Recommended Posts

Hi!

 

I wanted to buy a tablet for a long time but i waited to see how Windows 8 hybrids would turn out. After trying two of those hybrids (Asus Vivo Tab RT and Surface Pro) i came to the conculsion that the technology (cpu) is simply not there and that hybrids make either a bad laptop with a lack of power (Asus Vivo Tab RT) or a bad bulky expensive tablet with low battery life (Surface Pro).

 

So i decided to buy a cheap tablet and replace my current laptop with a new more powerful and likely smaller one.

 

I would like some recommendations from my fellow Neowinians. So here's what i'm looking for in a tablet :

 

1. Will be used mostly to read, play games, watch videos, listen to music and casualy browse the web. Reading will be the primary use. Quality of the screen to read is super important.

2. Would like to pay less than 400$ CAD. Definately not more than 500$ CAD. 500$ CAD is a hard limit (i.e. 501$ is too much).

3. Not decided between ~7 inches and ~11 inches. I think 7 inches might be too small and 11 inches too big. 8 inches something might be a good compromise?

4. I have an iPod Touch and an Android phone but i bought lot more apps and games on iTune than Google Play. Do i need to rebuy apps and games for tablet or the iPhone/iPod version works?

5. I would prefer 32GB since i have a lot of music files. I can probably live with 16GB (providing the OS doesn't take half of it Windows 8 style) but certainly not 8GB.

6. I'm not buying some no brand cheap Android tablets (no D2, Hipstreet and such). Not sure i trust HP with tablets.

7. I just need wifi.

8. A keyboard and office thingies are not a plus to me. I'm gonna use my laptop for that.

9. I want about the same battery life as my iPod Touch. I want to be able to spend 8 hours on a flight playing games, listeting to music, reading and watching videos without having to recharge it.

 

Right now i'm leaning toward the Kindle Fire HD, Nexus or iPad. All Windows 8 RT tablets i checked were over 500$ CAD. I might have missed some not avalaible in a store near me so i'm open to suggestions.

 

Kindle Fire HD 7 inches 32GB - 244$ CAD

Kindle Fire HD 8.9 inches 32GB - 314$ CAD

Google Nexus 7 32GB - 231$ CAD

iPad Mini 32GB - 431$ CAD

iPad Mini 16GB - 331$ CAD

iPad 2 16GB - 401$ CAD

Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 inches 16GB - 301$ CAD

Asus Memo Pad 7 Inches 32GB - 151$ CAD

Asus Memo Pad Smart 10.1 inches 16GB - 301$ CAD

 

How is the Kindle fire HD? Is it better to read books? I see the lack of Google Play store and the custom Android skin as a minus but it's cheap and i kinda like the 8.9 inches screen size.

 

Google Nexus 7 is **** cheap right now. How is it to read books? Is the Kindle app for Android any good? How does the screen compare to Kindle Fire HD? I don't want to pirate books so probably gonna buy them from Amazon anyway. I can't find the Goggle Nexus 10 in any store here don't know why ...

 

iTune would be a big plus for the iPad Mini since i already own a lot of games on my iPod Touch. It's Kinda expensive tough and i don't think i own between 100$ and 200$ CAD worth of apps and games lol. iPad 2 price is more competitive but i fear it might be a little bit too big and it's coming with 16GB only.

 

How are the Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 and Memo Pad Smart 10.1? They are both priced sort of low for 10 inches tablet but i fear they might be updated less often than Google Nexus. And they are coming with 16GB only. Are they vanilla Android or are they coming with stupid useless launchers? Are they coming with weaker cpu? Asus Memo Pad 7 at 151$ is really tempting. Hard to beat price for 32GB ... but there's surely a catch at this price.

 

Anyway i don't really have the time to extensively try all of those so i welcome any feedback and suggestion from Neowinian who actually tried any of those (or some that are not listed here but are priced under 400$ CAD and sold in Canada).

 

Ty in advance.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1163402-looking-for-tablet-recommendations/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Have you considered the Surface RT, if you use a lot desktop apps it's not ideal but it's had a price drop recently so it's certainly worth a look. It lasts about 8-10 hours on a single charge and I've added a 64GB microSDXC card to boost the available space, not only that but the 8.1 preview has a much smaller footprint than the initial release as I had about 15GB free on the internal storage after the update.

 

Unless you have a very specific requirement then I would say it's certainly worth considering. Looks like the price drop is in Canada as well http://www.microsoftstore.com/store/msca/en_CA/pdp/productID.277808900

 

I know that it's listed at $449 CAD but when you consider that the tablet only is listed at $349 CAD and the touch cover comes in at $119 CAD it makes $449 CAD a steal.

  • 2 weeks later...

Sorry to revive my old post but to answer neo158 ...

 

Yeah the new price of Surface RT makes it a really tempting solution. 350$ CDN for the 32GB model is a really good option. But there's still some minus about it. I heard Windows 8 RT takes a lot of space and you effectively get only around 20GB out of the 32GB avalaible. I have close to 10GB of aac audio files ... it would leave only 10 GB of free space. It's still Windows 8 RT an unproven platform microsoft might actually drop along the road to favor intel. Also it's kinda already old there's a new model coming soon. Not sure about the form factor either. I buy this mainly to read and it think the Surface RT is close to 27 CM high in portrait.

 

I'm gonna wait for the new Nexus 7 and Kindle Fire HD 2 (no google play store is a big minus though).

 

I tried the iPad Mini this weekend and really liked the form factor. It's perfect to read. But the 32GB model is too much expensive for my taste. I'll need to try in a store a 7 inches tablet to see if it's too small to read.

Have you considered the Surface RT

 

SurfaceRT

 

I personally wouldn't recommend the Surface RT, or any other tablet meant to be used mainly in the landscape orientation, for someone who wants a tablet primarily for reading.

 

I'd recommend waiting to see what Apple does with the next generation of the iPad, and potentially the iPad mini but that might be a longer wait. Even if the new devices are out of your price range, the current generation will become cheaper. If you need something now though, my vote would be for either the iPad mini or new Nexus 7. The Nexus' display is far better, but the iPad mini is the size you'd prefer (well 7.9" rather than 8") and a part of the ecosystem you already have more apps for (any universal apps that you have will work perfectly, whereas the iPhone/iPod touch apps will also work but they'll be scaled).

  • Like 2

I actually prefer landscape, not only for reading (side by side, comics), but for all the other things its better at too (browsing, video, etc).

 

If you are really a 'reader' and that concerned with size, you should be buying an e-ink anyway, which is about 'half' the Surface screen in wide orientation.

Sorry to revive my old post but to answer neo158 ...

 

Yeah the new price of Surface RT makes it a really tempting solution. 350$ CDN for the 32GB model is a really good option. But there's still some minus about it. I heard Windows 8 RT takes a lot of space and you effectively get only around 20GB out of the 32GB avalaible. I have close to 10GB of aac audio files ... it would leave only 10 GB of free space. It's still Windows 8 RT an unproven platform microsoft might actually drop along the road to favor intel. Also it's kinda already old there's a new model coming soon. Not sure about the form factor either. I buy this mainly to read and it think the Surface RT is close to 27 CM high in portrait.

 

I'm gonna wait for the new Nexus 7 and Kindle Fire HD 2 (no google play store is a big minus though).

 

I tried the iPad Mini this weekend and really liked the form factor. It's perfect to read. But the 32GB model is too much expensive for my taste. I'll need to try in a store a 7 inches tablet to see if it's too small to read.

 

The current released version of Windows RT does hog space but if you create the recovery media and delete the partition that frees up some space and putting those 10GB of aac files onto an SD Card and using the Library hack to get it to show as part of the library would keep space on the tablet free. Windows RT 8.1, I have the preview on my Surface RT, reduces the OS footprint so more space is left free so it's not really a problem and proves that RT is far from being dropped.

 

If you treat Surface RT as what it is, a content consumption device for the consumer, then you wouldn't be disappointed.

  • 1 month later...

Lap, I'd suggest not getting the galaxy tabs, and get the Note versions, they're upgraded, and a little more future proof, (I have the Note 10.1)

And there are many other devices, most of the good ones you've already mentioned,

And I believe the Nexus devices aren't bad at all for what they cost

 

If you're looking for sheer simplicity of use I'd probably go for one of the iPad's

I bought a Nexus 7 last year and upgraded to the new 32GB wifi a couple of days ago. I found it a superb device for reading (the combo aldiko / epub is great) and casual gaming (asphalt, prince of persia, world of goo anyone?) and a very good one for browsing (the Full HD one is a lot faster so I would say excellent). The first generation couldn't play a 10bit x264 video but it didn't had a problem for the normal 8bit 720p; I haven't tried the new one. The FHD one has a stereo sound system and a much better audio quality so I would recommend it over the old one if you want to listen to the music without headphones (that are not included). I didn't test the battery of the FHD enough. The first generation could barely do 8 hours of screen time but I always have Galaxy Pack live wallpaper on. Remember that playing heavy 3d games reduces the duration significantly (or not well optimized games like EA Bejewelled).

We have had a 1st generation Nexus 7 32GB since they were released in the UK, and I can't fault it. I don't like the 10" tabs as they're quite heavy and get uncomfortable to hold after a while.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!