XP Windows / Automatic Updates SVCHOST.exe 100% CPU .. MS did something.


Recommended Posts

The IE6 link worked for me on a clean SP3 install of XP Pro in Hyper-V. The VM was stuck at 100% CPU usage for well over an hour, installed that update and about 30 seconds later i was able to use Windows Update.

Thanks a lot!

Also nice to see Neowin randomly appear in Google searches!

Also nice to see Neowin randomly appear in Google searches!

 

Not only randomly but if you do a search for Svchost 100% we are 4 down from the top on page 1. Quite a accomplishment for such a broad search term. :D

I don't know about anyone else, but within the last year MS did something to Windows update for XP which has caused, even on fresh installs, SVCHOST to RAPE the CPU at 100%

 

for the past 2 years i've been using the same XP install Sp3 discs. On a fresh install I would run windows updates it would check for updates and under 30 seconds it would ask for the WGA update and then would proceed to show me the other 100 updates.

 

Now even on clean installs SVCHOST molests the CPU at 100% for a good 4+ Minutes before showing you the updates. You click install and then before it downloads them it molests the CPU at 100% for another few mins.

 

Has anyone else noticed this within the last year?

 

Please no "XP? HAHAHA" .. comments!.

My grandfather had this issue recently too. Only way I was able to make it stop was turning automatic updates off :/. They currently don't even have it connected to the internet though and only use it for one very specific program so I just left it disabled.

 

I'll give that IE6 update mentioned above a try next time I'm there

My grandfather had this issue recently too. Only way I was able to make it stop was turning automatic updates off :/. They currently don't even have it connected to the internet though and only use it for one very specific program so I just left it disabled.

 

Had a customer bring his computer into my office yesterday. Because it was so slow. The issue is when the 100% kicks in on Svchost it BRINGS MACHINES TO THEIR KNEES! In this case I tried all the fixes and nothing helped. Was even going to uninstall IE 8 and reinstall it. He decided to replace the machine and get a new one. It was pretty old.

 

For fun i just let the computer sit to see how long it would take. It was still going at 100% after 1 1/2 hours. So finally I just killed it and shut the computer off because he was going to get a new one anyway. This was an old Celeron from 2004 or earlier.

 

Food for though, imagine how many XP machines are out there are having this exact problem, rendering the computer unusable.

To warwagon, my Dell computer is over 9 years old (July 2004) and the XP update workaround worked successfully for me.

Hi all.

 

I would like to add my contribution to this thread.

 

I regularly fresh install versions of XP on multiple systems and have encountered these annoying symptoms,I have found that installing IE8 after the OS installation has terminated and ensuring you permit IE8 do it's updates (leave the sneaky default box ticked) and then let it do its fruitless malware scan and updates on your newly formated/installed installation immediately prior to accessing the update sites that the CPU spikes are extremely minimum and the updates can be accessed within a few minutes.

 

Hope this may assist.

 

Regards

Hi I just wanted to say, at our factory we have a bunch of machines using XP.  We will continue to be using XP after April '14 and I have been repairing some of our old machines just to be used for basic terminals.  Anyway this bug was driving me crazy to be honest.  I just setup a fresh XP SP3 machine and though the last KB2898785 seemed to solve the 100% cpu use from svchost during windows upgrade checks, I continued to have it while trying to install KB905474? ( Windows Genuine Advantage ) This was always causing 100% svchost.exe almost immediately.  I had all the updates but this one... I almost gave up until I found something that solved it.

 

When you go to install KB905474 windows installs a temporary directory: C:\0bc0babcde084230\  (Example)  Within this directory are 3 files:  wga_eula.txt, wgasetup.exe, and wganotifypackageinner.exe

 

By clicking wganotifypackageinner.exe the installer was able to install KB905474 finally.  Not by using wgasetup.exe! 

So if you are still plagued by this issue for this KB try this solution... 

Hi I just wanted to say, at our factory we have a bunch of machines using XP.  We will continue to be using XP after April '14 and I have been repairing some of our old machines just to be used for basic terminals.  Anyway this bug was driving me crazy to be honest.  I just setup a fresh XP SP3 machine and though the last KB2898785 seemed to solve the 100% cpu use from svchost during windows upgrade checks, I continued to have it while trying to install KB905474? ( Windows Genuine Advantage ) This was always causing 100% svchost.exe almost immediately.  I had all the updates but this one... I almost gave up until I found something that solved it.

 

When you go to install KB905474 windows installs a temporary directory: C:\0bc0babcde084230\  (Example)  Within this directory are 3 files:  wga_eula.txt, wgasetup.exe, and wganotifypackageinner.exe

 

By clicking wganotifypackageinner.exe the installer was able to install KB905474 finally.  Not by using wgasetup.exe! 

So if you are still plagued by this issue for this KB try this solution... 

 

Can you maybe detail this a bit more? My WU is now also stuck at trying to finalize the installation of WGA - right at "running processes after install" it just hangs there. Are you saying you let it hang there and ran wganotifypackageinner.exe which caused it to finally finish then? Or did you reboot, ran wganotifypackageinner.exe and then ran WU again and this time it went through the WGA install alright?

 

I'm having no luck with either method...

Can you maybe detail this a bit more? My WU is now also stuck at trying to finalize the installation of WGA - right at "running processes after install" it just hangs there. Are you saying you let it hang there and ran wganotifypackageinner.exe which caused it to finally finish then? Or did you reboot, ran wganotifypackageinner.exe and then ran WU again and this time it went through the WGA install alright?

 

I'm having no luck with either method...

 

 

First I checked my C:\ Drive and I had many temporary directories as listed above and deleted them first as they were all WGA install attempts.  

 

I downloaded the KB905474 manually from:  http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=20888.  Then when it begins installation I cancelled it then went into the C:\temporary_directory manually.

 

I did not use the windows update method otherwise you will be hung.  You will also hang if you run the above KB manually and click next to continue.  When you first run it, it will extract the installation into the temporary directory.  So do it on a reboot, if you are hung you have to kill a few tasks in your task manager including the KB905474 install executable.  So yes I ran the wganotifypackaginner manually do not use the other one or it will get stuck on the 'running processes after install'

 

When I ran the wganotifypackaginner it does the installation without hanging, you do not need to use the windows update at all for this method.  I noticed almost immediately the installer got by the hang part and began doing the proper installation right away.

 

See if you can get farther now...

This has been happening for years, I'm not surprised.  I tried updating Server 2003 with SP2 to the latest updates with IE6 installed and it took over 52 hours for it to find the updates to install....  After installing all those updates it is much faster, it had to create the database of what it had versus the windows update location similar to what SCCM Server does but much slower of course.

Hi again.

 

After wasting even more time on this nag I have discovered a solution that has cured the CPU usage and the massive delay waiting to access the updates at MS,I didn't take time out to see if this method has been mentioned previously on the thread,if it has my apologies in advance.

Downloading and installing the kb2898785 did the trick(select your OS language firstly)

 

http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=41404

I can confirm that after a clean install of Windows XP (Service Pack 3) the svchost.exe and wuauclt.exe files will redline the CPU resources to 99%. Every single "solution" that has been listed here by others -- have all failed. I can also confirm that while the computer does appear to be locked up, in fact it is not! I can say this with 100% confidence because after letting the computer run over night, the Windows updates finally came through. It is unknown which update clears this up! After several updates (about 150-some) installed, the issue no longer presented itself.

 

I for one, will not be holding my breath on Microsoft on this one. Seeing as how support ends April 2014, they most likely will not be putting any man-hours into a fix. Until then, I'm afraid the only thing you can do is let the computer run until updates come through. The only solid solution I can offer you -- is to use some type of cloning software. Be it Clonezilla, Ghost, etc only after all updates have come through. This way, you will have an image of Windows XP with SP3 including all updates and will not have to wait on svchost.exe ever again.

 

Good luck!

 

 

IS G33k

:geek:

 

*Edit 1: Apparently Microsoft is aware of this issue and is working on it but does not have an ETA on this fix. See the following: http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/12/exponential-algorithm-making-windows-xp-miserable-could-be-fixed/

I just performed a fresh install of XP on a POS HP Pavilion laptop, which was about 8-10yrs old. After installing SP3, I manually DL'd IE8, and applied the very latest cumulative update, restarted and it took all damn night before she showed me the boobs. After 5 billion updates and switching to Microsoft Update, it doesn't take long to scan. Of course none of that means squat, since its fully up to date now. Imaged that SOB right after because I'll be damned if I go through that crap again when they bring it back too me in two weeks infected with the latest fake security suite or whatever the hell else they clicked "yes" to :angry:

I just performed a fresh install of XP on a POS HP Pavilion laptop, which was about 8-10yrs old. After installing SP3, I manually DL'd IE8, and applied the very latest cumulative update, restarted and it took all damn night before she showed me the boobs. After 5 billion updates and switching to Microsoft Update, it doesn't take long to scan. Of course none of that means squat, since its fully up to date now. Imaged that SOB right after because I'll be damned if I go through that crap again when they bring it back too me in two weeks infected with the latest fake security suite or whatever the hell else they clicked "yes" to :angry:

 

This is why after every new clean install I do weather it's XP, Vista, 7, or 8 I image their drive onto a one of 2 "Customer Drive Image drives " 1-1 and 1-2 (backup of 1-1) ... minus their data. This way if a new drive that was installed prematurely dies, I can just restore the image.

Hi everyone

 

I am also having the same issues since about Sept. I have wasted a lot of time trying to find a fix.

 

Let me start by saying that I am a technician with a Point-of-Sale company and we have hundreds of computers in the field running WINXP and POSREADY2009.

 

My helpdesk staff and I have to deal with this on a monthly basis and it continues for at least 3 days after patch tuesday. Being that POSREADY2009 was released in 2009 MS has said that it will be supported until 2024. I was hoping that MS would have fixed it by now; but apparently they have not. We cannot afford to waste our resources on this and we are really trying to find a fix.

 

If anyone finds a possible fix please let me know.

 

Thanks to everyone for your help

Hi everyone

 

I am also having the same issues since about Sept. I have wasted a lot of time trying to find a fix.

 

Let me start by saying that I am a technician with a Point-of-Sale company and we have hundreds of computers in the field running WINXP and POSREADY2009.

 

My helpdesk staff and I have to deal with this on a monthly basis and it continues for at least 3 days after patch tuesday. Being that POSREADY2009 was released in 2009 MS has said that it will be supported until 2024. I was hoping that MS would have fixed it by now; but apparently they have not. We cannot afford to waste our resources on this and we are really trying to find a fix.

 

If anyone finds a possible fix please let me know.

 

Thanks to everyone for your help

turn off windows automatic updates, don't download updates automatically and don't install updates automatically should stop trigging scvhost

turn off windows automatic updates, don't download updates automatically and don't install updates automatically should stop trigging scvhost

Unfortunately in the POS world we need to do the auto updates for PCI (CC Security) compliance.

Unfortunately in the POS world we need to do the auto updates for PCI (CC Security) compliance.

 

Are you sure you installed all the roots certificates updates (including optional ones)? That usually cuts the update search time down by a lot.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!