Have you read the Bible?


Recommended Posts

The bible was first writen in various languages, Aramaic, Hebrew. Then compiled in Greek, then translated into Latin, from which most modern language translations come from....

Im not a bible scholar, so I might be wrong in the exact order, but what is for sure is that its a translation of a translation of a translation.......

What I suspect here is that english teaching is being done mostly by American missionaries over there, with the agenda of then inserting the Bible...

neopwi ok the old testament was originally written in hebrew. There are several different authors of the old testament books, or atleast we ascribe them to several different people, though we believe that God inspired each one to write. however the new testment was written in aramaic for some of it and greek for the rest. Also since the bible was recopied, there are different versions of the greek floating around. they usually get about 2-3 major greek copies, in each translation. Now the catholic bible has books like the wisdom of soloman and 1 macabees. These are not included in the protestant canonised bible. Also there are many different translations. King James, New King James, New american Standard, New Living. New International Version.

Also as for the latin, that is called the vulgate.

and the greek OT is called the septuigent.

The bible is available online for free, at biblegateway.com you can even pick different translations.

If you are interested in the story of the bible, there are 11 story line books of the OT and 2-3 of the NT.

Which means you merely need to read14 books max out of the 66 to understand the whole story.

The NT story line books are Luke-Acts and sometimes Revelation. I guess it just depends on your understanding of exchatology (or the study of the end times).

The OT story line books are, now i hope i am geting these correct. Genesis, Exodus, Numbers, Joshua, Judges, 1&2 Samuel, 1&2 kings, Ezera, Nehemiah. The books after Esther are Prophetic and poetic iterature, which is not neccisary to the main narrative, however it is helpful in rounding out the story. And christians believe that God put it in there b/c it was intended to be studied and it has just as much importance as any other part.

Now know that there is a doctrine for the bible in christian belief. They hold to the fact that All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness. Any moe questions, feel free to ask, i may not have all the answers, but i am pretty sure i can answer a lot of questions.

thanks in addvance,

--i3iz

I've read it. Anyone interested in philosophy, religion, history should read it... it's quite an influential book and has shaped people's behaviour for 2000 years. The Old Testament is a combination of myth and history that details the early development of religion. You can follow the progression of "God" from a tribal god, to a vengeful god, to a god of peace. The New Testament is much more interesting (I found) and is much more applicable to life. IMO, Jesus was a revolutionary. He saw all the corruption in the world, from the streets right up the supposedly "Holy" Temples/Synagogues, and decided to dedicate his life to spreading his philosophies about living together peacefully, loving each other, treating each other with kindness, helping each other. He was like the original Ghandi.. someone who spoke out against the status quo, peacefully, and many people supported him and his message. Of course, he was killed for it, but that's the price you pay for revolution, for change. Everyone could benefit from what he was saying. Forget about the metaphysical, whether or not there is a "God" or gods or whether Jesus was the son of God or whether God spoke to Mohammad. That's all part of the storytelling, the mythology, the mystical nature given to things beyond comprehension. What's important is the real messages at the root of all major religions: peace, love, kindness, respect for each other, respect for nature, etc. That's what we should be focusing on, not bickering about the details.

:ninja:

Regarding dinosaurs not being mentioned in the bible:

FYI - the word "dinosaur" wasn't introducted into the English language until sometime in the 1800's.. so of course there is no mention of "dinosaurs" in the Bible. What do you think people called dinosaurs before that? Maybe dragon, behemoth, leviathan, etc. Do you think everyone in the world calls a "humpback whale" a "humpback whale"? I also never remember reading specifically about "sharks" or "alligators", but that doesn't mean they weren't around at the time the Bible was written.

neopwi http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/2.asp

i havent read this page, but i think it attempts to explain the dinosaurs with the bible.

for those who are interested it might help out.

You can follow the progression of "God" from a tribal god, to a vengeful god, to a god of peace.

One of God's attributes is his immutability, or his inability to change. another one of Gods attributes is Love, this is checked and balanced with his attribute of immutability. Another attirbute is Justice and this is Checked and balanced by love and immutability. Infinite is another. You can see how the list continues. There are large scholarly debates on how many attributes exist, but none of them negate the other. Israel rebels, The LORD punishes them. If you ground your kids, do you not love them? Have you changed?

sticktron also much of what you say about Jesus is true, but you are missing the one crucial fact of christianity.

"All have sinned and fall short of the Glory of God."-The apostle Paul

"For the wages of Sin is Death, but the gift of God is eternal life, through Christ Jesus."-Paul the Apostle

"no man comes to the father, but through me"-Jesus

"I am the way the truth and the life"-Jesus

Now granted we ought to all love each other, but this is not possible apart from God. Thinking we can do good in and of ourselves, takes away the need for God. And then we enter the circular argument. However, i think this is where a lot of people confuse Christianity. Sure it is about love, but not the love we can give. The greek word for the love that the bible is about is AGAPE. In 1 Cor. 13 it speaks of this love. It is an unconditional love. God loves all of his creatures with that love.

When we anthropomorphize God, we take Him out of his majestic and omniscient context, and put our own structural framework around him. What i am sayiong, is not neccisarily to believe in God, or to not believe in God. What i am saying, is to honestly critique christianity, or the bible, you must be able to exegete scripture properly. To have a proper hermeneutic.

As far as those who love to read philosophy books, have you guys ever read dallas willard? He is the head of the philosophy department at USC. He has some great things to say in his books. I reccomend the Divine Conspiracy, if you are interested in philosophy. Also AW Tozer has a great book called knowledge of the Holy. Which discussed the attributes of God from a more philosophical perspective.

Thanks again

--i3iz

Regarding dinosaurs not being mentioned in the bible:

FYI - the word "dinosaur" wasn't introducted into the English language until sometime in the 1800's.. so of course there is no mention of "dinosaurs" in the Bible. What do you think people called dinosaurs before that? Maybe dragon, behemoth, leviathan, etc. Do you think everyone in the world calls a "humpback whale" a "humpback whale"? I also never remember reading  specifically about "sharks" or "alligators", but that doesn't mean they weren't around at the time the Bible was written.

neopwi http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/2.asp

i havent read this page, but i think it attempts to explain the dinosaurs with the bible.

for those who are interested it might help out.

neopwi That site is ridiculous... it claims the earth MUST have been created in six days, and that the BIBLE says the earth MUST have been created about 4000 BC. LOL that nonsense was thrown away by religious scholars ages ago. Even the most devout Christian understands that the story of Creation's simple, sweeping concepts are merely symbolic of the spirit and majesty of God.

The Universe is thought to be around 20 billion years old. The earliest evidence of life on earth is 3 billion year old bacteria. Dinosaurs and other large reptiles ruled the earth during the Mesozoic Era, which was 225 million to 65 million years ago (a 165 million year period). It was during that time the continents were formed from the former Pangaea (one large land mass). The homo genus has been for 2 million years. homo erectus (an earlier type of man that homo sapiens made extinct) fossils have been found from 1.5 million years ago. 500,000 years ago fire was discovered. The oldest homo sapien fossils are 400,000 years old. Neanderthal man (homo sapien neanderthalis) lived in ice age Europe and Middle East before becoming extinct around 40,000 years ago. 20,000 years ago bow and arrow are invented. 10,000 years ago the Agriculture in the Fertile Crescent of the Middle East flourishes. 7000 BC: pottery invented. 6000 BC: linen invented. 5000 BC: Mesopotamian Civilization begins.

As you can see, life started WAAAAAY before 4000 BC.

Religion is so funny, I really can't understand how so many people are still taken in by this pre-science, mythological, spiritual, bull$hit.

Why is it that you are more likely to be a Chrisitian in the US, or a Muslim in Pakistan? Because religion is not a result of people seeing "the light"/"the true path"/"the good life - it is because children are indoctrinated at childhood into believing the dominant myth of the society. Luckily people are coming around to realise how ridiculous religion is - unfortunately there are still a lot of people that will be keep the "faith"/religion/bull$hit going.

Then again, if we didn't have religous people - there would be a lot less to laugh at. God bless ######.

sticktron also much of what you say about Jesus is true, but you are missing the one crucial fact of christianity.

"All have sinned and fall short of the Glory of God."-The apostle Paul

"For the wages of Sin is Death, but the gift of God is eternal life, through Christ Jesus."-Paul the Apostle

"no man comes to the father, but through me"-Jesus

"I am the way the truth and the life"-Jesus

neopwi This is why I suggest to people to leave aside the metaphysical, which is dependent on personal interpretation and supernatural beliefs, and simply think about what the man Jesus was talking about. Lets just deal with facts. He was alive, he was a man, and he did preach to followers about living in peace and loving each other and the world. That is the most important part of the Bible story. Jesus sets an example of the way we can live so as to achieve the peace and happiness we want in life. That applies to every living person, regardless of religious beliefs, unaffected by church doctrine, interpretation, or misuse. You don't have to be Christian to follow the basic moral guidlines offered by Jesus.

Also, contrary to most people's understanding, Jesus himself also said that you didn't have to be any particular religion--or even have heard of religion at all--to go to heaven. All you have to go is live a life of peace, kindness, goodness, and you be rewarded. The beauty of it is that while you're trying so hard to get to heaven, which in all probability doesn't exist, you in effect make your actual life on earth much better--and THAT is the REAL reward.

Religion is so funny, I really can't understand how so many people are still taken in by this pre-science, mythological, spiritual, bull$hit.

Why is it that you are more likely to be a Chrisitian in the US, or a Muslim in Pakistan? Because religion is not a result of people seeing "the light"/"the true path"/"the good life - it is because children are indoctrinated at childhood into believing the dominant myth of the society. Luckily people are coming around to realise how ridiculous religion is - unfortunately there are still a lot of people that will be keep the "faith"/religion/bull$hit going.

Then again, if we didn't have religous people - there would be a lot less to laugh at. God bless ######.

neopwi There are several reasons religion has played such an important role in human development. It offered a way to explain things that aren't explainable yet by science (or before science existed). It implemented a reward/punishment system before there were police or courts. It offers people a personal source of comfort when needed in life. And it implemented a moral standard by which people could live so we were not all barbarians. Don't kill, don't steal, don't rape, don't pillage, etc. etc. these laws come originally from religion, before there were law books and justice systems.

There is one thing I hate about religion, and that is the fact that someone is bound to get really really mad when discussing it.

Anyways, I've read the Bible, and think that it is something everyone can enjoy, Christian or not. Many colorful stories, good morals to take with you in life and also brands itself "based on a true story".

You should read it for Christmas if you can spare the time. :)

the bullsh*t is that so many of you cry and scream about the freedom to think and feel any way you want and that anyone who puts you down is a bigot and a pile o' sh*t but you have no qualms of putting down christians and calling them fools and morons and treating them with contempt. i as a christian believe that we were all created in the image and likeness of god and that we all are sinners. i see no ground for me to stand on and put others down or judge them. i needed jesus' blood just as much as anyone. christ died to save any who call upon his name and you all are under that umbrella and can trust in him if you so choose. i am used to being put down for my faith on these boards... but i just wanted to point it out cause so many of you don't seem to realize... and the boards rules about trashing people for who they are don't seem to apply to me and the love of my life... strange.

huh?? Your teachers tell you if you want to learn english correctly - you should learn the bible??? Your teachers are just a bunch of thumpers!? For one - pretty sure that the use of the bible in public school would, even if for some type of english classs would be walking a fine line on the separation of church and state issue.

I know for sure if my kids brought home a bible as a text book - I would be bringing it to someones attention!

If looking for examples of the proper use of english, etc.. - the bible sure and the hell would not be on my top 100.

i know usa sucks in that way, they want to destroy a monument of the 10 commandments, change the pledge of alligence and others, but they teach crap in school, they make monuments of other things stimulating sex, and do bad stuff, anyway i dont want to change the thread but it really sucks, and yes i am christian i have read the bible, you shall read it to:whistle:l:p :p

You are right.

i have always found the best movie which discusses the christian faith, and what faith really is is Kevin Smith's Dogma. The conversation with the 2 angels in the garage sums up what faith and god and christianity really are.

Good post.

Regarding dinosaurs not being mentioned in the bible:

FYI - the word "dinosaur" wasn't introducted into the English language until sometime in the 1800's.. so of course there is no mention of "dinosaurs" in the Bible. What do you think people called dinosaurs before that? Maybe dragon, behemoth, leviathan, etc. Do you think everyone in the world calls a "humpback whale" a "humpback whale"? I also never remember reading  specifically about "sharks" or "alligators", but that doesn't mean they weren't around at the time the Bible was written.

neopwi http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/2.asp

i havent read this page, but i think it attempts to explain the dinosaurs with the bible.

for those who are interested it might help out.

neopwi Unfortunately, I DID read it. What a load of excuses and lies made to fit their closed-minded and illogical thinking. Can't explain why there were no dates next to the bones found? Just say it's a lie!

Just how do you Christians think that Evolution fits into the Bible. The Bible says that God created Adam and Eve in his likeness as the first humans. How does that fit with the hard scientific evidence that humans evolved from neanderthals who evolved from apes? And how does the Bible reflect the scientific discoveries about the evolution of the Universe? Oh, it doesn't, it just says that God created that too. BS. When are Christians going to start listening to the facts about the Universe and themselves and start realizing that science negates Christianity?

Just my humble opinion... :shifty:

this thread can go on forever, because we base argument upon faith.. peoples beliefs.. no matter what science has to say you can't take that away from people. it's what they live for, in essence their holy grail.

there is no right or wrong religion... and if someone wants to believe whatever the hell they want, they are entitiled to that. it's thier right as a human being.

there is no one religion that has proven what happens after death, and no one can tell you what happens after death because there is no way to factualize it. and you can't factualize it, because religion is BASED off faith. so you have yourself a catch-22 and you start over again.

I believe in a God, yes. Something greater that started everything. Or at least pushed the first ball in the domino effect of scientific related happenings leading to our existence. However I have not, nor will not tend to believe what is written in any of the tens of books given to each religion to follow from. People know the difference between right and wrong. If you choose wrong, good luck. If you choose right... well.. good luck.

Vii

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!