Suggestion: Family Sharing enabled on Xbox One Games Downloads. Post-DRM


Recommended Posts

It's been an exciting week! E3, aftermaths, lots of games, and today, the DRM removal of the Xbox One.

For one, I think many people over the net are happy, others are lent down because this could remove the proposal of having cheaper games at early times. Others, like me, are quite sad to see that the family sharing feature will fade away.


Since I believe that complaining does not solve a thing, I suggest (which I could be very wrong) to allow games downloaded via Xbox Live to be shared with family members. Furthermore, the DRM will be the same used on the 360.

You can do it a la iTunes. For example, if I connect to the Internet, I decide which family members will be allowed to play the game at once. Since, I believe there were two people, I select the ones I see fit. if I select two family members, then my game is locked out, and I can't play it until I relinquish the authorization from other family members.


The thing is that a single player game could be replicated throughout all family members if they decide to set each other offline. Example: I have three family members: Alan, Wilson, William. I activate the family sharing, and lend Wilson the game. I can still play the game because I own the authorization. I disconnect my xbox from the Internet. I log in in another console and relinquish my own authorization and give it to Alan. Then, Wilson does the same: he disconnects his device from the Internet, and logs in in William's device. He sets the rights to use the game to William. Now, the 4 can play the same game at the same time.

Why? Because each xbox offline were previously authorized to play each game. They will be able to do so, as long as you don't connect back to the Internet.

To counter this method, I'd suggest a mandatory online check, each 24 hours, IF AND ONLY IF you enable Family Sharing. Both parties would be happy.

 

I've also made this post on Xbox Live Forums to see how people react to it! 

 

What do you think?!

 

http://forums.xbox.com/xbox_forums/general_discussion/f/3817/p/1429486/3568483.aspx#3568483

My suggestion....

 

Enabling Family Share a user must meet the following requirements:

 

  • Authorized owner's xbox one system game must be downloaded digitally
  • Authorized owner's xbox one system must be online within a 24 hr period (or always online)

Shared Game Library:

 

  • Can only be accessed if user is online and within the authorized owner's list of 10 family members
  • Shared games can't be played offline
  • Shared games can only be accessed by 1 member of the family at a time

That simple.
 

I think they're going to re-add the sharing plan again.  It's one thing people liked all DRM aside.  The best way to do it is with full digital downloads to start.  After that there should be a way/option to make your disc copy a full digital copy and thus not have a need for the disc to be in the try again and also to have it be shared.

 

The best thing this way is that those who want to use it more digitally can, and those who want to stick tied to a disc can but I think the option should be there.  And yeah, in order to do it you'll have to agree to a online security check of 24hrs or w/e. 

My suggestion....

 

Enabling Family Share a user must meet the following requirements:

 

  • Authorized owner's xbox one system game must be downloaded digitally
  • Authorized owner's xbox one system must be online within a 24 hr period (or always online)

Shared Game Library:

 

  • Can only be accessed if user is online and within the authorized owner's list of 10 family members
  • Shared games can't be played offline
  • Shared games can only be accessed by 1 member of the family at a time

That simple.

 

The other way still had more benefits though, alot of people have bandwidth caps or slow internet speeds and as more people start going digital and using the internet to downloading bigger files, ISP are going to be introducing more restrictive caps, before there were no caps, now there all sorts of teir's and it is only goign to get worse. With the previous policy, i could buy the physical copy install it to my hd and play it without the disc, while pass the disc to my friend, so they could do the same and we wouldn't have to wait for the download or be worried about using up our bandwidth or going over the cap.

 

  • Shared games can't be played offline             should at least be able to play for 1 hr offline incase net goes down!

 

Honestly, I really liked that feature.  I'm a bit confused as to why they didn't keep that as is, and just allow disc based authentication as a fallback if you didn't have internet...

 

I figured they would handle it like Privacy Controls, where you can allow or disallow the 24 hour check (And it's benefits), so if it were turned off, or the internet were not available for a 24 hour period, you could just use the disc as authentication...

 

And I completely understand the concerns about piracy, but by requiring if the internet isn't available that you have the disc, doesn't seem too unreasonable...

 

But in all honesty, Microsoft themselves seemed really confused by the whole model...  They really need to figure that  out before they push forward with something like this.

these suggestions are good yes, but they don't take into consideration of piracy. how do you stop piracy, piracy was the reason for the 24hr check.

 

I was for the drm policy, it was worth the trade off. The family sharing and cloud features seemed worth it, but they probably had some limits on it as well, perhaps things like, shared games cannot unlock achievements, gain gamer points, only purchased games can enter tournaments for prizes, etc, this would have given shared friends more incentives to buy the game to own.

I just don't get why we can't have an opt-in opt-out for this sharing and other features that require the DRM there... if we want to do the online thing fine you opt-in... else you play off line.... kinda like xbox live is now.... you want it you do it else you just play by your little lone self

My suggestion....

 

Enabling Family Share a user must meet the following requirements:

 

  • Authorized owner's xbox one system game must be downloaded digitally
  • Authorized owner's xbox one system must be online within a 24 hr period (or always online)

Shared Game Library:

 

  • Can only be accessed if user is online and within the authorized owner's list of 10 family members
  • Shared games can't be played offline
  • Shared games can only be accessed by 1 member of the family at a time

That simple.

 

No need to be digitally downloaded, just connected at least once every 24 hours to verify license. No reason physical discs can't join the fun too as long as you check in with them.

I just don't get why we can't have an opt-in opt-out for this sharing and other features that require the DRM there... if we want to do the online thing fine you opt-in... else you play off line.... kinda like xbox live is now.... you want it you do it else you just play by your little lone self

 

If they do like I expect and start to add some of these features back in bit by bit then we could very well end up with a opt-in situation.  It's just hard to say how long it will take, maybe the the end of 2014?  Maybe longer than that?  I still don't see them dropping any of their original plans, they're just on hold a bit, that's all.

I don't see why it should take that long to implement. I mean, you'd think the system was pretty much done already.

If they really want to turn the tables, and rewrite all those feature comparison charts, then they would be wise to have them both available at launch.

I don't see why it should take that long to implement. I mean, you'd think the system was pretty much done already.

If they really want to turn the tables, and rewrite all those feature comparison charts, then they would be wise to have them both available at launch.

 

 

Software development is not an easy switch. Much testing has to go into it. They may add more features not that far after launch...maybe next spring with Titanfall ;). I know right now, even having to re-implement the old stuff is a tough task. I feel sorry for their developers and testers and program managers (that's how teams work at MS) who thought they were going to have a nice break...jeez.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • google, meta, microsoft, true cancers of modern society
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 changelog: Fixed a bug where Overwrite behaved as Overwrite All during same-drive move operations. AdvancedInstaller fixed the installer’s security vulnerability: EXE Bootstrapper resolved the %appdata% location incorrectly for the System account. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 | 14.6 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • First exciting thing to come to Windows in a long time ! This is the kind of things they should focus on, instead of cramming as much AI as they can in everything.
    • New AMD graphics driver fixes install issues and FSR 4.1 crashes on RX 7000 GPUs by Taras Buria AMD is rolling out yet another graphics driver. Version 26.6.4 is now available for download, bringing two important fixes. One is for those still using Windows 10 and having trouble installing driver 26.6.2. In fact, this patch is coming from the recently released hotfix, so it is not new if you are already running version 26.6.3. The second fix is for RX 7000 owners. AMD recently brought FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen graphics cards, but there was a bug with certain games crashing when using FSR 4.1. I experienced this issue with Forza Horizon 6, so today's driver should take care of that. Here is the official changelog: Intermittent install issue seen when installing AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.2 on Windows® 10 systems for Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Intermittent application crash may be observed in some games with AMD FSR Upscaling 4.1 enabled on Radeon™ RX 7000 series graphics products. Known issues include the following: Intermittent application crash or driver timeout may be observed while playing Battlefield™ 6 on AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. AMD is actively working on a resolution with the developer to be released as soon as possible. Texture flickering or corruption may appear while playing Battlefield™ 6 with AMD Record and Stream on some AMD graphics products. AMD FSR Upscaling and AMD FSR Frame Generation may show as inactive in AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition while playing Battlefield™ 6 when enabled on Radeon™ RX 9000 series graphics products. Failure to install may be observed while installing AI Bundle components in some regions with limited access to HuggingFace and GitHub. Model flickering or rendering failure may be observed in Maxon Cinema 4D and Blender on Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Users experiencing this issue are recommended to install AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.3.1. Intermittent application crash may be observed on some models while running Blender on Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Users experiencing this issue are recommended to install AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.3.1. You can download the AMD Radeon driver 26.6.4 from the official website here. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • Amazon may use OpenAI and Nova models after Anthropic reportedly raises costs by Karthik Mudaliar Amazon is reportedly considering to use OpenAI models and even its own Nova family of AI models after Anthropic raised the cost of using Claude inside Amazon services. According to a report from The Information, Amazon is weighing its options to reduce costs under a new arrangement with Anthropic. But back in April, Amazon said it would invest $5 billion more in Anthropic, with the possibility of adding up to another $20 billion if certain commercial milestones are met. That investment actually came on top of another $8 billion Amazon had already put into the Claude maker. Anthropic, meanwhile, committed to spend more than $100 billion over 10 years on AWS technologies, including Amazon’s Trainium chips. Amazon isn't just a customer of Anthropic but also one of the most important backers and cloud partners. This is why it makes it interesting that Amazon is considering other alternatives to handle its internal workloads. Although Amazon has been building its own options for a while now. Its Nova family of AI models was announced in late 2024 for Amazon Bedrock, with models aimed at text, image, and video tasks. Amazon pitched the model around cost and latency at that time. With that said, OpenAI has also become a more realistic option recently for AWS customers as well as for Amazon itself. Earlier this year, OpenAI brought its latest models and Codex coding agent to Amazon Bedrock, after changes to its previously more restrictive Microsoft cloud arrangement. This allowed AWS to serve even those customers who wanted other alternatives from Claude, without having to move workloads out of Amazon's cloud. Evaluating alternatives could also be due to commercial pressure and not necessarily a sign of a damaged partnership between Amazon and Anthropic. Whether or not Amazon is actually considering switching entirely to OpenAI's models or its own Nova models remains unknown at this moment.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      61
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!