New PC. Corsair Builder CX600W 80+ Bronze or not?


Recommended Posts

Heu guys,

I am building a new budget PC and while i have everything sorted out i am kinda stuck on the PSU selection. First of all this is the full specifications of the PC i am building:

CPU: Intel Core i5 3570

MOBO: Gigabyte Z77M-D3H

RAM: Corsair Vengeance DDR3 4GB DIMM 1600Mhz

GPU: None.I'll be using the i5's integrated for the beginning until i can afford a seperate GPU

HD: WD 5000AAKX 500GB

PSU: Corsair Builder Series CX600W 80+ Bronze

Now i am aware that 600w are more than enough for the system and i could go below that but i don't really want to do that having feature upgrades on my mind. Also i can not go above 110 euros.

My question is, if the CX600W is a good quality PSU that will last for some years.

I was also thinking of the Corsair Enthusiast Series TX650 V2 650W 80+ Bronze Certified which is supposed to be better but i saw videos in which the fan was running loud that made me doubt about its quality. Here are the videos:

Also regarding the CX600W i couldn't find any reviews on the internet so if anyone owns that PSU maybe can give some insight.

I've got a corsair PSU and can defintatly back their quality....Mine runs almost silent - I've got the Corsair 850W HX Modular PSU - From corsairs website - "Corsair HX Series? modular power supply units are designed for gaming rigs, overclocking systems, or any PC where rock-solid stability is essential. HX Series PSUs have earned 80 PLUS? Gold certification to guarantee cool, efficient operation.

Im sure the only reason that the bronze is loud i because its their budget one..If you could spend a few more ?$? I'd recommend the HX series...Even a smaller one like a 650...Not sure of the pricing now though :)

Hey SickDave, thank you for the reply.

I was hoping for some info if anyone knows though about the CX600W.I understand that HX is a better more well build series but unfortunately i have already exceeded the money limit if i go with the TX650.

I am mostly between these two and since TX650 doesnt seem to be that better in terms of quality compared to the CX600W (unless i am wrong) i cant see why i should pay more for it and not get the CX600W for less money.

Thank you all for your replies guys

I have a TX650. TX is the normal level. HX is for modular PSU's. CX is the consumer level (build level).

If you dont mind me asking, for how long do you have the TX650 and have you noticed any of the fan noise like on the videos i posted or any other issues?

If you dont mind me asking, for how long do you have the TX650 and have you noticed any of the fan noise like on the videos i posted or any other issues?

:rofl:

I think I had my TX650 since I upgraded to 1156. That was in early 2012, March or April. That was before the Rev. 2 version.

I never noticed any fan problems. But when you have 2x 250mm, 3x 120mm, and GFX fans, you never really notice it. Never gave me any problems.

None of quite a many CX (V2 series) of various output capacities, all CWT design, have failed thus far. It has been about a year since we've added them.

Might want to go with (relatively) new CX600M, too. Same platform.

Haven't seen that fan problem with some TX that have come my way.

None of quite a many CX (V2 series) of various output capacities, all CWT design, have failed thus far. It has been about a year since we've added them.

Might want to go with (relatively) new CX600M, too. Same platform.

Haven't seen that fan problem with some TX that have come my way.

That is quite useful info.Thx.

I have to say the low price of CX series is really tempting.

The only reason i am thinking of not going for the CX is i can't believe there is not one single review for it and regarding the TX the extra 40 euros for it must be for something...

Corsair doesn't make inner workings of units themselves. TX V1 made a big confusion at the time - Corsair switched from SeaSonic to CWT sometime in 2011, didn't tell anybody. Tbh, nobody ever does. Anyway, the one you see in the first video (pale yellow stickers) could be either. TX V2 (orange stickers) is SeaSonic again. Both Taiwanese, but SeaSonic is regarded a more premium brand, doesn't skimp on components by principle. Doesn't mean they won't fail (we see that fans have, apparently), but does raise the price.

Another thing over CX (in both CWT and SeaSonic design of TX) is independently regulated (TX) design vs group regulated (CX). The former generally means more stability of all kinds (clean voltage, transients, crossload) when overclocking or otherwise pushing the limits of the unit.

The last thing is 80+ efficiency. TX is rated Bronze (that is - just about 80% efficient at any load), CX isn't at all. Those pennies (or cents) that creep up in the electricity bill later for not having that no more than several percent advantage of TX won't, of course, even out the premium you'd pay for a more efficient unit right away. But it's of different importance for each of us.

Thanks for all the info.

 

After visiting the corsair forum and reading threads, I was ready to go with the CX series mainly beacuse i couldnt find any threads with problems for it.

On the other hand i found many threads with TX650, TX650v2 and generally the TX series problematic behaviour.

 

The CX is way too cheap however (whatever that means in terms of quality) and after reading what Phouchg said on the last post i think i am willing to risk it with the TX series...

I am fine if something happens to the PSU after some time.My main concern is not to destroy anything else with it in case it starts malfunctioning.

If you can buy a CX600M! I bought the M model, and it's modular, compared to the CX600. I can barely hear the PSU, and my build is very minimal - I have 4 fans total (CPU, Chasis fan, PSU fan, and video card fan)

If you can buy a CX600M! I bought the M model, and it's modular, compared to the CX600. I can barely hear the PSU, and my build is very minimal - I have 4 fans total (CPU, Chasis fan, PSU fan, and video card fan)

I know, i would but the store where i am going to build the pc from doesnt have the CX600M and i don't want to build the thing myself because i want the warranty.

Unfortunately i am stuck with the CX600W and the TX650v2

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      449
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      203
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!