggle at the higher graphics settings at full-res.

Yep that should do easily. It beats my 670 in tests, even beats the 680 and the 770 in most aspects

Heres a good site to compare cards - http://gpuboss.com/gpus/Radeon-HD-7970-vs-GeForce-GTX-680

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • 1. Define "better". 2. It's still more expensive than equivalent PCs so... And there is not one Windows platform. This is the mistake ALL Apple oriented people make. Apple is one OEM. You could reasonably compare them to one PC OEM, say Dell or HP. But you can't compare them to ALL PC OEMs. Case in point, Apple has NO touch screen MacBooks. No tablet Macs. There are no rugged Macs. The variety of PC OEM design is insane. With Apple, you have... Apple. The problem is that you're starting with Apple as the definition of "good" then filtering out anything that isn't close to an existing Apple product, then trying to homogenise all of those left into a fictional product line and then ignore any innovations to create a minimal feature subset so you can say "See! Apple better!" PS: I was an Apple dev for 17 years and helped develop MacInTalk and disability solutions for Apple - and I have several Mac and MacBooks - so tread very carefully.
    • Major Xbox layoffs may claim South of Midnight developer Compulsion entirely by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft has been making major changes in its gaming wing Xbox for a few months now, including the appointment of a new CEO, a large number of leadership changes, and strategy shifts. However, the company is seemingly also looking at initiating a major layoffs wave at Xbox and perhaps even a studio closure. The new report lands from Kotaku, Xbox first-party developer Compulsion Games is being shuttered soon by Microsoft. For those unfamiliar with the studio, it's the team behind Contrast (2013), We Happy Few (2018), and South of Midnight (2025). Its latest game was quite well received, even winning a Peabody Award for its writing. It even received a 9/10 in Neowin's own review, highlighting its engaging storyline, gorgeous world, and curious characters. The studio joined Xbox Game Studios in 2018, just as Microsoft announced it is acquiring Playground Games, Undead Labs, and Ninja Theory. Despite recent listings for new staff roles, according to the new report, Compulsion Games is being closed entirely, with over 90 staff being let go. Kotaku also added that the studio's leadership is in negotiations with Microsoft about this decision, but no official details have been revealed yet. The report lands just as two senior managers of Xbox leave their posts at Microsoft Gaming. Head of Xbox Game Studios Craig Duncan and chief of staff Louise O'Connor originally began their journey in Rare and have been a part of Xbox for over two decades. Dunkan has been responsible for games like Kinect Sports and Sea of Thieves, while O'Connor was primarily working on Rare's Everwild project before its cancelation. If this report about the studio shutdown is accurate, this may just be the start of a major new layoffs wave at Xbox Game Studios. There are also rumors of Arkane Studios being heavily affected. As always, take all these reports with a grain of salt until something official materializes from Microsoft or the studios.
    • The flaw with this analysis is that this laptop has a cellphone CPU in it. In the Intel world, that would be an N150 and those are everywhere, even in low end laptops. You can get an N150 based NUC with 16GB RAM and 256GB-512GB SSD... NOT soldered in... for < $500 Canadian (around US$360). The problem is two fold: tech bloggers/writers on most tech site (like this one, ironically) overvalue Apple and apparently aren't in the same earnings class as most regular people. As a result, we get breathless articles about how everyone needs a folding phone when most people just cannot afford one... or really need one. And we get Apple used as the baseline metric regardless of whether that comparison makes any sense. If Dell or HP released a retail laptop with a cellphone motherboard, you'd be all over them for doing that - but Apple does it and it's genius. I see articles suggesting what Samsung - a company that basically started the foldable phone market and has built them for eight years - needs to do to compete with Apple's unreleased, unspecced and unseen folding phone. Sorry, no - if the Neo (really creative name there BTW - still, better than the Go, the other "creative" product name everyone's using) encourages PC makers to make cellphone laptops using lower end ARM processors, we all lose. It's a step backwards and a capitulation to the fact that semiconductor makers and computer OEMs (and tech bloggers) have totally lost the plot.
    • Everyone should install this extension and ignore games that use AI. https://chromewebstore.google....nnigaaeelfkeomjcngmnh?pli=1 https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ai-warning-for-steam/
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!