Battlefield 4 to run at 720p and 60fps. Cool wit me


Recommended Posts

They shouldn't even be wasting their money developing this so called "next gen" version if they're gonna leave it running at 720p on both versions. What a waste.

 

 

I'm anxious to hear if the Xbox One version will be aiming higher.

 

Why would you think for a moment that they would aim higher on a weaker gpu?

  • Like 1

Are you people saying you really can't see the difference between 30fps and 60fps, not seeing the difference in the following tests:

Some people are distanced from reality when they hear things from sources they trust, I think.  Like my friend who's convinced everyone in the world still uses XP.  :rolleyes:

 

That said, this whole topic is based on something they already denied, as noted on the top of page 3.

 

Though I did find it ironic how many PS4 games shown off were struggling to keep up the framerate when X1 devs seemed to have no problem there.  I'm not saying that's how it'll be at launch, but it was interesting.

Umm... I clearly explained I wasn't talking about hardware or cost in the first place.  Your first response was completely out of context since it had nothing to do with what I said...  I was talking about optimization on the developer consoles being subpar causing developers to not be able to utilize the full potential as of now.  If you read my response, you'd understand that.

i know you didnt initially talk about cost,but you stated that you think ms/sony rushed this thing,and thats why we wont be able to have the greatest performance. i replied back that its not that they rushed it,these boxes have been in development for years. this particular architecture was chosen because of cost,but the consequences of using this architecture is more complex programming. the only part where i didnt agree with your original statement was the "rushing" part. maybe there was a little misunderstanding in between.

Though I did find it ironic how many PS4 games shown off were struggling to keep up the framerate when X1 devs seemed to have no problem there.  I'm not saying that's how it'll be at launch, but it was interesting.

 

m $ has a big advantage in software

Though I did find it ironic how many PS4 games shown off were struggling to keep up the framerate when X1 devs seemed to have no problem there.  I'm not saying that's how it'll be at launch, but it was interesting.

X1 demos were running on high powered PCs.

i know you didnt initially talk about cost,but you stated that you think ms/sony rushed this thing,and thats why we wont be able to have the greatest performance. i replied back that its not that they rushed it,these boxes have been in development for years. this particular architecture was chosen because of cost,but the consequences of using this architecture is more complex programming. the only part where i didnt agree with your original statement was the "rushing" part. maybe there was a little misunderstanding in between.

Ah ok, I see what you're saying.  Cost is definitely part of it. There's also heat, which is a major concern.  They could go for crazy performance, but creating a lot of heat and having a loud fan to prevent a "RROD" isn't ideal.  Hopefully MS learned their lesson on that, but I'm also a little concerned with Sony since their PSU is integrated.  Lots of trade-offs and what-ifs.

 

Microsoft has done a lot of flip-flopping and minor tweaking of hardware, so that's probably where I'm getting the impression that it's being rushed.  And at E3 when the PS4 couldn't do 60fps, and both consoles had crashing issues, it also gave a bad impression.  Things like that should have been worked out months and months ago.

This is shocking news, for next-gen, I wouldn't call that acceptable.

You've guys have got to consider that Frostbite is an engine specifically designed around Direct X. With the PS4 having no equivalent, it doesn't surprise me that there may be a high learning curve to it.

In the EA conference, when they did that online demo, they specifically mentioned 1080p 60fps and that was on the X1. With the article around how they built Direct X for the X1 it wouldn't surprise me if this was still true.

Here's the accusation, 

 

http://www.cinemablend.com/games/Xbox-One-Games-E3-Were-Running-Windows-7-With-Nvidia-GTX-Cards-56737.html

 

 

Here's the response:

http://www.cinemablend.com/games/Microsoft-Says-Windows-7-Nvidia-GTX-PCs-E3-Were-Xbox-One-Dev-Kits-56834.html

 

There's also this 'games reporter' noting that some demo kiosks crashed to a standard-issue Windows desktop (like what you'd have on a PC) rather than what you'd get for a console running Windows 8. https://twitter.com/JazRignall/statuses/344967744808185857

 

One developer responded saying "We just didn't have time to make Xbox1-native versions so we just ran the PC version because we wanted to showcase our game."

 

-- so, what's the summary? --

We know for sure the demos weren't running all running on XBox One hardware. Some of it was explained to be running on 'pc hardware similar to an xbox one -- development kits' and that despite their considerably more powerful hardware, the machines should have performance similar to the shipping consumer version of the XBox One. Other demos just were the desktop PC version running on pretty good quality hardware because that's all the developer had to showcase.

 

Make of that what you will.

All first party XB1games ran on devkits except Lococycle. I am not going to bother with those links. This was a non issue at E3 that was blown out of proportion.

All first party XB1games ran on devkits except Lococycle. I am not going to bother with those links. This was a non issue at E3 that was blown out of proportion.

Nothing was blown out of proportion.

 

It's just that some people were religiously hurt when the news came out. Whether first party, second party or third party doesn't matter.

 

I just hope both consoles run games at slightly higher resolution than 720p at least.

Here's the accusation, 

 

http://www.cinemablend.com/games/Xbox-One-Games-E3-Were-Running-Windows-7-With-Nvidia-GTX-Cards-56737.html

 

 

Here's the response:

http://www.cinemablend.com/games/Microsoft-Says-Windows-7-Nvidia-GTX-PCs-E3-Were-Xbox-One-Dev-Kits-56834.html

 

There's also this 'games reporter' noting that some demo kiosks crashed to a standard-issue Windows desktop (like what you'd have on a PC) rather than what you'd get for a console running Windows 8. https://twitter.com/JazRignall/statuses/344967744808185857

 

One developer responded saying "We just didn't have time to make Xbox1-native versions so we just ran the PC version because we wanted to showcase our game."

 

-- so, what's the summary? --

We know for sure the demos weren't running all running on XBox One hardware. Some of it was explained to be running on 'pc hardware similar to an xbox one -- development kits' and that despite their considerably more powerful hardware, the machines should have performance similar to the shipping consumer version of the XBox One. Other demos just were the desktop PC version running on pretty good quality hardware because that's all the developer had to showcase.

 

Make of that what you will.

Why did you single out Xbox One, when "PS4" had the same issues?

ihhSp0Cl.jpg

http://www.gameswelt.tv/need-for-speed-rivals/chris-zockt-gamescom-2013,35769

I don't get you guys. These are shuttle PCs with a hopped up 7790, multi core CPUs, decent clocks, min available 5GB, and less overhead than a Windows/Mac OS PC. Who in their right mind would doubt they can do 1080p native? Only really cautious or lazy developers, that's who.

Getting back to the fps argument; I can tell the difference between 30 and 60. But only when I stop and specifically look for the differences. During the middle of gameplay, especially in a game like Battlefield, it's much less noticeable because there is so much more going on that you need to pay attention to. So in the context of the OP that's why I said if I had to choose, I would pick 1080p30 over 720p60.

Nonsense. Both consoles can easily run that game 1080p ultra at 40 plus frames. Shoddy coding or up scaled prev Gen versions if not the case.

 

Your dreaming. A ps4/nextbox gpu only averages BF3 40fps on ultra at 1080p. Obivously the console hardware has advantages with memory access and no os etc. but considering BF4 is going to be more intensive than BF3 I think it's safe to say that a PS4 / Nextbox could not run BF4 ultra 1080p at anything more than 20-30fps.

 

720p 60fps is pretty sweet for a game like this on a console I guess, I couldn't go from a PC to that though....

Getting back to the fps argument; I can tell the difference between 30 and 60. But only when I stop and specifically look for the differences. During the middle of gameplay, especially in a game like Battlefield, it's much less noticeable because there is so much more going on that you need to pay attention to. So in the context of the OP that's why I said if I had to choose, I would pick 1080p30 over 720p60.

 

You can't be very good at bf3 or play very much then, as most people would definitely take 60fps. You are literally not as good in the game at 30fps. Close quarters combat and responding quickly to things especially is harder. 

Single player game it wouldn't matter as much.

the only game that wow me was watch dog. that game truly is 1080p base on my scrutiny.  In fact, next gen game should be native 1080p not a scale up version :s  if not then what is the point of buying when current gen some game scale up as well especially pc isn't optimize for true 1080p

Looks likes this was a non-issue? DICE has come out and said that final resolution is when game ships.

 

Javascript is not enabled or refresh the page to view.

Click here to view the Tweet

 

Nothing was blown out of proportion.

 

It's just that some people were religiously hurt when the news came out. Whether first party, second party or third party doesn't matter.

 

I just hope both consoles run games at slightly higher resolution than 720p at least.

 

When we continue to see statements like "X1 demos were running on high powered PCs.", that's twisting facts for whatever reason. The news was specifically about Microsoft booth which showed first party games.

All third parties used PCs for PS4 and XB1 - that is always the case for new consoles, nothing new there. See the PS4 photo above.

Your dreaming. A ps4/nextbox gpu only averages BF3 40fps on ultra at 1080p. Obivously the console hardware has advantages with memory access and no os etc. but considering BF4 is going to be more intensive than BF3 I think it's safe to say that a PS4 / Nextbox could not run BF4 ultra 1080p at anything more than 20-30fps.

 

720p 60fps is pretty sweet for a game like this on a console I guess, I couldn't go from a PC to that though....

 

Especially as the consoles will be at last getting 64 Multiplayer. combine that with 720p@60fps that is a decent feat for this round of consoles.

 

As a comparison my 660ti with 3Gb and clocked i7 2660k (8Gb DDr2133 sys ram) struggles to push BF3 at ultra, sub 1080p (1680x1050 for 60fps at ultra, drops to 50fps@1080p) on 64 player maps. Not exactly a top end games PC by any means.

One thing I did see very obvious in the previous title, seeing bf3 on a 360 on a large screen compared to a PC on the same side by side was shocking, a PC on low was comparable to the texture detail on the 360. Id think the one and ps4 will manage to push ultra comparing it with mid-top level pc levels, granted sub 1080 upscaled, with higher texture levels giving a richer env.

 

Without an upgrade, ill be happy if my bf3 rig plays bf4 at high, never mind ultra!

 

With both consoles, there hasnt been anything announced yet that has made me go wow , more a next half gen, deffo an improvement, just not as big as i thought.

 

Tbvh in any fps anything around 40+ is plenty for a smooth experience on any platform. 

 

If I was to buy one, it would be an xbox one, still got my black brick xbox and my 360 Elite, sadly havnt gamed on the 360 for years, its a netflix/lovefilm box these days.

That's quite bad tbh... All that "next gen" power and they can't do a measly 1080@60fps? :p

 

on a pc, you need a 1.2-1.8gflops gpu to play BF3 at 1080p60fps on ultra like a 650ti or 7850. these are the similar specs for xbox one and ps4.  because of the custom silicon,and the lower level software access, i fully expect the hardware to be capable of running next gen titles at 1080p60fps like BF4, but again, we have to wait and see how balanced the whole system is. developers might not waste their time optimizing if its a painful experience and the sdk sucks. this doesnt mean the hardware isnt capable.

  • Like 1

im gonna buy  GTA V and play the hell out of it and not worry about the next gen consoles till later. 

 

Exactly my plan.

Grab GTAV on launch day and rinse that for all it's worth. Once that's got boring, which looks like a long time yet, then i'll see what people who have actually used the new consoles say and i'll make my decision and grab one plus BF4.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft brings Claude to its own Azure infrastructure, powered by Nvidia GB300 Blackwell by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic's Claude models are now generally available in Microsoft Foundry on Azure and are running on Nvidia's GB300 Blackwell Ultra systems. Nvidia wrote in its announcement that the models are hosted on Microsoft Azure and accelerated by GB300 Blackwell Ultra GPUs, with Quantum-X800 InfiniBand networking used to support larger agentic systems and specialized sub-agents that can operate across business domains. This is great for customers and enterprises that want to build autonomous and domain-specific AI agents using Claude without moving outside Microsoft’s cloud platform. Microsoft currently offers Claude models in Foundry in two forms: “Hosted on Azure,” which runs end-to-end on Azure infrastructure and is generally available, and “Hosted on Anthropic infrastructure,” which remains in preview. This separation is quite important for organizations that have procurement, compliance, data processing, or internal governance requirements tied to Azure. Anthropic currently has 11 Claude models listed in Microsoft Foundry, including Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6, and even the unavailable Mythos and Fable models. Billing is handled through Claude Consumption Units (CCUs). Microsoft says CCU is an invoicing unit for Claude models in Foundry, with token usage converted using Anthropic’s published per-model token rates. The usage is billed through Azure Marketplace just like models from other distributors and appears on the customer's Azure invoice, while eligible spend can count against a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment. For starters, GB300 NVL72 is a rack-scale, fully liquid-cooled system that combines 72 Blackwell Ultra GPUs and 36 Grace CPUs. Nvidia has listed 37TB of fast memory, 130TB/s of NVLink bandwidth, and FP4 Tensor Core performance of up to 1,440 petaflops with sparsity. The deal is also part of a three-way partnership between Microsoft, Nvidia, and Anthropic. Under the deal, Anthropic has committed to buying $30 billion in Azure compute capacity and contracting additional capacity up to one gigawatt. Nvidia and Microsoft also said they would invest up to $10 billion and $5 billion in Anthropic, respectively.
    • WhatsApp is getting usernames, and you can reserve your preferred one now by Fiza Ali Sharing your phone number isn't always something you want to do, especially with people you've just met. Whether it's someone from a class, a local community group, or a sports team chat, handing over your number can feel like giving away more personal information than necessary. That's exactly the problem WhatsApp is trying to solve with its upcoming usernames feature. The company has announced that users can now reserve a unique WhatsApp username ahead of the feature's wider rollout later this year. Once usernames become available, they'll let people connect without revealing their phone numbers. It's a change that makes a lot of sense for group chats. Right now, everyone in the group can see your phone number. With usernames enabled, that won't necessarily be the case when someone contacts you for the first time. WhatsApp says it's opening username reservations early because more than three billion people use the app, meaning plenty of people are likely to want the same usernames. Reserving one now gives users a better chance of securing the name they actually want before the feature launches more broadly. If your preferred username is already taken, WhatsApp will also offer a built-in username generator to suggest available alternatives. The feature isn't only aimed at individual users. Creators, businesses, and organisations will be able to claim the same username they already use on Instagram or Facebook, making it easier to keep a consistent identity across Meta's apps. Furthermore, privacy is a big part of how WhatsApp is introducing usernames. There won't be a public directory where people can browse or search for usernames. Instead, people will need to know your exact username before they can start a conversation with you. Additionally, users can also choose to enable a username key, which adds another layer of control by requiring people to enter that key before sending a message. Once the feature rolls out, people who choose to use a username will no longer have their phone number shown when messaging a person or business for the first time. If you want to reserve a username, make sure you're running the latest version of WhatsApp, then head to Settings > Account > Username. The tech giant says usernames will roll out gradually over the coming months, and users will receive an in-app notification when the feature becomes available in their country.
    • When I think about a network, there are really two aspects, the hardware and the wiring. So here is what I would do for both. Wiring: Use Cat6A for the patch panel, outlets, and all structured cables (cables installed in walls). Run plenty of Wireless Access Point (WAP) cables, as a general rule, assume a signal can only pass through 2-3 walls and can't pass through a floor (that is conservative, but trust me on this if you want strong WiFi)  Cat6 patch cables are fine for now if you don't plan to run 10gig, those are easy to replace later if needed. Run OS2 single-mode fiber to anywhere you think you may have a server or sub-switch. (yes, single-mode for everything on a small network, don't mess with multimode unless you are at a scale where that minor cost and power savings will matter). If you really want to future proof, also run fiber to any high density WAP locations, it is likely that WiFi 8 and beyond WAPs will push the limits of 10g. Run 6-12 pairs of single-mode fiber between your MDF and the building's MDF, even if you only need 1 or 2 pairs now, those extra pairs will pay off down the road. Hardware: (its easy to say "get all the features incase you need them", so instead of futureproofing, I am going to take approach of suggesting areas worth investing in, and areas you can save money). Don't overspend thinking you need every feature on every port. You don't need 10g on every port, you don't need PoE on every port. Don't overspend on redundancy either, unless you are ready to buy two of everything, don't waste money buying two of some things and not others. Dual power supplies are worthwhile, but probably not HA or multi-path redundancy.  Get 1 "distribution layer" switch that your router/firewall will connect to as well as all your access layer switches below. This should be a fully managed 10g+ switch with a combination of copper and SPF ports, a few 25g uplink ports are nice for this switch. Given that you said it is a small network, I suggest also using that distribution layer switch for servers and WAPs, meaning it will need PoE. Speaking of wireless, get good professional tri-band WAPs, and either turn on the band stirring options, or limit 2.4 to an IoT only SSID. This will provide a solid WiFi capable nearly everything but the highest of bandwidth clients...you could even consider skipping wiring workstations depending on usage. Access layer switch for workstations and printers can be cheaper switches, 2.5g is a good sweet spot between price and future proofing, but even 1g is fine for most individual clients (the kind that could probably be fine on WiFi). You can consider saving a little on access layer switches by only getting 1 PoE switch for whatever needs it (remember your WAPs are connecting to the distribution switch, not here), and non-PoE for your workstations, because desk phones are falling out of favor. You can also save money here by not buying managed switches if you don't need them--but really do some soul searching there, if you go this route, then anything that isn't on your workstation VLAN would either need to be connected to the distribution switch, or its own access layer switch. Also, don't feel like you need a fancy fabric stacking switches for your access layer, that is the point of the higher-end distribution layer, to remove the need for things like that at this level. Home Hardware: I'm realizing the above assumed an office setting, if this if for your house and home lab then the above still applies, but you'll probably want everything managed and PoE, just because, but you probably also don't need multiple access layer switches. If your total port count is below 24, just skip separating distribution layer and access layer and just get one nice switch with the features you want. If you are at the point of considering a 48-port switch, I would instead get a nice high-end distribution switch for things that need it, and cheaper access layer switches with specs based on the needs of connected devices. For home use, don't worry about home running every device to the main switch, there is nothing wrong with running sub-switches for your media areas and office, those essentially become your access layer, just look for sub-switches with a 10g uplink so sharing bandwidth isn't an issue. Just make sure you always connect them to your distribution/main switch, don't daisy chain, the path should never have more steps than Client>Access>Distribution>Firewall>Internet or Client>Access>Distribution>Server if it is local.
    • Google Meet brings Gemini note-taking to AI Pro and Ultra subscribers by Karthik Mudaliar Google's Gemini-powered "Take notes for me" feature inside Google Meet is now available to Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. The features work on Google Meet for web as well as on mobile, and Google says that subscribers can use it for meetings they host in many supported languages. As the name suggests, "Take notes for me" allows Gemini to listen to a meeting, generate a summary, identify action items, and save the notes as a Google Doc in the user’s Drive. After the meeting, the organizer receives an email recap with the summary and action items, while the notes can also be attached to the related Calendar event depending on the meeting setup and sharing settings. The feature isn't automatically turned on for everyone, though. Google says that all meeting participants are notified when note-taking is turned on, and users can start it from the pencil icon in Meet or enable it for future calls through Meet’s meeting records settings. For work or school accounts, administrators can also control whether the feature is available and may require explicit participant consent for note-taking, recording, or transcription features. The feature first launched back in 2024, when it was available just for selected Workspace users. Over the years, Google added refinements and more options, including the ability to enable it when scheduling meetings via Google Calendar. Google's support docs say that the feature currently supports English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, and Spanish, but only one language at a time. Meetings with multiple spoken languages are not currently supported, and Google recommends using the tool for meetings between 15 minutes and eight hours. The new feature makes Google Meet closer to its rivals that have AI tools already built in. Microsoft Teams has recently started offering Copilot and intelligent recap features that summarize meetings, surface highlights, and help with follow-ups, while Zoom’s AI Companion can also generate meeting summaries from desktop and mobile meetings.
    • GnuCash 5.16 by Razvan Serea GnuCash is a personal and small business finance application, freely licensed under the GNU GPL and available for GNU/Linux, BSD, Solaris, Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows. It’s designed to be easy to use, yet powerful and flexible. GnuCash allows you to track your income and expenses, reconcile bank accounts, monitor stock portfolios and manage your small business finances. It is based on professional accounting principles to ensure balanced books and accurate reports. GnuCash can keep track of your personal finances in as much detail as you prefer. If you are just starting out, use GnuCash to keep track of your checkbook. You may then decide to track cash as well as credit card purchases to better determine where your money is being spent. When you start investing, you can use GnuCash to help monitor your portfolio. Buying a vehicle or a home? GnuCash will help you plan the investment and track loan payments. If your financial records span the globe, GnuCash provides all the multiple-currency support you need. Between 5.15 and 5.16, the following bugfixes were accomplished: Bug 421610 - RFE: Include logical dates for View->Filter by "date range"The Select Range section of the Date tab of the register's Filter By dialog box is changed to provide relative, specific date, or days ago options for the start and end of the filter range. The Show number of days item label is changed to Show from days ago to better reflect what it does. Bug 436105 - esc key not working as expected in register: Enable the escape key to cancel a field edit. Bug 797384 - Gnucash doesn't handle commodity prices with big numerator/denominator properly. Bug 798004 - Next gen UI for stock transactions Bug 799314 - Add "enter now" option in scheduled transaction editor. tab to allow users to select the scheduled transactions to be included in a “Since Last Run…” window. If there are no instances of a selected transaction triggered by today’s date, the next instance is triggered. Bug 799751 - autocomplete crash Bug 799759 - Users can't Enable entries via Checkboxes on Scheduled Transactions PageAllow the Enabled box in the list of scheduled transactions to be operated instead of having to open the transaction editor dialog and change the Enabled checkbox. Also added use of the Name column as the secondary column sort for all the other columns. Bug 799762 - Poor handling of cases where hidden/placeholder accounts are used in the account register Bug 799766 - Double line preference not respected in search register Bug 799767 - POST /accounts in bindings/python/example_scripts/rest-api is broken Bug 799777 - `xaccSplitSetParent`: reparenting a committed split silently drops its KVP slots (online_id, cap-gains links) Other changes & improvements: Numeric values may now be selected to copy in the Accounts page. Add new Finance::Quote source Finnhub.io: Free API key (personal/non-professional use) available at https://finnhub.io. Set FINNHUB_API_KEY environment variable to API key to use this source. As of June 2026, free tier API limit is 60 API calls/minute. The Investment Lots report has new optional columns for Computed Annual Growth Rate. Python Bindings: Improved translation of primary object (Account, Transaction, Split, etc.) so that they can be treated as normal Python objects. This is accomplished with SWIG magic so no existing code is obsoleted. Python Bindings: Better conversion of GLists to Python lists. Python Bindings: Destroy the QofSession in the Python Session dtor to prevent leaving the database locked. [engine] Add first-class online_id accessors for Split and Account and make them available to Python bindings, removing the unused Transaction online_id property. Improve C++ implementation of QofBook. Correct the Doxygen doc for qof_instance_get/set_kvp. [gnc-log-replay.cpp] fix incorrect guid dump Add some Boost library requirements needed by libgnucash-guile to CMakeLists.txt so that missing feature will fail at configure time. Use Compile-time Regular Expressions instead of std::regex in gnc-filepath-utils.cpp and instead of boost::regex in the CSV importer, with the CTRE v3.11.1 header added to borrowed [gnc-filepath-utils.cpp] null check char* arguments Add ChartJS licenses. Removed AEX from list of commodities. euronext.com is now using JS based anti-webscraping. [report-core] always offer options summary in reports. This is useful to debug reports. The Add options summary option is removed because it's no longer optional. Remove remaining obsolete IMContext from sheet Fix blurry text in HiDPI offscreen-rendered widgets Add port field to database connection dialog: The convention of appending the port number after the host isn't obvious. When editing a split in the register treat the account as being changed only if it isn't the one selected before editing instead of if the user performed an edit Return immediately from qof_book_destroy if hash_of_collections is null. If qof_book_destroy is called on a QofBook* freshly created with qof_book_new (usually because it was used to create a session that now must be destroyed) it would try to empty the non-existent hash tables, crashing. Clean up Flathub metadata to solve warnings at flatpak build time. Be consistent in naming GncPluginPage and GncPluginPageRegister HTML: Remove unimplemented function declarations. [gnc-html.cpp] remove unused buggy string conversion functions Convert libgnc-html to C++ Apply -Wall -Werr -Wmissing-prototypes to C++ compilation on Windows and fix the resulting errors. New and Updated Translations: Arabic, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Hungarian, Korean, Norwegian-Bokmal, Spanish Download: GnuCash 5.16 | 176.0 MB (Open Source) Links: GnuCash Home page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!