Mail from Linux/Shell


Recommended Posts

There is a standard utility simply called mail that is installed by default on most Linux and UNIX systems. You can find a basic tutorial for it here. If you need more functionality than the basics covered in that tutorial, mail is very well documented in its man page.

  On 05/08/2013 at 17:17, xorangekiller said:

There is a standard utility simply called mail that is installed by default on most Linux and UNIX systems. You can find a basic tutorial for it here. If you need more functionality than the basics covered in that tutorial, mail is very well documented in its man page.

 

Hi, I have already done that. But I need a utility which can pass a parameter like "from" and "smtp server ip" and execute it from commandline itself. I have mail, mailx, sendmail installed by default. I have the vbs script for this which uses "from, to, server_IP". But I need to make either a shell script or a simple command for the same.

I might be wrong but I don't think you can pass FROM as parameter to sendmail, postfix or the likes.

 

There's a quirky way to do that, telneting to your local mail server on port 25 and manually forging the email:

HELO yourdomain
MAIL FROM:youraddress@yourdomain
RCPT TO:someone@somewhere
DATA
Subject: this is so awkward Stallman would be proud
blahblah
whateverwhatever
.
QUIT

You could then spawn a non interactive telnet session from your script with all the mail parameters.

 

Again, quirky, but works.

  On 06/08/2013 at 11:10, ichi said:

I might be wrong but I don't think you can pass FROM as parameter to sendmail, postfix or the likes.

 

There's a quirky way to do that, telneting to your local mail server on port 25 and manually forging the email:

HELO yourdomain
MAIL FROM:youraddress@yourdomain
RCPT TO:someone@somewhere
DATA
Subject: this is so awkward Stallman would be proud
blahblah
whateverwhatever
.
QUIT
You could then spawn a non interactive telnet session from your script with all the mail parameters.

 

Again, quirky, but works.

 

In the past I've done something similar. Some distros allow you to open sockets within the shell (Redhat does, Debian doesn't AFAIK), so you can open a socket on port 25 and then redirect output into the "file" that gets created.

 

This is code similar to what I've done in the past. (Untested so it might be bugridden)...

 

 

#! /bin/bash

mail_server="smtp.something.com"
sender="test@test.com"
recipient="someone.else@test.com"
message="Hello, world!"

if ! exec 5<>"/dev/tcp/${mail_server}/25"; then
    echo "Could not open socket on port 25 to send email." >&2
    exit 1
else
    _response_code=""
    _message=""

    # Check socket open return code.
    read -u 5 _response_code _message
    if ! [ "${_response_code}" != "220" ]; then
        echo "Unable to send email to SMTP host. Reason: ${_message}." >&2
        exit 1
    fi

    # Build the email header.
    local _message_header=(
        "HELO"
        "MAIL FROM:<${sender}>"
        "RCPT TO:<${recipient}>"
    )

    # Send the header text.
    for _header in "${_message_header[@]}"; do
        echo -e "${_header}\r" >&5
        read -u 5 _response_code _message
        if [ "220" != "${_response_code}" ]; then
            echo "Unable to send email to SMTP host. Reason: ${_message}." >&2
            exit 1
        fi
    done

    # Signal start of message content.
    echo -e "DATA\r" >&5

    read -u 5 _response_code _message
    if [ "${_response_code}" != "354" ]; then
        echo "Unable to send email to SMTP host. Reason: ${_message}." >&2
        exit 1
    fi

    echo -e "${message}\r" >&5

    # Signal end of message
    echo -e "\r\n.\r" >&5
    read -u 5 _response_code _message

    if [ "220" != "${_response_code}" ]; then
        echo "Unable to send email to SMTP host. Reason: ${_message}." >&2
        exit 1
    fi

    echo "QUIT\r" >&5

    echo "Email sent!"

fi

Python's an easy option too if you want do make your own script, only takes a couple lines of code via smtplib, many distros have it installed by default and super easy to get if not. You mentioned VBScript so you should be able to figure this out rather quickly. An off the cuff example... It might even work, I'm just making this up, haven't tested it, but you can get the gist of it. If anything set it up to handle command line arguments and symlink it into somewhere in your path so you can access it from anywhere if needed.

 

#!/usr/bin/python

import smtplib

sender = 'whoever@whereever.com'
receivers = ['me@here.com','me@there.com']

message = """From: From Me <whoever@whereever.com>
To: To Me <me@here.com>
Subject: Just testing.

This is just a test from Python.
"""

try:
   smtpObj = smtplib.SMTP('localhost')
   smtpObj.sendmail(sender, receivers, message)         
   print "Mail sent ok."
except SMTPException:
   print "Mail not sent."
You can add authentication, encryption and all that if needed. Some more examples on the Python docs site, pretty easy stuff.

http://docs.python.org/2/library/email-examples.html

http://docs.python.org/2/library/smtplib.html

@Ichi - I can do that manually. But I want to know if anyone knows of a working script otherwise it will take me some time make one.

 

@Majesticmerc - Thanx a lot for that script, it looks good. I will try that. :)

 

@MaxNorris - I don't have any experience with python and I don't know if python is installed on the linux box. But I will try that as well. Thanks a lot. :)

 

Anyways, I have found a brilliant perl script which has a lot of options that can be parsed via commandline => http://caspian.dotconf.net/menu/Software/SendEmail/

 

But I would prefer a shell script over perl script for now. Thanks a lot everyone for your time and help. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • People yearn for the good old days of IRC and truly open Internet, yet are dismissive of modern solutions like ActivityPub (which Mastodon pioneered) and Matrix. Make it make sense.
    • AI judges learn new tricks to fact-check and code better by Paul Hill Image via Pixabay AI researchers and developers are increasingly turning to large language models (LLMs) to evaluate the responses of other LLMs in a process known as “LLM-as-a-judge”. Unfortunately, the quality of these evaluations degrades on complex tasks like long-form factual checking, advanced coding, and math problems. Now, a new research paper published by researchers from the University of Cambridge and Apple outlines a new system that augments AI judges with external validation tools to improve their judgment quality. This system aims to overcome limitations found in both human and AI annotation. Humans face challenges and biases due to time limits, fatigue, and being influenced by writing style over factual accuracy while AI struggles with the aforementioned complex tasks. The Evaluation Agent that the researchers created is agentic so it can assess the response to determine if external tools are needed and utilizes the correct tools. For each evaluation, three main steps are passed through: initial domain assessment, tool usage, and a final decision. The fact-checking tool uses web search to verify atomic facts within a response; code execution leverages OpenAI’s code interpreter to run and verify code correctness; and math checker is a specialized version of the code execution tool for validating mathematical and arithmetic operations. If none of the tools are found to be useful for making judgments, the baseline LLM annotator is used to avoid unnecessary processing and potential performance regression on simple tasks. The system delivered notable improvements in long-form factual checking, with significant increases in agreement with ground-truth annotations across various baselines. In coding tasks, the agent-based approach significantly improved performance across all baselines. For challenging math tasks, the agents improved performance over some baselines, but not all, and overall agreement remained relatively low at around 56%. Notably, the researchers found that in long-form factual responses, the agent’s agreement with ground-truth was higher than that of human annotators. This framework is extensible, so in the future, other tools could be integrated to further improve LLM evaluation systems. The code for the framework will be made open source on Apple’s GitHub, but it isn’t up yet.
    • https://www.neowin.net/news/tags/mastodon/ In short: Federated Twitter (X)
    • Keep in mind it was purchased by an advertising company. I use SearxNG.
    • I am using Waterfox Private Search now that I started using the Waterfox browser on my PC and Android. Both work great* search waterfox net with full stops in between. * I have an issue where making comments on articles on various websites is difficult with Waterfox on Android as it randomly adds spaces and doubles up on text.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      fernan99 earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Collaborator
      MikeK13 earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Alexander 001 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Antonio Barboza earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Antonio Barboza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      588
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      219
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      170
    4. 4
      Xenon
      136
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      126
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!