Recommended Posts

I bought some RAM online but the pin layout is different. Looking at some online datasheets they are both DDR2 and made for desktop but seem incompatible.

I say they are incompatible because the notch on the new RAM is more centered than the one on the current PC.

Here are the part numbers:

78T6453FZ0-CD5 (current)

F2-6400CL5D-4GBNT (new)

With that, Google will show information and hopefully you guys see something Im missing :)

Thank you

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1162102-different-pin-layouts-for-ddr2/
Share on other sites

I've had that very same problem when rebuilding older systems, best advise I can give, is go back to your retailer, and tell them that the module doesn't fit, (if possible take the mobo with you) that way it's the retailer who will try to solve the problem for you. (At least that's what I did)

Please note, I only know how to build em, not much more than that...

If they are visibly different (DDR2 FBDIMMs are different from UDIMMs, for example), take them back to the store - nobody can argue with that.

 

However, if PNs are correct, they, in theory, should both be DDR2 UDIMM and therefore similar :s

Are you sure you're not putting them the other way round (which is a stupid thing, but does happen to the best of techxperts)?

 

post-382760-0-37712900-1372685742.png

The first listed, 78T6453FZ0-CD5, appears to be a part number for the actual memory chip, not the stick of memory, so it's kind of hard to compare the two numbers you gave. That memory module is used on a number of different sticks of memory.

 

Same as most people have said though. Take them both out and line them up, do they match or no? Make sure you put it in the right way, make sure neither or both are registered, buffered, ecc, etc. You can hold them pin edge to pin edge and quickly see if the pins line up or not.

According to an OEM PC site for memory -

I did a memory search - and the first if you put a M in front of it .  

Seems to be Samsung OE  (Manufacturer Number)

Which it is saying that it is PC 4200  and is listed as this "DDR2-533 DIMM iMac G5, Samsung" ..

 

Hope this helps...  

 

The second number comes back as this...

 

G.SKILL 4GB (2 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 800 (PC2 6400) Dual Channel Kit Desktop Memory Model F2-6400CL5D-4GBNT

Ahh, you're right. Add M3 to the front and it shows up as a 512 MB stick of DDR2. They both look to be unbuffered and non-ecc, as well as 240 pin DDR2. I hate to say it but I'm gonna have to also go with putting them in backwards. I don't see any reason why they would be different pin layouts.

Don't mean to sound daft, but erm... did you try to flip it ? seems to me that the only problem looking at your pics is that both sticks are in the opposite direction, nothing more...

  On 02/07/2013 at 07:15, MP Technologie said:

Don't mean to sound daft, but erm... did you try to flip it ? seems to me that the only problem looking at your pics is that both sticks are in the opposite direction, nothing more...

Maybe I did not try it because of the sticker :p I feel like I should be nominated for a Darwin award if its just that lol.....

Give me a second.

  On 02/07/2013 at 07:15, MP Technologie said:

Don't mean to sound daft, but erm... did you try to flip it ? seems to me that the only problem looking at your pics is that both sticks are in the opposite direction, nothing more...

 

 

  On 02/07/2013 at 07:45, neohelp said:

Yup, Darwin award nomination here.

Sorry about wasting your time, guys.

LOL glad it's sorted, award the answer to the guy above pls on page 1 :P

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The DS925+ which is this years model with 2.5G networking is only marginally more expensive. About £25 more on Amazon UK. Not sure on the certified disks thing though, I guess it depends if the disks they certified are more expensive than the others or not. I use Seagate IronWolfs personally. Are they on the list? I agree with Steven. Synology DSM is miles ahead of the competition, I wouldn't go elsewhere now. The price is justified.
    • Google Cloud announces new Gemini-powered tools to 'increase efficiency' for partners by David Uzondu Google just announced a couple of new AI tools for its Partner Network Hub on Google Cloud, designed to take care of some of the most boring admin work and make things a bit easier for the companies it works with. Putting together a formal Statement of Work can be a tedious process, where every single detail needs to be perfectly aligned with Google Cloud's requirements. The company's new SOW Analyzer, powered by Gemini, tackles this directly. Partners can upload their draft document, and the AI will immediately point out problems like missing clauses or technical goals that are not measurable, even providing examples of how to fix them. In addition to the analyzer, there is a new Bot-Assisted Live Chat. This is an AI agent built into the partner portal that provides 24/7 help with things like onboarding, billing questions, and incentive claims. If the AI cannot solve your problem with billing or rebate claims, it can hand you off to a human agent without making you explain the entire issue from scratch. These two tools are joined by AI-powered updates to the existing Earnings Hub, which is designed to help partners find new growth opportunities by using predictive data to show what services are in demand: The SOW Analyzer and Earnings Hub are available right now for partners in the hub. The Bot-Assisted Live Chat is currently rolling out and is expected to be fully available to all users by next month.
    • Not sure I agree with your particular interpretation of this. An ESU key is still required per device that you have to enter into the device in order to activate ESU. These aren't being given out for free. The linked Microsoft article still states: "If you have paid to enroll your remaining Windows 10 systems in the ESU program..." which seems to confirm this.
    • I swear, whoever is handling the Gundam IP for video games should be fired. How can you go from the gems that were releasing in PS1, PS2 and PS3, to the utter disaster that's today, from the VR game just to be on the hype bandwagon and all the focus on SD. This will probably be studied as one of the worst ways companies mishandle an IP.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Kavin25 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      Leonard grant earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pcdoctorsnet earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rising Star
      Phillip0web went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      Epaminombas earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      535
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      207
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      172
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      148
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      119
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!