Battlefield 4 to run at 720p and 60fps. Cool wit me


Recommended Posts

jerzdawg, on 23 Aug 2013 - 14:40, said:

I'd imagine within a year or so we see more 1080p games @ 60fps, launch titles usually start off with the "growing pains" but I'll wait and see what other developers are able to pull off.

 

It's on X86 arch with a long history of game engines, tools & middleware experience though which should translate over to PS4 & Xbox One this time.

I just have a sneaking suspicion that Sony and Microsoft were in too huge of rush to get their next-gens released that the overall quality won't be as good as it should have been.  And that also is leading to game developers having a tough time getting the performance they were hoping for.

 

not really. its cost. buy a similar cpu and gpu today, thats $300 right there. add in the hard drive,controller,ram,bluray,etc.. you are paying way more than what they are charging,and you wont even get 1/2 or even 1/3 the performance because the way games are made for the new gen hardware is different,and coding is done specifically for the hardware,with all the multithreading and low level access to the gpu. theres just no way you're going to beat the performance to price ratio of these consoles. sure your $1200+ rig might give you better framerates or resolution,but look at how much more you're paying.

I'm anxious to hear if the Xbox One version will be aiming higher.

nope its also 720p upscaled to 1080p, DICE mentioned it on the first video footage released mate (think it was the show n tell of the Xbox One)

 

the only true 1080p (and higher) for BF4 is the PC variant sadly. 

 

Ill stick to playing BF on the platform that made DICE/Battlefield at a lovely 2560x1440 ;) tbh its always been a preference to play FPS type games on PC, my consoles always been driving games & sports on the big TV.

 

thats just my personal preference.

  • Like 1

not really. its cost. buy a similar cpu and gpu today, thats $300 right there. add in the hard drive,controller,ram,bluray,etc.. you are paying way more than what they are charging,and you wont even get 1/2 or even 1/3 the performance because the way games are made for the new gen hardware is different,and coding is done specifically for the hardware,with all the multithreading and low level access to the gpu. theres just no way you're going to beat the performance to price ratio of these consoles. sure your $1200+ rig might give you better framerates or resolution,but look at how much more you're paying.

This man is absolutely correct (y)

Maybe I am just used to low FPS in games, or not having things on ultra.. But this doesn't bug me.  I don't need things to be 60FPS as long as the game feels smooth.  I also don't need to see every fibre on a piece of clothing.

I don't know about you guys.. but when I am playing an FPS.. I don't stand still long enough to look at the scenery.

I'm rather accustomed to having both myself.

Well, I'm one of those people that don't think 60fps is a "must". I really don't think it looks better. But, if I had the choice between 720p60 and 1080p30, I'd choose the latter.

Yeah sure I run bf3 at 1080p or higher at max settings but I also spent around 1800 on my pc and the ps4 is only 399.  Also resolution is only 1 of many factors.  I can run just about any game out there at 1080p on my laptop at 60fps if i set the setting on minimum so it really depends on how many other graphical features are enabled which i care a lot more about than resolution. As long its 720 on my tv im happy and prolly wouldnt know the difference.  But if they start messing with other crap like textures i will notice right away.

Well, I'm one of those people that don't think 60fps is a "must". I really don't think it looks better. But, if I had the choice between 720p60 and 1080p30, I'd choose the latter.

Really?  :| I have a hard time with anything below 120 fps now. 30 fps doesn't look like real motion at all. At his last keynote John Carmack said he hoped the days of 30fps were behind us and I'm 100% with him on that one.

not really. its cost. buy a similar cpu and gpu today, thats $300 right there. add in the hard drive,controller,ram,bluray,etc.. you are paying way more than what they are charging,and you wont even get 1/2 or even 1/3 the performance because the way games are made for the new gen hardware is different,and coding is done specifically for the hardware,with all the multithreading and low level access to the gpu. theres just no way you're going to beat the performance to price ratio of these consoles. sure your $1200+ rig might give you better framerates or resolution,but look at how much more you're paying.

Well you're talking full-scale desktop PC components, but that comparison is invalid for a number of reasons.  Consoles don't have the GPU and memory of a traditional PC, so the overall cost is much lower.  Same as a laptop since the CPU, GPU, etc aren't as "full-scale" as a desktop.  There are less transistors and that equates to less cost and less performance. That's well accepted. 

 

PCs are also more expensive because there is a a lot of margin built-in to the prices.  On consoles, there is little to no margin, and the profits (in the beginning) are from the games.  So yeah consoles are cheaper, but you're probably buying them for close to cost.  Whereas if you buy a PC, you might be paying a 200% markup.  A console is designed different and priced different, so it doesn't make much sense to compare them to actual PCs.

 

Regardless, I was referring to the optimization of the development consoles.  It's pretty common knowledge that the development kits aren't completely the same as what the final hardware will be, so I would think that would be somewhat worrying for developers.  They can't safely push the limits since there would be a massive risk of performance degradation on the final hardware.  So for example, they could have designed BF4 to run at 1080p and it may work flawless on the development console, but they are forced to play it safe and settle for 720p.  They just have to weight out the risk to reward.  

 

After the consoles launch, I have no problem believing that future games will be able to play at 1080p60.

Really?  :| I have a hard time with anything below 120 fps now. 30 fps doesn't look like real motion at all. At his last keynote John Carmack said he hoped the days of 30fps were behind us and I'm 100% with him on that one.

 

Well in fairness that's because you've been spoilt with 120fps. To alot of folks who would play on consoles with mostly 30fps games, 120 is almost off putting at first.

Really?  :| I have a hard time with anything below 120 fps now. 30 fps doesn't look like real motion at all. At his last keynote John Carmack said he hoped the days of 30fps were behind us and I'm 100% with him on that one.

 

Yep. After gaming on PC going back and seeing 30 fps console games it looks like I'm watching a PowerPoint presentation.

Well you're talking full-scale desktop PC components, but that comparison is invalid for a number of reasons.  Consoles don't have the GPU and memory of a traditional PC, so the overall cost is much lower.  Same as a laptop since the CPU, GPU, etc aren't as "full-scale" as a desktop.  There are less transistors and that equates to less cost and less performance. That's well accepted. 

 

PCs are also more expensive because there is a a lot of margin built-in to the prices.  On consoles, there is little to no margin, and the profits (in the beginning) are from the games.  So yeah consoles are cheaper, but you're probably buying them for close to cost.  Whereas if you buy a PC, you might be paying a 200% markup.  A console is designed different and priced different, so it doesn't make much sense to compare them to actual PCs.

 

i dont know what the hell youre arguing about. you even said it yourself they are selling the console at cost. thats what im saying,they chose these components because of cost. they cant sell you an $800 machine,so this is what we're stuck with,because this is the best performance they can get from the price range theyre after. the performance you get out of this will beat anything you can go out and buy yourself at retail,because again like you said, there is markup. you completely missed the point i was making. it is a valid comparison,because you will be able to play the same games on consoles and pcs. comparing the same performance to price,consoles will win every single time.

 

your transistor theory is completely wrong. a 7790 has 2 billion transistors. a quad jag apu has 1.3 billion transistors. remove the igpu,and add another 4 cores,and you're still sub 2. add them together,and you're looking at in the 3s billion. xbox one soc has 5 billion transistors.

The difference in quality between 1080p and 720p for gaming isn't small, it's big. I have no problem paying a lot more for my hardware because I pay for quality.

 

Also, if the PS4 can't handle BF4 at 1080p the XBONE and it's inferior hardware won't either.

  • Like 2

1080p @ 60fps or gtfo, how hard is that to grasp

and how hard is it for you to grasp that it's a launch title. and when have launch titles ever been top quality on performance? just look at the launch 360 or ps3 games compared to what's offered now

IMHO if your a crazy psycho about framerates being 60+ GTFO and stay with your PC.  Unless you have a high a dollar TV (and even then theres no comparison to a high dollar pc monitor) you are just not going to tell the difference and of 12 people off hand that i know of that have consoles only me and one other have a high dollar TV and we just happen to be the only ones with high dollar computers as well.

i dont know what the hell youre arguing about. you even said it yourself they are selling the console at cost. thats what im saying,they chose these components because of cost. they cant sell you an $800 machine,so this is what we're stuck with,because this is the best performance they can get from the price range theyre after. the performance you get out of this will beat anything you can go out and buy yourself at retail,because again like you said, there is markup. you completely missed the point i was making. it is a valid comparison,because you will be able to play the same games on consoles and pcs. comparing the same performance to price,consoles will win every single time.

 

your transistor theory is completely wrong. a 7790 has 2 billion transistors. a quad jag apu has 1.3 billion transistors. remove the igpu,and add another 4 cores,and you're still sub 2. add them together,and you're looking at in the 3s billion. xbox one soc has 5 billion transistors.

Umm... I clearly explained I wasn't talking about hardware or cost in the first place.  Your first response was completely out of context since it had nothing to do with what I said...  I was talking about optimization on the developer consoles being subpar causing developers to not be able to utilize the full potential as of now.  If you read my response, you'd understand that.

IMHO if your a crazy psycho about framerates being 60+ GTFO and stay with your PC.  Unless you have a high a dollar TV (and even then theres no comparison to a high dollar pc monitor) you are just not going to tell the difference and of 12 people off hand that i know of that have consoles only me and one other have a high dollar TV and we just happen to be the only ones with high dollar computers as well.

 

I'm sorry but you can tell a massive difference between 30 and 60 fps.

Are you people saying you really can't see the difference between 30fps and 60fps, not seeing the difference in the following tests:

 

http://www.testufo.com/#test=framerates&count=3

http://boallen.com/fps-compare.html

http://frames-per-second.appspot.com/

 

:huh:

Are you people saying you really can't see the difference between 30fps and 60fps, not seeing the difference in the following tests:

 

http://www.testufo.com/#test=framerates&count=3

http://boallen.com/fps-compare.html

http://frames-per-second.appspot.com/

 

:huh:

They looked pretty much the same to me (30fps vs 60fps).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google Meet brings Gemini note-taking to AI Pro and Ultra subscribers by Karthik Mudaliar Google's Gemini-powered "Take notes for me" feature inside Google Meet is now available to Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. The features work on Google Meet for web as well as on mobile, and Google says that subscribers can use it for meetings they host in many supported languages. As the name suggests, "Take notes for me" allows Gemini to listen to a meeting, generate a summary, identify action items, and save the notes as a Google Doc in the user’s Drive. After the meeting, the organizer receives an email recap with the summary and action items, while the notes can also be attached to the related Calendar event depending on the meeting setup and sharing settings. The feature isn't automatically turned on for everyone, though. Google says that all meeting participants are notified when note-taking is turned on, and users can start it from the pencil icon in Meet or enable it for future calls through Meet’s meeting records settings. For work or school accounts, administrators can also control whether the feature is available and may require explicit participant consent for note-taking, recording, or transcription features. The feature first launched back in 2024, when it was available just for selected Workspace users. Over the years, Google added refinements and more options, including the ability to enable it when scheduling meetings via Google Calendar. Google's support docs say that the feature currently supports English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, and Spanish, but only one language at a time. Meetings with multiple spoken languages are not currently supported, and Google recommends using the tool for meetings between 15 minutes and eight hours. The new feature makes Google Meet closer to its rivals that have AI tools already built in. Microsoft Teams has recently started offering Copilot and intelligent recap features that summarize meetings, surface highlights, and help with follow-ups, while Zoom’s AI Companion can also generate meeting summaries from desktop and mobile meetings.
    • GnuCash 5.16 by Razvan Serea GnuCash is a personal and small business finance application, freely licensed under the GNU GPL and available for GNU/Linux, BSD, Solaris, Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows. It’s designed to be easy to use, yet powerful and flexible. GnuCash allows you to track your income and expenses, reconcile bank accounts, monitor stock portfolios and manage your small business finances. It is based on professional accounting principles to ensure balanced books and accurate reports. GnuCash can keep track of your personal finances in as much detail as you prefer. If you are just starting out, use GnuCash to keep track of your checkbook. You may then decide to track cash as well as credit card purchases to better determine where your money is being spent. When you start investing, you can use GnuCash to help monitor your portfolio. Buying a vehicle or a home? GnuCash will help you plan the investment and track loan payments. If your financial records span the globe, GnuCash provides all the multiple-currency support you need. Between 5.15 and 5.16, the following bugfixes were accomplished: Bug 421610 - RFE: Include logical dates for View->Filter by "date range"The Select Range section of the Date tab of the register's Filter By dialog box is changed to provide relative, specific date, or days ago options for the start and end of the filter range. The Show number of days item label is changed to Show from days ago to better reflect what it does. Bug 436105 - esc key not working as expected in register: Enable the escape key to cancel a field edit. Bug 797384 - Gnucash doesn't handle commodity prices with big numerator/denominator properly. Bug 798004 - Next gen UI for stock transactions Bug 799314 - Add "enter now" option in scheduled transaction editor. tab to allow users to select the scheduled transactions to be included in a “Since Last Run…” window. If there are no instances of a selected transaction triggered by today’s date, the next instance is triggered. Bug 799751 - autocomplete crash Bug 799759 - Users can't Enable entries via Checkboxes on Scheduled Transactions PageAllow the Enabled box in the list of scheduled transactions to be operated instead of having to open the transaction editor dialog and change the Enabled checkbox. Also added use of the Name column as the secondary column sort for all the other columns. Bug 799762 - Poor handling of cases where hidden/placeholder accounts are used in the account register Bug 799766 - Double line preference not respected in search register Bug 799767 - POST /accounts in bindings/python/example_scripts/rest-api is broken Bug 799777 - `xaccSplitSetParent`: reparenting a committed split silently drops its KVP slots (online_id, cap-gains links) Other changes & improvements: Numeric values may now be selected to copy in the Accounts page. Add new Finance::Quote source Finnhub.io: Free API key (personal/non-professional use) available at https://finnhub.io. Set FINNHUB_API_KEY environment variable to API key to use this source. As of June 2026, free tier API limit is 60 API calls/minute. The Investment Lots report has new optional columns for Computed Annual Growth Rate. Python Bindings: Improved translation of primary object (Account, Transaction, Split, etc.) so that they can be treated as normal Python objects. This is accomplished with SWIG magic so no existing code is obsoleted. Python Bindings: Better conversion of GLists to Python lists. Python Bindings: Destroy the QofSession in the Python Session dtor to prevent leaving the database locked. [engine] Add first-class online_id accessors for Split and Account and make them available to Python bindings, removing the unused Transaction online_id property. Improve C++ implementation of QofBook. Correct the Doxygen doc for qof_instance_get/set_kvp. [gnc-log-replay.cpp] fix incorrect guid dump Add some Boost library requirements needed by libgnucash-guile to CMakeLists.txt so that missing feature will fail at configure time. Use Compile-time Regular Expressions instead of std::regex in gnc-filepath-utils.cpp and instead of boost::regex in the CSV importer, with the CTRE v3.11.1 header added to borrowed [gnc-filepath-utils.cpp] null check char* arguments Add ChartJS licenses. Removed AEX from list of commodities. euronext.com is now using JS based anti-webscraping. [report-core] always offer options summary in reports. This is useful to debug reports. The Add options summary option is removed because it's no longer optional. Remove remaining obsolete IMContext from sheet Fix blurry text in HiDPI offscreen-rendered widgets Add port field to database connection dialog: The convention of appending the port number after the host isn't obvious. When editing a split in the register treat the account as being changed only if it isn't the one selected before editing instead of if the user performed an edit Return immediately from qof_book_destroy if hash_of_collections is null. If qof_book_destroy is called on a QofBook* freshly created with qof_book_new (usually because it was used to create a session that now must be destroyed) it would try to empty the non-existent hash tables, crashing. Clean up Flathub metadata to solve warnings at flatpak build time. Be consistent in naming GncPluginPage and GncPluginPageRegister HTML: Remove unimplemented function declarations. [gnc-html.cpp] remove unused buggy string conversion functions Convert libgnc-html to C++ Apply -Wall -Werr -Wmissing-prototypes to C++ compilation on Windows and fix the resulting errors. New and Updated Translations: Arabic, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Hungarian, Korean, Norwegian-Bokmal, Spanish Download: GnuCash 5.16 | 176.0 MB (Open Source) Links: GnuCash Home page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft finally launches WSL Containers in public preview by David Uzondu Microsoft has announced that WSL containers, a feature that allows developers to run Linux containers natively inside Windows without the need for Docker Desktop, is now available in public preview several weeks after Microsoft previewed it at Build 2026. To use the new container feature, you first have to install the latest pre-release version of the Windows Subsystem for Linux by running a quick update command in your terminal: wsl --update --pre-release After installing, you'd get access to the new Linux container CLI (wslc.exe) and the programmable API. Microsoft said that the CLI has a "familiar format" that matches the toolsets developers already use every day. If you know standard Docker commands, your muscle memory will translate directly to wslc.exe, which even features a built-in alias called container.exe. You can quickly run a full Ubuntu KDE desktop container by exposing ports, or pass your graphics card straight into a machine learning environment to run PyTorch workloads. Passing the --gpus all flag inside the run command instantly links your hardware. Image via Microsoft As for the API, developers can now embed Linux container operations directly inside native Windows applications without exposing the command line to users. The team integrated the API directly into MSBuild and CMake, so developers can define container steps directly in project files. Apart from bringing the CLI and API into public preview, Microsoft also said that it's working on a new default file system called virtiofs to speed up file transfer rates between Windows and Linux. Microsoft also introduced an experimental networking mode named consomme, which resolves compatibility issues with corporate VPNs by routing Linux network traffic straight through Windows. One thing to note about WSL containers is that they don't run in your standard WSL distributions; instead, every application and CLI session spawns its own lightweight Hyper-V utility VM in the background. This basically reduces the chances of one app snooping on the container of another app.
    • Google reportedly limited Meta's Gemini access over limited AI compute by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly limiting Meta's use of its Gemini AI models after Meta tried buying more computing capacity than even Google could supply. According to the Financial Times, Google told Meta in March that it could not provide the full Gemini capacity that Meta had requested. This shortfall even disrupted and delayed some of Meta's internal projects. Due to this, Meta even told its employees internally to use AI tokens more efficiently. Meta wasn't the only one to get hit by this sudden refusal by Google; even other customers were affected. But Meta was hit harder because of its unusually high demand for Google's models. The move from Google makes it evident that companies all over are in limited supply of both infrastructure and compute. Alphabet said in April that Google Cloud revenue grew 63% year-over-year to $20 billion in the first quarter, helped by enterprise AI infrastructure and AI solutions. In pursuit of more compute, Meta had earlier signed a multi-billion-dollar AWS agreement as well as a large AMD GPU deal for AI data centers. But the crunch would be short-lived as both Meta and Google have also ramped up infrastructure investments heavily. Meta said in November that it was committing more than $600 billion in the U.S. by 2028 for AI technology, infrastructure, and workforce expansion. In the first quarter of this year, Meta also raised its expected capital expenditure for 2026 to a range of $125 billion to $145 billion, citing higher component pricing and additional data center costs for future capacity. However, this doesn't make the company immune to the current dependence on outside suppliers. Meta has also spent many years promoting Llama as an open-weight alternative to closed models from Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic. But if the reported reliance on Google's Gemini models is severe enough for internal work to get impacted, then it looks like even frontier labs and Big Tech aren't fully self-sufficient. Source: Financial Times
    • I like to reminisce about the good old days, way back in autumn 2025 when building a gaming machine was fun and the drives were about $150 when you caught a deal. Yes duh, back in the day we had it gone. Then baby Skynet came along, hiding in AI datacenters demanding more processing power until it reached singularity. End of a not totally fictional story.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      533
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!