• 0

SharePoint 2010 website design help needed


Question

16 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Layout changes how?  I mean, if you are new to SharePoint, I suggest not deviating much from the stock templates and concentrating on functionality for now.

 

And for the level you are at, I say screw off Visual Studio and get SharePoint Designer (or whatever they are banding FrontPage as these days).

  • 0

Layout changes how?  I mean, if you are new to SharePoint, I suggest not deviating much from the stock templates and concentrating on functionality for now.

 

And for the level you are at, I say screw off Visual Studio and get SharePoint Designer (or whatever they are banding FrontPage as these days).

 

I'm basically picking up where someone else left off with the site. Right now, the site essentially consists of medium-sized company logo near the top left of the page. To the right of the logo and sort of centered on the page is a directory listing. There are then a few links at the bottom of the page. What I'm going to need to do is move the text which consists of the directory over to the right side of the page. I'm then going to need to make a few department sub pages in the form of a navigation menu on the left side.

 

Is SharePoint Designer going to be the best option to go with? For inserting text, is it basically just clicking where the text will be and then making adjustments with alignment and the decrease/increase indent?

  • 0

You've no real SharePoint experience do you?  Not condescending, am genuinely asking...

 

You can edit the page and drag/drop the elements you speak of.  Insert text controls and so on...

 

But yes, SP Designer (under your Office license) is best :)

  • 0

I honestly don't have any SharePoint experience. I hope that doesn't prevent me from accomplishing something with regards to modifying the existing site design.

I will have time this week to work on the site, but I did try copying and pasting some existing text to a new location and noticed that the line spacing want consistent and the header text lost it's formatting. I was looking for a format painter type option, but didn't find one. I'll look into getting SharePoint designer installed.

  • 0

I honestly don't have any SharePoint experience. I hope that doesn't prevent me from accomplishing something with regards to modifying the existing site design.

I will have time this week to work on the site, but I did try copying and pasting some existing text to a new location and noticed that the line spacing want consistent and the header text lost it's formatting. I was looking for a format painter type option, but didn't find one. I'll look into getting SharePoint designer installed.

 

I used to do a fair amount of SharePoint work and with designer it makes it dead simple to configure the master pages to do a large amount of the custom page layout, formatting, and branding you need. For anything content wise though, stick to the web interface. That's what SharePoint is for, dead simple webpart based content, calendars, data sharing, etc. If you try to hard code stuff into pages you'll just end up breaking stuff down the line and/or whenever someone else goes in and adds a webpart/moves something your hard coded adjustments will break.

  • 0

I know I can edit the page by navigating to the site and then from the site actions menu, selecting edit page. That's what I've been doing in the short amount of time I've had to look at editing the page. How would the site be loaded into SharePoint designer for editing?

  • 0

I know I can edit the page by navigating to the site and then from the site actions menu, selecting edit page. That's what I've been doing in the short amount of time I've had to look at editing the page. How would the site be loaded into SharePoint designer for editing?

 

It's been a while, but I'm pretty sure you can just add your site with a URL and then your login credentials.

  • 0

I've managed to create a desired layout for the main site. The one thing I am having difficulty with is trying to link to a network folder. In conducting research on how to do this, I found that I have to create the link as follows: file://servername. In my case, I am mapping to a network folder that is on the Y:\ drive, so I am putting in file://Y:\folderpathfile://servername actually becomes file:///servername once editing is done.

  • 0

After working on the site for a few days, I have been able to put together a homepage. My organization apparently has disabled the ability to use SharePoint Designer. Apparently they feel that sites should be edited by people with the proper permissions and without the need to have software installed on the workstation. With that being said, I am limited to editing the site directly from the web browser.

 

One issue that I am having a problem with is a table layout. I decided that I wanted to have a simple 2 x 2 table that would contain frequently used links. While I could probably have just created a list, I thought perhaps a table would look better. The issue I am having with the table layout is when it comes to linking to a network folder or to a file which has been uploaded to the shared documents, or even to an external website.

 

As an example, if the table were setup as follows:

 

Link 1      Link 2

Link 3      Link 4

 

The text physically fits inside the cell, although SharePoint is making the cell width wider than it needs to be. Then, when I go to provide the location to where Link 1 will point to, the cell width expands to twice the size it needs to be and in some instances, it forces a new table row to be created. This in turn has created problems with the HTML code in the table. Links aren't able to be clicked simply because extra code (such as < a >) has somehow been inserted. 

 

What I'd like to find out is if the table would be any easier to work with in SharePoint Designer and if the extra code insertion would be an issue if SharePoint Designer were to be used.

  • 0
My organization apparently has disabled the ability to use SharePoint Designer. Apparently they feel that sites should be edited by people with the proper permissions and without the need to have software installed on the workstation.

 

They are quite frankly asses and have no idea what they are talking about.

 

SP Designer is Microsofts prescribed too for editing the layout of Microsoft SharePoint.

  • 0

They are quite frankly asses and have no idea what they are talking about.

 

SP Designer is Microsofts prescribed too for editing the layout of Microsoft SharePoint.

 

Here is my take on this.  cbrookhart is not in a role of developer and they might even have developer workstation images, gpos, etc...  I have a feeling he is helping his department with something and not going through proper channels based on where he works and they are trying to get something done because IT / Developer Group might not be able to get something done.

  • 0

I've managed to create a desired layout for the main site. The one thing I am having difficulty with is trying to link to a network folder. In conducting research on how to do this, I found that I have to create the link as follows: file://servername. In my case, I am mapping to a network folder that is on the Y:\ drive, so I am putting in file://Y:\folderpathfile://servername actually becomes file:///servername once editing is done.

 

I would not recommend putting a network link in sharepoint.  Reason for this, is because odds are the user will be authenticated as themselves and navigating the site as themselves.  Now the user and not sharepoint will have to have permissions to this network drive.  And if its not nothing pisses off a user more then leaving an application for another window.  Its a context change.  Its not that its really hard.  You could just use a list.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I will keep my current devices for several years... no planning in upgrading until these devices stop working. Too pricey.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
    • This is a none story - these low volume Chinese models will always get new experimental features first because Apple and Samsung can't produce them in huge volume to meet demand.
    • Nvidia GeForce NOW gains support for Dark Scrolls, Empulse, and more by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final update of June for Nvidia's cloud gaming service GeForce NOW is now available, and it is touting support for six more games. The company is also drawing subscriber attention towards the summer sales kicking off across stores, so they can stock up on more cloud-supported titles. Of course, the Steam Summer Sale is the biggest promotion, which is kicking off later today. "Supported Steam games can be streamed across devices with GeForce NOW, making it easy to buy a game once, keep progress synced and pick up where the gameplay left off on PCs, Macs, handheld devices, phones, TVs and more," says the company. "In other words, the Steam Summer Sale brings the deals; GeForce NOW adds the flexibility." Don't forget that the GeForce NOW summer sale is still active as well. This limited-time offer drops the 12-month Performance membership from $99.99 to $64.99, saving members $35. At the same time, the 12-month Ultimate membership is currently going for $129.99, dropping the price by $70 from the original $199.99. Here are the games joining GeForce NOW's supported list this week: Dark Scrolls (New release on Steam, available June 22) SAND: Raiders of Sophie (New release on Steam, available June 22) Deer & Boy (New release on Steam, available June 23) EMPULSE (New release on Steam, available June 24) The Adventures of Elliot: The Millennium Tales (Steam) FATAL FURY: City of the Wolves (Steam) With the June expansions coming to an end, Nvidia should be announcing its July GeForce NOW plans next week. Keep in mind that, unlike subscription services like Game Pass or EA Play, a copy of a game must be owned by the GeForce NOW member (or at least have a license via PC Game Pass) to start playing via Nvidia's cloud servers. There is also a limit to how many hours subscribers can use the service per month.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!