350gb HD cloning is taking 24hrs+?


Recommended Posts

I'm trying to clone my drive to a 1TB backup drive.  My drive has two partitions, a 350gb and a 70gb.  Using DriveImage XML, the 70gb partition was copied in 40mins.  

Using the same software, copying from the same drive, to the same backup drive, the only difference is the source partition is now the 350gb one, and it's been running all night for 12hrs and it's only 2% done?!  

 

Is this normal?  

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1162858-350gb-hd-cloning-is-taking-24hrs/
Share on other sites

its copying at 160KB/S, which is way too slow. 12 hrs for only 7 gigs? you just did 70gigs in 40 mins. maybe its doing something else, not really sure.ill look into this software.

 

The drive it is copying from DOES have a few (7, in total) bad sectors, could that be somehow slowing it down to nothing?

 

Lol 160kB/s, I'd be better off uploading my drive to a cloud.

 

Also, I should add, this is the 3rd try.  Same problem with the first 2 tries.  Also, before I tried doing a drive image, I did a standard file copy to a different backup drive, copied the same 350GB in 4hrs.

 

I'd use different software, but this is the only one I've found that will let me copy a single partition at a time.  All the other ones (Acronis, Easeus) are too packed with that "user friendly" bull****, that just makes them more confusing to use with fewer options.

Try this software http://www.macrium.com/reflectfree.aspx

Make a PE v4 boot media (CD or USB stick). Boot into it and do a clone, you can edit the partition sizes when you do the clone.

I use the Pro version, it's works very well.

P.S I can help u go thru the procedure if you want (on IRC or voice chat if you want).

by the way,the 350gb drive, is this where windows is installed? and is the application running within windows itself? or did it reboot into a special environment?

To be clear, the 350GB is a PARTITION of a 500GB drive.  It has a copy of windows 7 installed, but it is not the windows I was booted from.  The 2nd partition, the 70GB one with Windows 8 installed, is the one I actually booted to, and IT copied faster than the one that was not in use!

 

Try this software http://www.macrium.com/reflectfree.aspx

Make a PE v4 boot media (CD or USB stick). Boot into it and do a clone, you can edit the partition sizes when you do the clone.

I use the Pro version, it's works very well.

P.S I can help u go thru the procedure if you want (on IRC or voice chat if you want).

I'd rather not have to use a boot disk.  I'd like to be able to use my system while I copy.  And DriveImage XML tries to do a volume lock first, and then if that fails because the drive is in use, it does volume shadow copy.    But if DKAngel says it can also do it from Windows, I'll give it a shot!

 

EDIT: Do you know of any mirrors for the free version?  Macrium's site makes you download from CNET, which now forces you to use their "downloader" instead of directly linking to the file.  I'd rather not have to install a "downloader" if possible.

Yes it is true you can clone from within Windows (using VSS).

Personally I prefer to use the boot media because this means the whole system is dedicated to the clone, so you get best possible copy speed.

There will be nothing else running to interfere with, or slow down, the copy process.

The dowloader is fine, it just allows you to get the most relevent version.

Yes it is true you can clone from within Windows (using VSS).

Personally I prefer to use the boot media because this means the whole system is dedicated to the clone, so you get best possible copy speed.

There will be nothing else running to interfere with, or slow down, the copy process.

The dowloader is fine, it just allows you to get the most relevent version.

 

So it should be just as fast to clone within Windows, because it isn't my system partition, so it doesn't use VSS, it locks/dismounts the partition entirely.  And since reading/writing to HDs only uses 5-10% of my CPU, it shouldn't be any slower unless I start playing games or something.

;

So it should be just as fast to clone within Windows, because it isn't my system partition, so it doesn't use VSS, it locks/dismounts the partition entirely.  And since reading/writing to HDs only uses 5-10% of my CPU, it shouldn't be any slower unless I start playing games or something.

It never is a CPU bound process. It is other things using the HDD that is gonna slow things down.

The downloader doesn't actually install itself, it just enables you to get the correct version of the Macrium Reflect installer.

;

It never is a CPU bound process. It is other things using the HDD that is gonna slow things down.

 

Oh right cause it is the same drive as my system pt, just different pts.  Well then why did my system partition copy so damn fast?!

 

Okay, I can see how to make an image file of a partition in Macrium, but I don't want an image file, I want a copy of the partition.  So that I can boot from it.  The help file for Macrium says that it has a "cloning" feature, but I don't see a clone button anywhere.  Is that a pro-only feature?

Ok I will amend my text:

It never is a CPU bound process. It is other things using the HDD that COULD slow things down.

If your copy is going well then that's great.

Oh right cause it is the same drive as my system pt, just different pts.  Well then why did my system partition copy so damn fast?!

Okay, I can see how to make an image file of a partition in Macrium, but I don't want an image file, I want a copy of the partition.  So that I can boot from it.  The help file for Macrium says that it has a "cloning" feature, but I don't see a clone button anywhere.  Is that a pro-only feature?

Cloning option is only avaliable from the WinPE boot disc.

Ok I will amend my text:

It never is a CPU bound process. It is other things using the HDD that COULD slow things down.

If your copy is going well then that's great.

Cloning option is only avaliable from the WinPE boot disc.

 

Nevermind, I found the cloning option.  It IS available from Windows, just not on the left pane where all the tasks are listed, its only shown when you click on a partition in the main pane.  Kinda stupid layout, but okay, it is now currently cloning.

A whole bunch of options I didn't understand though.  Like why was the partition alignment set to "Windows XP CHS" if it was a Windows 7 drive?  And I'm assuming I set it to an Active partition if I want it to be bootable, but then how am I booting off my Windows 8 partition if it is only a Primary (not Active) partition?

Nevermind, I found the cloning option. It IS available from Windows,

Oops sorry don't often use the free version, I forgot that was available.

Set the alignment to Win7/8/ssd (1MB) on all partitiions.

If you installed Win8 after Win7 (looks like you did) then the active partition will still be Win7 because that's where the boot loader has been placed.

I'm guessing that the HDD has some hardware issue(s) because you mentioned it has 7 bad sectors.

This has the potential to make access slow if the hardware is failing.

What make/model HDD do you have? You could try running a HDD diagnostic tool like http://www.seagate.com/gb/en/support/downloads/seatools/

You may have missed my post above yours as we posted at the same time, please read. Thanks.

 I did read.  Clearly this has nothing to do with bad sectors, or it would have interrupted DriveImage XML too.  As well as probably interrupting the image of the 2nd partition.  And the make/model of my drive is listed in the screenshot.

I have done a chkdsk /r, and all bad sectors are marked as such, and there haven't been any new ones created in a long time.  This shouldn't interfere with a drive clone.

Again, folks, bad sectors should not interfere with a drive cloning.  A bad/unreadable sector is still technically readable, it just doesn't return the bit that the system expects when it reads the bit.  Drive cloning shouldn't care what the bit is expected to be, and just copy it anyway, errors and all.

 

And I'm right.  Because I did a partition image instead of a partition clone, and it finished in 2 hours without any errors.  Then I restored the image to the drive, again without any errors.  Same end result as a drive clone, but with an extra step added in between.  I have no idea why Macrium is having such a hard time doing a drive clone, but it's not my drive's fault.  Even in the WinPE environment, Macrium got to 4% of cloning the partition and then said "Broken pipe" error.  

 

Oh well, I guess it just means any time I want to clone a drive, I have to image and restore it instead.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!