• 0

Deploying PHP Applications as a Native Desktop Application


Question

Hi,

 

I am sure this is one of those things that people probably asked many times. However, my research still

hasn't pointed me to a suitable solution. Basically I am tring to make my PHP applications (running on CakePHP, and SQLite) as painless as possible to deploy.

 

Are there any kind of tool or a package of Apache and PHP that self-contained and is very small and makes it super easy

to deploy an application for production use? So, the end user just has to run a single file and it will take care of

starting the web servers and launching the website. And once the window is closed it turns off the servers as well?

 

A solution that works on three major platforms (Windows, Mac and Linux) would be ideal.

 

Any ideas or options?

 

FYI coding in JAVA is not an option. CakePHP and EXTJS are all you need!

 

Thanks :)

21 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

WAMP/LAMP/MAMP or XAMPP? (These are useful for installing/configuring apache, mysql, php all together - then simply place your web application in a folder from the root of the server and browse to it).

 

Not exactly 'native'  but would suffice.

  • 0
  On 27/06/2013 at 12:07, TheGhostWalker said:

OMG I love you. Which one do you suggest though. Downloaded PHP Desktop and messed around with it. Which one provides the most options.

  • 0

PHP-GTK seems to be the oldest / most popular, although people like WinBinder. The real issue is that there wasn't a PHP release worth developing with on the desktop until (arguably) 5.3 so... obviously there's not a lot of support for desktop applications out there. Also, Python has existed as long as PHP has, and already covered the native application side of things.

  • 0
  On 27/06/2013 at 13:07, threetonesun said:

PHP-GTK seems to be the oldest / most popular, although people like WinBinder. The real issue is that there wasn't a PHP release worth developing with on the desktop until (arguably) 5.3 so... obviously there's not a lot of support for desktop applications out there. Also, Python has existed as long as PHP has, and already covered the native application side of things.

But I haven't been bothered to learn Python. Right now I do all of my web development in PHP/SQL so having the ability to transfer that knowledge to the desktop makes a bit of sense for me. I hate switching between languages on a daily basis. Eventually you confuse something and can't find what you did wrong because both versions look fine.

  • 0

What's stopping you from serving the app from a server? Surely that would take care of all your problems and make it even easier for people.

 

In any case, you're probably better of trying out the alternatives mentioned by TheGhostWalker to find which one you like since your requirements are a little bit on the vague side.

  • Like 1
  • 0
  On 27/06/2013 at 13:17, Jub Fequois said:

What's stopping you from serving the app from a server? Surely that would take care of all your problems and make it even easier for people.

 

In any case, you're probably better of trying out the alternatives mentioned by TheGhostWalker to find which one you like since your requirements are a little bit on the vague side.

I am not the OP :P. However, while nothing is stopping me from running it from the server, having to have a server itself is a limitation. No longer having that limitation is a plus in some situations. Servers add more variables of things that can go wrong. What if the person doesn't install the server correctly? What if they change a single setting and now the server doesn't want to launch anymore. I use to do stuff with XAMP until a client managed to render the software completely useless. Couldn't get it to launch. Reinstalling didn't matter. Tried for hours to get it to work but nothing would budge. Having everything confined and using very little settings and files is a much better solution than having to rely on a customer not somehow screwing up something by changing a single obscure setting. After looking through PHP Desktop, I noticed there are not very many files. If someone screws up, just copy and paste over the files and the software would work again. Simple solutions always trump unnecessarily complex ones in my book.

  • 0
  On 27/06/2013 at 13:10, ILikeTobacco said:

But I haven't been bothered to learn Python. Right now I do all of my web development in PHP/SQL so having the ability to transfer that knowledge to the desktop makes a bit of sense for me. I hate switching between languages on a daily basis. Eventually you confuse something and can't find what you did wrong because both versions look fine.

 

Well, usually you can either do everything with Javascript (now that local storage is available), or you're going to want access to APIs that PHP doesn't have.

  On 27/06/2013 at 13:25, ILikeTobacco said:

I am not the OP :p. However, while nothing is stopping me from running it from the server, having to have a server itself is a limitation. No longer having that limitation is a plus in some situations. Servers add more variables of things that can go wrong. What if the person doesn't install the server correctly? What if they change a single setting and now the server doesn't want to launch anymore. I use to do stuff with XAMP until a client managed to render the software completely useless. Couldn't get it to launch. Reinstalling didn't matter. Tried for hours to get it to work but nothing would budge. Having everything confined and using very little settings and files is a much better solution than having to rely on a customer not somehow screwing up something by changing a single obscure setting. After looking through PHP Desktop, I noticed there are not very many files. If someone screws up, just copy and paste over the files and the software would work again. Simple solutions always trump unnecessarily complex ones in my book.

 

This all sounds soooooo terrible :laugh:

 

PHP for desktop applications is very much the "if you only have a hammer, everything is a nail" mentality.

  • 0
  On 27/06/2013 at 13:29, threetonesun said:

Well, usually you can either do everything with Javascript (now that local storage is available), or you're going to want access to APIs that PHP doesn't have.

 

This all sounds soooooo terrible :laugh:

 

PHP for desktop applications is very much the "if you only have a hammer, everything is a nail" mentality.

Comes down to time constraints. I rarely do anything that is confined to a single desktop. Most of my work is for websites and applications that require a server anyway. If you are short on time, you make everything a nail. :P

 

Also, for SQL, even though JavaScript technically can be used, I prefer to stay away from that practice. It may just be me, but I find using PHP for any sort of processing is just more efficient.

  • 0
  On 27/06/2013 at 12:34, ILikeTobacco said:

OMG I love you. Which one do you suggest though. Downloaded PHP Desktop and messed around with it. Which one provides the most options.

My only experience is with php gtk, but winbinder seems lovely (and so does php desktop) :).

  • 0

Wow, thanks for those links guys. ILikeTobacco, I am glad that I am not the only crazy one looking for a solution like that. I honestly feel that PHP is badass and with the technologies like CakePHP, EXTJS or jQuery you can create badass applications. Surely, putting things on the web has its benefits but why not both :p.... I have a fetish for native applications or something.

 

I could switch to JAVA and make my application there. But honestly the amount of code and the things you have to do in JAVA just to build a cross platform application take more time than if you used a popular library like EXT for the front-end and CakePHP for handling the logic.

 

I was looking for a solution like Adobe AIR... but instead of just HTML/JAVASCRIPT or SQLLite, you would code in PHP.

 

ThreeToneSun, I am not familiar with Python. But did you just say if I create a web app in Python, it will act as if it's a native application? Or would I still have to fire up a browser to run them?

 

I just looked up EXTJS and JAVA... something interesting popped up :p

  • 0
  On 27/06/2013 at 17:47, roosevelt said:

ThreeToneSun, I am not familiar with Python. But did you just say if I create a web app in Python, it will act as if it's a native application? Or would I still have to fire up a browser to run them?

Python is just another server side language like PHP. However, it isn't as focused on web applications as PHP is. It can also be run directly on a desktop.

  • 0

Guys I ran into this awesome nugget. Even though it does not support PHP... using a badass Javascript library to handle user's actions would be a good replacement for this. It's called AppJS. Basicaly it allows you to package your HTML/JAVASCRIPT/CSS project as a native desktop application. And it runs on Windows, Mac and Linux. I tested EXTJS, my ultimate fetish, and it is working great!

 

http://appjs.org/

  • 0
  On 27/06/2013 at 19:17, roosevelt said:

Guys I ran into this awesome nugget. Even though it does not support PHP... using a badass Javascript library to handle user's actions would be a good replacement for this. It's called AppJS. Basicaly it allows you to package your HTML/JAVASCRIPT/CSS project as a native desktop application. And it runs on Windows, Mac and Linux. I tested EXTJS, my ultimate fetish, and it is working great!

 

http://appjs.org/

Nice. Is it possible to hide the code? I have been playing with PHP Desktop and that doesn't seem to be possible. Makes the code not very secure.

  • 0
  On 27/06/2013 at 17:50, ILikeTobacco said:

Python is just another server side language like PHP. However, it isn't as focused on web applications as PHP is. It can also be run directly on a desktop.

 

Python is not a server side programming language. You would need an Apache module to run it on a server, and most people use a framework like Django with it as well. It's just a general purpose programming language.

 

If you can able OO PHP, you could pick up Python in a week. It makes a lot more sense than PHP does. On the other hand, if you want to do all of your UI with HTML + CSS (and it sounds like you do), a straight conversion program like appcelerator probably makes more sense.

  • 0
  On 27/06/2013 at 19:49, threetonesun said:

Python is not a server side programming language. You would need an Apache module to run it on a server, and most people use a framework like Django with it as well. It's just a general purpose programming language.

 

If you can able OO PHP, you could pick up Python in a week. It makes a lot more sense than PHP does. On the other hand, if you want to do all of your UI with HTML + CSS (and it sounds like you do), a straight conversion program like appcelerator probably makes more sense.

That makes it a server side language. If you install Apache without any modules, PHP doesn't run on it. For something to be a server side language, it simply needs to be a programming language that runs on the server when it is called. Also, for most larger projects, people use frameworks in PHP. The two languages are both server side languages in that situation, however Python wasn't created to be a server side language like PHP.

  • 0
  On 27/06/2013 at 19:25, ILikeTobacco said:

Nice. Is it possible to hide the code? I have been playing with PHP Desktop and that doesn't seem to be possible. Makes the code not very secure.

 

Have you read the "Protecting sources" section on the KnowledgeBase wiki page?

 

  Quote

 

 

PHP Desktop doesn't provide a direct way for protecting your php sources, but you can load custom php extensions, thus allowing you to use many of the available php encoders such as Ion CubeZend GuardSource Guardian or Nu-Coder.

 

https://code.google.com/p/phpdesktop/wiki/KnowledgeBase#Protecting_sources

  • 0
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google Maps expands cycling routes and alerts for low-emission zones in Europe by Aditya Tiwari Google announced some new Google Maps updates for users in Europe. These features are meant to help them get around more sustainably and reduce emissions in cities, according to the search giant. For starters, Google is expanding its AI-powered feature that predicts when walking or taking transit will take roughly the same amount of time as driving. Currently available in 60 cities, the feature recommends walking or transit routes and has helped avoid tens of millions of car trips. It will soon launch in Copenhagen, Stockholm, Warsaw, and other cities. Speaking of car trips, Google displays helpful alerts when a car enters an area designated as a low-emission or low-traffic zone in supported cities, such as London and Berlin. It informs users whether their vehicle is permitted in these zones, and they should select an alternative route if necessary. The feature will expand to more than 1,000 low-emission and low-traffic zones across Europe in the coming months, including Italy, Sweden, Austria, and other countries. For those interested in cycling on the roads, Maps will display helpful details about routes in more places. Riders will see bike lanes on their cycling route, as well as other useful information, such as whether there is heavy car traffic or a steep incline ahead. The feature will expand to 17 new cities, including nine in Europe, which will cover about 125,000 km (77,671 miles) of bike lanes globally. Google has partnered with local governments and public authorities in cities such as Hamburg, Madrid, Barcelona, Milan, Rome, Zurich, Budapest, Vienna, and Brussels to source the data. Additionally, Google announced that fuel-efficient routing, also known as eco-friendly routing, is now available globally. As the name suggests, it finds the most fuel or energy-efficient route for your trip. The feature was introduced in 2021, starting with the US, and later expanded to over 40 countries across Europe in its first major update in 2022. On average, about 500 million trips using fuel-efficient routing are taken each month. Google estimated that the feature collectively resulted in "more than 2.7 million metric tons of GHG [greenhouse gas] emissions avoided in 2024 alone," which is equivalent to taking "more than 630,000 gasoline-powered cars off the road for a year."
    • That's one impressive "baby step". Well done!
    • They're already dead. They've been through many rounds off layoffs due to mismanagement and Destiny 2 is basically over as the interest levels are the lowest theyve ever been.
    • Redesigned Windows 11 Start menu: What users wanted and what Microsoft delivered by Taras Buria Windows 11 is getting a redesigned Start menu. This is a big deal for the soon-to-be-four-year-old operating system and its highly controversial design bits. After years of slow to no progress in the Start menu area, Microsoft is finally delivering a much better variant with many new features and plenty of feedback addressed. How much has been addressed? In 2023, we posted a list of the "Top 10 Start menu features and changes Windows 11 users want," so it is now time to compare that to the new Start menu. Note: The new Start menu is not yet publicly available. Microsoft is testing it in Windows 11 preview builds from the Dev and Beta Channels, and you can check out this article to learn how to enable it so that you can try it yourself. 1. Allow users to turn off the "Recommended" section - Delivered (17K+ upvotes) Round of applause for Microsoft, everyone, as the company actually delivered the most requested Start menu feature. The redesigned variant lets you turn off the Recommended section and hide it altogether so that it does not waste any space. Recommended section, begone!2. More customization options - Nope (5.4K+ upvotes) Although Microsoft now allows turning off the Recommended section and switching between three views for the All apps list, the menu remains quite restricted when it comes to personalization, so if you want true customization, Windhawk and the Start menu styler mod are here for you, allowing some seriously cool Start menu designs, as one on the screenshot below: 3. Allow resizing the Start menu - Sort of delivered (3.8K+ upvotes) You still cannot change the size of the Start menu manually like you could in Windows 10. However, the menu is now more adaptive, which means you will see more content if you have a bigger screen. Still, I would like to have the ability to make the menu bigger, so this one remains standing. 4. Go back to the Windows 10-style Start menu - Nope (3.4K+ upvotes) Microsoft is not going back to the Windows 10 Start menu, so if you are one of the 3,400+ people who upvoted this in Feedback Hub, your best course of action is to install a third-party Start menu or just stick to Windows 10. 5. Use Grid view for the All apps list - Delivered (1.5K+ upvotes) Another popular request was delivered fully. I would even say that Microsoft over delivered it. Instead of just killing the standard list view in favor of grid view, Microsoft let users decide what kind of view they want. You can stick to the classic list, switch over to grid view, or enjoy a categorized view. Again, well done! 6. Display jump lists when right-clicking pinned apps - Needs fixing (1K+ upvotes) Microsoft has already fixed this problem, and you can access jump lists and recent files by right-clicking pinned applications in the current Start menu version. However, turning off the Recommended section also turns off jump lists on the Start menu and taskbar for some reason. A very frustrating design for those who use jump lists and do not want the Recommended section. This needs fixing. Microsoft punishes you with no jump lists if you dare to turn off "Recommended." Why?7. Make the Start menu open on the All apps list by default - Delivered (1K+ upvotes) The new Start menu ticks this box as well. There is no need to click "All apps" when you open the Start menu. It now features a single-view user interface with the list of all apps right below your pins and recommendations. All you need to do is start scrolling. 8. Add a full-screen Start menu - Nope (1K+ upvotes) Even though Microsoft "has got this," nothing indicates that the company plans to reintroduce a full-screen Start menu from the days of Windows 10 and Windows 8. A shame, if you ask me. Interestingly, it appears that Microsoft considered a full-screen Start menu for Windows 11. The company recently showed some of the prototypes it considered implementing, including a scrollable full-screen menu. 9. Bring back live tiles - Nope (1K+ upvotes) Tiles are no longer alive. They are as dead as Windows Phone, and there is no return. 10. Make the Start menu button follow the system accent color - Nope (760+ upvotes) Microsoft "has got this," but the blue Start button is here to stay. Do you like what Microsoft did to Windows 11's Start menu? What features are still missing in your opinion? Share your thoughts in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      vivetool earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      pnajbar earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      TBithoney earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      xuxlix earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      Tomek Święcicki earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      674
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      286
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      223
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      195
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      143
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!