Monitors - is 1440p worth the extra over 1080p?


Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I'm currently using a 22" monitor with a 1650 x 1050 resolution, but ideally would like a little more screen real estate.

 

I'm looking at 27" monitors, and for a decent IPS 1080p monitor you're looking at ?200 or so, a 1440p monitor would be more than double that.

 

So I've come full circle and am wondering if a 23" monitor with a resolution of 1080p would be a noticable upgrade from my current monitor? I don't need heaps more space, just a bit more.

 

I'm also worried that I'd need a new graphics card if I went for 1440p... I don't game an awful lot, but I do have a lot of games on Steam I'd like to get through, and my current card (6750 I think) would no doubt really struggle with 1440p.

 

Thanks!

I recently switched from a 19" 1680x1050 to a 24" 1920x1080 (Asus VG248QE - 144 Hz). Not a huge real estate difference, but putting two documents/browsers side by side is great. Have you thought about dual monitors? Also depends on what kind of details you want to play at, if you can turn down details, a 6750 should be sufficient. I'm thinking about replacing my GTX 560 Ti since I can also feel the difference after making the resolution switch. 1080p seems to be an ideal resolution for many things (games, videos, etc.). Ideally I wanted to keep the 16:10 aspect ratio, but I couldn't find any decent 1920x1200 monitors. 

I used to have a samsung 22 inch, 1680x1050 monitor, picture on it was great, until I bought a 23 inch packard bell (used) 1920x1080 the PB amazed me, the resolution difference was incredible. So I'll vote get whatever 1080 res monitor you can get for your budget. If you can get an IPS one, even better. And for graphics cards a gt550ti is a good card for it's price I'm currently using a lesser card at the moment, a gt 430 (didn't bother upgrading because I was going to build a new system, but at the moment, I have too much on my plate to do so) it will play StarCraft HotS comfortably on mid settings, so I wasn't too concerned.

1440p looks great but you need the GPU power to run it. If you'll end up playing at 1080p to get a decent framerate, then 1080p looks better on a 1080p screen than on a 1440p, i.e. there's no interpolation. An HD 6750 is not a very powerful GPU and will struggle even at 1080p in some recent titles.

  • Like 3

Hello,

 

If you write or program, the extra vertical pixels are definitely worth it.  I am much more productive when I can display a larger amount of data on the screen.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

  • Like 3

Hello,

 

If you write or program, the extra vertical pixels are definitely worth it.  I am much more productive when I can display a larger amount of data on the screen.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

If you can, flip your monitor to Portrait. I like doing that when I'm coding - 1920 pixels vertical, 1080 pixels wide = perfect. 

1080p is the crippled standard that everyone adopted because it's easier to make panels that have the same resolution as TVs. It's a downgrade from monitors that were produced before 1080p was widely adopted. It's already puhsing it to have 1080p on a 24", 1080p on a 27" is just ludicrous and is the hallmark of a crappy monitor. You definitely want to get a higher resolution or stay with a smaller screen size. Two smaller 1080p monitors for example give you about as much screen real estate as a 30" monitor but it's spread between a wider space than a tall space, which turns out to be absolutely great for actual work productivity because you can tile so many things side by side.

At work I use 3 1680 x 1050 monitors, at home I have a single Dell 3008wfp at 2560x1600.

 

I prefer the single Dell at 2560x1600, I don't move my head as much and can fit everything I need onto a single monitor.

 

Trying to game at 1600P takes its toll on the graphics card though :)

  • Like 2

1440p looks great but you need the GPU power to run it. If you'll end up playing at 1080p to get a decent framerate, then 1080p looks better on a 1080p screen than on a 1440p, i.e. there's no interpolation. An HD 6750 is not a very powerful GPU and will struggle even at 1080p in some recent titles.

 

I have an HD 5770, and I can play Grid 2 at max everything, including 4xMSAA, and my framerate never dips below 60fps@1080p. (also have an AMD Athlon II X4 620 @ 2.6ghz, and 4GB DDR3).  No one ever believes me.

I don't know how much less of a card the 50 is than the 70, but surely the fact that it's a 6-7 would mean that a 6-7-50 would be better than a 5-7-70 (that's how their naming scheme works)

 

In fact, there are very very few games that I can't play at max settings (excluding MSAA, because that usually adds a pretty big hit to fps).  I can play BF3 at max everything at 1080 at 30fps.  The only series of games that I've played that has ever struggled to run on my PC was the Splinter Cell series.  They got a lot of light play goin on in those games.

I have an HD 5770, and I can play Grid 2 at max everything, including 4xMSAA, and my framerate never dips below 60fps@1080p. (also have an AMD Athlon II X4 620 @ 2.6ghz, and 4GB DDR3).  No one ever believes me.

I don't know how much less of a card the 50 is than the 70, but surely the fact that it's a 6-7 would mean that a 6-7-50 would be better than a 5-7-70 (that's how their naming scheme works)

 

In fact, there are very very few games that I can't play at max settings (excluding MSAA, because that usually adds a pretty big hit to fps).  I can play BF3 at max everything at 1080 at 30fps.  The only series of games that I've played that has ever struggled to run on my PC was the Splinter Cell series.  They got a lot of light play goin on in those games.

 

I believe you.

 

Have a HD 5750 and play BF3 all at high settings fine sense the game came out. (also have a Intel Quad Core 3.6 Ghz and 8 GB of ram)

I believe you.

 

Have a HD 5750 and play BF3 all at high settings fine sense the game came out. (also have a Intel Quad Core 3.6 Ghz and 8 GB of ram)

 

Yay!

Yeah its true, with today's games, it's not the GPU that counts, and it's not the CPU that counts, its the combination of the two.  I have a hardware monitoring app (open-hardware-monitor) that graphs, among other things, CPU usage over time, AND GPU usage over time.  When I play older DX9 games, like Hitman: Silent Assassin, most of the work is being done by the GPU, and the CPU only occasionally chimes in with some processing.  But if I play Splinter Cell: Blacklist (with the settings turned down far enough that I can get 30fps out of it), my GPU only hovers around 80-90% usage, but each one of my four CPU cores are pretty much locked at 99% usage.

You really have to have both, nowadays.  So just skimp on the RAM and the HD.  I've had 4GB DDR3 for several years now, and I've never needed more.  The only situations where more would have helped, was when I'm doing video studio editing.  It makes other programs slightly slower, because they don't have as much memory to work with.  But games?  Even if your video game of choice needed more than 4GB of RAM, it wouldn't affect the average framerate latency, it would just add the occasional spike in latency when the game is forced to use the HD instead of the RAM.

An SSD won't help you much in gaming performance, either.  It'll blow your mind at how fast everything else loads, including the game's loading time, but it won't do a damn thing for the game's framerate.

As for your monitor, well I've been using a BenQ v2200 22" 1080p monitor, and while its an EXCELLENT monitor for the price ($180, 5 years ago), it's just too damn small.  The monitor is only 4 feet away from me, and I wish it was closer.  Maybe it would be fine if you're an office-chair-and-desk kind of gamer, but I have a loveseat and an ottoman, with the monitor on a little (but sturdy) end-table.  So I can't really get much closer than 4 feet away unless I get rid of the ottoman.  And that's just not gonna happen :P

I'd say, if you can, go for the 23" or 24".  Fark resolution, you don't need any more than 1080.  Hell, even the Xbox 360 only plays games at 720, and most people aren't complaining about that.  Unless you're using it for office work and you need the extra desktop space.  But for gaming?  I'll tell you this, I've played computer games on my 22 inch monitor at 1080, I've played them on a big screen 2560x1440 40inch TV, and I've played them on a big screen 1080p 48 inch TV.  All using my computer, so there was no difference in the source video.  And going back to my 22 inch, I miss the extra screen size a hell of a lot, but I don't miss the extra resolution at all.

Thanks all! Reading through this thread has made me realise that I actually have a 5750, not a 6750, oops! But reading the above it sounds like I might be okay with a 1440p monitor anyway :)

 

I definitely take your points on board about 1080p not being ideal for a monitor, but one huge benefit of 1080p is that they're  cheap and you get a lot for your money.

 

But I'm still going to avoid them, I think... just need to decide between 23" 1200p or 27" 1440p now :)

I made the jump to a 2560x1440 monitor, and while my AMD 7770 struggles a little, it's the desktop environment which I love, all the added screen real estate to have windows open is a blessing.

 

Bingo that is why it is so great on a tablet or laptop.

Hi,

 

I'm currently using a 22" monitor with a 1650 x 1050 resolution, but ideally would like a little more screen real estate.

 

I'm looking at 27" monitors, and for a decent IPS 1080p monitor you're looking at ?200 or so, a 1440p monitor would be more than double that.

 

So I've come full circle and am wondering if a 23" monitor with a resolution of 1080p would be a noticable upgrade from my current monitor? I don't need heaps more space, just a bit more.

 

I'm also worried that I'd need a new graphics card if I went for 1440p... I don't game an awful lot, but I do have a lot of games on Steam I'd like to get through, and my current card (6750 I think) would no doubt really struggle with 1440p.

 

Thanks!

 

1440p is better for games because if you set 1/4 of the resolution (1280x720) you play without artifacts. Neat, right?

The answer is simple for work, i.e. writing, coding, design 1440p is a must. For play it will require a powerful graphics card to run in native resolution. With the value of the Korean IPS 1440p panels or if you can afford the Dell versions it is almost a no brainer to go 1440p. One thing to consider is your distance to the screen and your desk. I have found that sometimes two 24" 1920x1200 monitors are better than two 27" screens because I find I have to place the 27" a lot farther away from me.

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
    • [Price Drop] PDF Expert for Mac v3 is still half off by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time you can save 42% on PDF Expert One-Time Purchase. PDFs remain the best way to transmit documents, but editing them isn't possible with standard Mac software. PDF Expert changes that, allowing you to edit PDF text, images, links, and outlines quickly and easily. Typo in a contract? Easy fix. Need to rework a complete section of a document? No problem. PDF Expert provides a series of essential functions that will transform the way you work with documents on your Mac. It recognizes text and OCR, makes edits, and fills out forms. And with the “Enhance” feature powered by AI, it will fix distortions, remove shadows and improve contrast so that even difficult-to-read documents look great. EDIT Change the text. Easily fix typos, update numbers, or add entire paragraphs Insert images. Update logos in a contract or add a new graph to a report Add links. Enrich your PDFs by linking to other pages or external websites ANNOTATE Highlight the important. Make the most valuable content stand out at a glance Comment on PDFs. Add text to PDFs, insert pop-up notes & write your thoughts in the margins Add stamps. Review documents with our set of stamps or create custom stamps for any workflow ORGANIZE Merge PDFs. Combine multiple files into one PDF document Manage pages. Add, delete, rearrange, or rotate PDF pages with ease Split PDFs. Extract pages from PDFs & save them as separate files CONVERT Convert to PDF. Turn JPG, PNG, Word, PPT, and Excel to PDF PDF to Word. Convert PDFs into editable Word documents PDF to image. Turn PDFs into JPG or PNG images PDF to Excel. Convert PDFs into Excel spreadsheets PDF to PPT. Save PDFs as PowerPoint presentations PDF to text. Convert PDFs into editable TXT files FILL OUT Fill out PDF forms. Easily fill out PDF forms by just clicking on them Sign documents. Add your signature to a PDF in a few clicks. Let customers sign documents with handy one-time signatures Redact PDFs. Blackout or erase confidential information from your documents RECOGNIZE TEXT OCR text in PDF. Recognize the text, so you can search, highlight & copy it Enhance scans. Fix distortions, remove shadows & improve contrast Crop & split pages. Split double-page scans into separate pages & remove undesired margins Good to know: Length of access: Lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Mac Max number of device(s): Unlimited usage on personal macOS devices Version: PDF Expert 3 for Mac (macOS) Updates: Get continuous support and bug fixes. Additional new features may come at an extra cost. PDF Expert One-Time Purchase normally costs $139.99, but you can pick it up for just $69.97 for a limited time, that represents a saving of $70 (50% off). For a full description, specs, and license info, click the link below. Deal Price One time cost now only $69.97 (was $139.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • Indeed - drives me mad - usually because Refresh is hidden in the full menu.
    • Firefox has had rounded corners for many years. I take it you're not a fan of modern browsers?
    • The problem is in the fundamentals of how businesses are allowed to operate and the change should happen in the basics and certain consumer friendly and moral practices should be enforced by law. This would fix so many things, not just this ages old default browser issue which is a tiny drop in the backut that includes a flood of privacy and other issues.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!