"Of course PS4 can do Cloud Computing", says President of Sony'


Recommended Posts

 

Microsoft has been keen to promote Xbox One's use of the cloud. Xbox One's official website, for example, states that "thanks to the power of the cloud, Xbox One will keep getting better." Cloud computing supposedly makes Xbox One four times more powerful. It also justifies why Xbox One is effectively an always-on console.

 

But what about Sony's next-gen machine? Sure, it can stream games via the cloud-powered Gaikai. But can it also follow Microsoft's step in offloading computation to the cloud? "Of course," Sony's Shuhei Yoshida said.

 

"Linking, matchmaking... there are already many computations being done on the cloud side," Yoshida told Polygon. And although PS4 won't require an internet connection to use, Yoshida said that "if your title needs [an] online connection to provide some online features: Go for it."

 

There you go. Both consoles can do cloud computing. Although be warned--it's all pretty much a load of rubbish either way. Hooray for marketing!

 

http://www.shacknews.com/article/79760/sony-of-course-ps4-can-do-cloud-computing

 

 

But off course, we all know that "cloud computing" is a fancy buzzword that doesn't mean anything.

rofl

 

Joke of the year award hands down.

 

CPU and GPU use the fastest  input/output available on hardware, and now Microsoft pretends it can send the same instructions to a server over WAN, execute them, send them back to your Xbox over WAN, and tells you this method has better performance. It's just completely absurd.

 

And then you have many Xbox One fans believing this and use it as their primary argument why the Xbox One will be better in bringing you the "next gen" and why the PS4 isn't.

CPU and GPU use the fastest  input/output available on hardware, and now Microsoft pretends it can send the same instructions to a server over WAN, execute them, send them back to your Xbox over WAN, and tells you this method has better performance. It's just completely absurd.

 

And then you have many Xbox One fans believing this and use it as their primary argument why the Xbox One will be better in bringing you the "next gen" and why the PS4 isn't.

 

You've got some reading to do sonny.

Cloud computing may very well be the in buzz word at the moment but the benefits it can bring to all aspects of our lives is very real.

No doubt Sony will put something in place for the Playstation.

 

 

No doubt. But as far as gaming goes the latency is too unreliable right now for it to be a viable option. It's gonna be used here and there for background/persistant thingies. But it wont make the consoles more powerful. Will be useful for persistant worlds though.

""Linking, matchmaking... there are already many computations being done on the cloud side," Yoshida told Polygon" I think that's a very loose sense of what cloud computing is.

it's clear you guys have no programming knowledge or even understand whats being offered or it's use case.

not everything will be done in the cloud. the console can take care of things in the foreground/immediate events while the cloud takes care of things in the background or things that doesn't need to be updated EVERY frame. this gives the console itself more resources to do more computations on foreground events.

anyways, in the coming years we will see if i's really marketing or something real.

every console can do computations in the cloud yes, but Microsoft is offering to devs FREE of charge while on other platforms they would have to brunt the cost of said cloud infrastructure.

it's the difference between having an 18 player match and a 128 player match.

it's the difference between getting kicked out of a game because the host left and being able to keep playing even if someone leaves

CPU and GPU use the fastest  input/output available on hardware, and now Microsoft pretends it can send the same instructions to a server over WAN, execute them, send them back to your Xbox over WAN, and tells you this method has better performance. It's just completely absurd.

 

And then you have many Xbox One fans believing this and use it as their primary argument why the Xbox One will be better in bringing you the "next gen" and why the PS4 isn't.

Not even the fastest CPU/GPU combo will be able to do what Forza 5's drivatars are supposed to do. You need the magic of the cloud for that. It's not that PS4 can't do it but it doesn't have the dev. tools + infrastructure baked into the core platform as Xb1 does.

That's the difference. Microsoft will have upper hand here (software company, infrastructure) just like Sony has upper hand at hardware.

Not even the fastest CPU/GPU combo will be able to do what Forza 5's drivatars are supposed to do. You need the magic of the cloud for that. It's not that PS4 can't do it but it doesn't have the dev. tools + infrastructure baked into the core platform as Xb1 does.

That's the difference. Microsoft will have upper hand here (software company, infrastructure) just like Sony has upper hand at hardware.

A Drivatar is just AI based on how a player drives for others to race against if the player is not online. They just compute data from the game and send it to their cloud service where an AI profile is created and used for others. This is not that special and the console is already doing most of the work tracking the players driving habits and just packaging and sending it. People think this cloud computing will do big things during a game but this stuff is done outside of the game and the console can easily do this type of work after a race.

http://www.polygon.com/2013/6/11/4420778/forza-motorsport-5-preview-e3-2013-drivatar-cloud

Not even the fastest CPU/GPU combo will be able to do what Forza 5's drivatars are supposed to do. You need the magic of the cloud for that. It's not that PS4 can't do it but it doesn't have the dev. tools + infrastructure baked into the core platform as Xb1 does.

That's the difference. Microsoft will have upper hand here (software company, infrastructure) just like Sony has upper hand at hardware.

 

Yep but what does Drivatars will actually bring to the game ? The last thing i want is a crappy online experience with baddies in my offline driving game. In one of the E3 demo just when the guy is about to explain the Drivatars you can see 2 cars hitting each others for no obvious reason.

 

It's not like building a good AI is impossible offline.

 

We have yet to see if Drivatars will really improve the AI of the game. The idea is not bad (kinda Deep Blue style) but it will still require lot of works from the dev to make it remotely realistic. I feel like asking a bunch of actually good players to play many games, record those games and use them as a DB to build an AI would actually be more effective than tracking millions of games where 95% of the players are terrible.

Not even the fastest CPU/GPU combo will be able to do what Forza 5's drivatars are supposed to do. You need the magic of the cloud for that. It's not that PS4 can't do it but it doesn't have the dev. tools + infrastructure baked into the core platform as Xb1 does.

That's the difference. Microsoft will have upper hand here (software company, infrastructure) just like Sony has upper hand at hardware.

 

Essentially they are giving publishers access to certain amounts of Azure resources (storage and CPU cycles) and letting them decide what to do with it. Any claims to increasing the "power" of the console are pure conjecture. And on top of that, the Xbox One is doing all the heavy lifting as far as Drivatar is concerned; by tracking and profiling the driving habits and sending it to Microsoft servers; on in turn make that AI profile play while the player is not there.

""Linking, matchmaking... there are already many computations being done on the cloud side," Yoshida told Polygon" I think that's a very loose sense of what cloud computing is.

it's clear you guys have no programming knowledge or even understand whats being offered or it's use case.

not everything will be done in the cloud. the console can take care of things in the foreground/immediate events while the cloud takes care of things in the background or things that doesn't need to be updated EVERY frame. this gives the console itself more resources to do more computations on foreground events.

anyways, in the coming years we will see if i's really marketing or something real.

every console can do computations in the cloud yes, but Microsoft is offering to devs FREE of charge while on other platforms they would have to brunt the cost of said cloud infrastructure.

it's the difference between having an 18 player match and a 128 player match.

it's the difference between getting kicked out of a game because the host left and being able to keep playing even if someone leaves

 

I think it comes down to a couple things. First and foremost was Microsoft's decision to only have 5GB of RAM available to devs probably happened before they realized the PS4 would have 7, and those 7 would be better-integrated with the GPU. The Xbox One boards for the console were probably already being fabricated and more importantly it would likely have fudged their cost projections to toss another couple of GBs in it.

 

So what could Microsoft do to combat the superior hardware of the PS4? This is where the "Cloud" comes in. By adding "cloud computing support"; which is more more of a software thing that they can develop in the meantime without changing the cost of their console and acts as a sales bulletpoint of the technologically illiterate.

 

Companies never want to release something less powerful than their competitors, so when they get the jump on you in specs you have to compensate somehow - more features or a lower price. Sometimes when you're up against a wall those "features" aren't substantial, like MS's Grand Magic Cloud Strategy.

 

I think it comes down to a couple things. First and foremost was Microsoft's decision to only have 5GB of RAM available to devs probably happened before they realized the PS4 would have 7, and those 7 would be better-integrated with the GPU. The Xbox One boards for the console were probably already being fabricated and more importantly it would likely have fudged their cost projections to toss another couple of GBs in it.

 

So what could Microsoft do to combat the superior hardware of the PS4? This is where the "Cloud" comes in. By adding "cloud computing support"; which is more more of a software thing that they can develop in the meantime without changing the cost of their console and acts as a sales bulletpoint of the technologically illiterate.

 

Companies never want to release something less powerful than their competitors, so when they get the jump on you in specs you have to compensate somehow - more features or a lower price. Sometimes when you're up against a wall those "features" aren't substantial, like MS's Grand Magic Cloud Strategy.

 

 

Yeah, because scaling computing tasks to operate seamlessly in datacenters, doing load-balance testing, hooking up and configuring 300K servers, writing APIs, and doing all the network latency performance tuning is less expensive than redesigning a console at the last minute. :rolleyes:

What Sonys cloud compute can do is...nothing the Xbox 360/PS3 couldn't!

 

Microsofts can be used for dedicated servers, sharing player/game created content, MMOs and things like that.

 

The point that people are missing is, even though it absolutely CAN BE DONE on the PS4, developers don't have to do it all themselves with the X1.

 

You can bet Sony is looking to do things with Gaikai to combat this at some point...they'll talk it down as much as they possibly can until then!

PS3 did a form of cloud computing years ago, remember Folding @ home? also looking at the Xbox One Architecture Panel back in May shows they were overhyping it more than they should have.

 

I feel it's worth noting that debating this whole thing is rather useless. We don't know what all of this will entail, how these "features" will actually pan out, or what benefits they may provide us with in the long term. All we know is what may be possible, but it isn't something tangible that we can measure, especially given how many dependencies cloud computing relies on in order to work and function properly.

 

With all that being said, I think we should just note cloud computing with a big asterisk until we can actually see it in action. Just my two cents though.

Who needs cloud computing when you can have hardware that does it better?

 

No one, but that has nothing to do with this...

 

They do have hardware that can do it better, the problem is are they actually utilising it or is it a marketing show.

Who needs cloud computing when you can have hardware that does it better?

 

I agree - everyone needs to have their own datacenter!

 

 

We'll see how it works out in reality, but I can envision playing a game with a battle involving thousands of AI characters fighting each other in realtime - the AI calculations all being computed in the cloud.  Math calculations can be highly compressed and uploaded/downloaded with little delay, esp. if the environmental information is already in the cloud.  You couldn't do that with local hardware.

I agree - everyone needs to have their own datacenter!

 

 

We'll see how it works out in reality, but I can envision playing a game with a battle involving thousands of AI characters fighting each other in realtime - the AI calculations all being computed in the cloud.  Math calculations can be highly compressed and uploaded/downloaded with little delay, esp. if the environmental information is already in the cloud.  You couldn't do that with local hardware.

 

It doesn't matter that the cloud could, in theory, compute the ai for "thousands of characters fighting" when the hardware(especially the much weaker Xbox One) couldn't display even a 5th of all those characters at once.

It doesn't matter that the cloud could, in theory, compute the ai for "thousands of characters fighting" when the hardware(especially the much weaker Xbox One) couldn't display even a 5th of all those characters at once.

 

Using lower res-figures for those far away, and using other optimization techniques, I think it might be possible.  Maybe not humans in photorealistic detail, but spaceships or other characters that don't require such a high-poly count.

<p>

There are some things that the cloud can do that local hardware can't and vice versa.

You mean, like being a server, matchmaking, providing downloads, and other miscellaneous expected tasks? Those are the expected tasks for non-local hardware. Everything else local hardware does better, significantly better. Xbox One is just making bad publicity if it cannot push a single player game and requires online access to offload some tasks. And what exactly does this mean? A thousand x thousand battle will be offloaded to a server and if the user doesn't have a connection good enough to stream all that back? Or has bandwidth caps? Or the game support gets dropped? Or the closes server is 800ms away? There is nothing next gen admitting that your CPU is too weak to handle basic AI.</p>

<p> </p>

<p>EDIT: And Neowin fully messed up IE10 support.</p>

Yeah, because scaling computing tasks to operate seamlessly in datacenters, doing load-balance testing, hooking up and configuring 300K servers, writing APIs, and doing all the network latency performance tuning is less expensive than redesigning a console at the last minute. :rolleyes:

 

Ehmm, you are aware that Microsoft is making use of their Azure Cloud Platform, correct? They are not actually building from the ground up.

 

The problem is that what Microsoft is promising is theoretically impossible. Cloud computing can do many things but increasing performance by sending CPU instructions to a server is a dynamic real time environment is not one of them.  300.000 servers sound impressive but they all run virtually so we have no idea what "a server" means and the vast majority of those servers will be used for multiplayer servers and the vast amount of content Microsoft is going to need to distribute online.

 

Besides, 300k servers thing i s a gimmick. 300,000 servers is the entire Azure architecture. There are not 300,000 physical servers. Most are virtual servers on the same hardware. The whole Azure network does a ton of other things. Now one of them with be all the XB1 stuff.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I notice how you dodged the questions I had about the racism shown by ignorant, gullible, cowardly people when the Poles, like your partner, were the immigrants. Ahem. I wonder how you'd feel if native born Brits suddenly treated you as "dirty crooked immigrant" for being half Trump-American? If they ordered you to leave and "go back to your corrupt country" (on the other side of the Atlantic), would you go? The truth is based on facts as supported by evidence. As requested in your previous posts, I have used the facts in your own post to show everyone the truth.
    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!