PS4?s DRM stance has set a


Recommended Posts

I'm all for digital, I've been Xbox fan since the first Xbox released. But I think MS is doing what Sony did with BR, I feel like they're shoving down something on me which Sony did with BR. I didn't buy PS3 right away, I bought PS3 when I was ready like a year or something after its release.

I agree with MS that always online is the further but give me a choice, don't tell me take it or leave, Once I'm ready I'll embrace it. Sony learned for there mistake with PS3 and now when BR is mainstream they're sticking what works.

By the way I'm not skipping XB1 this generation, but will buy when I'm nice and ready.

The PS4 stance is short term and na?ve. Digital download is where the future is, Disk DRM is so pass?. There is no reason this day and age gaming should be encumbered by what is printed on a disk and distributed by a 3rd party. Digital Downloads FTW and i'm willing to bet Microsoft will fix their few quirks long before Sony realizes disks aren't all that.

BTW, that PS4 is more and more hideous the more I see it..

PS4 has full support for digital downloads, so your post does not make much sense. Both consoles support both disks and downloads, the difference is that the xbox has unnecessarily restrictive DRM. Super restrictive DRM is not a necessity for digital downloads, and it definitely does not make sense to apply this extra DRM to disks making it harder for those with disks to play offline. I'm amazed at how blindly people are supporting microsoft's policy here.

 

And disks aren't going away anytime soon for either console, there are far too many people that are still stuck with slow/crappy Internet, and games these days are quite huge.

PS4 has full support for digital downloads, so your post does not make much sense. Both consoles support both disks and downloads, the difference is that the xbox has unnecessarily restrictive DRM. Super restrictive DRM is not a necessity for digital downloads, and it definitely does not make sense to apply this extra DRM to disks making it harder for those with disks to play offline. I'm amazed at how blindly people are supporting microsoft's policy here.

 

And disks aren't going away anytime soon for either console, there are far too many people that are still stuck with slow/crappy Internet, and games these days are quite huge.

 

I have 3.5mb internet. It's obviously therefore quicker for me to drive to the store and buy The Last of Us than download it on PSN, but to be honest it's still quicker for me to buy it next day delivery online and play it the next day  :pinch:

The PS4 has all of the same benefits of digital distribution, so I don't understand why some people keep saying the PS4 isn't "future focused". True, it doesn't have the family-share thing that the Xbone has, but that is something that could easily be added to PSN in the future.

 

Other than that, both solutions seem pretty similar in terms of convenience, but I would go further and say that the PS4 is even more so due to the fact that it doesn't have the 24 hour brick-check.

  

I don't think the PS4 has the same benefits because you can't resell them back (reselling digital content on ps4/psn is restricted). you can share it to someone but you have to give your account details which amounts to account sharing.

I'm not sure about sony adding anything because from what I've seen is sony removing features throughout the ps3 life.

Well the most convenient in my opinion is the method(s) that actually allow EVERYONE to play. You not needing to get off your ass to change a disc is not more important than gamers without internet/without reliable internet/people going on holiday/Uni&College students actually being able to enjoy gaming. What's better for the industry?

ok that's in your opinion, nothing wrong with that. with the xbox you don't need a constant internet connection and I'm not sure how come college students don't have internet in their dorms (that sounds like college in 1999). I would think college students like to play multi-player games which they would need internet on any system.

people on holiday or vacation, I don't know about them but if I were them I'd try to have internet where ever I'm going.

on the point of convenience, I think that's a subjective matter because people have different needs.

for me it's convenient to just change to any game or content without needing to go look for a disc I might have lent out or forgot where or which game case I had placed it in.

I think it's convenient that I dont' have to pick and choose which disc to bring by my friends place if I'm going to spend some time over there or at a little party with friends

I think it's convenient that I don't have to keep 2 remotes close by (I can just leave them all in my tool drawer), my tv remote takes ages to change channels on my cablebox.

I think it's convenient to just call up a tv channel without having to know the exact channel number.

I think it's convenient that I don't have to flip through channel after channel trying to find something to watch, I can just call up whats going on and see whats showing on all channels and easily pick what to watch.

at parties I don't have to worry about my game discs being stolen.

I mean, these are all subjective matters, nothing that people can't live without but they're just convenient to me and make life a whole lot easier.

I think the point that's trying to be made in here is there is the type of convenience that can be universally agreed upon as beneficial (having a hair dryer to dry your hair vs waiting), and the type of convenience that benefits specific consumers and hurts others. In enforcing a pretty much digital only solution on the Xbox One you hurt all the examples of consumers that have been shouted about from the roof tops since the confirmation of Xbox One DRM. MS didn't do this DRM on the 360, so they are whether you want to agree or not alienating people who have invested in the Xbox brand.

 

It's very rare a one size fits all actually fits all.

MS have said you can trade licensing to ONE person with discs, but XBL purchased digital content? I have not read that anywhere.

 

I think most people interested in PS4 gaming care more about the fact they can trade/sell their physical copies as much as they want, not once. When there is a choice like that you don't really hear anyone caring about trading digital copies bought on PSN. How many people were asking to trade the PS3 PSN copy of a game this generation? They were all too busy trading/selling the physical copies.

 

Sure if your friend has fast internet to download the game at his and not have you waiting for hours. Not everyone does.

 

Plus as mentioned before in here, there are going to be digital copies on the PS4, just like how you can buy The Last of Us on PSN just now.

 

yeah true, but for playstation, digital copy and physical copy are treated as two different sales, where as on the xbox those two are the same thing. you can go down to the store and buy a physical copy of the game and when you load it up on your xbox you also get access to the digital copy, no extra purchase needed.

plus you can trade or sell it back in you want to, you're not stuck with it.

 

There's nothing stopping you from bringing the discs, you just don't have to anymore.

I don't think they understand the concept or they're just trying to turn a blind eye and act like its not a big convenience

  

I have 3.5mb internet. It's obviously therefore quicker for me to drive to the store and buy The Last of Us than download it on PSN, but to be honest it's still quicker for me to buy it next day delivery online and play it the next day  :pinch:

yeah you can still do the same on xbox but whats good is that your physical copy is also treated as a digital copy

PS4 has full support for digital downloads, so your post does not make much sense. Both consoles support both disks and downloads, the difference is that the xbox has unnecessarily restrictive DRM. Super restrictive DRM is not a necessity for digital downloads, and it definitely does not make sense to apply this extra DRM to disks making it harder for those with disks to play offline. I'm amazed at how blindly people are supporting microsoft's policy here.

 

And disks aren't going away anytime soon for either console, there are far too many people that are still stuck with slow/crappy Internet, and games these days are quite huge.

 

The DRM is there for one reason: Family sharing.

 

You can have ten people in your 'family' and you can view and play their entire library. I can play my family members game with him/her even though I haven't even bought it. That's something PS4 doesn't have.

 

yeah true, but for playstation, digital copy and physical copy are treated as two different sales, where as on the xbox those two are the same thing. you can go down to the store and buy a physical copy of the game and when you load it up on your xbox you also get access to the digital copy, no extra purchase needed.

plus you can trade or sell it back in you want to, you're not stuck with it.

  I don't think they understand the concept or they're just trying to turn a blind eye and act like its not a big convenience

  

yeah you can still do the same on xbox but whats good is that your physical copy is also treated as a digital copy

 

Give up man. They'll just keep squirming in their seats either blatantly lying or ignoring the facts.

I'm still very much on the fence regarding which console to get (with a slight lean toward XB1 at the mo) but if i ever turn in to one of these fan boy whining twats then i'll give you my address and you can come and give me a slap :p

 

yeah you can still do the same on xbox but whats good is that your physical copy is also treated as a digital copy

 

It's not also treated like a digital copy, it basically is a digital copy. Requires an install, requires online checks, can only be traded once.

 

That by all means is not what the console realm classes as a physical copy.

It's not also treated like a digital copy, it basically is a digital copy. Requires an install, requires online checks, can only be traded once.

 

That by all means is not what the console realm classes as a physical copy.

 

Can you hold the disk? Therefore it's a physical copy. The way MS makes you install it is no different than how people had to install games to the hard drive and use a cd key to verify it was a legit copy on the PC. And from what we know, you can delete the contents from the hard drive and sell the physical copy or give it away.

 

What they're doing really isn't new. It's just console gamers don't want to deal with the same stuff PC gamers had to for years.

Can you hold the disk? Therefore it's a physical copy. The way MS makes you install it is no different than how people had to install games to the hard drive and use a cd key to verify it was a legit copy on the PC. And from what we know, you can delete the contents from the harddrive and sell the physical copy or give it away.

 

What they're doing really isn't new. It's just console people don't want what PC gamers have/had to go through. 

 

First and foremost PC gamers do not need online check ins (unless you are Sim City/Diablo 3). Secondly what other physical products can you only trade once? I give my DVDs/Music CDs to anyone multiple times. Lastly, consoles are not PCs. Console gaming and PC gaming has never been fully comparable, consoles are closed environments with no competitors, PC's are open environments with different OS'/hardware and most importantly competition - Steam/Origin/Green Man Gaming/etc.

 

Yes, I know it's a disc and plastic and a printed cover, but you know what I mean by my comment about it not really being physical, it alludes to all the above.

 

Give up man. They'll just keep squirming in their seats either blatantly lying or ignoring the facts.

I'm still very much on the fence regarding which console to get (with a slight lean toward XB1 at the mo) but if i ever turn in to one of these fan boy whining twats then i'll give you my address and you can come and give me a slap :p

 

lmao, I hear that man.

 

It's not also treated like a digital copy, it basically is a digital copy. Requires an install, requires online checks, can only be traded once.

 

That by all means is not what the console realm classes as a physical copy.

so even though you have the contents on a physical disc you still don't call that physical? yes you would need to check it in online to make sure that you haven't sold or traded it.

I don't understand what you mean by "can only be traded once". do you mean, lending to a friend or trade back into the system? I think you'd need to explain what you meant a little more because it seems you have warped sense of what trading just like the sony rep rodhe has a warped sense of what precedence means.

It's not also treated like a digital copy, it basically is a digital copy. Requires an install, requires online checks, can only be traded once.

 

That by all means is not what the console realm classes as a physical copy.

  

in the console realm....? what is this mortal combat? well to you I guess having a physical copy means having to change discs to play a specific game. maybe you don't mind doing that because you've been doing it for years, but I for one have always wished that I didn't have to and now it's finally here.

I guess if sony decides to start doing what Microsoft is doing now later down the line, you all would be like "well it's ok because it's more better and convenient now" just like how they start charging for online play now and you're all like "well it's ok because they're trying to make the service better now and I get free stuff" even though you all used to point and laugh at xbl subscribers before saying things like "I don't pay to play and will never pay to play" now it's a different tune.

First and foremost PC gamers do not need online check ins (unless you are Sim City/Diablo 3). Secondly what other physical products can you only trade once? I give my DVDs/Music CDs to anyone multiple times. Lastly, consoles are not PCs. Console gaming and PC gaming has never been fully comparable, consoles are closed environments with no competitors, PC's are open environments with different OS'/hardware and most importantly competition - Steam/Origin/Green Man Gaming/etc.

 

Yes, I know it's a disc and plastic and a printed cover, but you know what I mean by my comment about it not really being physical, it alludes to all the above.

you're not talking "TRADE", you're talking about "LENDING" two very separate things. as I've said before it seems you have a warped sense of what trading means just like the sony rep you in your OP has a warped sense of what a precedence is.

Being fully digital means not good for reselling and more expensive games. If your games are all digital, your stuck with them unlike physical. The consumer should always come first, if the consumer likes buying, selling,  buying used, giving games to friends, they should freely. Putting drm on games completely hurts the consumer and gives publisher a much bigger advantage.

You will be able to buy a digital version of a PS4 games on the PSN.

so you're ok with buying a physical copy then going to buy a digital copy, spending twice the money?

on playstation it seems if you buy a digital copy you lose the benefit of a physical copy: can't bring to someone else's place if need to, can't sell/trade it back into the system etc. but on xbox you don't lose those benefits.

Being fully digital means not good for reselling and more expensive games. If your games are all digital, your stuck with them unlike physical.

xbox allows resale/trade ins even for digital copies, so you're not stuck with them.

Its a very restrictive selling of used xbox one games, and also very complex. You cant just sell your xbox one games on online. I dont know how Microsoft believes that is the future. The future is more of the same of being able to easily and freely selling your games with no strings attached.

Its a very restrictive selling of used xbox one games, and also very complex. You cant just sell your xbox one games on online. I dont know how Microsoft believes that is the future. The future is more of the same of being able to easily and freely selling your games with no strings attached.

How many downloaded games will you be able to sell on the PS4?  Oh, right.  :rolleyes:

 

The entire industry is moving to digital distribution.  It's happening.  Denying that is just delusional.  It's just a matter of when. 

MS decided to embrace that now with the xbone.  Whether it will pay off or not remains to be seen.

Its a very restrictive selling of used xbox one games, and also very complex. You cant just sell your xbox one games on online. I dont know how Microsoft believes that is the future. The future is more of the same of being able to easily and freely selling your games with no strings attached.

 

How do you know it's restrictive? It's not been announced how we'd go about selling our games yet.

How do you know it's restrictive? It's not been announced how we'd go about selling our games yet.

 

Well we already know that... You can only give Xbox One games to people who have been on your friends list for at least 30 days and that  each game can only be given once. That already is restrictive.

There are upsides and downsides to both consoles. Based on the information given (not speculation) with interviews and webpages by official sites, Sony has a better approach to physical games, while Microsoft has a better approach to digital games. There are certain things that Sony can do with physical games that Microsoft can't (with the information given at this time) and there are certain things Microsoft can do with digital games that Sony can't (with the information given at this time).  

 

There is no "better" solution because it depends on the needs and want of the consumer.

 

PS4 fans: "Well, if your internet goes out for over a day, you can't play games."
XB1 fans: "Well, if you lose/scratch your disc, you can't play your game"

 

PS4 fans: "Well you can't share your game with anyone you want easily."

XB1 fans: "Well, you can't share your game with a person across the world easily."

 

PS4 fans: "You have digital DRM."

XB1 fans: "You have physical DRM."

 

This list can go on...I'm getting both systems (I may flip my PS4 for more money though since it's the "darling" right now and more people want it) but the amount of FUD that is going on is ridiculous. I will say especially towards the Xbox One since it's the one (pun not intended) changing.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • On the topic of being locked out of a service. Recently two different friends of mine got locked out of their Google accounts. Both were hack attempts and one of them is waiting 30 days before he can get back in. He had backup codes and MFA but not a passkey. It was a browser token hack. Anyhow he has to wait 30 days for the dispute or whatever to end. The other person only had a password and is screwed losing all of the email, docs and years of photos. Google won’t help her at all. Her fault because she had no backup/recovery setup. Enable passkeys if possible. Also do NOT use browser based password managers. If using a cloud service make sure it is one you can fully sync to one of your devices so you can back it up. Like a PC or Mac with some backup drive plugged into it. Google is the worst to use IMHO. You can’t sync your photos at all. You have to use the “Take Out” service which is manual and takes days. That service strips the meta data from your photos. Also Google Docs synced to a device are useless without a Google accounts. MS Office/Libre Office is not going to open a link to a Google doc to a dead account.
    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!